1
|
Kim M, Foster JC, Moore MD, Chen M. Improving Single-Molecule Antibody Detection Selectivity through Optimization of Peptide Epitope Presentation in OmpG Nanopore. ACS Sens 2023. [PMID: 37379512 DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.3c00528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
Outer membrane protein G (OmpG) is a monomeric porin found in Escherichia coli, which possesses seven flexible loops. OmpG has been engineered as a nanopore sensor, where its loops can host affinity epitopes for selective detection of biological molecules. In this study, we investigated various loop positions to incorporate a FLAG peptide antigen epitope in the most flexible loop 6 and tested the efficacy and sensitivity of these nanopore constructs in antibody detection. We observed an OmpG construct containing inserted FLAG sequence, which exhibited strong interaction with anti-FLAG antibodies in flow cytometry; however, it could not translate molecule interactions into a readable signal in current recordings. Further optimization of the peptide presentation strategy by replacing specific sections of loop 6 sequences with the FLAG tag created a construct capable of generating unique and distinct signals when interacting with various monoclonal or polyclonal anti-FLAG clones IgG antibodies in the mixture. The peptide display scheme demonstrated in this study can be generalized for the engineering of OmpG sensors, which can be used for screening and validating positive clones during antibody development, as well as for real-time quality control of cell cultures in monoclonal antibody production.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minji Kim
- Department of Food Science, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, United States
| | - Joshua C Foster
- Molecular and Cellular Biology Program, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, United States
| | - Matthew D Moore
- Department of Food Science, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, United States
- Molecular and Cellular Biology Program, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, United States
| | - Min Chen
- Molecular and Cellular Biology Program, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, United States
- Department of Chemistry, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hu Y, Cheng K, He L, Zhang X, Jiang B, Jiang L, Li C, Wang G, Yang Y, Liu M. NMR-Based Methods for Protein Analysis. Anal Chem 2021; 93:1866-1879. [PMID: 33439619 DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c03830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is a well-established method for analyzing protein structure, interaction, and dynamics at atomic resolution and in various sample states including solution state, solid state, and membranous environment. Thanks to rapid NMR methodology development, the past decade has witnessed a growing number of protein NMR studies in complex systems ranging from membrane mimetics to living cells, which pushes the research frontier further toward physiological environments and offers unique insights in elucidating protein functional mechanisms. In particular, in-cell NMR has become a method of choice for bridging the huge gap between structural biology and cell biology. Herein, we review the recent developments and applications of NMR methods for protein analysis in close-to-physiological environments, with special emphasis on in-cell protein structural determination and the analysis of protein dynamics, both difficult to be accessed by traditional methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunfei Hu
- Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance in Biological Systems, State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic and Molecular Physics, National Center for Magnetic Resonance in Wuhan, Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences-Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430071, China.,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 10049, China
| | - Kai Cheng
- Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance in Biological Systems, State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic and Molecular Physics, National Center for Magnetic Resonance in Wuhan, Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences-Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430071, China
| | - Lichun He
- Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance in Biological Systems, State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic and Molecular Physics, National Center for Magnetic Resonance in Wuhan, Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences-Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430071, China.,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 10049, China
| | - Xu Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance in Biological Systems, State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic and Molecular Physics, National Center for Magnetic Resonance in Wuhan, Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences-Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430071, China.,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 10049, China
| | - Bin Jiang
- Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance in Biological Systems, State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic and Molecular Physics, National Center for Magnetic Resonance in Wuhan, Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences-Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430071, China.,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 10049, China
| | - Ling Jiang
- Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance in Biological Systems, State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic and Molecular Physics, National Center for Magnetic Resonance in Wuhan, Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences-Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430071, China.,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 10049, China
| | - Conggang Li
- Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance in Biological Systems, State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic and Molecular Physics, National Center for Magnetic Resonance in Wuhan, Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences-Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430071, China.,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 10049, China
| | - Guan Wang
- Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance in Biological Systems, State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic and Molecular Physics, National Center for Magnetic Resonance in Wuhan, Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences-Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430071, China.,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 10049, China
| | - Yunhuang Yang
- Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance in Biological Systems, State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic and Molecular Physics, National Center for Magnetic Resonance in Wuhan, Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences-Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430071, China.,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 10049, China
| | - Maili Liu
- Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance in Biological Systems, State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic and Molecular Physics, National Center for Magnetic Resonance in Wuhan, Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences-Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430071, China.,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 10049, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhuang T, Tamm LK. Control of the conductance of engineered protein nanopores through concerted loop motions. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2014; 53:5897-902. [PMID: 24777684 PMCID: PMC4091679 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201400400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2014] [Revised: 03/12/2014] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Protein nanopores have attracted much interest for nucleic acid sequencing, chemical sensing, and protein folding at the single molecule level. The outer membrane protein OmpG from E. coli stands out because it forms a nanopore from a single polypeptide chain. This property allows the separate engineering of each of the seven extracellular loops that control access to the pore. The longest of these loops, loop 6, has been recognized as the main gating loop that closes the pore at low pH values and opens it at high pH values. A method was devised to pin each of the loops to the embedding membrane and measure the single-pore conductances of the resulting constructs. The electrophysiological and complementary NMR measurements show that the pinning of individual loops alters the structure and dynamics of neighboring and distant loops in a correlated fashion. Pinning loop 6 generates a constitutively open pore and patterns of concerted loop motions control access to the OmpG nanopore.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiandi Zhuang
- Department of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics and Center for Membrane Biology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, P.O. Box 800886, Charlottesville, VA 22908, U.S.A. Homepage: http://tammlab.medicine.virginia.edu/
| | - Lukas K. Tamm
- Department of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics and Center for Membrane Biology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, P.O. Box 800886, Charlottesville, VA 22908, U.S.A. Homepage: http://tammlab.medicine.virginia.edu/
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhuang T, Chisholm C, Chen M, Tamm LK. NMR-based conformational ensembles explain pH-gated opening and closing of OmpG channel. J Am Chem Soc 2013; 135:15101-13. [PMID: 24020969 DOI: 10.1021/ja408206e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
The outer membrane protein G (OmpG) is a monomeric 33 kDa 14-stranded β-barrel membrane protein functioning as a nonspecific porin for the uptake of oligosaccharides in Escherichia coli. Two different crystal structures of OmpG obtained at different values of pH suggest a pH-gated pore opening mechanism. In these structures, extracellular loop 6 extends away from the barrel wall at neutral pH but is folded back into the pore lumen at low pH, blocking transport through the pore. Loop 6 was invisible in a previously published solution NMR structure of OmpG in n-dodecylphosphocholine micelles, presumably due to conformational exchange on an intermediate NMR time scale. Here we present an NMR paramagnetic relaxation enhancement (PRE)-based approach to visualize the conformational dynamics of loop 6 and to calculate conformational ensembles that explain the pH-gated opening and closing of the OmpG channel. The different loop conformers detected by the PRE ensemble calculations were validated by disulfide cross-linking of strategically engineered cysteines and electrophysiological single channel recordings. The results indicate a more dynamically regulated channel opening and closing than previously thought and reveal additional membrane-associated conformational ensembles at pH 6.3 and 7.0. We anticipate this approach to be generally applicable to detect and characterize functionally important conformational ensembles of membrane proteins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiandi Zhuang
- Department of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics and Center for Membrane Biology, University of Virginia , Charlottesville, Virginia 22903, United States
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hwang WL, Chen M, Cronin B, Holden MA, Bayley H. Asymmetric droplet interface bilayers. J Am Chem Soc 2008; 130:5878-9. [PMID: 18407631 DOI: 10.1021/ja802089s] [Citation(s) in RCA: 142] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
In cell membranes, the lipid compositions of the inner and outer leaflets differ. Therefore, a robust model system that enables single-channel electrical recording with asymmetric bilayers would be very useful. We and others recently developed the droplet interface bilayer (DIB), which is formed by connecting lipid monolayer-encased aqueous droplets submerged in an oil-lipid mixture. Here, we incorporate lipid vesicles of different compositions into aqueous droplets and immerse them in an oil bath to form asymmetric DIBs (a-DIBs). Both alpha-helical and beta-barrel membrane proteins insert readily into a-DIBs, and their activity can be measured by single-channel electrical recording. We show that the gating behavior of outer membrane protein G (OmpG) from Escherichia coli differs depending on the side of insertion in an asymmetric DIB with a positively charged leaflet opposing a negatively charged leaflet. The a-DIB system provides a general platform for studying the effects of bilayer leaflet composition on the behavior of ion channels and pores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William L Hwang
- Chemistry Research Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of Oxford, OX1 3TA, England, UK.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Signorell GA, Chami M, Condemine G, Schenk AD, Philippsen A, Engel A, Remigy HW. Projection maps of three members of the KdgM outer membrane protein family. J Struct Biol 2007; 160:395-403. [PMID: 17919922 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2007.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2007] [Revised: 07/09/2007] [Accepted: 08/16/2007] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
We present the projection structures of the three outer membrane porins KdgM and KdgN from Erwinia chrysanthemi and NanC from Escherichia coli, based on 2D electron crystallography. A wide screening of 2D crystallization conditions yielded tubular crystals of a suitable size and quality to perform high-resolution electron microscopy. Data processing of untilted samples allowed us to separate the information of the two crystalline layers and resulted in projection maps to a resolution of up to 7A. All three proteins exhibit a similar putative beta-barrel structure and the three crystal forms have the same symmetry. However, there are differences in the packing arrangements of the monomers as well as the densities of the projections. To interpret these projections, secondary structure prediction was performed using beta-barrel specific prediction algorithms. The predicted transmembrane beta-barrels have a high similarity in the arrangement of the putative beta-strands and the loops, but do not match those of OmpG, a related protein porin whose structure was solved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gian A Signorell
- Maurice E. Müller Institute for Structural Biology, Biozentrum, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 50/70, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|