Effect of thalidomide on stem cell collection and engraftment in patients with multiple myeloma

Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma

BACKGROUND

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematologic malignancy, affecting approximately 14,000 new patients in the United State per year. The median overall survival is 5 years, and cure is a realistic goal for only a small minority of patients.

METHODS

A review of the literature was conducted that focused on treatment strategies for MM involving administration of high doses of chemotherapy followed by autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

RESULTS

For over three decades, the standard treatment for MM has been a regimen of melphalan and prednisone (MP). Complete responses (CRs) have been rare, and 50% of patients have had disease that was resistant to treatment with MP. Attempts have been made to improve the outcome of MM by administering other combinations of standard doses of chemotherapy, but these treatments are equivalent in terms of overall survival. For patients who are candidates, high-dose therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation results in higher CR rates and improved long-term survival compared to treatment with standard doses of chemotherapy alone. While this strategy represents an advance in the treatment of MM, evidence-based reviews indicate that there are a number of issues to consider regarding the induction therapy, the collection of stem cells, and the timing, type, and number of high-dose therapies to use in this type of treatment strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

Advances have been made in autologous transplantation, allogeneic transplantation, anti-MM agents, and immunotherapy for MM. Combining these different strategies to achieve synergistic responses is an exciting possibility.

Efficacy of vinorelbine plus granulocyte colony-stimulation factor for CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma

We aimed to assess the efficacy of vinorelbine plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for chemo-mobilization of CD34(+) hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) in patients with multiple myeloma and to identify adverse risk factors for successful mobilization. Vinorelbine 35 mg/m(2) was administered intravenously on day 1 in an outpatient setting. Filgrastim 5 μg/kg body weight (BW) was given twice daily subcutaneously from day 4 until the end of the collection procedure. Leukapheresis was scheduled to start on day 8 and be performed for a maximum of 3 consecutive days until at least 4 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells per kg BW were collected. Overall, 223 patients were mobilized and 221 (99%) patients proceeded to leukapheresis. Three (1.5%) patients required an unscheduled hospitalization after chemo-mobilization because of neutropenic fever and renal failure (n = 1), severe bone pain (n = 1), and abdominal pain with constipation (n = 1). In 211 (95%) patients, the leukaphereses were started as planned at day 8, whereas in 8 (3%) patients the procedure was postponed to day 9 and in 2 (1%) patients to day 10. In the great majority of patients (77%), the predefined amount of HPC could be collected with 1 leukapheresis. Forty-four (20%) patients needed a second leukapheresis, whereas only 6 (3%) patients required a third leukapheresis procedure. The median number of CD34(+) cells collected was 6.56 × 10(6) (range, .18 to 25.9 × 10(6)) per kg BW at the first day of leukapheresis and 7.65 × 10(6) (range, .18 to 25.9 × 10(6)) per kg BW in total. HPC collection was successful in 212 (95%) patients after a maximum of 3 leukaphereses. Patient age (P = .02) and prior exposition to lenalidomide (P < .001) were independent risk factors for a lower HPC amount collected in multiple regression analysis. Vinorelbine plus G-CSF enables a very reliable prediction of the timing of leukapheresis and results in successful HPC collection in 95% of the patients.

Factors impacting stem cell mobilization failure rate and efficiency in multiple myeloma in the era of novel therapies: experience at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Thalidomide, lenalidomide and bortezomib have increasingly been incorporated in first-line induction therapies for multiple myeloma. Concerns regarding the impact of these agents, especially lenalidomide, on stem cell mobilization prompted us to re-evaluate the risk factors that impact mobilization, including exposure to novel induction regimens. Among 317 patients who proceeded to stem cell collection after induction therapy between 2000 and 2009, the rate of mobilization failure, defined as the inability to collect 5 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg following the first collection attempt, was 13%. By multivariate analysis, independent risk factors associated with mobilization failure included older age (P=0.04), lower platelet count (P=0.002) and use of single-agent G-CSF for mobilization (P<0.0001). When considering for outcome measurement stem cell collection efficiency measured by the number of CD34+ cells yielded per pheresis performed during first collection attempt, lower platelet count, use of single-agent G-CSF and older age were also associated with lower efficiency. In this population mobilized mostly with cyclophosphamide and G-CSF, the use of lenalidomide during induction was not associated with a lower stem cell collection efficiency by multivariate analysis. The data support the current International Multiple Myeloma Working Group guidelines recommending the use of cyclophosphamide and G-CSF based mobilization for patients previously exposed to lenalidomide.

Lower dose dexamethasone/thalidomide and zoledronic acid every 3 weeks in previously untreated multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND

Physicians in Asia have anecdotally reported that Asian patients with multiple myeloma (MM) are frequently intolerant of conventional doses of dexamethasone (Dex) and/or thalidomide (Thal). Since zoledronic acid (Zol) has an anti-MM effect in preclinical studies, we investigated whether the approved 3-times-weekly Zol combined with lower dose Dex/Thal could be an effective and better tolerated regimen in Asian patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this first Asian cooperative multicenter phase II study, previously untreated patients with MM (N = 44) received up to 6 cycles of 3-times-weekly low-dose Dex/Thal and 4 mg Zol (the dtZ regimen). Response was graded using Bladé criteria.

RESULTS

The average doses of Dex and Thal administered were 185.2 mg/month; and 87.5 mg/day, respectively. Thirty-nine (88.6%) patients demonstrated at least a partial response (PR), including 18.2% very good partial response (VGPR), 15.9% near complete response (nCR) and 18.2% complete response (CR). Achievement of CR/nCR was related to significant (P < .05), rapid, and sustained inhibition of osteoclasts (OCs) and OC precursors (pOCs) by Zol. Sepsis was the most frequently reported serious toxicity, contributing to 3 of 4 deaths. Importantly, there was no peripheral neuropathy, osteonecrosis of the jaw, or nephrotoxicity.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the dtZ regimen is an effective and well-tolerated regimen for Asian patients with newly diagnosed MM. The high rate of VGPR/nCR/CR suggests that Zol could have a clinically relevant anti-MM effect. Since infections are the most frequent adverse event, it is probably wise to further lower the dose of Dex in future studies.

A phase I safety study of enzastaurin plus bortezomib in the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and identify the recommended doses of enzastaurin and bortezomib in combination for future Phase II studies in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Three dose levels (DLs) of oral enzastaurin and intravenous bortezomib were used according to a conventional "3 + 3" design. A loading dose of enzastaurin (250 mg twice/day [BID]) on Day 1 was followed by enzastaurin 125 mg BID for 1 week, after which bortezomib was added (Cycle 1, 28 days, 1.0 mg/m(2) : Days 8, 11, 15, and 18; seven subsequent 21-day cycles, 1.3 mg/m(2) : Days 1, 4, 8, and 11). Twenty-three patients received treatment; all patients received prior systemic therapy. Most patients received ≥3 regimens; 17 patients were bortezomib-refractory. A median of four treatment cycles (range 1-24) was completed. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed; thus, DL 3 was the recommended Phase II dose. The most common drug-related Grade 3/4 toxicities were thrombocytopenia (n = 6) and anemia (n = 2). No patients died on therapy. One patient (DL 1) achieved a very good partial response; three patients (DLs 2 and 3), a partial response; nine patients, stable disease; and four patients, progressive disease. The recommended Phase II doses in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma are as follows: enzastaurin loading dose of 375 mg three times/day on Day 1 followed by 250 mg BID, with bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21-day cycle. The combination was well-tolerated and demonstrated some antimyeloma activity.

Current status of stem cell mobilization

New advances in effective mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells have permitted a greater proportion of patients to benefit from autologous stem cell transplantation. In this review, the relative merits of peripheral blood and mobilized bone marrow are discussed. All available agents are reviewed. A critical assessment of the appropriate dosing and frequency of available growth factors is undertaken, and the most commonly used chemotherapy plus growth factor combinations are covered. Specific recommendations for patients who are poor mobilizers are dealt with including the role of plerixafor.

CXCR4 expression on transplanted peripheral blood CD34+ cells: relationship to engraftment after autologous transplantation in a cohort of multiple myeloma patients

Expression of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 by haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) is believed to influence the process of these cells 'homing' back to the bone marrow post-transplantation, in response to the stromal cell-derived factor-1 gradient, followed by engraftment. The primary aim of this retrospective study was to compare reinfused CD34(+) cell dose, assessed from the fresh collection, with the post-thaw viable (v) CD34(+) and vCD34/CXCR4(+) dual positive cell dose as predictors of haematopoietic recovery in multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation. Cryopreserved samples from stem cell collections of 27 myeloma patients were analysed for CD34 and CXCR4 expression and times to haematological engraftment measured. Dosage of transplanted vCD34(+) cells was on average 79% of the original calculation from the fresh collection bag (range 29-98%). The median percentage of vCD34+ cells co-expressing CXCR4 was 37% (3.7-97%). Surface expression of CXCR4 by thawed vCD34(+) cells was closely correlated to complementary DNA levels. The median dose of CD34/CXCR4(+) cells in the autografts was 1.2 × 10(6)/kg (0.2-3.0 × 10(6)/kg) compared with 3.3 × 10(6)/kg for transplanted vCD34(+) cells (1.2-5.5 × 10(6)/kg). Both CD34 and vCD34 doses correlated with neutrophil engraftment (p < 0.005) although vCD34/CXCR4(+) dose did not. However, patients given a higher dose of CD34/CXCR4(+) cells (≥1.75 × 10(6)/kg) showed a faster time to platelet recovery (p < 0.05) than those given a lower dose (≤0.42 × 10(6)/kg). These results warrant further study of CD34/CXCR4 expression by mobilised HSCs and the relationship to platelet recovery post-transplantation on a larger cohort of patients.

Induction treatment with cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a phase II study

BACKGROUND

Thalidomide has alternative mechanisms of action; it can be combined with dexamethasone or alkylating agents for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM); however, the optimal doses and appropriate intervals of thalidomide continue to be debated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We assessed the clinical efficacy and toxicity of thalidomide in patients with newly diagnosed MM; 68 patients were treated with pulsed cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (CTD) chemotherapy for induction treatment.

RESULTS

After a median of 28 months' follow-up, the overall response rate was 79.4%, with a 42.6% complete response (CR) or very good partial response (VGPR). Patients with cytogenetically high-risk disease had poor CR/VGPR rates (27.3%) at a median of 11.5 months of time to progression (TTP) compared with patients with standard-risk disease who achieved CR/VGPR rates (50%) at a median of 20.3 months of TTP. The major adverse events included peripheral sensory neuropathy (14.3%), infection (10.2%), and thromboembolic complications (5.9%). Thirty-two patients who achieved more than a PR proceeded to peripheral blood stem cell collection with a median number of 5.0 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg collected.

CONCLUSION

CTD resulted in a favorable response with tolerable toxicity in patients with MM and did not affect the yield of the stem cell collection.

High rate of stem cell mobilization failure after thalidomide and oral cyclophosphamide induction therapy for multiple myeloma

Novel agents are increasingly used during induction therapy for multiple myeloma (MM), but there is concern about their potential impact on stem cell mobilization. Regimens containing either thalidomide or cyclophosphamide have little or no impact on stem cell collection. In this retrospective review of 136 patients with newly diagnosed MM, we show that the combination of thalidomide and oral CY with dexamethasone (CTD) during induction therapy impaired stem cell mobilization substantially. Compared with VAD (vincristine, doxorubicin, dexamethasone) and a VAD-like induction regimen, the stem cell collection yield after CTD was decreased by 49% (median 5.0 vs 9.8 × 10(6) CD34+cells/kg, P<0.001). Following CTD, more patients failed to mobilize enough stem cells for one (25.4 vs 5.8%, P=0.002) or two (39.4 vs 15.9%, P=0.002) transplants. These results demonstrate that the combination of thalidomide and oral CY impairs stem cell mobilization and indicate that drugs with no previously reported relevant effect on stem cell mobilization can have a substantial impact when given in combination.

How best to use new therapies in multiple myeloma

Advances in the molecular understanding of myeloma have led to the development of novel agents such as immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and proteasome inhibitors (bortezomib). When used alone, these agents have significant activity against myeloma and responses increase significantly when they are combined with additional agents including glucocorticosteroids and chemotherapeutic agents such as alkylators. There is a drive to use these novel agents in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma, where they lead to impressive response rates with increasing duration of responses. In addition, novel agents are now the mainstays of therapy for relapsed disease. In the following paper, we summarize the key observations from recent completed and ongoing studies that determined the effect of these novel therapies both in the setting of newly diagnosed myeloma and for relapsed disease. We also discuss our approach to the use of these agents in specific myeloma settings.

Plerixafor and G-CSF versus placebo and G-CSF to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma

This phase 3, multicenter, randomized (1:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the safety and efficacy of plerixafor with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in mobilizing hematopoietic stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma. Patients received G-CSF (10 microg/kg) subcutaneously daily for up to 8 days. Beginning on day 4 and continuing daily for up to 4 days, patients received either plerixafor (240 microg/kg) or placebo subcutaneously. Starting on day 5, patients began daily apheresis for up to 4 days or until more than or equal to 6 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg were collected. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who collected more than or equal to 6 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg in less than or equal to 2 aphereses. A total of 106 of 148 (71.6%) patients in the plerixafor group and 53 of 154 (34.4%) patients in the placebo group met the primary endpoint (P < .001). A total of 54% of plerixafor-treated patients reached target after one apheresis, whereas 56% of the placebo-treated patients required 4 aphereses to reach target. The most common adverse events related to plerixafor were gastrointestinal disorders and injection site reactions. Plerixafor and G-CSF were well tolerated, and significantly more patients collected the optimal CD34(+) cell/kg target for transplantation earlier compared with G-CSF alone. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00103662.

Serum M-spike and transplant outcome in patients with multiple myeloma

High dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT-ASCT) has prolonged survival in patients with multiple myeloma. Patients who achieve a complete response (CR) benefit the most from this form of therapy. Thus, achieving a CR is an important goal of therapy and it will be beneficial if the probability of achieving CR can be determined for any patient before transplant. Here we report that pretransplant monoclonal protein level (M-spike) was found to be an important predictor. Thus, we used knowledge of the rate of M-protein production by myeloma cells together with the clearance of the protein to estimate the pretransplant disease burden. We show that the pretransplant disease burden, based on the M-spike, is the only predictor for achieving CR. A simple function that describes this probability is presented. We also provide an estimate of the rate of tumor regrowth in patients who obtain a CR and in patients who only get a partial response with HDT-ASCT. The significant expansion of myeloma cells after HDT-ASCT is clearly evident. Clinical trials must be designed that take into account these kinetic aspects of the disease.

Impact of lenalidomide therapy on stem cell mobilization and engraftment post-peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma

While initial therapies have become highly effective with introduction of lenalidomide and bortezomib and patients may opt for delayed stem cell transplantation, it is important to collect stem cells for future transplant. Given its increasing use as initial therapy, we examined if lenalidomide had any impact on the ability to collect peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). We studied the entire cohort of patients with myeloma undergoing PBSC mobilization at our institution during a 5-year period, comparing the results between patients receiving different initial therapies. Among those mobilized with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone, there was a significant decrease in total CD34(+) cells collected (P<0.001), average daily collection (P<0.001), day 1 collection (P<0.001) and increased number of aphereses (P=0.004) in patients treated with lenalidomide compared to those receiving dexamethasone, thalidomide-dexamethasone or VAD. A similar trend was seen in those mobilized with chemotherapy and G-CSF. A trend was seen towards decreased PBSC yield with increasing duration of lenalidomide therapy as well as increasing age (P=0.002). There was no effect on quality of PBSC collected based on similar engraftment across all groups. We recommend collection of PBSC within 6 months of initiation of therapy with lenalidomide containing regimens to minimize the risk of mobilization failures.

Thalidomide in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: influence of thalidomide treatment on peripheral blood stem cell collection yield

In a phase III randomized, multicenter study, the German-speaking Myeloma-Multicenter Group (GMMG) and the Dutch-Belgian Hemato-Oncology Cooperative Group (HOVON) group investigated the influence of thalidomide (Thal) on the outcome of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection in multiple myeloma (MM) before peripheral autologous blood stem cell transplantation (ABSCT). We analyzed the data of 398 myeloma patients after induction with Thal, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (TAD) in comparison with vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (VAD) followed by mobilization with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, dexamethasone (CAD) and PBSC collection. Within both the study groups, patients treated with TAD showed to collect significantly fewer CD34(+) cells compared with VAD (GMMG, TAD: median 9.8 x 10(6)/kg; range 2.0-33.6; VAD: median 10.9 x 10(6)/kg range 3.0-36.0; P=0.02) (HOVON, TAD: median 7.4 x 10(6)/kg; range 2.0-33.0; VAD: median 9.4 x 10(6)/kg; range 0.0-48.7; P=0.009). However, engraftment after peripheral autologous stem cell transplantation showed no difference between Thal and VAD groups. We conclude that Thal as a part of induction regimen is associated with better response rates (GMMG-HD3: CR/PR 79%, VAD: CR/PR 58%; HOVON-50: TAD: CR/PR 81%, VAD: CR/PR 61%), but significantly affects the yield of PBSC collection. Nevertheless, the number of total CD34(+) cells collected was sufficient for double autologous transplantation in 82% of the Thal patients, with at least 2.5 x 10(6)/kg CD34(+) cells.

Phase I Trial of First-Line Bortezomib/Thalidomide plus Chemotherapy for Induction and Stem Cell Mobilization in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

BACKGROUND

In preclinical studies, bortezomib was shown to suppress tumor growth, sensitize malignant cells to apoptosis, and reverse chemotherapy resistance.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We evaluated the addition of escalating doses of bortezomib 0.7, 1, and 1.3 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 4, and 8 to DT-PACE (cisplatin 10 mg/m2, doxorubicin 10 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 400 mg/m2, and etoposide 40 mg/m2 per day by intravenous continuous infusion on days 1-4) plus oral dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1-4 and thalidomide 200 mg on days 1-8 in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma. Peripheral blood stem cells were collected after cycle 1. Twelve patients completed the study, and all received autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT).

RESULTS

Hematologic toxicities were predictable, with 3 episodes of neutropenic fever. Grade >/= 2 nonhematologic toxicities included diarrhea (n = 1), deep vein thrombosis (n = 2), hypotension (n = 2), syncope (n = 1), and peripheral neuropathy (n = 3). The median number of CD34+ cells collected was 20.57 x 10 superset6 CD34+ cells/kg. After 2 cycles, 10 of 12 patients exhibited a partial response or better. Best response after autologous SCT, complete response/near complete response was exhibited in 9 patients, and partial response was exhibited in 3 patients. At a median of 20 months, 4 patients experienced relapse and 1 had died. Bortezomib/DT-PACE compared favorably with DT-PACE with regard to leukapheresis days, total CD34+ cell collection, and engraftment.

CONCLUSION

This novel strategy of simultaneous proteasome inhibition in combination with thalidomide and chemotherapy was effective and safe, allowing for adequate stem cell collection and early autologous SCT; its impact on overall survival, especially in patients with high-risk myeloma, awaits further investigation.

Multiple myeloma: diagnosis and treatment

Major advances have occurred in our understanding of the biology of multiple myeloma (MM) and in its treatment in the past decade. New diagnostic criteria have been developed, and an international Staging System has replaced the Durle-Salmon Staging System. It is now possible to classify MM as standard risk or high risk on the basis of specific Independent prognostic factors. The role of single and double autologous stem cell transplantation has been clarified by randomized trials. Most importantly, thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide have emerged as new active agents and are being incorporated rapidly into the treatment of both newly diagnosed and relapsed MM. The current approach to the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of MM is reviewed.

First-line thalidomide–dexamethasone therapy in preparation for autologous stem cell transplantation in young patients (<61 years) with symptomatic multiple myeloma

Thalidomide-dexamethasone therapy was given in patients (<61 years) with previously untreated symptomatic multiple myeloma. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of this combination as first-line therapy, and to determine its effect on stem cell collection and engraftment. During first-line therapy, thalidomide and dexamethasone were administered for 75 days (200 mg/day) and 3 months, respectively. The monthly dose of dexamethasone was 20 mg/m2/day for 4 days, with cycles repeated on days 9 to 12 and 17 to 20 on the first and the third month of therapy. After first-line therapy, a collection of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) was performed. Between May 2003 and September 2004, 60 patients were included. On an intent-to-treat basis, the overall response (> or =partial response) rate was 74%, including 24% of patients who obtained a complete remission. Grade 3-4 toxicities consisted of infections (12%), deep-vein thrombosis (3%), constipation (5%), and neuropathy (5%). A total of 58 patients (96%) proceeded to PBSC mobilisation and yielded a median number of 8 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. First-line thalidomide-dexamethasone therapy is effective and relatively well tolerated in young patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma. This combination does not affect PBSC mobilisation.

Superiority of thalidomide and dexamethasone over vincristine-doxorubicindexamethasone (VAD) as primary therapy in preparation for autologous transplantation for multiple myeloma

The aim of the present study was to compare thalidomide-dexamethasone (Thal-Dex) and vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone (VAD) as primary therapy in preparation for autologous peripheral blood stem-cell (PBSC) transplantation for multiple myeloma (MM). For this purpose, we performed a retrospective matched case-control analysis of 200 patients who entered 2 consecutive studies from 1996 to 2004 and received Thal-Dex (n = 100) or VAD (n = 100) administered for 4 months before collection of PBSCs and autologous transplantation. Matching criteria included age, clinical stage, and serum beta2-microglobulin levels. In comparison with VAD, Thal-Dex resulted in a significantly higher response rate (52% versus 76%, respectively; P < .001) and effected more profound reduction in myeloma cell mass of both immunoglobulin G (IgG; P = .02) and IgA (P = .03) type. More frequent toxicities included nonfatal deep vein thrombosis with Thal-Dex (15%) and granulocytopenia with VAD (12%). In each of the 2 treatment groups, 91% of patients proceeded to PBSC mobilization. The median number of collected CD34+ cells was 7.85 x 10(6)/kg in the Thal-Dex group and 10.5 x 10(6)/kg in the control group. Thal-Dex may be considered an effective and relatively well-tolerated oral alternative to the more complex VAD regimen as front-line therapy for MM patients who are candidates for subsequent autologous transplantation.

An evaluation of factors predicting long-term response to thalidomide in 234 patients with relapsed or resistant multiple myeloma

The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of pretreatment clinical and laboratory parameters in refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) patients who have a long-term response to thalidomide (THAL), lasting at least 18 months. The study was carried out on 234 patients who received THAL for relapsed/refractory myeloma. Out of the 234 patients, 129 patients (55.1%) responded to THAL with a mean response duration of 11.9 months (ranging from 1 to 48) and an overall survival rate of 20.3 months (ranging 1–55 months). In 64 patients (27.4% of the whole group), the response to THAL lasted ⩾18 months with a mean response lasting 24 months. Statistical analysis of the group of nonresponders and patients with long-term response to THAL showed a significantly higher serum albumin level (P=0.0003) and haemoglobin level (P=0.05), as well as a lower β2 microglobulin (β2M) (P=0.022), LDH (P=0.045) serum level in patients with long-term response. In this study, the LDH and serum albumin level were predictors for response to THAL therapy. The β2M serum level was not a predictor for response to THAL. The albumin serum level was the best parameter distinguishing the group of patients with long-term response to THAL from the entire responding group (P=0.02).

Thalidomide : mécanismes d'action et indications en hématologie

Purpose. - Thalidomide, a major teratogen drug, was rehabilitated mainly in malignant hemopathy. Current knowledge and key points. - Thalidomide-mechanisms of action are well known, multiple, they combine immunomodulatory, antiangiogenic properties, and the modulation of cytokines, particularly tumour necrosis factor-alpha. Multiple trials are ongoing, however, the main indication remain multiple myeloma with a response rate of 30% in relapsed patients. Future prospects and projects. - New structural analogues of the thalidomide which priviligiate some of the thalidomide-specific mechanisms of action, the selected cytokine inhibitory drugs (SelCIDS) and the immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) family are under evaluation. The IMiDs, which mechanism is based on stimulation of T lymphopoiesis rather than inhibition of tumour necrosis factor-alpha, are under clinical trials in multiple myeloma with interesting results.

Thalidomide in combination with vincristine, epirubicin and dexamethasone (VED) for previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma

The present study aimed to evaluate the side-effects and efficacy of thalidomide in combination with an anthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimen in previously untreated myeloma patients. Thalidomide (400 mg/d) was combined with bolus injections of vincristine and epirubicin and oral dexamethasone (VED). Chemotherapy cycles were repeated every 3 wk until no further reduction in myeloma protein was observed, whereas the treatment with thalidomide was continued until disease progression. Thirty-one patients were enrolled, 12 patients were exclusively treated with thalidomide in combination with VED and 19 patients additionally received high-dose melphalan, for consolidation. Adverse events and response to therapy were assessed prior to treatment with high-dose chemotherapy. Response to thalidomide combined with VED was complete remission in six patients (19%), partial remission in 19 patients (61%), stable disease in five patients (16%), and progressive disease in one patient (3.2%). Grade 3 and 4 adverse events consisted of leukocytopenia in 10 patients (32%), and thrombocytopenia and anemia in one patient each (3.2%). Neutropenic infections grade 3 and 4 occurred in seven (23%) and three patients (9.7%), respectively, including two patients (6.5%) who died from septic shock. Deep vein thrombosis occurred in eight patients (26%), constipation in 20 patients (65%), and polyneuropathy in 20 patients (65%). The probability of event-free survival and overall survival in the whole group of patients at 36 months were 26 and 62%, respectively. In conclusion, the combination of thalidomide with VED appears to be highly effective in previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma, but it is associated with a high rate of thrombotic events, polyneuropathy, and neutropenic infections.