Evaluation of the Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Ritonavir and Didanosine

Human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitors

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of individuals infected with this pathogen. The protease is an enzyme that is essential for viral replication because it cleaves both structural and functional proteins from precursor viral polyprotein strands. Inhibition of this process suppresses viral replication, which produces immature noninfectious virions. When combined with reverse transcriptase inhibitors, these agents are very potent in suppressing viral replication. Pharmacologic properties, toxic profile, drug interactions, and resistance patterns differ among protease inhibitors, and all must be considered when selecting the drugs for therapeutic use in humans. The best combination, sequence of use, durability of response, and magnitude of immune reconstitution and function are issues that have yet to be fully elucidated.

Multidose pharmacokinetics of ritonavir and zidovudine in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients

The effect of coadministration of ritonavir and zidovudine (ZDV) on the pharmacokinetics of these drugs was investigated in a three-period, multidose, crossover study. Eighteen asymptomatic, human immunodeficiency virus-positive men were assigned randomly to six different sequences of the following three regimens: ZDV (200 mg every 8 h [q8h] alone for 4 days, ritonavir (300 mg q6h) alone for 4 days, and ZDV with ritonavir for 4 days. Ritonavir pharmacokinetics were unaffected by coadministration with ZDV. However, ZDV exposure was reduced by about 26% (P < 0.05) in the presence of ritonavir. The maximum concentration in (Cmax) of ZDV plasma decreased from 748 +/- 375 (mean +/- standard deviation) to 546 +/- 296, and area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24) decreased from 3,052 +/- 1,007 to 2,261 +/- 715 when coadministered with ritonavir. In contrast, the ZDV elimination rate constant was unaffected by ritonavir, suggesting that there was no change in ZDV systemic metabolism. Correspondingly, differences in ZDV-glucuronide Cmax and AUC were not statistically significantly different between regimens (P > 0.31). Also, there were no apparent differences in the formation of 3'-amino-3'-deoxythymidine or in the adverse event profiles between the regimens. The lack of change in ritonavir pharmacokinetics suggests that dosage adjustment of ritonavir is unnecessary when it is administered concurrently with ZDV. The clinical relevance of a 26% reduction in ZDV exposure when ZDV is administered with ritonavir is unknown. In addition to other multidrug regimens, the long-term safety and efficacy of coadministration of ritonavir and ZDV is being investigated.

Management of drug interactions in patients with HIV

OBJECTIVE

To provide a complication of relevant information on drug interactions to assist healthcare practitioners in managing complex HIV-related pharmacotherapy.

DATA SOURCES

Information was retrieved via a MEDLINE search (January 1966-December 1996) using MeSH headings "human immunodeficiency virus," "drug interactions," and names of medications commonly prescribed for the management of HIV infection and related opportunistic infections. Abstracts of international and national conferences, review articles, textbooks, and references of all articles were also searched.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All literature on pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interactions was considered for inclusion. Pertinent information, as assessed by the authors, was selected and summarized for discussion.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Drug disposition and/or pharmacologic effect may be affected either by HIV-related physiologic changes or by the presence of concomitant drug therapy. Modifications in drug selection, dosage, dosing regimen, or route of administration may be needed to avoid or manage drug-disease, drug-drug, or drug-food interactions. Management options may depend on the mechanism and the clinical significance of the interaction, the availability of therapeutic alternatives, patient convenience, and cost restrictions. In the absence of specific data, consideration of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics to assist practitioners in predicting the likelihood of possible interactions was included.

RESULTS

A comprehensive table of clinically significant drug interactions is provided. Drug interaction principles and practical management strategies are also discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

The potential for drug interactions is extremely common, given the increasing complexity of managing patients infected with HIV. To avoid compromising therapeutic efficacy or increasing drug toxicity, practitioners need to be aware of potential interactions and are encouraged to use a systematic approach when managing patient drug therapy.