1
|
Aderibigbe AS, Dare AJ, Kalvin HL, Olasehinde O, Wuraola F, Adisa A, Omisore AD, Komolafe AO, Omoyiola OZ, Okereke CE, Katung A, Egberoungbe A, Ariyibi O, Olatoke SA, Adeyeye AA, Agodirin SO, Bojuwoye MO, Fayenuwo JO, Ademakinwa OR, Osinowo D, Lawal AR, Abdulkareem FB, Goldman D, Knapp G, Murthy S, Kahn R, Gonen M, Kingham TP, Alatise OI. Analysis of Risk Factors, Treatment Patterns, and Survival Outcomes After Emergency Presentation With Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study in Nigeria. J Surg Oncol 2025; 131:170-182. [PMID: 39574208 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2024] [Accepted: 08/12/2024] [Indexed: 01/03/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Prospective data on presentation and outcomes of colorectal cancer (CRC) in Nigeria are limited; however, emergency presentation with advanced disease is thought common. METHODS Consecutive CRC patients presenting at six sites over 6 years were included. Risk factors for emergency presentation were evaluated using logistic regression methods. Overall survival (OS) was compared between emergent and elective patients using Kaplan-Meier methods and the log-rank test. RESULTS Of 535 patients, 30.7% presented emergently. Median age was 56 years, 55% were men, and 5.0% reported a cancer family history. Emergency patients had more proximal cancers (42.1% vs. 24.0%), Stage IV disease (61.6% vs. 40.2%; p < 0.001), lower household income (₦35 000/month vs. ₦50 000/month), lower education levels (p = 0.008) and accessed care with nonmotorized transport (50.6% vs. 37.2%; p = 0.005). Median OS was shorter in the emergency group (6.4 vs. 17.4 months; p < 0.001). Across clinical stages, emergency presentation was associated with worse OS (Stage IV median OS 4.8 vs. 9.4 months; p = 0.002). Surgery improved survival in both groups, although emergency patients had higher 30-day postoperative mortality (23.2% vs. 9.1%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Emergent Nigerian CRC patients have worse OS than elective patients. Cancer control efforts should focus on faster cancer detection, early presentation, diagnosis, and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anna J Dare
- Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital & University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hannah L Kalvin
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Olalekan Olasehinde
- Department of Surgery, College of Health Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile Ife, Osun State, Nigeria
| | - Funmilola Wuraola
- Department of Surgery, College of Health Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile Ife, Osun State, Nigeria
| | - Adewale Adisa
- Department of Surgery, College of Health Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile Ife, Osun State, Nigeria
| | - Adeleye Dorcas Omisore
- Department of Radiology, College of Health Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile Ife, Osun State, Nigeria
| | - Akinwumi O Komolafe
- Department of Morbid Anatomy, College of Health Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile Ife, Osun State, Nigeria
| | - Oluwatosin Zainab Omoyiola
- Department of Morbid Anatomy, College of Health Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile Ife, Osun State, Nigeria
| | | | - Aba Katung
- Department of Surgery, Federal Medical Center, Owo, Ondo State, Nigeria
| | | | - Olufemi Ariyibi
- Department of Morbid Anatomy, Federal Medical Center, Owo, Ondo State, Nigeria
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Dapo Osinowo
- Department of Pathology, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria
| | - Abdul-Razak Lawal
- Department of Pathology, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria
| | - Fatimah B Abdulkareem
- Department of Pathology, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria
| | - Debra Goldman
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gregory Knapp
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Shilpa Murthy
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Rivka Kahn
- Global Cancer Disparities Initiative, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mithat Gonen
- Department of Surgery, Federal Medical Center, Owo, Ondo State, Nigeria
| | - T Peter Kingham
- Global Cancer Disparities Initiative, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Olusegun I Alatise
- Department of Surgery, College of Health Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile Ife, Osun State, Nigeria
- African Research Group for Oncology, Ife, Osun State, Nigeria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Scott EC, Hoskin PJ. Health inequalities in cancer care: a literature review of pathways to diagnosis in the United Kingdom. EClinicalMedicine 2024; 76:102864. [PMID: 39398494 PMCID: PMC11470173 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2024] [Revised: 09/12/2024] [Accepted: 09/13/2024] [Indexed: 10/15/2024] Open
Abstract
This literature review discusses current health disparities in cancer care in the United Kingdom, spanning access to services, diagnosis, and outcomes. These inequities stem from a complex interplay of factors such as health literacy, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, age, gender, geography, and lifestyle choices. Health literacy plays a crucial role in timely healthcare seeking and diagnosis, while cultural beliefs significantly shape perceptions and behaviours. Socioeconomic barriers often result in delayed diagnosis and inferior outcomes due to limited access to preventive measures and high-quality treatment. Barriers to timely diagnosis include non-specific symptoms, variations in diagnostic intervals influenced by age and gender, and non-attendance at secondary care appointments. Addressing these challenges necessitates initiatives aimed at improving health literacy, implementing culturally sensitive screening approaches, and enhancing accessibility to both primary and secondary care services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily C.S. Scott
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, London, United Kingdom
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- East of England Cancer Alliance, Ely, United Kingdom
| | - Peter J. Hoskin
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, London, United Kingdom
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- East of England Cancer Alliance, Ely, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gammall J, Lai AG. Prognostic determinants in cancer survival: a multidimensional evaluation of clinical and genetic factors across 10 cancer types in the participants of Genomics England's 100,000 Genomes Project. Discov Oncol 2024; 15:448. [PMID: 39277826 PMCID: PMC11402888 DOI: 10.1007/s12672-024-01310-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2023] [Accepted: 09/03/2024] [Indexed: 09/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer is a complex disease, caused and impacted by a combination of genetic, demographic, clinical, environmental and lifestyle factors. Analysis of cancer characteristics, risk factors, treatment options and the heterogeneity across cancer types has been the focus of medical research for years. The aim of this study is to describe and summarise genetic, clinicopathological, behavioural and demographic characteristics and their differences across ten common cancer types and evaluate their impact on overall survival outcomes. METHODS This study included data from 9977 patients with bladder, breast, colorectal, endometrial, glioma, leukaemia, lung, ovarian, prostate, and renal cancers. Genetic data collected through the 100,000 Genomes Project was linked with clinical and demographic data provided by the National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service (NCRAS), Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) and Office for National Statistics (ONS). Descriptive and Kaplan Meier survival analyses were performed to visualise similarities and differences across cancer types. Cox proportional hazards regression models were applied to identify statistically significant prognostic factor associations with overall survival. RESULTS 161 clinical and 124 genetic factors were evaluated for prognostic association with overall survival. Of these, 116 unique factors were found to have significant prognostic effect for overall survival across ten cancer types when adjusted for age, sex and stage. The findings confirmed prognostic associations with overall survival identified in previous studies in factors such as multimorbidity, tumour mutational burden, and mutations in genes BRAF, CDH1, NF1, NRAS, PIK3CA, PTEN, TP53. The results also identified new prognostic associations with overall survival in factors such as mental health conditions, female health-related conditions, previous hospital encounters and mutations in genes FANCE, FBXW7, GATA3, MSH6, PTPN11, RB1, RNF43. CONCLUSION This study provides a comprehensive view of clinicopathological and genetic prognostic factors across different cancer types and draws attention to less commonly known factors which might help produce more precise prognosis and survival estimates. The results from this study contribute to the understanding of cancer disease and could be used by researchers to develop complex prognostic models, which in turn could help predict cancer prognosis more accurately and improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jurgita Gammall
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, 222 Euston Road, London, NW1 2DA, UK.
- Oracle Global Services Limited, London, UK.
| | - Alvina G Lai
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, 222 Euston Road, London, NW1 2DA, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Globus O, Sagie S, Lavine N, Barchana DI, Urban D. Early death after a diagnosis of metastatic solid cancer-raising awareness and identifying risk factors from the SEER database. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0281561. [PMID: 37751439 PMCID: PMC10522015 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer death rates are declining, in part due to smoking cessation, better detection and new treatments; nevertheless, a large fraction of metastatic cancer patients die soon after diagnosis. Few studies and interventions focus on these patients. Our study aims to characterize early mortality in a wide range of metastatic solid tumors. METHODS We retrieved data on adult patients diagnosed with pathologically confirmed de- novo metastatic solid tumors between the years 2004-2016 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER). Our primary outcome was cancer specific early death rate (defined as death within two months of diagnosis). Additional data extracted included socio-demographical data, tumor primary, sites of metastases, and cause of death. RESULTS 109,207 (20.8%) patients died of de-novo metastatic cancer within two months of diagnosis. The highest rates of early death were found in hepatic (36%), pancreato-biliary (31%) and lung (25%) primaries. Factors associated with early death included primary site, liver, and brain metastases, increasing age, and lower income. Cancer was the cause of death in 92.1% of all early deaths. Two-month mortality rates have moderately improved during the study period (from 22.4% in 2004 to 18.8% in 2016). CONCLUSION A fifth of de-novo metastatic cancer patients die soon after diagnosis, with little improvement over the last decade. Further research is required to better classify and identify patients at risk for early mortality, which patients might benefit from faster diagnostic tracks, and which might avoid invasive and futile diagnostic procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Opher Globus
- Institute of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Shira Sagie
- Institute of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
- The Sheba Talpiot Medical Leadership Program, Israel
- Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Noy Lavine
- St. George’s University of London Medical Program Delivered by University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Daniel Itshak Barchana
- St. George’s University of London Medical Program Delivered by University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Damien Urban
- Institute of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abraham S, Foreman N, Sidat Z, Sandhu P, Marrone D, Headley C, Akroyd C, Nicholson S, Brown K, Thomas A, Howells LM, Walter HS. Inequalities in cancer screening, prevention and service engagement between UK ethnic minority groups. BRITISH JOURNAL OF NURSING (MARK ALLEN PUBLISHING) 2022; 31:S14-S24. [PMID: 35648663 DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2022.31.10.s14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
More people in the UK are living with cancer than ever before. With an increasingly ethnically diverse population, greater emphasis must be placed on understanding factors influencing cancer outcomes. This review seeks to explore UK-specific variations in engagement with cancer services in minority ethnic groups and describe successful interventions. The authors wish to highlight that, despite improvement to engagement and education strategies, inequalities still persist and work to improve cancer outcomes across our communities still needs to be prioritised. There are many reasons why cancer healthcare inequities exist for minority communities, reported on a spectrum ranging from cultural beliefs and awareness, through to racism. Strategies that successfully enhanced engagement included language support; culturally-sensitive reminders; community-based health workers and targeted outreach. Focusing on the diverse city of Leicester the authors describe how healthcare providers, researchers and community champions have worked collectively, delivering targeted community-based strategies to improve awareness and access to cancer services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shalin Abraham
- F2 Academic Foundation Doctor, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Nalini Foreman
- Quality Assistant, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Zahirah Sidat
- Senior Research Practitioner, Hope Clinical Trials Facility, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester
| | - Pavandeep Sandhu
- Research Technician, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Domenic Marrone
- Research Technician, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Catherine Headley
- Senior Cancer Services Manager, Leicester City Clinical Commissioning Group, Leicester
| | - Carol Akroyd
- Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Equality and Diversity Theme Manager, Centre for Ethnic Health Research, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Sarah Nicholson
- Hope Clinical Trials Facility Manager/Cancer, Haematology, Urology, Gastroenterology, General Surgery Research Lead, Hope Clinical Trials Facility, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester
| | - Karen Brown
- Professor in Translational Cancer Research, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Anne Thomas
- Professor of Cancer Therapeutics, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Lynne M Howells
- Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre Translational Research Manager, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Harriet S Walter
- Associate Professor of Medical Oncology, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Donnelly C, Hart N, McCrorie AD, Donnelly M, Anderson L, Ranaghan L, Gavin A. Predictors of an early death in patients diagnosed with colon cancer: a retrospective case-control study in the UK. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e026057. [PMID: 31221871 PMCID: PMC6588982 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2018] [Revised: 03/20/2019] [Accepted: 05/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Despite considerable improvements, 5-year survival rates for colon cancer in the UK remain poor when compared with other socioeconomically similar countries. Variation in 5-year survival can be partly explained by higher rates of death within 3 months of diagnosis in the UK. This study investigated the characteristics of patients who died within 3 months of a diagnosis of colon cancer with the aim of identifying specific patient factors that can be addressed or accounted for to improve survival outcomes. DESIGN A retrospective case-control study design was applied with matching on age, sex and year diagnosed. Patient, disease, clinical and service characteristics of patients diagnosed with colon cancer in a UK region (2005-2010) who survived less than 3 months from diagnosis (cases) were compared with patients who survived between 6 and 36 months (controls). Patient and clinical data were sourced from general practice notes and hospital databases 1-3 years prediagnosis. RESULTS Being older (aged ≥78 years) and living in deprivation quintile 5 (OR=2.64, 95% CI 1.15 to 6.06), being unmarried and living alone (OR=1.64, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.50), being underweight compared with normal weight or obese (OR=3.99, 95% CI 1.14 to 14.0), and being older and living in a rural as opposed to urban area (OR=1.96, 95% CI 1.21 to 3.17) were all independent predictors of early death from colon cancer. Missing information was also associated with early death, including unknown stage, histological type and marital/accommodation status after accounting for other factors. CONCLUSION Several factors typically associated with social isolation were a recurring theme in patients who died early from colon cancer. This association is unexplained by clinical or diagnostic pathway characteristics. Socially isolated patients are a key target group to improve outcomes of the worst surviving patients, but further investigation is required to determine if being isolated itself is actually a cause of early death from colon cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conan Donnelly
- University of Cork, National Cancer Registry Ireland, Cork, Ireland
| | - Nigel Hart
- School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Alan David McCrorie
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Michael Donnelly
- Centre for Public Health, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Lesley Anderson
- Centre for Public Health, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Lisa Ranaghan
- Belfast City Hospital, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Anna Gavin
- N Ireland Cancer Registry, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sineshaw HM, Jemal A, Ng K, Osarogiagbon RU, Robin Yabroff K, Ruddy KJ, Freedman RA. Treatment Patterns Among De Novo Metastatic Cancer Patients Who Died Within 1 Month of Diagnosis. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2019; 3:pkz021. [PMID: 31119208 PMCID: PMC6521896 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkz021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2018] [Revised: 12/18/2018] [Accepted: 01/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about patterns of and factors associated with treatment for de novo metastatic cancer patients who die soon after diagnosis. In this study, we examine treatment patterns for patients newly diagnosed with metastatic lung, colorectal, breast, or pancreatic cancer who died within 1 month of diagnosis. METHODS We identified 100 848 adult patients in the National Cancer Database with de novo metastatic lung, colorectal, breast, and pancreatic cancer, diagnosed between 2004 and 2014 and who died within 1 month. We performed descriptive and multivariable logistic regression analyses to examine receipt of surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, and hormonal therapy by cancer type, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical variables. RESULTS Treatment substantially varied by cancer type, over time, age, insurance, and facility type. Surgery ranged from 0.4% in pancreatic to 28.3% in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, chemotherapy from 5.8% among CRC to 11% in lung and breast cancer patients, and radiotherapy from 1.3% in pancreatic to 18.7% in lung cancer patients. Use of some treatments (eg, surgery for CRC and breast cancer) progressively declined between 2004 and 2014. Compared with lung cancer patients treated at National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers, those treated at community cancer centers had 48% lower odds of radiation. CONCLUSIONS Treatment of patients diagnosed with imminently fatal de novo metastatic cancer varied markedly by cancer type and patient/facility characteristics. These variations warrant more research to better identify patients with imminently fatal de novo metastatic cancer who may not benefit from aggressive and expensive therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Kimmie Ng
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Esteva M, Ruiz-Díaz M, Sánchez MA, Pértega S, Pita-Fernández S, Macià F, Posso M, González-Luján L, Boscá-Wats MM, Leiva A, Ripoll J, On behalf of the DECCIRE GROUP. Emergency presentation of colorectal patients in Spain. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0203556. [PMID: 30273339 PMCID: PMC6166931 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2018] [Accepted: 07/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the leading cause of cancer deaths in Europe. Survival is poorer in patients admitted to hospitals through the emergency department than in electively admitted patients. Knowledge of factors associated with a cancer diagnosis through presentation at an emergency department may reduce the likelihood of an emergency diagnosis. This study evaluated factors influencing the diagnosis of CRC in the emergency department. Methods and findings This is a cross-sectional study in 5 Spanish regions; subjects were incident cases of CRC diagnosed in 9 public hospitals, between 2006 and 2008. Data were obtained from patient interviews and primary care and hospital clinical records. We found that approximately 40% of CRC patients first contacted a hospital for CRC through an emergency service. Women were more likely than men to be emergency presenters. The type of symptom associated with emergency presentation differed between patients with colon cancer and those with rectal cancer, in that the frequency of “alarm symptoms” was significantly lower in colon than in rectal cancer patients who initially presented to emergency services. Soon after symptom onset, some patients went to a hospital emergency service, whereas others contacted their GP. Lack of contact with a GP for CRC-related symptoms was consistently related to emergency presentation. Among patients who contacted a GP, a higher number of consultations for CRC symptoms and any referral to outpatient consultations reduced the likelihood of emergency presentation. All diagnostic time intervals were shorter in emergency presenters than in elective patients. Conclusions Emergency presenters are not a uniform category and can be divided into categories according to their symptoms, help seeking behavior trajectory and interaction with their GPs. Time constraints for testing and delays in obtaining outpatient appointments led patients to visit a hospital service either on their own or after referral by their GP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdalena Esteva
- Primary Care Research Unit, Majorca Department of Primary Care; Baleares Health Service [IbSalut], Balearic Islands Health Research Institute (IdISBa), Majorca, Spain
- * E-mail:
| | | | - M. Antonia Sánchez
- Centro de Salud Fuentes Norte Zaragoza, Department of Medicine, Psychiatry and Dermatology, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Sonia Pértega
- Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC), Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña (CHUAC), SERGAS, Universidade da Coruña, A Coruña, España
| | - Salvador Pita-Fernández
- Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC), Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña (CHUAC), SERGAS, Universidade da Coruña, A Coruña, España
| | - Francesc Macià
- Epidemiology and Evaluation Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- REDISSEC (Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network), Madrid, Spain
| | - Margarita Posso
- Epidemiology and Evaluation Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
- IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
- REDISSEC (Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network), Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis González-Luján
- Serreria II Primary Care Centre, Valencia Institute of Health, Valencia, Spain
| | - Marta M. Boscá-Wats
- Digestive Medicine Unit, Hospital Clinic Universitari de València, València, Spain
| | - Alfonso Leiva
- Primary Care Research Unit, Majorca Department of Primary Care; Baleares Health Service [IbSalut], Balearic Islands Health Research Institute (IdISBa), Majorca, Spain
| | - Joana Ripoll
- Primary Care Research Unit, Majorca Department of Primary Care; Baleares Health Service [IbSalut], Balearic Islands Health Research Institute (IdISBa), Majorca, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lüchtenborg M, Morris EJA, Tataru D, Coupland VH, Smith A, Milne RL, Te Marvelde L, Baker D, Young J, Turner D, Nishri D, Earle C, Shack L, Gavin A, Fitzpatrick D, Donnelly C, Lin Y, Møller B, Brewster DH, Deas A, Huws DW, White C, Warlow J, Rashbass J, Peake MD. Investigation of the international comparability of population-based routine hospital data set derived comorbidity scores for patients with lung cancer. Thorax 2018; 73:339-349. [PMID: 29079609 PMCID: PMC5870453 DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-210362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2017] [Revised: 09/07/2017] [Accepted: 09/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP) identified significant international differences in lung cancer survival. Differing levels of comorbid disease across ICBP countries has been suggested as a potential explanation of this variation but, to date, no studies have quantified its impact. This study investigated whether comparable, robust comorbidity scores can be derived from the different routine population-based cancer data sets available in the ICBP jurisdictions and, if so, use them to quantify international variation in comorbidity and determine its influence on outcome. METHODS Linked population-based lung cancer registry and hospital discharge data sets were acquired from nine ICBP jurisdictions in Australia, Canada, Norway and the UK providing a study population of 233 981 individuals. For each person in this cohort Charlson, Elixhauser and inpatient bed day Comorbidity Scores were derived relating to the 4-36 months prior to their lung cancer diagnosis. The scores were then compared to assess their validity and feasibility of use in international survival comparisons. RESULTS It was feasible to generate the three comorbidity scores for each jurisdiction, which were found to have good content, face and concurrent validity. Predictive validity was limited and there was evidence that the reliability was questionable. CONCLUSION The results presented here indicate that interjurisdictional comparability of recorded comorbidity was limited due to probable differences in coding and hospital admission practices in each area. Before the contribution of comorbidity on international differences in cancer survival can be investigated an internationally harmonised comorbidity index is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margreet Lüchtenborg
- National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Skipton House, Public Health England, London, UK
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Population and Global Health, Division of Cancer Studies, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Eva J A Morris
- Cancer Epidemiology Group, Leeds Institute of Data Analytics, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, Leeds, UK
| | - Daniela Tataru
- National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Skipton House, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Victoria H Coupland
- National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Skipton House, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Andrew Smith
- National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Skipton House, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Roger L Milne
- Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Luc Te Marvelde
- Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Deborah Baker
- Cancer Institute New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jane Young
- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Donna Turner
- Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | | | - Craig Earle
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lorraine Shack
- Cancer Control Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Anna Gavin
- Northern Ireland Cancer Registry, Centre for Public Health Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Deirdre Fitzpatrick
- Northern Ireland Cancer Registry, Centre for Public Health Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Conan Donnelly
- Northern Ireland Cancer Registry, Centre for Public Health Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Yulan Lin
- Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | | | - David H Brewster
- Scottish Cancer Registry, Public Health & Intelligence Unit of NHS National Services Scotland, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Andrew Deas
- Scottish Cancer Registry, Public Health & Intelligence Unit of NHS National Services Scotland, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Dyfed W Huws
- Welsh Cancer Intelligence and Surveillance Unit, Public Health Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - Ceri White
- Welsh Cancer Intelligence and Surveillance Unit, Public Health Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - Janet Warlow
- Welsh Cancer Intelligence and Surveillance Unit, Public Health Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - Jem Rashbass
- National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Skipton House, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Michael D Peake
- National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Skipton House, Public Health England, London, UK
- Institute for Lung Health, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kelly M, O'Brien KM, Lucey M, Clough-Gorr K, Hannigan A. Indicators for early assessment of palliative care in lung cancer patients: a population study using linked health data. BMC Palliat Care 2018; 17:37. [PMID: 29482533 PMCID: PMC5828095 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-018-0285-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2017] [Accepted: 02/06/2018] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Analysing linked, routinely collected data may be useful to identify characteristics of patients with suspected lung cancer who could benefit from early assessment for palliative care. The aim of this study was to compare characteristics of newly diagnosed lung cancer patients dying within 30 days of diagnosis (short term survivors) with those surviving more than 30 days. To identify indicators for early palliative care assessment we distinguished between characteristics available at diagnosis (age, gender, smoking status, marital status, comorbid disease, admission type, tumour stage and histology) from those available post diagnosis. A second aim was to examine the association between receiving any tumour-directed treatment, place of death and survival time. METHODS A retrospective observational population based study comparing lung cancer patients who died within 30 days of diagnosis (short term survivors) with those who survived longer using Chi-squared tests and logistic regression. Incident lung cancer (ICD-03:C34) patients diagnosed 2005-2012 inclusive who died before 01-01-2014 (n = 14,228) were identified from the National Cancer Registry of Ireland linked to death certificate data and acute hospital episode data. RESULTS One in five newly diagnosed lung cancer patients died within 30 days of diagnosis. After adjusting for stage and histology, death within 30 days was higher in patients who were aged 80 years or older (adjusted OR 2.46; 95%CI 2.05-3.96; p < 0.001), patients with emergency admissions at diagnosis (adjusted OR 2.96; 95%CI 2.61-3.37; p < 0.001) and patients with any comorbidities at diagnosis (adjusted OR 1.32 95%CI 1.15-1.52; p < 0.001). Overall, 75% of those who died within 30 days died in hospital compared to 43% of longer term survivors. CONCLUSIONS We have shown a high proportion of lung cancer patients who die within 30 days of diagnosis are older, have comorbidities and are admitted through the emergency department. These characteristics, available at diagnosis, may be useful prognostic factors to guide decisions on early assessment for palliative care for lung cancer patients. Patients who die shortly after diagnosis are more likely to die in hospital so reporting place of death by survival time may be useful to evaluate interventions to reduce deaths in acute hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Kelly
- National Cancer Registry Ireland and Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
| | - Katie M O'Brien
- National Cancer Registry Ireland and Cork Institute of Technology, Cork, Ireland
| | | | - Kerri Clough-Gorr
- National Cancer Registry Ireland and Cork Institute of Technology, Cork, Ireland
| | - Ailish Hannigan
- Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Does emergency presentation of cancer represent poor performance in primary care? Insights from a novel analysis of linked primary and secondary care data. Br J Cancer 2017; 116:1148-1158. [PMID: 28334728 PMCID: PMC5418447 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.71] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2016] [Revised: 02/20/2017] [Accepted: 02/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: People diagnosed with cancer following emergency presentation have poorer short-term survival. To what extent this signifies a missed opportunity for earlier diagnosis in primary care remains unclear as little detailed data exist on the patient/general practitioner interaction beforehand. Methods: Analysis of primary care and regional data for 1802 cancer patients from Northeast Scotland. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for patient and GP practice predictors of emergency presentation. Qualitative context coding of primary care interaction before emergency presentation. Results: Emergency presentations equalled 20% (n=365). Twenty-eight per cent had no relevant prior GP contact. Of those with prior GP contact 30% were admitted while waiting to be seen in secondary care, and 19% were missed opportunities for earlier diagnosis. Associated predictors: no prior GP contact (OR=3.89; CI 95% 2.14–7.09); having lung (OR=23.24; 95% CI 7.92–68.21), colorectal (OR=18.49; CI 95% 6.60–51.82) and upper GI cancer (OR=18.97; CI 95% 6.08–59.23); ethnicity (OR=2.78; CI 95% 1.27–6.06). Conclusions: Our novel approach has revealed that emergency cancer presentation is more complex than previously thought. Patient delay, prolonged referral pathways and missed opportunities by GPs all contribute, but emergency presentation can also represent effective care. Resources should be used proportionately to raise public and GP awareness and improve post-referral pathways.
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify patient and practitioner factors that influence cancer diagnosis via emergency presentation (EP). DESIGN Systematic review. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, EBM Reviews, Science and Social Sciences Citation Indexes, Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Social Science and Humanities. Searches were undertaken from 1996 to 2014. No language restrictions were applied. STUDY SELECTION Studies of any design assessing factors associated with diagnosis of colorectal or lung cancer via EP, or describing an intervention to impact on EP, were included. Studies involving previously diagnosed cancer patients, assessing only referral pathway effectiveness, outcomes related to diagnosis or post-EP management were excluded. The population was individual or groups of adult patients or primary care practitioners. Two authors independently screened studies for inclusion. RESULTS 22 studies with over 200,000 EPs were included, most providing strong evidence. Five were graded 'insufficient', primarily due to missing information rather than methodological weakness. Older patient age was associated with EP for lung and colorectal cancers (OR 1.11-11.03 and 1.19-5.85, respectively). Women were more at risk of EP for lung but not colorectal cancer. Higher deprivation increased the likelihood of lung cancer EP, but evidence for colorectal was less conclusive. Being unmarried (or divorced/widowed) increased the likelihood of EP for colorectal cancer, which was also associated with pain, obstruction and weight loss. Lack of a regular source of primary care, and lower primary care use were positively associated with EP. Only three studies considered practitioner factors, two involving diagnostic tests. No conclusive evidence was found. CONCLUSIONS Patient-related factors, such as age, gender and deprivation, increase the likelihood of cancer being diagnosed as the result of an EP, while cancer symptoms and patterns of healthcare utilisation are also relevant. Further work is needed to understand the context in which risk factors for EP exist and influence help-seeking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth D Mitchell
- Centre for Health Services Research, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Una Macleod
- Supportive Care, Early Diagnosis and Advanced disease (SEDA) Research Group, Centre for Health and Population Sciences, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Brewster DH, Nowell SL, Clark DN. Risk of oesophageal cancer among patients previously hospitalised with eating disorder. Cancer Epidemiol 2015; 39:313-20. [PMID: 25769223 PMCID: PMC4464101 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2015.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2014] [Revised: 02/19/2015] [Accepted: 02/20/2015] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
There are case reports of oesophageal cancer in patients with eating disorders. We followed up a cohort of patients hospitalised previously with eating disorders. These patients were at significantly increased risk of oesophageal cancer. All cancers were squamous cell carcinomas in females with prior anorexia nervosa. Indirect evidence suggests confounding by established risk factors.
Background It has been suggested that the risk of oesophageal adenocarcinoma might be increased in patients with a history of eating disorders due to acidic damage to oesophageal mucosa caused by self-induced vomiting practiced as a method of weight control. Eating disorders have also been associated with risk factors for squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus, including alcohol use disorders, as well as smoking and nutritional deficiencies, which have been associated with both main sub-types of oesophageal cancer. There have been several case reports of oesophageal cancer (both main sub-types) arising in patients with a history of eating disorders. Methods We used linked records of hospitalisation, cancer registration and mortality in Scotland spanning 1981–2012 to investigate the risk of oesophageal cancer among patients with a prior history of hospitalisation with eating disorder. The cohort was restricted to patients aged ≥10 years and <60 years at the date of first admission with eating disorder. Disregarding the first year of follow-up, we calculated indirectly standardised incidence ratios using the general population as the reference group to generate expected numbers of cases (based on age-, sex-, socio-economic deprivation category-, and calendar period-specific rates of disease). Results After exclusions, the cohort consisted of 3617 individuals contributing 52,455 person-years at risk. The median duration of follow-up was 13.9 years. Seven oesophageal cancers were identified, as compared with 1.14 expected, yielding a standardised incidence ratio of 6.1 (95% confidence interval: 2.5–12.6). All were squamous cell carcinomas arising in females with a prior history of anorexia nervosa. Conclusions Patients hospitalised previously with eating disorders are at increased risk of developing oesophageal cancer. Confounding by established risk factors (alcohol, smoking, and nutritional deficiency) seems a more likely explanation than acidic damage through self-induced vomiting because none of the incident cases of oesophageal cancer were adenocarcinomas, and because the study cohort had higher than background rates of hospitalisation with alcohol-related conditions and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David H Brewster
- NHS National Services Scotland, Gyle Square, 1 South Gyle Crescent, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
| | - Siân L Nowell
- NHS National Services Scotland, Gyle Square, 1 South Gyle Crescent, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - David N Clark
- NHS National Services Scotland, Gyle Square, 1 South Gyle Crescent, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Platon AM, Erichsen R, Christiansen CF, Andersen LK, Sværke C, Montomoli J, Sørensen HT. The impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on intensive care unit admission and 30-day mortality in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery: a Danish population-based cohort study. BMJ Open Respir Res 2014; 1:e000036. [PMID: 25478184 PMCID: PMC4212724 DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2014-000036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2014] [Revised: 05/18/2014] [Accepted: 06/08/2014] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may increase the risk of postoperative complications and thus mortality after colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery, but the evidence is sparse. Methods We conducted this nationwide population-based cohort study in Denmark, including all patients undergoing CRC surgery in the period 2005–2011, identified through medical databases. We categorised the patients according to the history of COPD. We assessed the rate of complications within 30 days. We computed 30-day mortality among patients with/without COPD using the Kaplan-Meier method. We used Cox regression to compute HRs for death, controlling for age, gender, type of admission, cancer stage, hospital volume, alcohol-related diseases, obesity and Charlson comorbidity score. Results We identified 18 302 CRC surgery patients. Of these, 7.9% had a prior diagnosis of COPD. Among patients with COPD, 16.1% were admitted postoperatively to the intensive care unit, 1.9% were treated with mechanical ventilation, and 3.6% were treated with non-invasive ventilation. In patients without COPD, the corresponding proportions were 9.7%, 1.1% and 1.1%. The reoperation rate was 10.6% among patients with COPD and 8% among patients with cancer without COPD. 30-day mortality was 13% (95% CI 11.4% to 14.9%) among patients with COPD and 5.3% (95% CI 5.0% to 5.7%) among patients without COPD, corresponding to an adjusted HR of 1.7 (95% CI 1.5 to 2.0). Conclusions COPD is a strong predictor for intensive care unit admission and mortality after CRC surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Maria Platon
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark
| | - Rune Erichsen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark
| | | | - Lea Kjær Andersen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark
| | - Claus Sværke
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark
| | - Jonathan Montomoli
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark
| | - Henrik Toft Sørensen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lyratzopoulos G. Markers and measures of timeliness of cancer diagnosis after symptom onset: a conceptual framework and its implications. Cancer Epidemiol 2014; 38:211-3. [PMID: 24742794 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2014.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2013] [Revised: 03/13/2014] [Accepted: 03/17/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Lyratzopoulos
- Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lyratzopoulos G, Greenberg DC, Rubin GP, Abel GA, Walter FM, Neal RD. Advanced stage diagnosis of cancer: who is at greater risk? Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2014; 12:993-6. [DOI: 10.1586/era.12.77] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
17
|
Eadie L, Enfield L, Taylor P, Michell M, Gibson A. Breast cancer risk scores in a standard screening population. BREAST CANCER MANAGEMENT 2013. [DOI: 10.2217/bmt.13.52] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
SUMMARY Aim: Information regarding the characteristics and breast cancer risk factors of British women in the standard population attending breast cancer screening is limited. Such information could be useful in personalizing screening and care, and informing and educating women about their risk. Materials & methods: Information about various breast cancer risk factors was obtained from 355 women aged between 46 and 74 years at a UK inner-city breast cancer screening clinic using questionnaires. The risk of breast cancer was calculated using the modified Gail model and analyzed using descriptive and regression statistics. Results: There were 26 women recalled for further assessment and two cases confirmed as invasive breast cancer. Forty-seven women reported first-degree relatives with breast cancer. A total of 58% of our sample was overweight or obese, although 84% reported meeting the recommended target of ≥150 min of exercise per week. A total of 44% were smokers and 23% reported consuming alcohol on a regular basis. The mean lifetime risk score was 9.0% and the mean 5-year risk score was 1.5%. Various non-Gail model risk factors were found to be correlated with risk scores, but the only factor that was significantly different between women recalled for further assessment and those who were not was age of menarche. Conclusion: The results suggest that determining risk factor data in a standard screening population could be useful both to the women, who may have modifiable lifestyle factors that can be changed to improve their risk, and to the clinics, which can identify women at a higher risk who may be unaware and not present themselves as candidates for risk assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leila Eadie
- Centre for Rural Health, Aberdeen University, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Louise Enfield
- Department of Medical Physics & Bioengineering, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Paul Taylor
- Centre for Health Informatics & Multiprofessional Education, University College London, London, N19 5LW, UK
| | - Michael Michell
- South East London Breast Screening Programme, Breast Radiology, King’s College Hospital London, SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Adam Gibson
- Department of Medical Physics & Bioengineering, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Emergency presentation of cancer and short-term mortality. Br J Cancer 2013; 109:2027-34. [PMID: 24045658 PMCID: PMC3798965 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 163] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2013] [Revised: 08/09/2013] [Accepted: 08/26/2013] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The short-term survival following a cancer diagnosis in England is lower than that in comparable countries, with the difference in excess mortality primarily occurring in the months immediately after diagnosis. We assess the impact of emergency presentation (EP) on the excess mortality in England over the course of the year following diagnosis. Methods: All colorectal and cervical cancers presenting in England and all breast, lung, and prostate cancers in the East of England in 2006–2008 are included. The variation in the likelihood of EP with age, stage, sex, co-morbidity, and income deprivation is modelled. The excess mortality over 0–1, 1–3, 3–6, and 6–12 months after diagnosis and its dependence on these case-mix factors and presentation route is then examined. Results: More advanced stage and older age are predictive of EP, as to a lesser extent are co-morbidity, higher income deprivation, and female sex. In the first month after diagnosis, we observe case-mix-adjusted excess mortality rate ratios of 7.5 (cervical), 5.9 (colorectal), 11.7 (breast ), 4.0 (lung), and 20.8 (prostate) for EP compared with non-EP. Conclusion: Individuals who present as an emergency experience high short-term mortality in all cancer types examined compared with non-EPs. This is partly a case-mix effect but EP remains predictive of short-term mortality even when age, stage, and co-morbidity are accounted for.
Collapse
|
19
|
Tsang C, Bottle A, Majeed A, Aylin P. Cancer diagnosed by emergency admission in England: an observational study using the general practice research database. BMC Health Serv Res 2013; 13:308. [PMID: 23941140 PMCID: PMC3751722 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2013] [Accepted: 08/09/2013] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients diagnosed with cancer by the emergency route often have more advanced diseases and poorer outcomes. Rates of cancer diagnosed through unplanned admissions vary within and between countries, suggesting potential inconsistencies in the quality of care. To reduce diagnoses by this route and improve patient outcomes, high risk patient groups must be identified. This cross-sectional observational study determined the incidence of first-ever diagnoses of cancer by emergency (unplanned) admission and identified patient-level risk factors for these diagnoses in England. Methods Data for 74,763 randomly selected patients at 457 general practices between 1999 and 2008 were obtained from the General Practice Research Database (GPRD), including integrated Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data and Office for National Statistics (ONS) mortality data. The proportion of first-ever diagnoses by emergency admission out of all recorded first cancer diagnoses by any route was analysed by patient characteristics. Results Diagnosis by emergency admission was recorded in 13.9% of patients diagnosed with cancer for the first time (n = 817/5870). The incidence of first cases by the emergency route was 2.51 patients per 10,000 person years. In adjusted regression analyses, patients of older age (p < 0.0001), living in the most deprived areas (RR 1.93, 95% CI 1.51 to 2.47; p < 0.0001) or who had a total Charlson score of 1 compared to 0 (RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.69; p = 0.014) were most at risk of diagnosis by emergency admission. Patients with more prior (all-cause) emergency admissions were less at risk of subsequent diagnosis by the emergency route (RR 0.31 per prior emergency admission, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.46; p < 0.0001). Conclusions A much lower incidence of first-ever cancer diagnoses by emergency admission was found compared with previous studies. Identified high risk groups may benefit from interventions to reduce delayed diagnosis. Further studies should include screening and cancer staging data to improve understanding of delayed or untimely diagnosis and patient care pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Tsang
- Dr Foster Unit at Imperial, Ground Floor 3 Dorset Rise, EC4Y 8EN, London, England.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Shafique K, Proctor MJ, McMillan DC, Leung H, Smith K, Sloan B, Morrison DS. The modified Glasgow prognostic score in prostate cancer: results from a retrospective clinical series of 744 patients. BMC Cancer 2013; 13:292. [PMID: 23768149 PMCID: PMC3686580 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2013] [Accepted: 06/13/2013] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Background As the incidence of prostate cancer continues to rise steeply, there is an increasing need to identify more accurate prognostic markers for the disease. There is some evidence that a higher modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) may be associated with poorer survival in patients with prostate cancer but it is not known whether this is independent of other established prognostic factors. Therefore the aim of this study was to describe the relationship between mGPS and survival in patients with prostate cancer after adjustment for other prognostic factors. Methods Retrospective clinical series on patients in Glasgow, Scotland, for whom data from the Scottish Cancer Registry, including Gleason score, Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin, six months prior to or following the diagnosis, were included in this study. The mGPS was constructed by combining CRP and albumin. Five-year and ten-year relative survival and relative excess risk of death were estimated by mGPS categories after adjusting for age, socioeconomic circumstances, Gleason score, PSA and previous in-patient bed days. Results Seven hundred and forty four prostate cancer patients were identified; of these, 497 (66.8%) died during a maximum follow up of 11.9 years. Patients with mGPS of 2 had poorest 5-year and 10-year relative survival, of 32.6% and 18.8%, respectively. Raised mGPS also had a significant association with excess risk of death at five years (mGPS 2: Relative Excess Risk = 3.57, 95% CI 2.31-5.52) and ten years (mGPS 2: Relative Excess Risk = 3.42, 95% CI 2.25-5.21) after adjusting for age, socioeconomic circumstances, Gleason score, PSA and previous in-patient bed days. Conclusions The mGPS is an independent and objective prognostic indicator for survival of patients with prostate cancer. It may be useful in determining the clinical management of patients with prostate cancer in addition to established prognostic markers.
Collapse
|
21
|
Oliphant R, Nicholson GA, Horgan PG, Molloy RG, McMillan DC, Morrison DS. Deprivation and Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Longer-Term Survival Inequalities are Due to Differential Postoperative Mortality Between Socioeconomic Groups. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 20:2132-9. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-2959-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2012] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
22
|
Early mortality from colorectal cancer in England: a retrospective observational study of the factors associated with death in the first year after diagnosis. Br J Cancer 2013; 108:681-5. [PMID: 23287990 PMCID: PMC3593544 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The United Kingdom performs poorly in international comparisons of colorectal cancer survival with much of the deficit owing to high numbers of deaths close to the time of diagnosis. This retrospective cohort study investigates the patient, tumour and treatment characteristics of those who die in the first year after diagnosis of their disease. Methods: Patients diagnosed with colon (n=65 733) or rectal (n=26 123) cancer in England between 2006 and 2008 were identified in the National Cancer Data Repository. Multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate the odds of death within 1 month, 1–3 months and 3–12 months after diagnosis. Results: In all, 11.5% of colon and 5.4% of rectal cancer patients died within a month of diagnosis: this proportion decreased significantly over the study period. For both cancer sites, older age, stage at diagnosis, deprivation and emergency presentation were associated with early death. Individuals who died shortly after diagnosis were also more likely to have missing data about important prognostic factors such as disease stage and treatment. Conclusion: Using routinely collected data, at no inconvenience to patients, we have identified some important areas relating to early deaths from colorectal cancer, which merit further research.
Collapse
|
23
|
The importance of blood loss during colon cancer surgery for long-term survival: an epidemiological study based on a population based register. Ann Surg 2012; 255:1126-8. [PMID: 22498893 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0b013e3182512df0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study tested the hypothesis that the amount of blood loss during surgery for colonic cancer influences long-term survival. BACKGROUND The perioperative blood loss during surgery for colorectal cancer relates to the risk for complications and early mortality. METHODS All patients who underwent surgery for colon cancer between 1997 and 2003 in the health-care region of Uppsala/Örebro were prospectively registered at the regional oncological center. Data on patients who underwent radical surgery for stages I to III disease were analyzed. Patients who died within 6 months after surgery were excluded. Hazard ratios were calculated with uni- and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression. Because of covariation, blood loss, blood transfusion, and complications were tested in separate multivariate analyses. RESULTS Blood loss of 250 mL or more during surgery, male gender, occurrence of complications, age more than 75 years, and stage III disease were risk factors for overall mortality in the uni- and multivariate analyses. Perioperative blood transfusion was shown to be a risk factor in the univariate analysis only. CONCLUSIONS The results support the hypothesis that degree of blood loss during surgery for colon cancer is a factor that influences long-term survival.
Collapse
|
24
|
Stapelkamp C, Holmberg L, Tataru D, Møller H, Robinson D. Predictors of early death in female patients with breast cancer in the UK: a cohort study. BMJ Open 2011; 1:e000247. [PMID: 22123920 PMCID: PMC3227804 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To identify factors predicting early death in women with breast cancer. Design Cohort study. Setting 29 trusts across seven cancer networks in the North Thames area. Participants 15 037 women with primary breast cancer diagnosed between January 1996 and December 2005. Methods Logistic regression analyses to determine predictors of early death and factors associated with lack of surgical treatment. Main exposures Age at diagnosis, mode of presentation, ethnicity, disease severity, comorbidities, treatment and period of diagnosis in relation to the Cancer Plan (the NHS's strategy in 2000 for investment in and reform of cancer services). Main outcome measures Death from any cause within 1 year of diagnosis, and receipt of surgical treatment. Results By 31 December 2006, 4765 women had died, 980 in the year after diagnosis. Older age and disease severity independently predicted early death. Women over 80 were more likely to die early than women under 50 (OR 8.05, 95% CI 5.96 to 10.88). Presence of distant metastases on diagnosis increased the odds of early death more than eightfold (OR 8.41, 95% CI 6.49 to 10.89). Two or more recorded comorbidities were associated with a nearly fourfold increase. There was a significant decrease in odds associated with surgery (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.35). Independently of disease severity and comorbidities, women over 70 were less likely than those under 50 to be treated surgically and this was even more pronounced in those aged over 80 (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.10). Other factors independently associated with a reduced likelihood of surgery included a non-screening presentation, non-white ethnicity and additional comorbidities. Conclusions These findings may partially explain the survival discrepancies between the UK and other European countries in female patients with breast cancer. The study identifies a group of women with a particularly poor prognosis for whom interventions aiming at early detection may be targeted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lars Holmberg
- Division of Cancer Studies, Cancer Epidemiology Group, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Daniela Tataru
- Thames Cancer Registry, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Henrik Møller
- Thames Cancer Registry, King's College London, London, UK
| | - David Robinson
- Thames Cancer Registry, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|