Intensive graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis is required after unrelated-donor nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation

Reduced-intensity hematopoietic stem cell transplants for malignancies: harnessing the graft-versus-tumor effect

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation combines the power of cytotoxic chemo/radiotherapy with the ability of the new immune system to seek out and destroy tumor cells. However, administration of such myeloablative transplants is fraught with risks, some of which are related to the intensive conditioning regimens. Reductions in the intensity of the administered cytotoxic therapy have demonstrated that under some circumstances, the burden of fighting tumor and enhancing stem cell engraftment can be shouldered mostly by the transplanted immune system. Reduced intensity has allowed a potentially curative therapy for hematologic malignancies to be offered to an expanded patient population. Ongoing research seeks to enhance the safety and power of this form of allogeneic immunotherapy.

Allogeneic immunotherapy to optimize the graft-versus-tumor effect: concepts and controversies

This article focuses on the recent evolution of novel conditioning regimens in combination with adoptive cellular therapy in the allogeneic transplant setting for hematologic malignancies. Building on data from animal models, the field of allogeneic transplantation is undergoing a paradigm shift toward immunosuppressive regimens with less toxicity that allow donor hematopoietic engraftment in order to provide a graft-versus-tumor effect as the primary goal of transplantation, rather than chemoablation. In addition, the strategies described in this article, including the use of T-cell subsets as adoptive therapy, will apply to a much broader pool of patients than traditional transplant approaches, thereby allowing more patients with life-limiting illnesses, previously deemed ineligible, to pursue therapy with curative intent.

Sirolimus, tacrolimus, and low-dose methotrexate as graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in related and unrelated donor reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

We assessed the combination of sirolimus, tacrolimus, and low-dose methotrexate as acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) prophylaxis after reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation from matched related (MRD, n = 46) and unrelated (URD, n = 45) donors. All patients received fludarabine and intravenous busulfan conditioning followed by transplantation of mobilized PBSC. The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 13 days. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV and III-IV aGVHD were 16% and 7%, respectively. There was no difference in the incidence of aGVHD between MRD and URD cohorts. Two-year cumulative incidence of extensive chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was 40%. Relapse-free survival (RFS) at 2 years was 34%: 21% in MRD and 45% in URD. Overall survival (OS) at 2 years was 59%: 47% in MRD and 67% in URD. High levels (>90%) of donor derived hematopoiesis were achieved in 59% of patients early after transplantation. The addition of sirolimus to tacrolimus and low-dose methotrexate as GVHD prophylaxis following RIC with fludarabine and low-dose intravenous busulfan is associated with rapid engraftment, low rates of aGVHD, and achievement of high levels of donor chimerism.

Donor leukocyte infusions for the treatment of relapsed acute leukemia after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) offers the only hope for cure for many adults with acute leukemia. Unfortunately, many patients relapse and die of their disease even after transplantation. Although in some cases, allogeneic SCT is effective because the intensive conditioning therapy eradicates all malignant cells, it has long been recognized that the adoptive transfer of donor immunity plays a critically important role in the induction and maintenance of remission. Recognition of the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect of allogeneic SCT has prompted attempts at remission re-induction by adoptive immunotherapy with donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs) in patients with relapsed disease after allogeneic SCT. In some cases, DLI-induced remissions are sustained and patients cured when no other treatment modality was effective. This review discusses the rationale, biology, complications and future applications of DLI in acute leukemia patients after allogeneic SCT.

A study of a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen followed by allogeneic stem cell transplantation for patients with hematologic malignancies using Campath-1H as part of a graft-versus-host disease strategy

Nonmyeloablative transplantation (NMT) is intended to be less toxic than traditional allografts, but such regimens as fludarabine/melphalan still pose a significant risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We used Campath-1H in an attempt to reduce the risk of GVHD in NMT. Patients with hematologic malignancies suitable for allogeneic transplantation underwent transplantation using a regimen of fludarabine 30 mg/m(2) on days -5 to -2 (total, 120 mg/m(2)), total body irradiation of 200 cGy on day -1, and Campath-1H 20 mg/day on days -7 to -3 (total dose, 100 mg). After loss of graft in 5 of the first 6 patients, the protocol was amended by decreasing the Campath-1H dose to 20 mg on days -4 and -3 and 10 mg on day -2 (total dose, 50 mg) for all subsequent patients. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of only cyclosporine, due to the immunosuppressive effect of Campath-1H. Patients received prophylactic acyclovir, fluconazole, and a quinolone. Other requirements included creatinine clearance > or = 25 mL/min, diffusing capacity > or = 45% of predicted, and cardiac ejection fraction > or = 40%. Twenty-five patients with hematologic malignancies entered the study. The median age was 40 years (range, 26-71 years). Median time to engraftment (defined as a neutrophil count of 500 mm(3) and a platelet count of 20,000 mm(3) without platelet support on at least 2 days) was 19 days (range, 9-32 days). All patients who were treated after the amendment engrafted with 90%-100% donor cells by day 100 except for 2 early deaths. Acute GVHD developed in 40% of the patients. Patients who underwent related transplants developed GVHD after donor lymphocyte infusions for poor engraftment or relapse whereas those undergoing unrelated transplants developed GVHD de novo. Two patients (8%) developed chronic GVHD, and 48% had cytomegalovirus reactivation, which was easily managed medically. Nonrelapse mortality within the first 12 months was 12%; 32% of the patients survived at a median of 269 days. We conclude that Campath-1H, fludarabine, and melphalan is a reasonable preparative regimen for reduced-intensity transplantation with a low nonrelapse mortality, but that issues of GVHD remain problematic, due to either the use of donor lymphocyte infusions or the use of volunteer unrelated donors.

Donor leukocyte infusions in myeloid malignancies: new strategies

Donor leukocyte infusion (DLI) provides direct and potent graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) activity to treat relapse after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. DLI is dramatically effective for relapsed chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), but has been less effective for relapse of other myeloid malignancies. Nevertheless, most recipients of DLI for relapsed CML, and many patients with relapsed acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), will experience prolonged remissions and probable cure. Graft-versus-host disease remains the major complication of DLI. New strategies for GVL induction explore novel dosing regimens and both methods of enhancing GVL activity of donor T cells and of minimizing toxicity from graft-versus-host disease. Ultimately, the identification of the effector cells and target antigens for GVL induction will lead to the use of tumor-specific adoptive immunotherapy to both prevent and treat relapse with minimal toxicity. Although many issues remain unsettled, the potential to harness the graft-versus-leukemia activity of allogeneic donor cells provides a powerful new paradigm for the immunotherapy of cancer.

Donor leukocyte infusions after unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Donor leukocyte infusions provide direct and potent graft-versus-tumor activity to treat relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Extensive data are available on the use of donor leukocyte infusion after matched-sibling stem cell transplantation, but reports are remarkably few on the use of donor leukocyte infusion after unrelated-donor stem cell transplantation. But the role for unrelated-donor leukocyte infusion is not well established.

RECENT FINDINGS

The dramatic success of donor leukocyte infusion to treat relapse after matched-sibling stem cell transplantation has led to the use of unrelated-donor leukocyte infusion in many patients. Several case studies suggest that unrelated-donor leukocyte infusion effectively induces direct graft-versus-tumor reactions with toxicity comparable to that of matched-sibling donor leukocyte infusion. Important issues include the relationship between dose and response/toxicity appropriate timing, dose, and schedule; and identification of the best tumor targets. In particular nonmyeloablative transplant strategies using unrelated donors are expanding rapidly, but relapse rates are high. There is a paucity of data on unrelated-donor leukocyte infusion in this setting.

SUMMARY

This review summarizes recent data on the use of unrelated-donor leukocyte infusion. We discuss anticipated outcomes and identify areas under active investigation in both ablative and nonmyeloablative unrelated-donor stem cell transplantation.

Update on the management of acute graft-versus-host disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acute graft-versus-host disease is one of the commonest complications after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Recent advances in its prevention and therapy are giving new hope to patients with this disease. This review covers the major advances in prophylaxis and therapy for this problem.

RECENT FINDINGS

The use of novel approaches for prophylaxis such as posttransplant cyclophosphamide and non-methotrexate-containing regimens is discussed. The results of therapy with new agents such as pentostatin, pulse cyclophosphamide, long-wavelength ultraviolet A phototherapy, and monoclonal antibodies such as denileukin diftitox or etanercept are reviewed.

SUMMARY

Without question, outcome in patients who develop graft-versus-host disease is improving. With better supportive care, and more effective prophylaxis and therapy, these patients have an improved chance for full recovery. Patients should be enrolled, when possible, in studies aimed to prevent and treat graft-versus-host disease.

Cellular immune therapy for refractory cancers: novel therapeutic strategies

OBJECTIVE

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is curative for certain cancers, but the high doses of chemotherapy and radiotherapy may lead to toxicity. This review summarizes the field of cellular immune therapy using very-low-dose conditioning for refractory cancers.

METHODS

In our initial study, we treated 25 patients with refractory cancers with 100 cGy total body irradiation followed by allogeneic, nonmobilized peripheral blood cells. Eighteen patients received sibling and seven patients received unrelated cord blood stem cells.

RESULTS

None of the 13 patients with solid tumors achieved donor chimerism or had a sustained response. Twelve patients with hematologic malignancies were treated, 1 received a cord blood transplant and 11 received sibling donor cells. Nine of these 11 patients achieved donor chimerism, ranging from 5% to 100%. Four patients had sustained complete remission of their cancers. The patients who received cord blood transplants did not respond. Development of chimerism correlated with total previous myelotoxic chemotherapy (p < 0.001). We review additional studies in this area, including data in the haploidentical and unrelated donor setting. The data presented comprises studies performed at the four institutions represented by the authors, and a review of other pertinent studies in this area.

CONCLUSIONS

Cellular immune therapy is an emerging application of transplantation therapy, which may be appropriate for refractory cancers. New studies in solid tumors, and with alternative donors, will expand the application of this new and promising treatment.