Fractionated administration of irinotecan and cisplatin for treatment of lung cancer: a phase I study

Combination therapeutic effect of cisplatin along with Solanum trilobatum on benzo(a)pyrene induced experimental lung carcinogenesis

Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer death in the world and is notoriously difficult to treat effectively. In the present study, male Swiss albino mice were divided into five groups of six animals each: group I animals received corn oil orally and served as a control; group II cancer-induced animals received benzo(a)pyrene (B[a]P) (50 mg kg(-1) bodyweight dissolved in corn oil, orally) twice weekly for four successive weeks; group III cancer-bearing animals (after 12 weeks of induction) were treated with cisplatin (6 mg kg(-1) bodyweight, i.p.) once weekly for 4 weeks; group IV cancer-bearing animals were treated with cisplatin along with Solanum trilobatum (300 mg kg(-1) bodyweight) orally once weekly for 4 weeks; and group V animals constituted the drug control treated with cisplatin along with S. trilobatum. The serum, lung and liver were investigated biochemically for aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, 5'-nucleotidase, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and protein-bound carbohydrate components (hexose, hexosamine and sialic acid). These enzyme activities were increased significantly in cancer-bearing animals compared with control animals. The elevation of these in cancer-bearing animals was indicative of the persistent deteriorating effect of B[a]P in cancer-bearing animals. Our data suggest that cisplatin, administered with S. trilobatum, may extend its chemotherapeutic effect through modulating protein-bound carbohydrate levels and marker enzymes, as they are indicators of cancer. The combination of cisplatin with S. trilobatum could effectively treat the B[a]P-induced lung cancer in mice by offering protection from reactive oxygen species damage and also by suppressing cell proliferation.

Triple Combination Chemotherapy with Cisplatin, Docetaxel, and Irinotecan for Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase I/II Trial

BACKGROUND

To determine the recommended dose and evaluate the response rate and toxicity of triplet chemotherapy using cisplatin, docetaxel, and irinotecan for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with stage IIIB or IV.

METHODS

A total of 65 patients (33 men and 32 women) with advanced NSCLC, a good performance status, and 65 years of age or younger were included in these phase I/II studies. The median age was 52 years. Most patients had performance status 1 (49/65) and stage IV disease (49/65). Adenocarcinoma was the most common tumor histology (55 patients). Cisplatin and docetaxel were given on day 1 and irinotecan on day 2; the cycles were repeated every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

In the phase I study, the maximum tolerated doses of combination cisplatin/docetaxel/irinotecan were, respectively, 80/60/60 (mg/m) and the recommended doses for the phase II study were determined to be 60/60/60 (mg/m), respectively. The dose-limiting toxicities were neutropenia, neutropenic fever, and diarrhea. In the phase II study, 157 cycles of chemotherapy were delivered to 49 patients (median three cycles per patient). The objective response rate was 57.1% (95% confidence interval: 43.1%-71.1%). The median survival time and the actual 2-, 3- and estimated 5-year survival rates were 17 months, 33%, 25%, and 18%, respectively. Grade 3/4 toxicities consisted of neutropenia (92%), neutropenic fever (45%), nausea/vomiting (27%), diarrhea (35%), and hepatic toxicity (2%); there were no cases of treatment-related death.

CONCLUSION

This triplet chemotherapy has shown a promising activity against advanced NSCLC according to admission-based treatment with adequate supportive care. The principal toxicity was neutropenic fever, but supportive care should be explored to reduce this incidence.

Phase I/II study of docetaxel and cisplatin with concurrent thoracic radiation therapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Recent studies have suggested the superiority of concomitant over sequential administration of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Docetaxel and cisplatin have demonstrated efficacy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study evaluated the safety, toxicity, and antitumour activity of docetaxel/cisplatin with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced NSCLC. Patients with locally advanced NSCLC (stage IIIA or IIIB), good performance status, age <or=75 years, and adequate organ function were eligible. Both docetaxel and cisplatin were given on days 1, 8, 29, and 36. Doses of docetaxel/cisplatin (mg m(-2)) in the phase I study portion were escalated as follows: 20/30, 25/30, 30/30, 30/35, 30/40, 35/40, 40/40, and 45/40. Beginning on day 1 of chemotherapy, thoracic radiotherapy was given at a total dose of 60 Gy with 2 Gy per fraction over 6 weeks. In the phase I portion, the maximum tolerated doses (MTD) among 33 patients were docetaxel 45 mg m(-2) and cisplatin 40 mg m(-2). The major dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was radiation oesophagitis. The recommended doses (RDs) for the phase II study were docetaxel 40 mg m(-2) and cisplatin 40 mg m(-2). A total of 42 patients were entered in the phase II portion. Common toxicities were leukopenia, granulocytopenia, anaemia, and radiation oesophagitis, with frequencies of grade >or=3 toxicities of 71, 60, 24, and 19%, respectively. Toxicity was significant, but manageable according to the dose and schedule modifications. Dose intensities of docetaxel and cisplatin were 86 and 87%, respectively. Radiotherapy was completed without a delay in 67% of 42 patients. The overall response rate was 79% (95% confidence interval (CI), 66-91%). The median survival time was 23.4+ months with an overall survival rate of 76% at 1 year and 54% at 2 years. In conclusion, chemotherapy with cisplatin plus docetaxel given on days 1, 8, 29, and 36 and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy is efficacious and tolerated in patients with locally advanced NSCLC and should be evaluated in a phase III study.

Phase I Study of Weekly Alternating Therapy with Irinotecan/Cisplatin and Etoposide/Cisplatin for Patients with Small-Cell Lung Cancer

The combination of IP (irinotecan/cisplatin) has been shown to confer a survival benefit compared with EP (etoposide/cisplatin) in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Based on this and potential synergy from sequential inhibition of topoisomerases I and II, we conducted a phase I study to assess the feasibility of weekly therapy alternating IP and EP. The doses of EP were fixed (etoposide 60 mg/m2 on days 1-3 and cisplatin 20 mg/m2 on day 1). The dose of irinotecan was escalated in serial cohorts at 3 dose levels: 80, 90, and 100 mg/m2 on day 1. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was given on days 2-5 and days 4-7 after IP and EP, respectively. Patients with limited-stage SCLC received chemoradiation during weeks 4-6 with etoposide 120 mg/m2 on days 1-3, cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1, and thoracic radiation 1.5 Gy twice daily in 30 fractions. Patients received 12 weeks of therapy. To evaluate dose escalation in subsequent cohorts, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was initially assessed during weeks 1-3 of treatment. Characteristics of the 18 patients accrued are as follows: performance status 0/1, n = 9; female sex, n = 9; extended-stage SCLC, n = 16; and median age, 53 years. Four patients treated at irinotecan dose level 1 (80 mg/m2), 6 patients at dose level 2 (90 mg/m2), and 6 patients at dose level 3 (100 mg/m2) did not experience DLT in weeks 1-4 and completed therapy without major incident. The only 2 patients to experience DLT during weeks 1-4 were treated at dose level 2. Both were hospitalized during week 4 and subsequently died. However, patients had already been accrued at dose level 3 and tolerated therapy well. Therefore, the trial design was modified to assess DLT during weeks 1-4, and additional patients were cautiously added to the dose level 2 and 3 cohorts. Analysis of summary toxicity data resulted in a recommendation that dose level 3 be used in phase II based on the probability of DLT of 16% (95% CI, 3%-29%). Responses in 16 evaluable patients include complete response in 1 patient, partial response in 14 patients, and minor response in 1 patient. With the exception of the 2 deaths, the therapy was well tolerated and active. Phase II evaluation of the regimen in patients with extensive-stage SCLC is ongoing.

Phase I study of weekly irinotecan combined with weekly cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have reported a synergistic effect between irinotecan and cisplatin. We have conducted a phase I trial combining these agents to find the optimal dose of irinotecan in combination with a fixed dose of cisplatin.

METHODS

Patients with advanced solid tumors, aged < or =75 years, performance status < or =2, and adequate organ function were enrolled in this study. They were treated at 4-week intervals with irinotecan plus 20 mg/m(2) cisplatin on days 1, 8, and 15. The starting dose of irinotecan of 40 mg/m(2) was escalated in 10 mg/m(2) increments until a maximum dose of 90 mg/m(2) was reached.

RESULTS

The recommended dose for phase II studies is 90 mg/m(2) of irinotecan and 20 mg/m(2) of cisplatin on days 1, 8, and 15. Overall response to the chemotherapy was 35% (95% confidential interval, 19.2-54.6%).

CONCLUSION

This combination seems to be active against lung cancer with acceptable toxicity. A phase II study is now ongoing.

Preoperative induction chemotherapy with cisplatin and irinotecan for pathological N(2) non-small cell lung cancer

We conducted a phase I/II study to investigate whether the surgical resection after induction chemotherapy with cisplatin and irinotecan was feasible and could improve the treatment outcome for patients with pathological N(2) non-small cell lung cancer. Fifteen patients with stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer having mediastinal lymph node metastases proved by mediastinoscopy were eligible. Both cisplatin (60 mg m(-2)) and irinotecan (50 mg m(-2)) were given on days 1 and 8. Patients received two cycles of chemotherapy after 3-4 weeks interval. Induction was followed by surgical resection in 4-6 weeks. Patients who had documented tumour regression after preoperative chemotherapy received two additional cycles of chemotherapy and other patients received radiotherapy postoperatively. After the induction chemotherapy, the objective response rate was 73%. All the 15 patients received surgical resection and complete resection was achieved in 11 (73%) patients. There was no operation-related death and one death due to radiation pneumonitis during postoperative radiotherapy. The median time from entry to final analysis was 46.5 months, ranging from 22 to 68 months. The 5-year survival rate was 40% for all the 15 patients and it was 55% for the 11 patients who underwent complete resection. We conclude that the surgical resection after induction chemotherapy with cisplatin and irinotecan is feasible, and associated with low morbidity and high respectability.

Polymorphisms of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase and pharmacokinetics of irinotecan

Irinotecan is a prodrug that is hydrolyzed by carboxylesterase in vivo to form an active metabolite SN-38. SN-38 is further conjugated and detoxified by UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) to yield its beta-glucuronide (SN-38G). Although irinotecan is widely used, the drug causes unpredictably severe, occasionally fatal, toxicity of leukopenia or diarrhea. Interindividual variation of sensitivity to irinotecan is related to large variations of biotransformation of the active metabolite SN-38, some of which would be caused by genetic polymorphism of UGT1A1, an isozyme responsible for the SN-38 glucuronidation. As a surrogate for the UGT activity, the polymorphic frequency distribution of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) ratios of SN-38 to SN-38G (AUC(SN-38)/AUC(SN-38G)) using pooled pharmacokinetic data from four independent study groups in Japan was explored. The data from 100 cancer patients was analyzed, including 14 who were genotyped for UGT1A1 gene in the previous studies. The median ratios of AUC(SN-38)/AUC(SN-38G) was 0.40 (interquartile range, 0.30 to 0.55; range, 0.09 to 2.32). Frequency distribution of the AUC (SN-38)/AUC(SN-38G) was skewed to the right without bimodality and the patient population could not be segregated into discrete subgroups that differ in the UGT activity by the AUC ratios. The 4 subjects carrying UGT1A1*28 allele had values of the AUC(SN-38)/AUC(SN-38G) above the 75th percentile of the total population, suggesting a potential pharmacogenetic/pharmacokinetic relationship. Ordinary values with a median of 0.41 (interquartile range, 0.33 to 0.49) were obtained for the UGT1A1*6 heterozygous patient and the 9 UGT1A1*1 homozygous patients (the reference sequence). The large variation in the UGT activity being related to the genetic status would warrant pharmacogenetic-guided dosing of irinotecan.

Advances in systemic therapy of small cell cancer of the lung

Over the last 20 years, progress in the therapy of small cell lung cancer has been painfully slow. Despite dramatic initial responses to chemotherapy, most patients relapse quickly with an overall 5-year survival of about 5%. Recent trials however offer some hope at changing this picture. Combining standard regimens with newer agents has doubled median survival in some cases. The use of novel targeted agents holds the promise of significantly increasing the survival in this disease, with manageable toxicity. This review outlines current treatment strategies, summarizes recent clinical trials and offers a view of what the next 5 years may hold for the treatment of small cell lung cancer.

Fractionated administration of irinotecan and cisplatin for treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study of Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group

A phase II study of fractionated administration of irinotecan (CPT-11) and cisplatin (CDDP) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was conducted. Between January 1996 and January 1998, 44 previously untreated patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were enrolled. CDDP at a dose of 60 mg x m(-2) was given first and followed by CPT-11 at a dose of 50 mg x m(-2). Both drugs were given by 1-hour infusion on days 1 and 8, and repeated every 4 weeks up to 4 cycles. 42 patients were evaluated for response and 44 for survival and toxicity. 20 patients (48%: 95% confidence interval 32-63%) achieved an objective response. The median duration of responses was 8 months, and the median survival time and the 1-year survival rate were 12.5 months and 56.8%, respectively. Major toxicities were neutropenia and diarrhoea. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 70.5% of the patients and one patient died of sepsis. Grade 3 or 4 diarrhoea was experienced in 25.0%, but manageable by conventional therapy. In conclusion, fractionated administration of CPT-11 and CDDP was highly effective for advanced NSCLC with manageable toxicities.

Oral topoisomerase 1 inhibitors in adult patients: present and future

The renewed interest in topoisomerase 1 inhibitors, based on new insights on the mechanism of action and the development of semi-synthetic derivates of camptothecin with a more favourable toxicity profile, has led to extensive preclinical and clinical research. Significant levels of anti-tumor activity in human tumor xenografts were seen especially with prolonged duration of exposure. Since oral drug delivery is a more convenient method for prolonged drug administration, and preferred by patients, further development of oral formulations seems attractive. Common concerns in the development of oral formulations are their sometimes low oral bioavailability and the frequently large intra- and interpatient variation in systemic exposure. Efforts to improve absorption and minimize intestinal metabolism/efflux of the oral chemotherapeutic agent using new formulas might lead to better bioavailability. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluations have enabled guidance in recommendations of schedules. Given the interpatient variation in exposure it is interesting to note that flat dosing of topotecan resulted in the same systemic exposure compared with the more complex dosing per body surface area. In order to diminish the interpatient variation in exposure to 9-AC a limited sampling model for oral 9-AC was developed, enabling prediction of the systemic exposure for 9-AC and optimizing treatment for any given patient. Drug sequencing plays a key role in the combination topotecan/cisplatin and might be important for combination with other classes of drugs. Therefore, forthcoming phase 1 trials on combination therapy with oral topoisomerase 1 inhibitors should include studies on sequence dependence and pharmacokinetic analyses to evaluate any mutual interaction.

Phase I study of 3-week schedule of irinotecan combined with cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors

PURPOSE

To assess the feasibility, pharmacokinetic interaction, and possible sequence-dependent effects of the irinotecan/cisplatin combination given every 3 weeks, and to assess the influence of additional granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on the hematologic toxicity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who had received no more than one prior combination chemotherapy regimen or two single-agent regimens were entered. Treatment consisted of a 90-minute irinotecan infusion followed by a 3-hour cisplatin infusion on day 1, with cycles repeated once every 3 weeks. After the maximum-tolerated dose was determined, the sequence of administration was reversed. In a separate cohort of six patients, we assessed the effect of G-CSF on the experienced hematologic toxicity and dose-intensity. Irinotecan doses ranged from 175 to 300 mg/m(2) and cisplatin doses ranged from 60 to 80 mg/m(2).

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients entered the study; one was not eligible, and two were not assessable for response. Twenty-five patients were pretreated, and 26 were not. Fifty-one patients received a total of 223 courses. The dose-limiting toxicity was a combination of neutropenic fever, diarrhea, and fatigue at a dose level combining irinotecan 300 mg/m(2) with cisplatin 80 mg/m(2). Neutropenia was common (grades 3 to 4, 68%). Irinotecan pharmacokinetics were linear over the dose range studied. No sequence-dependent side effects were observed. Tumor responses included three complete responses and eight partial responses.

CONCLUSION

For phase II studies, we recommend irinotecan 260 mg/m(2) combined with cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) once every 3 weeks for chemotherapy-naive patients in good physical condition, and irinotecan 200 mg/m(2) combined with cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) for other patients.

Pharmacokinetic, metabolic, and pharmacodynamic profiles in a dose-escalating study of irinotecan and cisplatin

PURPOSE

To investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of irinotecan and cisplatin administered once every 3 weeks in a dose-escalating study in patients with solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-two cancer patients were treated with irinotecan administered as a 90-minute infusion at doses ranging from 175 to 300 mg/m(2) followed by cisplatin administered as a 3-hour intravenous infusion at doses ranging from 60 to 80 mg/m(2). After reaching the maximum-tolerated dose, the sequence of drug administration was revised. For pharmacokinetic analysis, serial plasma samples were obtained on days 1 through 3 of the first cycle. Forty-five patients were assessable for irinotecan pharmacokinetics, and 46 were assessable for cisplatin pharmacokinetics.

RESULTS

Irinotecan and cisplatin demonstrated linear pharmacokinetics comparable to that observed with single-agent administration, which suggests an absence of pharmacokinetic interaction. SN-38G constituted the major plasma metabolite of irinotecan, whereas 7-ethyl-10-[4-N-(1-piperidino)1-amino]-carbonyloxycamptothecine (NPC) was only a minor metabolite in plasma, possibly indicating a rapid conversion of NPC to SN-38. The terminal elimination phases of SN-38 and SN-38G were similar and relatively delayed when compared with the elimination of irinotecan. Maximal DNA adduct formation did not significantly differ from that observed with single-agent administration. The percentage decrease in WBC was significantly related to the areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUCs) of the lactone form of irinotecan (P =.0245) and SN-38 (P =. 0123). The severity of diarrhea was not significantly related to the AUCs of irinotecan and SN-38, nor to the systemic glucuronidation rate of SN-38.

CONCLUSION

There was no apparent pharmacokinetic interaction between irinotecan and cisplatin in this study. Reversion of the administration sequence of the drugs did not seem to have any influence on the pharmacokinetics. The incidence and severity of delayed-type diarrhea was not related to any of the studied parameters.