High-dose treosulfan in patients with relapsed or refractory high-grade lymphoma receiving tandem autologous blood stem cell transplantation

Treosulfan plus fludarabine versus TEAM as conditioning treatment before autologous stem cell transplantation for B-cell Non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Conditioning with treosulfan and fludarabine (Treo/Flu) has been proven to be feasible and efficient in several types of malignancies before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Given its favorable reduced toxicity profile, we introduced Treo/Flu as conditioning before autologous HSCT (auto-HSCT) in patients with B-cell Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Treo/Flu in comparison to TEAM. Fifty-seven patients with NHL received auto-HSCT after conditioning with either Treo/Flu (n = 22) or TEAM (n = 35). All patients achieved sustained engraftment. PFS, EFS and OS were not significant in both groups. Of note is that patients in the Treo/Flu group were less dependent on thrombocyte transfusions (p = 0.0082), significantly older (in median 11 years, p < 0.0001) and suffered less frequently from infectious complications (p = 0.0105), mucositis and stomatitis (p < 0.0001). This study is the first to present efficacy, feasibility, and safety of conditioning with Treo/Flu preceding auto-HSCT in patients with NHL. Since it demonstrated a lack of significant difference in comparison to TEAM conditioning it might be a valuable alternative especially in elderly patients with B-cell NHL and comorbidities. Further evaluation by prospective clinical trials is warranted.

Comparison of Melphalan Combined with Treosulfan or Busulfan as High-Dose Chemotherapy before Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in AML

Simple Summary

Different consolidation strategies are available for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients fit for intensive treatment. For favorable- or intermediate-risk AML, high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is one of these options. Busulfan plus melphalan is a frequently used and efficient HDCT regimen, but it bears neurotoxic potential and may cause irreversible alopecia, amongst other toxicities. Thus, improving HDCT regimens with lesser toxicity, albeit at comparable anti-leukemic efficacy, is wishful. We combined treosulfan with its more favorable toxicity profile with melphalan for HDCT and compared these patients with a group receiving busulfan/treosulfan. Whereas disease-free and overall survival did not differ significantly, the treosulfan regimen compared favorably, with the absence of neurotoxicity and irreversibly alopecia. Treosulfan serum levels by mass cytometry demonstrated considerable interindividual biovariability. Further studies should explore treosulfan/melphalan for HDCT/ASCT in AML, aiming to improve the quality of life of AML survivors and offer safer consolidation strategies.

Abstract

(1) Background: High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients predominantly combines busulfan with cyclophosphamide or melphalan. Treosulfan compares favorably regarding lower inter-individual bioavailability and neurotoxicity, but so far, had not been studied before ASCT in AML. (2) Methods: This single-center study investigated AML patients undergoing ASCT in CR1 between November 2017 and September 2020. The first 16 patients received busulfan 16 mg/kg b.w. (days −5 to −2) and melphalan 140 mg/m² (day −1) (BuMel). In a subsequent (TreoMel) cohort, 20 patients received treosulfan 14 g/m² (days −4 to −2) and melphalan. Plasma concentrations of busulfan and treosulfan were determined by mass spectrometry. (3) Results: Neutrophil engraftment and platelet recovery were similar, and PFS and OS were comparable. In only the BuMel cohort, patients reported central nervous toxicities, including seizures (6%) and encephalopathy (12%). The mean AUC for busulfan was 1471.32 μM*min, and for treosulfan it was 836.79 mg/L*h, with ranges of 804.1–2082 μM*min and 454.2–1402 mg/L*h. The peak values for busulfan ranged between 880.19–1734 μg/L and for treosulfan between 194.3–489.25 mg/L. (4) Conclusions: TreoMel appears to be safe and effective for pre-ASCT treatment in AML patients. Due to considerable interindividual biovariability, pharmacologic monitoring may also be warranted for the use of treosulfan.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Treosulfan in Patients With Thalassemia Major Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

A treosulfan (Treo)-based conditioning regimen prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has been successfully used in treating hematological malignant and nonmalignant diseases. We report Treo pharmacokinetics (PK) in patients with thalassemia major undergoing HSCT (n = 87), receiving Treo at a dose of 14 g/m² /day. Median Treo AUC and clearance (CL) was 1,326 mg*h/L and 10.8 L/h/m² , respectively. There was wide interindividual variability in Treo AUC and CL (64 and 68%) which was not explained by any of the variables tested. None of the Treo PK parameters were significantly associated with graft rejection or toxicity; however, Treo CL <7.97 L/h/m² was significantly associated with poor overall (hazard ratio (HR) 2.7, confidence interval (CI) (1.09-6.76), P = 0.032) and event-free survival (HR 2.4, CI (0.98-5.73), P = 0.055). Further studies in a larger cohort are warranted to identify the factors explaining the variation in Treo PK as well as to establish a therapeutic range of Treo for targeted dose adjustment to improve HSCT outcome.

Ocular disposition of treosulfan and its active epoxy-transformers following intravenous administration in rabbits

Treosulfan (TREO) has an established position in chemotherapy of advanced ovarian cancer but has been also applied in uveal melanoma patients. Moreover, it is used as an orphan drug for a myeloablative conditioning prior to stem cell transplantation. In this paper, biodistribution of prodrug TREO and its active monoepoxide (S,S-EBDM) and diepoxide (S,S-DEB) into aqueous humor of the eye was studied for the first time. For that purpose, alone TREO and the mixture of TREO, S,S-EBDM and S,S-DEB were administered intravenously to New Zealand White rabbits. The three analytes were determined in plasma and aqueous humor by validated HPLC methods and pharmacokinetic calculations were performed in WinNonlin. After the infusion of TREO, the aqueous humor/plasma C_max ratio and area under the curve ratio amounted 0.04 and 0.10 for TREO, and 1.1 and 2.2 for S,S-EBDM, respectively. Following the bolus injection of the mixture of the prodrug and its epoxides, the aqueous humor/plasma C_max ratios for TREO, S,S-EBDM and S,S-DEB were 0.05, 0.66, and 4.0, respectively. The presented results indicate a poor penetration of TREO into the eye, which may impair systemic treatment of ocular tumors but is beneficial in terms of a lack of clinically relevant ophthalmic adverse effects.

Cytostatic conditioning in experimental allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: Busulfan causes less early gastrointestinal toxicity but Treosulfan results in improved immune reconstitution

BACKGROUND

Acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (allo-BMT) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We evaluated the impact of the conditioning regimen on aGVHD comparing Treosulfan (Treo) and Busulfan (Bu) with total body irradiation (TBI).

METHODS

Using a haploidentical murine model, B6D2F1 mice conditioned with Bu (100 mg/kg)/Fludarabine (Flu, 500 mg/kg) or Treo (6000 mg/kg)/Flu (500 mg/kg) or TBI with 14 Gy received bone marrow cells and splenocytes (20 × 10(6)) from either syngeneic (B6D2F1) or allogeneic (C57BL/6N) donors in order to analyze aGVHD outcome.

RESULTS

Conditioning with Bu/Flu or Treo/Flu resulted in significantly reduced aGVHD severity and improved survival (p < 0.05) after allo-BMT compared to TBI. On day 5 after allo-BMT, the organ damages of Bu/Flu conditioned animals were significantly reduced in association with diminished expression of tumor necrosis factor in serum compared to Treo/Flu. Interestingly, the early toxicity of Treo/Flu did not result in significantly higher aGVHD severity; furthermore, a significantly improved immune reconstitution of B220-positive B cells was observed at day 42 after Treo/Flu conditioning compared to Bu/Flu.

CONCLUSION

Conditioning with Treo/Flu or Bu/Flu results in decreased aGVHD severity compared to TBI. Moreover, Treo/Flu was associated with improved immune reconstitution despite the early toxicity.

Risk-adapted, treosulfan-based therapy with auto- and allo-SCT for relapsed/refractory aggressive NHL: a prospective phase-II trial

Since the outcome of relapsed/refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) is highly variable, a risk-adapted treatment approach was evaluated. After two cycles of DHAP, patients received high-dose treosulfan/etoposide/carboplatinum (TEC) and autologous stem cell rescue. After TEC, low-risk patients with late relapse (>1 year after first CR who achieved CR after DHAP received no further treatment. Patients with late relapse who achieved CR or PR only after TEC underwent a second cycle of TEC. High-risk patients with early relapse/refractory disease received treosulfan/fludarabine followed by allogeneic transplantation. Rituximab was added in patients with B-cell lymphoma (86%). At entry, 36% of all 57 patients had refractory disease, 32% early and 32% late relapse. During DHAP treatment, progression occurred in 32% of patients. Of 33 patients who received TEC, 5 received second TEC and 15 allogeneic transplantation. Main toxicity after TEC was oral mucositis (CTC grades 3 and 4 in 50% and 13%, respectively). In total, 42% patients achieved CR. Median OS was 21.4 months for all patients and 32.6 for those who underwent allogeneic transplantation. International prognostic index (IPI) at study entry was highly discriminative at predicting OS (P<0.0001). Risk-adapted, treosulfan-based therapy with auto- and allo-SCT is feasible. Long-term survival is possible with allogeneic transplantation.

Pharmacology of dimethanesulfonate alkylating agents: busulfan and treosulfan

INTRODUCTION

Among the dimethanesulfonates, busulfan, in combination with other alkylating agents or nucleoside analogues, is the cornerstone of high-dose chemotherapy. It is used, and followed hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, for the treatment of various hematologic malignancies and immunodeficiencies. Treosulfan, which is a hydrophilic analogue of busulfan, was the first dimethanesufonate registered for the treatment of ovarian cancer. Recently, treosulfan has been investigated for the treatment of hematologic malignancies in combination with the same second agents before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

AREAS COVERED

This work reviews the pharmacological data of these two dimethanesulfonates alkylating agents. Specifically, the article looks at their chemistry, metabolism, anticancer activity, and their pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

EXPERT OPINION

Busulfan has been investigated widely for more than three decades leading to a large and precise handling of this agent with numerous studies on activity and pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. In contrast, the behavior of treosulfan is still under investigation and not fully described. The complexity of treosulfan's metabolism and mechanism of action gives rise to the need of a deeper understanding of its pharmacological activity in a context of high-dose chemotherapy. Specifically, there is a great need to better understand its pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics relationship.

Long-term follow-up of children conditioned with Treosulfan: German and Austrian experience

We report the long-term follow-up of children transplanted with Treosulfan (TREO)-based conditioning in Germany and Austria. Nine centres reported a total of 109 transplantations. Patients were stratified according to the paediatric TRM risk score derived from the paediatric BMT registry (PRST) and compared with the historical transplant population of this registry. Underlying diseases were malignancies, immunodeficiencies, and haematologic and metabolic disorders. TREO total dose ranged from 21-42 g/m(2). Additional conditioning drugs included fludarabine, thiotepa, melphalan, CY and/or TBI. EFS at 3 years for non-malignant and malignant diseases was 88% and 49%, respectively. Leukaemia patients in remission had a survival of 51% at 3 years; nonremission patients relapsed and died within 18 months. TRM and OS in the low-risk groups 0 and 1 were similar to PRST controls. TRM in the high-risk groups 2 and 3 was markedly lower (9% vs 28% and 13% vs 53%, respectively) than in the PRST group, but OS was similar. In conclusion, TREO-based conditioning regimens in children resulted in excellent engraftment and long-term survival in nonmalignant disease. In high-risk malignancy, low acute toxicity was followed by low TRM but it did not translate into increased survival.

Preclinical analysis of treosulfan in combination with total body irradiation as conditioning regimen prior to bone marrow transplantation in rats

Treosulfan (Treo) and total body irradiation (TBI) demonstrate a high therapeutic activity in treatment of acute leukemia and lymphoma. We investigated the combination of Treo and TBI prior to bone marrow transplantation (BMT) in rats. Female Lewis rats were treated with Treo on 3 consecutive days followed by TBI with either 5 Gy (n = 28) or 7.5 Gy (n = 48). After conditioning animals received 4 x 10E7 bone marrow cells (BC) from female Lewis rats. Additional 16 rats were transplanted with 4 x 10E7 BC and 1.5 x 10E7 spleen T-cells from female Brown-Norway (BN) rats. Animals were examined daily for clinical signs and toxicity was investigated by necropsy and histology in all animals. Gastrointestinal toxicity was the dose-limiting factor of Treo in combination with TBI. The highest tolerable dose of Treo in combination with 7.5 Gy TBI was 3 x 0.5 g/kg and the highest tolerable dose of Treo in combination with 5 Gy TBI was 3 x 0.6 g/kg. Allogeneic BMT from BN donors resulted in engraftment and survival of 12 out of 16 animals. Gastrointestinal toxicity is the dose-limiting factor in the treatment with Treo and TBI. Furthermore, Treo possesses certain characteristics of a radiosensitizer.

Treosulfan/fludarabine as an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant conditioning regimen for high-risk patients

In recent years, new conditioning regimens have been explored in patients not eligible for conventional transplant with the aim to reduce transplant-related mortality. In a phase II multicentric prospective trial, we investigated the safety and feasibility of the treosulfan-fludarabine combination prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant in patients with various hematological malignancies not eligible for conventional regimens because of previous intensive treatment, older age, and comorbidities. Forty-six consecutive patients, median age 48 years (range 17-69), were enrolled. Sixteen of them were in complete remission, and 20 had a HSCT comorbidity index > or = 1. Forty-four patients had regular and sustained engraftment, and 39 out of 40 evaluable patients developed complete chimerism. Nonhematological toxicity was limited. Risk of transplant-related mortality was 9% (95% CI, 2-17%) at day +100 and plotted at 15% (95% CI, 7-22%) after 7 months. The estimated overall survival and progression-free survival with a median follow-up of 20 months were 51% and 38%, respectively. The estimated 30 months progression-free survival for patients transplanted in remission was 56%. The treosulfan-fludarabine combination is a reduced-toxicity but myeloablative regimen that can be proposed to patients not fitting criteria for conventional transplant regimens. Longer follow-up and further prospective studies are necessary to evaluate this regimen.

Preclinical studies of treosulfan demonstrate potent activity in Ewing's sarcoma

OBJECTIVES

High-dose chemotherapy with the alkylating agent busulfan has been widely used in the treatment of patients with high-risk Ewing's sarcoma. Because of risks for toxicity, busulfan and radiotherapy can not be applied together, leading to the omission of one effective therapy component. Treosulfan is a derivative of busulfan which has a lower side effect profile than busulfan and which can be used together with radiotherapy. We investigated the effect of treosulfan in a panel of Ewing's sarcoma cell lines on cell survival, cell cycle and apoptosis in vitro and compared it to busulfan. Furthermore, the anti-tumor effect of treosulfan was studied in an orthotopic Ewing's sarcoma mouse xenograft model.

METHODS

Cell survival was measured by MTT assay and cell cycle analysis by flow cytometry. Apoptosis was analyzed via detection of DNA fragmentation, Hoechst 33258 staining, Annexin V, and cleavage of caspases-3 and 9. The effect of treosulfan and busulfan on primary tumor growth was assessed in Ewing's sarcoma xenografts in NOD/SCID mice (10 mice per group), pharmacokinetics of treosulfan were analyzed in nude mice.

RESULTS

Treosulfan inhibited cell growth to at least 70% in all cell lines at concentrations achievable in vivo. Treosulfan had a greater effect on the inhibition of cell growth at equivalent concentrations compared to busulfan. The growth inhibitory effect of treosulfan at low concentrations was mainly due to a G2 cell cycle arrest, whereas at higher concentrations it was due to apoptosis. Apoptosis was induced at lower concentrations compared to busulfan. In contrast to busulfan, treosulfan induced cell death in an apoptosis-deficient cell line at concentrations achievable in vivo. In mice, treosulfan suppressed tumor growth at dosages of 2,500 and 3,000 mg/kg. Pharmacokinetic exposures of treosulfan in mice were similar to previous reports in human patients. At maximal tolerated dosages treosulfan had a higher anti-tumor activity than busulfan.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that treosulfan has efficacy against Ewing's sarcoma cells in vitro and in mice. Therefore, controlled trials examining the role of treosulfan in patients with Ewing's sarcoma are warranted.

Pericarditis after high-dose chemotherapy: more frequent than expected?

BACKGROUND

Pericarditis is a rare side-effect of chemotherapy and has been reported following administration of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and other drugs but not treosulfan.

CASE REPORTS

We report on 2 patients with retrosternal chest pain and typical widespread upward concave ST-segment elevation in the 12-lead electrocardiogram prompting the diagnosis of acute pericarditis. The patients had received treatment for multiple myeloma or relapsed mantle cell lymphoma with high-dose treosulfan alone or in combination with etoposide and carboplatin followed by autologous stem cell transplantation 5 days before onset of the symptoms. In both patients, no serological evidence of viral infection was found. Serum creatine kinase and serum cardiac troponin I remained unchanged. Within 24 h of onset of the symptoms, C-reactive protein increased from normal values (< 5 mg/l) to 95 mg/l and 115 mg/l, respectively. In one of the patients, a paroxysmal supraventricular arrhythmia occurred that persisted for 2 days. After treatment with diclofenac, both patients recovered completely within 1 week.

CONCLUSION

The differential diagnosis of chest pain in the setting of high-dose chemotherapy with e.g. treosulfan should include pericarditis. The pathogenesis remains unclear. Alongside infections, direct toxic or immunological drug-related mechanisms are suggested.

Cytotoxicity of treosulfan and busulfan on pediatric tumor cell lines

High-dose chemotherapy of solid tumors aims at eliminating residual or metastatic tumor cells, which remained after conventional treatment. Thus, anticancer drugs used for high-dose chemotherapy should display significant cytotoxicity against the respective tumors. As little data are available about the in-vitro toxicity of busulfan and treosulfan especially on pediatric tumor cell lines, we compared the cytotoxicity of treosulfan and busulfan on four Ewing tumor, four neuroblastoma, two osteosarcoma and two leukemia cell lines in vitro. Growth inhibition of tumor cells was determined by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide test after 24, 48, 72 and 96 h. Treosulfan and busulfan reduced the growth of all tumor cell lines in a time-dependent and dose-dependent manner. In vitro treosulfan was consistently more cytotoxic than busulfan. Fifty percent growth inhibitions of 608-0.73 micromol/l were determined for treosulfan and of above 5,000-2.81 micromol/l for busulfan. Both drugs exhibited similar cytotoxicity profiles. Busulfan-sensitive/resistant cell lines were also sensitive/resistant to treosulfan. Overall, the leukemia cell lines were most sensitive to busulfan and treosulfan. The Ewing tumor cell lines were the second most sensitive followed by the neuroblastoma cell lines. The osteosarcoma cell lines were the most resistant cell lines. Although the in-vitro stability of both drugs makes direct comparison of their in-vitro toxicity difficult and does not allow any estimation of dosages needed clinically, the in-vitro results indicate substantial cytotoxicity of both drugs on leukemias, Ewing tumors and neuroblastomas. These data suggest further evaluation of treosulfan for high-dose chemotherapy of advanced Ewing tumors, neuroblastomas and high-risk leukemias.