Treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease with PUVA (psoralen and ultraviolet irradiation): results of a pilot study

Chronic graft-versus-host disease. Part II: Disease activity grading and therapeutic management

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a major complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation and a leading cause of long-term morbidity, nonrelapse mortality, and impaired health-related quality of life. The skin is commonly affected and presents heterogeneously, making the role of dermatologists critical in both diagnosis and treatment. In addition, new clinical classification and grading schemes inform treatment algorithms, which now include 3 Federal Drug Administration-approved therapies, and evolving transplant techniques are changing disease epidemiology. Part I reviews the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis of cGVHD. Part II discusses disease grading and therapeutic management.

A deep dive into UV-based phototherapy: Mechanisms of action and emerging molecular targets in inflammation and cancer

UV-based phototherapy (including psoralen plus UVA (PUVA), UVB and UVA1) has a long, successful history in the management of numerous cutaneous disorders. Photoresponsive diseases are etiologically diverse, but most involve disturbances in local (and occasionally systemic) inflammatory cells and/or abnormalities in keratinocytes that trigger inflammation. UV-based phototherapy works by regulating the inflammatory component and inducing apoptosis of pathogenic cells. This results in a fascinating and complex network of simultaneous events-immediate transcriptional changes in keratinocytes, immune cells, and pigment cells; the emergence of apoptotic bodies; and the trafficking of antigen-presenting cells in skin-that quickly transform the microenvironment of UV-exposed skin. Molecular elements in this system of UV recognition and response include chromophores, metabolic byproducts, innate immune receptors, neurotransmitters and mediators such as chemokines and cytokines, antimicrobial peptides, and platelet activating factor (PAF) and PAF-like molecules that simultaneously shape the immunomodulatory effects of UV and their interplay with the microbiota of the skin and beyond. Phototherapy's key effects-proapoptotic, immunomodulatory, antipruritic, antifibrotic, propigmentary, and pro-prebiotic-promote clinical improvement in various skin diseases such as psoriasis, atopic dermatitis (AD), graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), vitiligo, scleroderma, and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) as well as prevention of polymorphic light eruption (PLE). As understanding of phototherapy improves, new therapies (UV- and non-UV-based) are being developed that will modify regulatory T-cells (Treg), interact with (resident) memory T-cells and /or utilize agonists and antagonists as well as antibodies targeting soluble molecules such as cytokines and chemokines, transcription factors, and a variety of membrane-associated receptors.

Photochemotherapy and Graft-versus-Leukemia Reaction in Acute Leukemia: Tumor Immunity and Survival Are Dependent on Timing of Photochemotherapy of the Skin

BACKGROUND

Cure of acute leukemia after transplantation is mediated by the grafted cells. We investigated the graft-versus-leukemia effect (GVL) in patients with cutaneous acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) treated with photochemotherapy (psoralen and ultraviolet light type A).

METHOD

Forty-seven patients with acute leukemia were followed 5,000 days after transplantation to assess survival and GVL by multivariate analysis. The primary predictor was time to treatment of cutaneous acute GVHD by photochemotherapy separated into treatment start during the first week of acute GVHD versus after the first week of acute GVHD.

RESULTS

Photochemotherapy started after the first week of acute GVHD predicted GVL with a hazard ratio (HR) of 3.94 (95% confidence interval, CI, 1.67-9.33, p = 0.0018) and survival with preserved GVL with an HR of 2.63 (95% CI 1.30-5.32, p = 0.007). The effects on GVL and survival with preserved GVL were present regardless of whether the patients were transplanted in remission or relapse (p < 0.05). Chronic GVHD came earlier in the group that started photochemotherapy after 1 week of acute GHVD, but chronic GVHD did not increase the GVL.

CONCLUSION

The timing of photochemotherapy after cutaneous acute GVHD may direct the GVL and predict long-term leukemia-free survival.

Total synthesis of natural products containing benzofuran rings

In this review, various approaches for the construction of benzofurans as an important moiety in different natural products during the total synthesis of the natural of products are underscored.

Photochemotherapy of Cutaneous Graft-versus-Host Disease May Reduce Concomitant Visceral Disease

BACKGROUND

Photochemotherapy may be used to treat cutaneous graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). Animal models show that in the days after photochemotherapy and antigen provocation, cells with an antigen-specific suppressive phenotype are elicited in the lymphoid organs. In GvHD, host antigens are present not only in the skin treated by photochemotherapy but also in the visceral tissues.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this paper was to evaluate the effect on visceral acute GvHD (aGvHD) of photochemotherapy of the skin.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 33 patients with aGvHD of the skin, the liver, and/or the gastrointestinal tract treated with photochemotherapy for their aGvHD of the skin and did a long-term follow-up of 10 years on survival.

RESULTS

The complete response (CR) to photochemotherapy was 39%, the complete and partial response was 64% and the 6-month survival was 64%. Total body irradiation (TBI) before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation predisposed for CR of aGvHD of the liver and the gastrointestinal tract (p = 0.045). In the TBI group, the accumulated dose (numbers of treatments) for CR of visceral aGvHD increased with the body surface area affected by disease, from 8 (min-max: 5-14) for skin disease stage 1 to 10.5 (6-33) for stage 2 and 13 (11-21) for stage 3 (p = 0.04). Skin disease stage 1 showed a trend to be associated with CR in visceral disease at 28, 56, and 100 days (p = 0.07). Overall CR in visceral disease predicted a better 10-year overall survival (p = 0.0036). Finally, after TBI aGvHD of the gastrointestinal tract without anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG), clearance of T cells and dendritic cells responded better than aGvHD of the liver and aGvHD of the gastrointestinal tract with ATG (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Photochemotherapy after ionizing irradiation regulates the cell-mediated immunity in the viscera, and the systemic efficacy increases when the skin itself is less affected by disease. ATG modulates the regulatory effect of the gastrointestinal tract.

Specific removal of alloreactive T-cells to prevent GvHD in hemopoietic stem cell transplantation: rationale, strategies and perspectives

Hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a standard procedure for treatment of malignant and non-malignant hematological diseases. HSCT donors include HLA-identical siblings, matched or mismatched unrelated donors and haploidentical related donors. Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), mediated by donor alloreactive T-cells in the graft, can be triggered by minor histocompatibility antigens in HLA-identical pairs, by alleles at loci not considered for MUD-matching or by the mismatched haplotype in haplo-HSCT. Therefore, removal of donor T-cells, that contain the alloreactive precursors, is required, but T-cell depletion associates with opportunistic infections and with reduced graft-versus-leukemia effect. Selective T-cell depletion strategies have been introduced, like removal of αβ T-lymphocytes and of naive T-cells, two subsets including the alloreactive precursors, but the ultimate goal is specific removal of alloreactive T-cells. Here we review the different approaches to deplete alloreactive T-cells only and discuss pros and cons, specificity, efficiency and efficacy. Combinations of different methods and innovative approaches are also proposed for depleting specific alloreactive T-cells with high efficiency.

Phototherapy for the treatment of cutaneous graft versus host disease

Graft versus host disease (GvHD) occurs in half the patients who receive allogenic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation and is a major contributor for the morbidity and mortality in these patients. Immunosuppressant therapy cannot suppress all the manifestations of GvHD and new ways of treating the condition are needed. The focus of this review is the treatment of cutaneous GvHD through phototherapy. Of the six acute and ten chronic cutaneous GvHD case series examined the overall trend was that phototherapy was able to reduce the presence of cutaneous lesions of GvHD and, as a consequence, steroid use could be reduced. This provides a positive outlook for phototherapy as a treatment for cutaneous GvHD but there is a need for future studies to include larger numbers of patients in order to obtain more data.

Current practice in diagnosis and treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease: results from a survey among German-Austrian-Swiss hematopoietic stem cell transplant centers

To assess current clinical practice in diagnosis and treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), we performed a survey among German, Austrian, and Swiss allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) centers. Thirty-four of 72 contacted centers (47%) completed both the diagnostic and therapeutic sections of the survey, representing 65% of allo-HSCT activity within the participating countries in 2011. Three pediatric centers answered as requested only the diagnostic part of the survey. In the presence of diarrhea and decreased oral intake after engraftment, only 4 centers (12%) do not perform any endoscopy before the start of immunosuppressive treatment. In case of a skin rash with the differential diagnosis of drug reaction, only 12 centers (35%) perform a skin biopsy up front, whereas 19 do so after failure of systemic steroids. In the presence of rapidly increasing cholestasis occurring without any other signs of aGVHD, 11 centers (32%) perform a liver biopsy up front and 14 only after failure of steroid treatment, whereas 9 centers do not perform a liver biopsy at all. Twenty centers (59%) use a percutaneous approach, 12 a transvenous approach, and 1 mini-laparoscopy for liver biopsies. First-line treatment of cutaneous aGVHD stage 1 consists of topical treatment alone in 17 of 31 responding centers (61%), whereas isolated cutaneous aGVHD stage III is treated with systemic steroids (prednisolone below 0.5 mg/kg/day n = 2, 0.5 to 1.0 mg/kg/day n = 10, above 1.0 to 2.5 mg/kg/day n = 19) without or with topical agents (steroids n = 10; calcineurin inhibitors n = 3). In gastrointestinal manifestations of aGVHD, 9 centers (29%) add topical to systemic steroids, and 3 consider topical steroids as the only treatment for mild gastrointestinal and cutaneous aGVHD. The choice of agent for second-line treatment as well as the sequence of administration are extremely heterogeneous, most likely due to a lack of convincing data published. Most frequently used are mycophenolate mofetil (n = 14) and extracorporeal photopheresis (n = 10). Our survey also demonstrates that clinicians chose salvage therapies for steroid-refractory aGVHD based on their centers' own clinical experience.

Narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy for the treatment of steroid-refractory and steroid-dependent acute graft-versus-host disease of the skin

BACKGROUND

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) is a common complication of allogeneic stem cell transplantation. It is usually treated with high doses of corticosteroids and other immunosuppressive agents. When cutaneous features are predominant, narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) phototherapy may be an attractive option for its steroid-sparing effect.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to examine the clinical efficacy of NB-UVB in the treatment of steroid-refractory and steroid-dependent cutaneous aGvHD.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with steroid-refractory and steroid-dependent aGvHD, who received NB-UVB between 2005 and 2009 at our institution.

RESULTS

We identified 14 patients with aGvHD treated with NB-UVB between 2005 and 2009. The median number of treatments was 15, administered over a median of 43 days. Eight of 14 patients (57%) achieved a complete response at the end of treatment; an additional 3 patients (21%) achieved a partial response; and 3 patients (21%) showed no improvement at the time when phototherapy was discontinued (nonresponders). Four patients developed chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). Three of the 8 complete responders remained free of GvHD at 6 months' follow-up.

LIMITATIONS

The rarity of steroid-refractory aGvHD limited the study to a small number of participants. Because GvHD is variable in its presentation and course, and life-threatening in many cases, large controlled prospective trials for potential therapies are difficult.

CONCLUSIONS

NB-UVB is a viable option for the treatment of steroid-refractory and steroid-dependent aGvHD of the skin.

UVA (UVA-1) therapy for the treatment of acute GVHD of the skin

Long-wavelength UVA (340-400 nm UVA-1) phototherapy has been reported to be effective in atopic dermatitis, localized scleroderma and T-cell-derived skin diseases. We retrospectively investigated 70 patients with acute cutaneous GVHD after allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation or donor lymphocyte infusion. Complete and partial responses with a median duration of 10 months were achieved in 49 (70%) and 17 (24.3%) patients, respectively. Overall, 47 (67.1%) patients were not treated with systemic steroids. Furthermore, immunosuppression could be tapered in 24 (34.3%) patients while they were receiving UVA-1 treatment. Responses were seen irrespective of age or type of conditioning. Treatment was very well tolerated. After a median follow-up of 18 (range 10-60) months, three patients developed epithelial skin neoplasia. We conclude that UVA-1 therapy is feasible, well tolerated and can be an effective treatment for acute GVHD of the skin, thereby avoiding the use of systemic steroids and/or allowing a more rapid tapering of systemic immunosuppression in a substantial number of patients. The results of this retrospective analysis warrant larger, prospective studies and the effectiveness of UVA-1 therapy should be compared with other established treatment modalities.

Current and novel therapies in acute GVHD

Despite improvements in our understanding of transplant immunology and clinical and supportive care, acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a clinical challenge and a major cause of morbidity and mortality for patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. While systemic corticosteroid is standard primary therapy for acute GVHD, there is no established standard treatment in the steroid-refractory setting. New generations of monoclonal antibodies, biologics, and chemotherapeutics with immunomodulatory effects have been developed over the past decade, and are being tested as novel therapies in this disease. Many of these agents - including, among others, mycophenolate mofetil, anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha antibodies, denileukin diftitox, and anti-interleukin-2Ralpha-chain antibodies - have demonstrated promising activity in steroid-refractory acute GVHD. Despite the high response rates, however, long-term survival remains poor due to a high incidence of infections. The key to improving acute GVHD outcomes may, in fact, rest upon successful initial therapy, and timely taper of corticosteroids to promote healthier immune reconstitution. Clinical trials combining these newer agents with systemic corticosteroids as initial treatment are under way, and will determine whether fortifying initial therapy will indeed reduce the development of steroid-refractory GVHD and improve long-term outcomes. In this article, we review current and novel agents available for acute GVHD, and discuss newer investigational approaches - such as phototherapy and cellular therapies - in the management of this common transplant complication.

Fototerapia na doença enxerto contra hospedeiro

FUNDAMENTOS: A doença enxerto contra hospedeiro é um dos obstáculos ao sucesso do transplante de medula óssea, e o envolvimento cutâneo é freqüente. A fototerapia é utilizada devido à intensa atividade imunomoduladora local, sendo opção terapêutica adjuvante para as lesões cutâneas resistentes à terapia convencional. OBJETIVO: Realizar análise descritiva do tratamento da doença enxerto contra hospedeiro com fototerapia (Puva ou UVB de faixa estreita). MÉTODOS: Foram atendidos nove pacientes com manifestação cutânea da doença enxerto contra hospedeiro aguda ou crônica. Seis foram tratados com Puva, terapia de primeira escolha, e três com UVB de faixa estreita. As sessões foram realizadas três vezes por semana, e a resposta terapêutica avaliada após 12 sessões. RESULTADOS: Todos os pacientes com doença enxerto contra hospedeiro aguda mostraram melhora, com desaparecimento do eritema e do edema. Naqueles com doença crônica, observaram-se involução das lesões liquenóides e melhora da mobilidade daqueles com a forma esclerodermiforme. Dois pacientes apresentaram doença de evolução grave e foram a óbito. CONCLUSÃO: A fototerapia mostrou-se efetiva no tratamento das manifestações cutâneas da doença enxerto contra hospedeiro aguda e crônica. A Puva permite o controle da doença, podendo a UVB de faixa estreita ser opção para pacientes impossibilitados de usar medicação sistêmica.

A case of acute cutaneous graft-versus-host disease mimicking psoriasis vulgaris

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a frequent complication occurring after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and is divided into acute and chronic type. Cutaneous involvement is the most frequent manifestation of acute GVHD, with maculopapular exanthema and perifollicular papular lesions. We describe the first case to develop acute cutaneous GVHD mimicking psoriasis vulgaris shortly after allogenic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. The patient's rash resembled psoriasis vulgaris and showed histologic features of both psoriasis and acute GVHD. Despite various immunosuppressant therapies, the skin lesion was drug-resistant. Therefore, we administered psoralen-UVA (PUVA) therapy and achieved the desired therapeutic effect. As far as we know, this is the first case of psoriasiform skin eruption as a manifestation of acute GVHD.

Medium dose long-wavelength ultraviolet A (UVA1) phototherapy for the treatment of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease of the skin

Long-wavelength ultraviolet A (340-400 nm UVA1) phototherapy has been reported to be effective in atopic dermatitis, localized scleroderma and other T-cell-derived skin diseases. UVA1 as an adjunct to systemic immunosuppressive treatment was found to be safe, and effective in 10 patients with chronic cutaneous (seven lichenoid and three sclerodermoid) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after stem cell transplantation. Complete and partial responses were achieved in six (60%), and in three (30%) patients, respectively. One patient had improvement of sclerotic skin lesions. At a median follow-up of 14 months, two patients with lichenoid lesions relapsed. Both responded to another treatment cycle. Furthermore, we treated seven patients with UVA1 as primary therapy for acute cutaneous GVHD grades II and III in a pilot experience. Five patients had a complete response with no relapse at a median follow-up of 9 months after UVA1. Two patients showed no response and systemic steroids had to be started. UVA1 therapy is feasible, well tolerated and can be effective in treating chronic as well as acute GVHD confined to the skin thereby avoiding systemic steroids. Our results should be confirmed in larger studies and the effectiveness of UVA1 compared to other established treatment modalities.

Dermatologic treatment of cutaneous graft versus host disease

Cutaneous involvement in graft versus host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant can be separated into acute GVHD (aGVHD), lichenoid chronic GVHD (cGVHD) and sclerodermatous cGVHD. It seems clear that these syndromes result from different mechanisms and entail different treatment approaches. Standard treatment of cutaneous aGVHD involves the intensification of immunosuppressive therapy with adequate topical supportive management. In skin-limited disease, phototherapy has shown promising results. In cutaneous cGVHD, the combination of corticosteroids and cyclosporine (ciclosporin) is the recommended therapy, and other immunosuppressants may be added depending on whether lichenoid or sclerodermatous lesions are present. High response rates to phototherapy have been found in lichenoid disease, while sclerodermatous disease responds better to etretinate or extracorporeal photochemotherapy. Localized cutaneous cGVHD may be treated with topical corticosteroids alone. Few reports on the effect of treatments in GVHD clearly describe the cutaneous involvement and the influence of the treatment on the skin. Therefore, dermatologists should be deeply involved in the diagnosis and treatment of GVHD, and good dermatologic grading systems should be developed. Theses changes will increase our knowledge of cutaneous GVHD, and relevant data in the evaluation of the effect of therapy in the disease will be obtained.

Life-threatening graft-vs-host disease

Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (SCT) is considered standard therapy for a variety of malignant and nonmalignant diseases. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) still represents today a major complication of hematopoietic SCT. Two types of GVHD have traditionally been recognized on the basis of the time of onset following transplantation, distinct pathobiological pathways, and different clinical presentations. The acute form commonly breaks out 2 to 6 weeks after transplantation, affecting up to 60% of patients receiving allogeneic transplants from HLA identical donors. Transfer of immunocompetent donor T cells contained in the graft may undergo alloreactivity against recipient cells because of major or minor histocompatibility antigens disparities between the donor and the immunosuppressed host. Target specificity in acute GVHD involves preferential injury to epithelial surfaces of the skin and mucous membranes, biliary ducts of the liver, and crypts of the intestinal tract. Chronic GVHD affects approximately 30% to 80% of patients surviving 6 months or longer after stem cell transplantation and is the leading cause of nonrelapse deaths occurring more than 2 years after transplantation. Chronic GVHD is a multiorgan syndrome with clinical features suggesting some autoimmune diseases, and possibly both alloreactive and autoreactive T cell clones are involved in its pathophysiology. Although GVHD may convey beneficial graft-versus-leukemia/lymphoma effects, it also entails a significant risk of morbidity and mortality. Patients with mild GVHD need only minimal, if any, immunosuppressive treatment, whereas prognosis of patients with extensive disease or resistant to standard immunosuppressive treatment may be dismal. Early recognition of GVHD followed by prompt therapeutic intervention may prevent the progression to higher-grade disease and improve the outcome for patients receiving hematopoietic SCT.

Novel approaches in GVHD therapy

Severe graft-versus-host disease is a lethal complication to allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation. This short review gives an overview of novel treatment strategies. Psoralen-enhanced UVA irradiation (PUVA), extracorpoal PUVA, antibodies against IL-2 and TNF-alpha, thalidomide, octreotide, and mesenchymal stem cells are briefly discussed.

Phototherapy and PUVA photochemotherapy in children

The use of phototherapy and photochemotherapy in children has been limited due to concerns over their long-term carcinogenic potential. Furthermore, the method of administration is disconcerting to some children, particularly as phototherapy treatment units are seldom rendered 'child-friendly'. Despite these reservations, ultra-violet therapies can be useful treatment options for children with selected dermatological conditions provided they are used under carefully controlled conditions.