Intensive sequential dose dense chemotherapy with stem cell support as first-line treatment in advanced ovarian carcinoma: a phase II study

Comparing Paclitaxel-Carboplatin with Paclitaxel-Cisplatin as the Front-Line Chemotherapy for Patients with FIGO IIIC Serous-Type Tubo-Ovarian Cancer

The use of weekly chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with advanced-stage serous-type epithelial Tubo-ovarian cancer (ETOC), and primary peritoneal serous carcinoma (PPSC) is acceptable as the front-line postoperative chemotherapy after primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS). The main component of dose-dense chemotherapy is weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m²), but it would be interesting to know what is the difference between combination of triweekly cisplatin (20 mg/m²) or triweekly carboplatin (carboplatin area under the curve 5-7 mg/mL per min [AUC 5-7]) in the dose-dense paclitaxel regimen. Therefore, we compared the outcomes of women with Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC ETOC and PPSC treated with PCS and a subsequent combination of dose-dense weekly paclitaxel and triweekly cisplatin (paclitaxel–cisplatin) or triweekly carboplatin using AUC 5 (paclitaxel–carboplatin). Between January 2010 and December 2016, 40 women with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC EOC, FTC, or PPSC were enrolled, including 18 treated with paclitaxel–cisplatin and the remaining 22 treated with paclitaxel–carboplatin. There were no statistically significant differences in disease characteristics of patients between two groups. Outcomes in paclitaxel–cisplatin group seemed to be little better than those in paclitaxel–carboplatin (median progression-free survival [PFS] 30 versus 25 months as well as median overall survival [OS] 58.5 versus 55.0 months); however, neither reached a statistically significant difference. In terms of adverse events (AEs), patients in paclitaxel–carboplatin group had more AEs, with a higher risk of neutropenia and grade 3/4 neutropenia, and the need for a longer period to complete the front-line chemotherapy, and the latter was associated with worse outcome for patients. We found that a period between the first-time chemotherapy to the last dose (6 cycles) of chemotherapy >21 weeks was associated with a worse prognosis in patients compared to that ≤21 weeks, with hazard ratio (HR) of 81.24 for PFS and 9.57 for OS. As predicted, suboptimal debulking surgery (>1 cm) also contributed to a worse outcome than optimal debulking surgery (≤1 cm) with HR of 14.38 for PFS and 11.83 for OS. Based on the aforementioned findings, both regimens were feasible and effective, but maximal efforts should be made to achieve optimal debulking surgery and following the on-schedule administration of dose-dense weekly paclitaxel plus triweekly platinum compounds. Randomized trials validating the findings are warranted.

Are there candidates for high-dose chemotherapy in ovarian carcinoma?

Background

Prognosis of advanced ovarian carcinomas (AOC) remains poor with a 5-year survival of 30%. Benefit from high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) in this disease has not been demonstrated to date.

Methods

To evaluate the value of HDC as consolidation treatment after surgery and platinum/taxane-based therapy, we designed a monocentric retrospective comparative study. We used a subset approach to identify parameters associated with HDC efficacy.

Results

One hundred and three AOC patients treated with conventional chemotherapy alone (CCA) were compared to 60 patients receiving HDC plus hematopoietic stem cell support. After a median follow-up of 47.5 months there was no overall survival (OS) advantage for the HDC group in the whole population (p=0.29). Nevertheless, HDC was associated to a better outcome in young patients (≤50 years), both in term of progression-free survival (p=0.02, log-rank test) and OS (p=0.05, log-rank test). Median OS was 54.6 and 36 months in the HDC and CCA groups, respectively.

Conclusions

Although randomized trials failed to demonstrate any benefit for HDC in AOC patients, this study suggests that young patients may derive a substantial advantage from receiving it after the standard treatment. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm this gain and to search for the biological processes associated with this improvement.

Post-operative sequential high-dose chemotherapy with haematopoietic stem cell support as front-line treatment in advanced ovarian cancer: a phase II multicentre study

In spite of multimodal management including aggressive surgery and chemotherapy, the prognosis of advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) remains poor. Multicycle high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with haematopoietic stem cell (HSC) support has been shown to be a promising procedure in various cancers including AOC. We conducted a phase II multicentre study to evaluate feasibility, toxicity and efficacy of post-operative front-line sequential HDC with HSC support in AOC. Thirty four patients with stage IIIC/IV received a post-operative sequential combination of high-dose cyclophosphamide/epirubicin (D1, D21) with HSC harvesting, high-dose carboplatin (D42, D98) followed by HSC infusion, and dose-dense paclitaxel (D63, D77, D119, D133). Rh-G-CSF (filgrastim) was administered following all cycles. Primary endpoint was pathological complete response rate (pCR). Thirty patients received at least 7 of the scheduled 8 cycles. Haematological toxicity was significant but manageable. Grade 3/4 extra-haematopoietic toxicities were relatively uncommon and reversible. No toxicity-related death was observed. The observed pCR was 37% and did not reach the initial endpoint. Post-operative front-line sequential HDC in AOC is feasible and safe in a multicentre setting. The observed pCR does not support a clear advantage over conventional treatment. This approach remains an experimental strategy to further optimise and validate.

Future directions in the management of ovarian cancer

As investigators at the bench define the oncogenic pathways involved in ovarian cancer growth and invasion, clinical scientists will develop therapies to target these important pathways. The approach to the treatment of ovarian cancer will change to focus on strategies designed to eliminate minimal residual disease after primary therapy and in this way cure the disease. Concepts of consolidation after standard adjuvant chemotherapy and maintenance regimens will start to be evaluated for clinical efficacy. In addition, the focus on recurrent disease may change from repeated cytotoxic approaches to regimens chosen to prevent invasion or the development of drug resistance, changing the approach to ovarian cancer recurrence to a treatment plan of managing a chronic, but not imminently terminal, disease.