Chronopharmacokinetics of oral tegafur and uracil in colorectal cancer patients

Chronopharmacokinetic model analysis of 5-fluorouracil following S-1 administration in rats: comparison with infusion and other prodrugs for chronochemotherapy

Circadian rhythms influence the pharmacokinetics of chemotherapeutic agents, including 5-fluorouracil, a cornerstone drug for colorectal cancer treatment. While chronomodulated chemotherapy for 5-fluorouracil infusion regimens can improve patient outcomes, the impact of circadian rhythms on oral 5-fluorouracil prodrug regimens remains poorly understood, and no dose-timing strategies have been established. This study investigated circadian variations in the pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil after administering S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine-based anticancer drug, in rats using a cosinor-based chronopharmacokinetic model. Plasma tegafur exposure showed significant circadian variation, peaking at 01:00 (17 h after light onset), whereas plasma 5-fluorouracil exposure exhibited no significant time-of-dosing differences. Chronopharmacokinetic analysis revealed minimal circadian variation in 5-fluorouracil clearance with S-1 (amplitude-to-mesor ratio: ±14.6 %) compared to long-term 5-fluorouracil infusion (±28.0 %) and other oral prodrugs including capecitabine (±43.0 %) and uracil-tegafur (±36.7 %), which showed pronounced fluctuations. These results suggest that S-1 provides consistent 5-fluorouracil exposure regardless of dosing time, offering a practical advantage by simplifying treatment schedules and reducing the need for chronomodulated therapy. This study could advance the development of 5-fluorouracil-based chronochemotherapy using oral prodrug regimens, enabling more personalized and effective cancer treatment strategies.

Circadian rhythms in CYP2A5 expression underlie the time-dependent effect of tegafur on breast cancer

The chemotherapeutic agent tegafur, a prodrug that prolongs the half-life of fluorouracil (5-FU), exerts antitumor effects against various cancers. Since tegafur is metabolized to 5-FU by CYP2A6 in the liver, the expression of CYP2A6 determines the effect of tegafur. Here, we report that the expression rhythm of Cyp2a5, a homolog of human CYP2A6, in female mice causes dosing time-dependent differences in tegafur metabolism. In the livers of female mice, CYP2A5 expression showed a circadian rhythm, peaking during the dark period. This rhythm is regulated by RORA, a core clock component, and abrogation of the CYP2A5 activity abolished the time-dependent difference in the rate of tegafur metabolism in female mice. Furthermore, administration of tegafur to mice transplanted with 4T1 breast cancer cells during the dark period suppressed increases in tumor size compared to female mice treated during the light period. Our findings reveal a novel relationship between 5-FU prodrugs and circadian clock machinery, potentially influencing antitumor effects, and contributing to the development of time-aware chemotherapy regimens for breast cancer.

The past, present, and future of chemotherapy with a focus on individualization of drug dosing

While there have been rapid advances in developing new and more targeted drugs to treat cancer, much less progress has been made in individualizing dosing. Even though the introduction of immunotherapies such as CAR T-cells and checkpoint inhibitors, as well as personalized therapies that target specific mutations, have transformed clinical treatment of cancers, chemotherapy remains a mainstay in oncology. Chemotherapies are typically dosed on either a body surface area (BSA) or weight basis, which fails to account for pharmacokinetic differences between patients. Drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion rates can vary between patients, resulting in considerable differences in exposure to the active drugs. These differences result in suboptimal dosing, which can reduce efficacy and increase side-effects. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), genotype guided dosing, and chronomodulation have been developed to address this challenge; however, despite improving clinical outcomes, they are rarely implemented in clinical practice for chemotherapies. Thus, there is a need to develop interventions that allow for individualized drug dosing of chemotherapies, which can help maximize the number of patients that reach the most efficacious level of drug in the blood while mitigating the risks of underdosing or overdosing. In this review, we discuss the history of the development of chemotherapies, their mechanisms of action and how they are dosed. We discuss substantial intraindividual and interindividual variability in chemotherapy pharmacokinetics. We then propose potential engineering solutions that could enable individualized dosing of chemotherapies, such as closed-loop drug delivery systems and bioresponsive biomaterials.

Timing in drug absorption and disposition: The past, present, and future of chronopharmacokinetics

The importance of drug dosing time in pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and toxicity is receiving increasing attention from the scientific community. In spite of mounting evidence that circadian oscillations affect drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME), there remain many unanswered questions in this field and, occasionally, conflicting experimental results. Such data arise not only from translational difficulties caused by interspecies differences but also from variability in study design and a lack of understanding of how the circadian clock affects physiological factors that strongly influence ADME, namely, the expression and activity of drug transporters. Hence, the main goal of this review is to provide an updated analysis of the role of the circadian rhythm in drug absorption, distribution across blood-tissue barriers, metabolism in hepatic and extra-hepatic tissues, and hepatobiliary and renal excretion. It is expected that the research suggestions proposed here will contribute to a tissue-targeted and time-targeted pharmacotherapy.

Circadian variations in the pharmacokinetics of the oral anticancer agent tegafur-uracil (UFT) and its metabolites in rats

Uracil-tegafur (UFT) is an oral anticancer drug containing uracil and 5‑fluorouracil prodrug tegafur and is widely used for adjuvant chemotherapy of colorectal cancer. Although clinical data show circadian variations in plasma 5‑fluorouracil concentrations during its long-term infusion, and feasibility studies of chronomodulated administration have been previously reported, the circadian pattern in plasma 5‑fluorouracil concentration after UFT administrations remains unclear. The aim of this study was to identify factors causing circadian variations in UFT pharmacokinetics and estimate circadian patterns of plasma 5‑fluorouracil concentration corresponding to UFT dosing time in rats. Rats were orally administered UFT (15 mg/kg as tegafur) at three different times of the day: 07:00 (23 h after light onset, HALO), 13:00 (5 HALO), or 19:00 (11 HALO), and then plasma concentrations of tegafur, 5‑fluorouracil, and uracil were measured after UFT administration. We found that the area under the plasma concentration-time curves (AUC_0-∞) of 5‑fluorouracil depended on the UFT dosing time of day with a 2.4-fold difference between the peak (at 19:00: 13.7 ± 1.4 μmol·h/L) and trough (at 13:00: 5.6 ± 1.3 μmol·h/L). The simulated population mean clearance of 5‑fluorouracil followed a 24-h cosine circadian curve, with the highest value in the early light phase being 2.2-fold higher than the lowest value in the early dark phase, which was an inverse circadian pattern compared to the plasma 5‑fluorouracil concentration. The plasma tegafur levels suggested that circadian variation in tegafur absorption and conversion to 5‑fluorouracil are factors causing variations in plasma 5‑fluorouracil levels following UFT administration. In conclusion, the circadian pattern of 5‑fluorouracil clearance and circadian variations in tegafur pharmacokinetics are important determinants of plasma 5‑fluorouracil concentrations following UFT administration. This knowledge could help in developing a chronomodulated administration strategy of UFT for improving clinical outcomes.

Pooled population pharmacokinetic analysis of phase I, II and III studies of linifanib in cancer patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Linifanib is a multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, which can inhibit members of the vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor families. The objective of this analysis was to characterize the population pharmacokinetics of linifanib in cancer patients.

METHODS

We pooled 7,351 linifanib plasma concentrations from 1,010 cancer patients enrolled in 13 clinical studies. Population pharmacokinetic modelling was performed using NONMEM version 7.2. The covariates that were screened included the cancer type, co-medications, creatinine clearance, formulation, fed status, liver function markers (bilirubin, blood urea nitrogen [BUN], aspartate aminotransferase [AST], alanine aminotransferase [ALT]), albumin, age, sex, race, body weight, surface area and body mass index.

RESULTS

A two-compartment model with first-order absorption and disposition best described linifanib pharmacokinetics. An increase in body weight was associated with less than proportional increases in volumes of distribution. Subjects with hepatocellular carcinoma and renal cell carcinoma were estimated to have 63 and 86% larger volumes of distribution, respectively, than subjects with the other cancer types. Females had 25% slower oral clearance (CL/F) than males, while subjects with colorectal cancer had 41% faster CL/F than other subjects. For linifanib bioavailability, subjects with refractory acute myeloid leukaemia or myelodysplastic syndrome had 43% lower bioavailability, evening doses were associated with 27% lower bioavailability than morning doses, and administration of linifanib under fed conditions decreased the bioavailability by 14%. Finally, the oral solution formulation showed two-fold faster absorption than the tablet formulations.

CONCLUSION

The use of mixed-effects modelling allowed robust assessment of the impact of the concomitant effects of body size, different cancer types, formulation, diurnal variation, sex and food on linifanib pharmacokinetics. The developed population pharmacokinetic model describes linifanib concentrations adequately and can be used to conduct simulations or to evaluate the linifanib exposure-response relationship.

Chronopharmacodynamics of drugs in toxicological aspects: A short review for clinical pharmacists and pharmacy practitioners

For many decades, researchers are aware of the importance of circadian rhythm in physiological/biochemical properties and drug metabolism. Chronopharmacology is the study of how the effects of drugs vary with biological timing and endogenous periodicities. It has been attaching substantial attention in the last years. Chronopharmacodynamics mainly deals with the biochemical and physiological effects of drugs on the body, the mechanisms of drug action, the relationship between drug concentration and effect in relation to circadian clock. In this review, we will focus on mammalian circadian pharmacodynamics and discuss new chronotherapy approaches. Moreover, we will try to highlight the chronopharmacodynamics of cardiovascular drugs, anti-cancer drugs, analgesics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and give some practical concerns for clinical pharmacists and pharmacy practitioners, concerning this issue.

Chronopharmacology of anti-convulsive therapy

Approximately one-third of patients with epilepsy continue to have seizures despite antiepileptic therapy. Many seizures occur in diurnal, sleep/wake, circadian, or even monthly patterns. The relationship between biomarkers and state changes is still being investigated, but early results suggest that some of these patterns may be related to endogenous circadian patterns whereas others may be related to wakefulness and sleep or both. Chronotherapy, the application of treatment at times of greatest seizure susceptibility, is a technique that may optimize seizure control in selected patients. It may be used in the form of differential dosing, as preparations designed to deliver sustained or pulsatile drug delivery or in the form of 'zeitgebers' that shift endogenous rhythms. Early trials in epilepsy suggest that chronopharmacology may provide improved seizure control compared with conventional treatment in some patients. The present article reviews chronopharmacology in the treatment of epilepsy as well as future treatment avenues.

Cancer chronotherapeutics: experimental, theoretical, and clinical aspects

The circadian timing system controls cell cycle, apoptosis, drug bioactivation, and transport and detoxification mechanisms in healthy tissues. As a consequence, the tolerability of cancer chemotherapy varies up to several folds as a function of circadian timing of drug administration in experimental models. Best antitumor efficacy of single-agent or combination chemotherapy usually corresponds to the delivery of anticancer drugs near their respective times of best tolerability. Mathematical models reveal that such coincidence between chronotolerance and chronoefficacy is best explained by differences in the circadian and cell cycle dynamics of host and cancer cells, especially with regard circadian entrainment and cell cycle variability. In the clinic, a large improvement in tolerability was shown in international randomized trials where cancer patients received the same sinusoidal chronotherapy schedule over 24h as compared to constant-rate infusion or wrongly timed chronotherapy. However, sex, genetic background, and lifestyle were found to influence optimal chronotherapy scheduling. These findings support systems biology approaches to cancer chronotherapeutics. They involve the systematic experimental mapping and modeling of chronopharmacology pathways in synchronized cell cultures and their adjustment to mouse models of both sexes and distinct genetic background, as recently shown for irinotecan. Model-based personalized circadian drug delivery aims at jointly improving tolerability and efficacy of anticancer drugs based on the circadian timing system of individual patients, using dedicated circadian biomarker and drug delivery technologies.

Circadian Timing in Cancer Treatments

The circadian timing system is composed of molecular clocks, which drive 24-h changes in xenobiotic metabolism and detoxification, cell cycle events, DNA repair, apoptosis, and angiogenesis. The cellular circadian clocks are coordinated by endogenous physiological rhythms, so that they tick in synchrony in the host tissues that can be damaged by anticancer agents. As a result, circadian timing can modify 2- to 10-fold the tolerability of anticancer medications in experimental models and in cancer patients. Improved efficacy is also seen when drugs are given near their respective times of best tolerability, due to (a) inherently poor circadian entrainment of tumors and (b) persistent circadian entrainment of healthy tissues. Conversely, host clocks are disrupted whenever anticancer drugs are administered at their most toxic time. On the other hand, circadian disruption accelerates experimental and clinical cancer processes. Gender, circadian physiology, clock genes, and cell cycle critically affect outcome on cancer chronotherapeutics. Mathematical and systems biology approaches currently develop and integrate theoretical, experimental, and technological tools in order to further optimize and personalize the circadian administration of cancer treatments.

Drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics

In this article, aspects of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion have been described bearing in mind the pathogenesis of allergic diseases and their possible therapeutic opportunities. The importance of the routes of administration of the different therapeutic groups has been emphasized. The classical aspects of drug metabolism and disposition related to oral administration have been reviewed, but special emphasis has been given to intranasal, cutaneous, transdermal, and ocular administration as well as to the absorption and the subsequent bioavailability of drugs. Drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters present in extrahepatic tissues, such as nasal mucosa and the respiratory tract, have been particularly discussed. As marketed antiallergic drugs include both racemates and enantiomers, aspects of stereoselective absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion have been discussed. Finally, a new and promising methodology, microdosing, has been presented, although it has not yet been applied to drugs used in the treatment of allergic diseases.

Liver circadian clock, a pharmacologic target of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor seliciclib

Circadian disruption accelerates malignant growth and shortens survival, both in experimental tumor models and cancer patients. In previous experiments, tumor circadian disruption was rescued with seliciclib, an inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs). This effect occurred at a selective dosing time and was associated with improved antitumor activity. In the current study, seliciclib altered robust circadian mRNA expression of the clock genes Rev-erb alpha, Per2, and Bmal1 in mouse liver following dosing at zeitgeber time (ZT) 3 (i.e., 3 h after the onset of the 12 h light span), when mice start to rest, but not at ZT19, near the middle of the 12 h dark span, when mice are most active. However, liver exposure to seliciclib, as estimated by the liver area under the concentration x time curve (AUC), was approximately 80% higher at ZT19 than at ZT3 (p = 0.049). Circadian clock disruption was associated with increased serum liver enzymes and modified glycogen distribution in hepatocytes, as revealed by biochemical determinations and optic and electronic microscopy. The extent of increase in liver enzymes was most pronounced following dosing at ZT3, as compared to ZT19 (p < 0.04). Seliciclib further up-regulated the transcriptional activity of c-Myc, a cell cycle gene that promotes cell cycle entry and G1-S transition (p < 0.001), and down-regulated that of Wee1, which gates cell cycle transition from G2 to M (p < 0.001). These effects did not depend upon drug dosing time. Overall, the results suggest the circadian time of seliciclib delivery is more critical than the amount of drug exposure in determining its effects on the circadian clock. Seliciclib-induced disruption of the liver molecular clock could account for liver toxicity through the resulting disruption of clock-controlled detoxification pathways. Modifications of cell cycle gene expression in the liver likely involve other mechanisms. Circadian clocks represent relevant targets to consider for optimization of therapeutic schedules of CDK inhibitors.