The association between antihypertensive drug therapies and plasma lipid levels in the general population

Hypertension and Dyslipidemia Combined Therapeutic Approaches

Treating blood pressure (BP) alone may provide only limited benefits while it is recommendable to manage the total cardiovascular risk. To date, several studies have shown that concomitant treatment of hypertension and dyslipidemia with non-pharmacological approaches and/or metabolically neutral antihypertensive drugs and statins produce a significantly greater reduction of the risk of developing cardiovascular disease. Thus, in this review article, we summarize the available evidence regarding non-pharmacological and pharmacological approaches with a favourable effect on both BP and lipids.

Use of carvedilol in hypertension: an update

β-blockers are effective antihypertensive agents and, together with diuretics, have been the cornerstone of pioneering studies showing their benefits on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality as a consequence of blood pressure reduction in patients with hypertension. However, evidence from recent meta-analyses have demonstrated no benefit afforded by atenolol compared with placebo in risk of mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke, and a higher risk of mortality and stroke with atenolol/propranolol compared with other antihypertensive drug classes. Thus, the effect of these agents on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertensive patients, especially their use in uncomplicated hypertension, has remained largely controversial. However, it is recognized that the clinical studies used in these meta-analyses were mainly based on the older second-generation β-blockers, such as atenolol and metoprolol. Actually, considerable heterogeneity in, eg, pharmacokinetic, pharmacological, and physicochemical properties exists across the different classes of β-blockers, particularly between the second-generation and newer third-generation agents. Carvedilol is a vasodilating noncardioselective third-generation β-blocker, without the negative hemodynamic and metabolic effects of traditional β-blockers, which can be used as a cardioprotective agent. Compared with conventional β-blockers, carvedilol maintains cardiac output, has a reduced prolonged effect on heart rate, and reduces blood pressure by decreasing vascular resistance. Studies have also shown that carvedilol exhibits favorable effects on metabolic parameters, eg, glycemic control, insulin sensitivity, and lipid metabolism, suggesting that it could be considered in the treatment of patients with metabolic syndrome or diabetes. The present report provides an overview of the main clinical studies concerning carvedilol administered as either monotherapy or in combination with another antihypertensive or more frequently a diuretic agent, with particular focus on the additional benefits beyond blood pressure reduction.

Blood pressure responses and metabolic effects of hydrochlorothiazide and atenolol

BACKGROUND

Thiazides and β-blockers cause adverse metabolic effects (AMEs), but whether these effects share predictors with blood pressure (BP) response is unknown. We aimed to determine whether AMEs are correlated with BP response in uncomplicated hypertensives.

METHODS

In a multicenter, open-label, parallel-group trial, we enrolled 569 persons, aged 17-65, with random assignment to 9 weeks of daily hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) or atenolol monotherapy, followed by 9 weeks of add-on therapy with the alternate agent. Measurements included home BP, averaged over 1 week, weight and fasting levels of serum glucose, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), triglycerides, and uric acid (UA) before and after monotherapy and after add-on therapy.

RESULTS

Increases in UA correlated with reductions in systolic BP (SBP) (r = -0.18; P = 0.003) and diastolic BP (DBP) (r = -0.20; P = 0.001) following HCTZ monotherapy and add-on therapy (r = -0.27 and r = -0.21, respectively; both P < 0.001). After adjustment for age, race, gender, and baseline body mass index (BMI), only the correlation between UA and DBP response became nonsignificant. Reductions in HDL correlated with systolic response following atenolol monotherapy (r = 0.18; P = 0.002) and with systolic and diastolic response following add-on therapy (r = 0.30 and r = 0.24, respectively; both P < 0.0001). These correlations remained significant after covariate adjustment. BP responses were not correlated with changes in glucose, LDL, triglycerides, or weight following either therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

BP response correlated with changes in UA following HCTZ therapy and HDL following atenolol therapy. No other significant correlations were observed between BP response and AMEs, suggesting that these effects generally do not share predictors. Patients should be monitored for AMEs, regardless of BP response.

Carvedilol in hypertension treatment

Although β-blockers have been previously shown to effectively reduce blood pressure (BP) and have been used for hypertension treatment for over 40 years, their effect on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertensive patients remains controversial and its use in uncomplicated hypertension is currently under debate. However, data on the above field derive mainly from studies which were conducted with older agents, such as atenolol and metoprolol, while considerable pharamacokinetic and pharmacodynamic heterogeneity is present within the class of β-blockers. Carvedilol, a vasodilating non-cardioselective β-blocker, is a compound that seems to give the opportunity to the clinician to use a cardioprotective agent without the concerning hemodynamic and metabolic actions of traditional β-blocker therapy. In contrast with conventional β-blockers, carvedilol maintains cardiac output, has a less extended effect on heart rate and reduces BP by decreasing vascular resistance. Further, several studies has shown that carvedilol has a beneficial or at least neutral effect on metabolic parameters, such as glycemic control, insulin sensitivity, and lipid metabolism, suggesting that they could be used in subjects with the metabolic syndrome or diabetes without negative consequences. This article summarizes the distinct pharmacologic, hemodynamic, and metabolic properties of carvedilol in relation to conventional β-blockers, attempting to examine the potential use of this agent for hypertension treatment.

Effect of antihypertensive treatment on plasma fibrinogen and serum HDL levels in patients with essential hypertension

The influence of hypertension, and its treatment, on circulating lipid and fibrinogen (Fib) concentrations in patients with essential hypertension was investigated. The lipid profile and Fib levels were measured in 353 patients (131 men) with essential hypertension. Their median age was 60 years (range: 18-85 years). All patients had normal results from liver, renal, and thyroid function tests. There were 162 patients (45.9%) who were not receiving antihypertensive treatment. Of the remaining patients, 117 were taking 'lipid-hostile' beta-blockers, thiazide diuretics) antihypertensives and 74 were taking 'lipid-neutral' (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, angiotensin-II receptor blockers) agents. Patients who were taking 'lipid-hostile' antihypertensive drugs had significantly higher plasma Fib concentrations when compared with those taking 'lipid-neutral' antihypertensives or those not receiving antihypertensive treatment. These differences were not attributable to established factors that influence plasma Fib levels, since when smokers and patients with diabetes mellitus and/or vascular disease were excluded, the difference remained significant. In addition, in these more homogeneous groups, patients receiving 'lipid-neutral' treatment had significantly higher serum high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels when compared with both those taking 'lipid-hostile' antihypertensives and untreated ones. There were no significant differences in the other lipid variables, independently of the presence/absence or the type of antihypertensives. These results suggest that antihypertensive drugs have additional effects, beyond lowering blood pressure, on other vascular risk factors, like Fib and HDL. These effects may depend on the type of drug used.

Effects of hydrochlorothiazide and propranolol treatment on chylomicron metabolism in hypertensive subjects

Modifications in chylomicron metabolism caused by antihypertensive drugs were investigated in hypertensive subjects because previous studies had indicated that diuretics and beta-blockers modify the plasma lipid concentrations through mechanisms that were not fully understood. A triglyceride-rich emulsion resembling lymph chylomicrons, labeled with (3H) triolein and (14C) cholesteryl oleate, was infused intravenously into mildly hypertensive patients after 8 weeks on placebo and subsequently on hydrochlorothiazide (n = 10) or propranolol (n = 8). The residence time of both radioactivities in plasma was utilized for the simultaneous calculation of the particle remnant removal rate and of the lipoprotein lipase activity expressed as a delipidation index = 1 – [(3H) triolein residence time/(14C) cholesteryl oleate residence time]. Treatment with hydrochlorothiazide diminished the delipidation rate value whereas propranolol mildly increased the removal rate of the remnant particle. These alterations of the chylomicron kinetics were not accompanied by changes in plasma triglycerides, glucose, and insulin concentration as measured in the fasting state. The impairment of the lipoprotein lipase activity by thiazides and the faster removal rate of the whole particle by propranolol could explain the reason why in previous clinical studies the simultaneous use of these drugs does not aggravate the hyperlipidemia known to be induced by thiazides alone. Key words: hydrochlorothiazide, propranolol, hypertension, plasma lipoproteins, chylomicron metabolism.

Self-blood-pressure monitoring--a questionnaire study: response, requirement, training, support-group popularity and recommendations

The objective of this study was to survey hypertensive patients' response to, requirement for and training in self-blood pressure monitoring (SBPM). A total of 222 hypertensives were invited to complete a questionnaire even when not participating in the project. Questions supplied information on demographics, monitoring frequency, convenience of attending the surgery, monitor ownership and preference for and ease of self-monitoring. Comments supplied qualitative data. Training group questionnaires supplied similar data as well as SBPM data before and after training. Of 133 respondents, a higher educated, younger, wider age range wanted to participate (76; 57.2%) and tended to self-monitor. However, only an increase in further education (FE) was associated with an increased probability of participation and inclination to self-monitor in the multivariate analyses. A positive relationship exists between age and frequency in both groups. About a sixth of respondents own monitors and ownership is correlated to FE. Although most patients found it convenient to visit the surgery, the percentage finding it convenient was lower in patients attending training sessions than in the original survey, possibly indicating that independence is important for SBPM. Younger, higher-educated patients tended to self-monitor although FE was again the significant factor. Training increased preference for the idea of SBPM, prospective monitor ownership (64.8% of non-owners) and self-monitoring intention (76.1%). Patients found recording card listed cardiovascular disease (CVD) risks valuable and 69.6% (32) wanted to establish a support group. Comments and interviews indicated haphazard knowledge, routines and uncertainty about SBPM. A standardised procedure including patient assessment, SBPM protocol and lifestyle education is needed for SBPM to be successful.