Vacuum and forceps training in residency: experience and self-reported competency

Analysis of the obstetrician's posture and movements during a simulated forceps delivery

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to identify and qualify, by means of a three-dimensional kinematic analysis, the postures and movements of obstetricians during a simulated forceps birth, and then to study the association of the obstetricians' experience with the technique adopted.

METHOD

Fifty-seven volunteer obstetricians, 20 from the Limoges and 37 from the Poitiers University hospitals, were included in this multi-centric study. They were classified into 3 groups: beginners, intermediates, and experts, beginners having performed fewer than 10 forceps deliveries in real conditions, intermediates between 10 and 100, and experts more than 100. The posture and movements of the obstetricians were recorded between December 2020 and March 2021 using an optoelectronic motion capture system during simulated forceps births. Joint angles qualifying these postures and movements were analysed between the three phases of the foetal traction. These phases were defined by the passage of a virtual point associated with the forceps blade through two anatomical planes: the mid-pelvis and the pelvic outlet. Then, a consolidated ascending hierarchical classification (AHC) was applied to these data in order to objectify the existence of groups of similar behaviours.

RESULTS

The AHC distinguished four different postures adopted when crossing the first plane and three different traction techniques. 48% of the beginners adopted one of the two raised posture, 22% being raised without trunk flexion and 26% raised with trunk flexion. Conversely, 58% of the experts positioned themselves in a "chevalier servant" posture (going down on one knee) and 25% in a "squatting" posture before initiating traction. The results also show that the joint movement amplitude tends to reduce with the level of expertise.

CONCLUSION

Forceps delivery was performed in different ways, with the experienced obstetricians favouring postures that enabled observation at the level of the maternal perineum and techniques reducing movement amplitude. The first perspective of this work is to relate these different techniques to the traction force generated. The results of these studies have the potential to contribute to the training of obstetricians in forceps delivery, and to improve the safety of women and newborns.

First and Second Stage Labor Management: ACOG Clinical Practice Guideline No. 8

PURPOSE

The purpose of this document is to define labor and labor arrest and provide recommendations for the management of dystocia in the first and second stage of labor and labor arrest.

TARGET POPULATION

Pregnant individuals in the first or second stage of labor.

METHODS

This guideline was developed using an a priori protocol in conjunction with a writing team consisting of one maternal-fetal medicine subspecialist appointed by the ACOG Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines-Obstetrics and two external subject matter experts. ACOG medical librarians completed a comprehensive literature search for primary literature within Cochrane Library, Cochrane Collaboration Registry of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, PubMed, and MEDLINE. Studies that moved forward to the full-text screening stage were assessed by the writing team based on standardized inclusion and exclusion criteria. Included studies underwent quality assessment, and a modified GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) evidence-to-decision framework was applied to interpret and translate the evidence into recommendation statements.

RECOMMENDATIONS

This Clinical Practice Guideline includes definitions of labor and labor arrest, along with recommendations for the management of dystocia in the first and second stages of labor and labor arrest. Recommendations are classified by strength and evidence quality. Ungraded Good Practice Points are included to provide guidance when a formal recommendation could not be made because of inadequate or nonexistent evidence.

A new approach to assessing the obstetrician's posture and movement during an instrumental forceps delivery

INTRODUCTION

The number of deliveries by forceps decreases significantly in favour of the vacuum. Now, when the use of forceps is necessary, physicians less experimented with this procedure are likely to induce serious and preventable perineal or foetal injuries. Training therefore becomes essential. However, there are no clear recommendations on the technique to perform a delivery by forceps, namely the body posture and gesture to adopt. Our goal is then to provide a protocol that can help to determine if there is an optimal technique to perform a delivery by forceps.

METHOD

We will include voluntary participants whose level of experience and type of practice differ. We will propose to record their postures and gestures using an optoelectronic motion analysis system during a forceps delivery simulated on a mannequin. We will also measure the traction force produced by the subject on the forceps using force platforms and technical markers placed on the forceps. We will then perform a principal component analysis to look for similar motion patterns.

EXPECTED RESULTS

We plan to analyse about fifty participants (25 seniors and 25 juniors). Our hypothesis is that the realism of the simulation will be deemed satisfactory by the participants, that the experimental conditions will not modify their gestures, and that the degree of experience will result in different techniques.

CONCLUSION

A better knowledge on the posture and gesture to adopt to realise a forceps delivery should improve the safety of women and new-borns. The results of this study could also be a valuable contribution for the training of obstetricians.

Using Motion Tracking to Analyze Forceps Paths During Simulated Forceps-Assisted Vaginal Deliveries

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of motion tracking to discern variation in forceps paths during standardized simulated forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries among experienced and inexperienced obstetric providers.

METHODS

This is a pilot study involving 24 obstetrics and gynecology residents and 6 faculty at a single institution. Each participant was filmed performing standardized simulated forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries on a high-fidelity model. Motion tracking software (Kinovea, Medoc, France) was used to track the path of the forceps shank. Data were analyzed for total path length, total x-plane displacement, total y-plane displacement, and final forceps angle. One-way analysis of variance was used to evaluate for statistically significant differences between groups based on education year, with Turkey HSD post hoc test to identify interactions.

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences were noted between groups in the total path length (F = 7.57, P < 0.001) and total y-plane displacement (F = 5.79, P < 0.001). On pairwise comparison, significant differences were noted between faculty and postgraduate year 1 as well as faculty and postgraduate year 2 for total y-plane displacement and total path length. Significant differences were not observed between groups for total x-plane displacement (F = 0.89, P = 0.475) and final forceps angle (F = 2.45, P = 0.052).

CONCLUSIONS

Motion tracking of standardized simulated forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries identifies statistically significant differences between experienced and inexperienced obstetric providers. Our findings suggest that motion tracking can be used to design an educational intervention to improve forceps technique among obstetrics and gynecology residents.

A push for evidence: An effective training in operative birth

Effective training in operative birth should be the only type of operative birth that trains the junior obstetricians who are exposed to it. Although it remains difficult to fully characterise, effective training in operative birth is likely to include (i) realistic, local, integrated simulation training and (ii) hands-on senior support for an extended period of time. To further improve skills training in operative birth, an evaluation of the real-world effectiveness of current training should take place, a core outcome set for clinical trials should be developed, and real-time reporting and tracking of practitioner-specific outcome measures should be implemented.

Resident and program director confidence in resident preparedness for operative vaginal deliveries in Obstetrics and Gynecology Training Programs in the United States

BACKGROUND

Operative vaginal delivery is used to expedite a safe vaginal delivery in the second stage of labor and is considered an essential part of residency training in obstetrics and gynecology.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the self-reported readiness of obstetrics and gynecology residents in the United States to perform vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery and forceps-assisted vaginal delivery compared with the perceptions of program directors.

STUDY DESIGN

The Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology surveyed the residents in all US training programs about their readiness to perform forceps-assisted and vacuum-assisted deliveries. The program directors were simultaneously surveyed about the readiness of their cohort to perform operative deliveries with and without attending oversight. The primary outcome of the survey was the residents' self-reported confidence in their ability to autonomously and independently perform operative deliveries.

RESULTS

Α total of 5084 out of 5514 (92.9%) resident physicians and 241 out of the 292 (83%) residency program directors completed the survey. Eighty-seven percent (95% confidence interval, 84.9-88.9) of the graduating residents reported feeling that they could autonomously perform a vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery, compared with 49.5% (95% confidence interval, 46.6-52.4) for forceps-assisted vaginal delivery (P<.01). Similarly, whereas 95.9% (95% confidence interval, 94.6-97.0) of the residents felt that they could confidently perform an emergency vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery, only 42.3% (95% confidence interval, 39.4-45.2) felt confident performing an emergency forceps-assisted vaginal delivery (P<.01). The residency program directors significantly overestimated their residents' confidence in independently performing an emergency forceps-assisted vaginal delivery or vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery than the residents themselves (54% [95% confidence interval, 47.1-60.5] vs 24% [95% confidence interval, 22.5-24.9] and 98.6% [95% confidence interval, 97.0-100] vs 71.9 [95% confidence interval, 70.6-73.2] respectively P<.01). Trainees in military-based residency programs and those interested in pursuing a career as generalists or maternal-fetal medicine specialists reported significantly higher preparedness to perform a forceps-assisted vaginal delivery.

CONCLUSION

Graduating obstetrics and gynecology residents report feeling less prepared to independently perform a forceps-assisted vaginal delivery than a vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery. The program directors had more confidence in the ability of their residents to perform an operative vaginal delivery than the residents themselves.

Has the prevalence of levator avulsion after forceps delivery changed over the last six decades? A retrospective study in a urogynaecological population

OBJECTIVE

Forceps delivery is associated with a higher risk of maternal birth trauma. It is speculated that it is due to sub-optimal use of forceps in inexperienced hands. The aim of this study was to determine the association between time of forceps birth and prevalence of levator avulsion over the last six decades.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective analysis of datasets of women with a history of forceps delivery, seen at a tertiary urogynaecological centre between January 2014 and August 2018. They had undergone a standardized interview, clinical examination and four-dimensional translabial ultrasound. Archived imaging data was reviewed for levator avulsion offline at a later date, blinded against all clinical data. Associations between levator avulsion, maternal age at first vaginal birth, the weight of the first vaginally born baby, and time since forceps delivery categorised by decade were tested by univariable analysis. Factors found to be significant on univariable analysis were included in a multivariable logistic regression model to test the association between prevalence of levator avulsion and time of forceps delivery while controlling for confounders.

RESULTS

In total, 2026 patients were seen during the study period. Among them 511 (25.2%) had a history of forceps delivery. Fourteen volume datasets were incomplete or missing, leaving 497 complete datasets for analysis. Mean age at presentation was 58 ± 12 years (23-91). Mean body mass index was 29 ± 6 kg/m². Mean age at first delivery was 25 ± 5 years. Mean birth weight of the first vaginal birth was 3454 ± 557 g. 457 women (92%) had had one forceps delivery, 31 had two forceps deliveries (6%) and 9 had three forceps deliveries (2%). Mean time interval between forceps delivery and assessment was 32 ± 13 years (0.3-64.8). 229 women (46%) were diagnosed with levator avulsion. The prevalence of avulsion after forceps increased significantly from 34% to 56% between 1950 and 2017 (P = 0.04). However this difference became insignificant when controlling for maternal age at 1st vaginal delivery and birth weight.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence of a changed prevalence of levator avulsion at forceps delivery over the last 67 years.

Reported case numbers and variability in delivery route and volume by obstetrics and gynecology residents from 2003 to 2019

BACKGROUND

The obstetrical landscape in the United States has changed over the past several decades, during which there has been a decline in the number of operative vaginal deliveries performed. Procedural cases of obstetrics and gynecology residents are tracked in the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education database, with a minimum requirement of 15 operative vaginal deliveries before graduation. Nowadays, it is unknown whether the decreasing numbers of operative vaginal deliveries are affecting the delivery case volume and experience of obstetrics and gynecology residents.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to analyze the trends in the number and route of obstetrical deliveries, including operative vaginal deliveries, performed by graduating obstetrics and gynecology residents in the United States as logged within the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education database.

STUDY DESIGN

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education case log data were examined for graduating obstetrics and gynecology residents between 2003 and 2019. Delivery case volume numbers for spontaneous vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery, forceps-assisted vaginal delivery, and vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery were extracted and analyzed over time using linear regression. To compare the variability in logged cases, residents at the 70th percentile for number of cases logged were compared with residents at the 30th percentile for number of cases logged for each delivery type (spontaneous vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery, forceps-assisted vaginal delivery, and vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery).

RESULTS

Overall, obstetrical delivery data for 20,268 obstetrics and gynecology residents were collected from 2003 to 2019. Over this period, the mean number of spontaneous vaginal deliveries significantly decreased over time by 20% from 320.8±138.7 to 256.1±75.6 (slope, -2.6; P<.001); however, no significant difference was noted in the reported cesarean delivery cases, with an 8% increase from 191.8±80.1 to 206.8±69.7 per graduating resident (slope, 0.136; P=.873). Notably, the mean reported cases of forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries decreased by 75% from 23.8±21.9 to 6±6.8 per graduating resident (slope, -0.851; P<.001). Similarly, the mean logs of vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery decreased by 37% from 23.8±17.1 to 15±9.5 (slope, -0.542; P<.001). The ratio of reported resident case logs comparing the volume at the 70th percentile with the volume at the 30th percentile demonstrated a significant decrease over time for spontaneous vaginal delivery (slope, -0.015; P<.001), cesarean delivery (slope, -0.015; P<.001), and vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery (slope, -0.033; P<.001) but was significantly increased for forceps-assisted vaginal delivery (slope, 0.07, P=.0065).

CONCLUSION

In the reported Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education case logs, we identified that the reported number of obstetrical deliveries performed by obstetrics and gynecology residents in the United States is changing, with a significant decline recognized from 2003 to 2019 in logged numbers of spontaneous vaginal deliveries, vacuum-assisted vaginal deliveries, and forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries, without a difference in reported cesarean delivery cases per graduating resident. Furthermore, substantial variation is seen among resident volume nationwide, with the difference in high- and low-volume resident forceps-assisted vaginal delivery experience increasing over time. Awareness of these data should notify the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and educators about reasonable targets, increased need for simulation, and new ways to teach all modes of deliveries effectively in all residency programs.

Training and expertise in undertaking assisted vaginal delivery (AVD): a mixed methods systematic review of practitioners views and experiences

BACKGROUND

During childbirth, complications may arise which necessitate an expedited delivery of the fetus. One option is instrumental assistance (forceps or a vacuum-cup), which, if used with skill and sensitivity, can improve maternal/neonatal outcomes. This review aimed to understand the core competencies and expertise required for skilled use in AVD in conjunction with reviewing potential barriers and facilitators to gaining competency and expertise, from the point of view of maternity care practitioners, funders and policy makers.

METHODS

A mixed methods systematic review was undertaken in five databases. Inclusion criteria were primary studies reporting views, opinions, perspectives and experiences of the target group in relation to the expertise, training, behaviours and competencies required for optimal AVD, barriers and facilitators to achieving practitioner competencies, and to the implementation of appropriate training. Quality appraisal was carried out on included studies. A mixed-methods convergent synthesis was carried out, and the findings were subjected to GRADE-CERQual assessment of confidence.

RESULTS

31 papers, reporting on 27 studies and published 1985-2020 were included. Studies included qualitative designs (3), mixed methods (3), and quantitative surveys (21). The majority (23) were from high-income countries, two from upper-middle income countries, one from a lower-income country: one survey included 111 low-middle countries. Confidence in the 10 statements of findings was mostly low, with one exception (moderate confidence). The review found that AVD competency comprises of inter-related skill sets including non-technical skills (e.g. behaviours), general clinical skills; and specific technical skills associated with particular instrument use. We found that practitioners needed and welcomed additional specific training, where a combination of teaching methods were used, to gain skills and confidence in this field. Clinical mentorship, and observing others confidently using the full range of instruments, was also required, and valued, to develop competency and expertise in AVD. However, concerns regarding poor outcomes and litigation were also raised.

CONCLUSION

Access to specific AVD training, using a combination of teaching methods. Complements, but does not replace, close clinical mentorship from experts who are positive about AVD, and opportunities to practice emerging AVD skills with supportive supervision. Further research is required to ascertain effective modalities for wider training, education, and supportive supervision for optimal AVD use.

A randomized controlled trial of prophylactic early manual rotation of the occiput posterior fetus at the beginning of the second stage vs expectant management

BACKGROUND

Women whose fetuses are in the occiput posterior head position at the time of delivery are known to have longer second stages of labor and more complicated deliveries including more operative deliveries (cesarean, forceps, or vacuum-assisted delivery) and more third- and fourth-degree lacerations than those whose fetuses are in the occiput anterior position.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that rotating the fetus at the start of the second stage might decrease these complications.

STUDY DESIGN

At Utah Valley Regional Medical Center, we randomized term (37 weeks or beyond), nulliparous patients with epidurals and a singleton fetus in the occiput posterior position to either attempted early manual rotation to occiput anterior or to a control group managed expectantly. The control group could later be rotated if indicated by the clinical setting. The primary outcome was the length of the second stage of labor. Dichotomous outcomes were compared utilizing the chi-square test, and continuous outcomes were compared utilizing the Student t test or Wilcoxon rank sum test. The sample size estimate was for 64 patients to be randomized (32 in each group) to show a difference of 36 minutes of pushing time between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

We randomized 65 patients (33 to early manual rotation and 32 to control). When we examined a variety of baseline obstetrical characteristics, we found no statistically different values for the 2 groups. The early manual rotation group had a shorter median second stage of labor (65 minutes vs 82 minutes; P=.04).

CONCLUSION

Early manual rotation of the occiput posterior fetus led to a shorter second stage of labor in this small randomized trial. Future larger randomized trials are needed to validate these findings.

Factors affecting confidence and competence of doctors in performing operative vaginal births: A qualitative study

OBJECTIVES

Operative vaginal birth (OVB) is an important skill for obstetricians. It is the most common emergency intervention in obstetrics and requires a high degree of skill. While there is a lot of data available on technical and non-technical factors affecting the outcome of OVBs little work has been done to investigate the factors that make obstetricians feel confident and competent when performing such a procedure. The objective of this study was therefore to identify the common factors that affect confidence and competence of obstetricians in operative vaginal births (OVB). Our hypothesis was that a qualitative research method would provide a rich approach where themes would be developed that the participants themselves identify as important.

STUDY DESIGN

Qualitative research within two University Hospitals and one District Hospital in Ireland. Participants interviewed ranged from first year trainees to consultant obstetricians. Interviews using open ended questions. Interviews were recorded on audio and later transcribed. Thematic analysis was performed until saturation.

RESULTS

35 obstetricians were interviewed. The median number of years of experience was 5 years (range 3-20 years). The median number of OVB was 200 (range 20-1000+). Vacuum was the preferred choice amongst junior trainees. Preference shifted to forceps with increasing clinical experience. Seven clear themes emerged. Three themes were common to all participants: firstly, that all clinicians reported respect for the primiparous OVB in anticipation of possible complications, secondly the wish for senior midwifery support and finally the importance of clinical experience and exposure. Four themes were common to trainees only. Female clinicians in training reported significant self-doubt in their ability to perform an OVB and had concerns about causing harm. Clinicians in training wished to be trained by consultants during their first year on the labour ward. Experience was important. The final theme was a wish for more training in forceps OVB by clinicians in training.

CONCLUSION

This qualitative study identified factors that can be used to design education and training in OVB in order to support trainees and ultimately improve care for the woman and baby.

Simulation for intrapartum care: from training to novel device innovation

Improving maternal and perinatal care is a global priority. Simulation training and novel applications of simulation for intrapartum care may help to reduce preventable deaths worldwide. Evaluation studies have published details of the effectiveness of simulation training for obstetric emergencies, exploring clinical and non-clinical factors as well as the impact on patient outcomes (both maternal and neonatal). This review summarized the many uses of simulation in obstetric emergencies from training to assessment. It also described the adaption of training in low-resource settings and the evidence behind the equipment recommended to support simulation training. The review also discussed novel applications for simulation such as its use in the development of a new device for assisted vaginal birth and its potential role in Cesarean section training. This study analyzed the financial implications of simulation training and how this may impact the delivery of such training packages, considering that simulation should be developed and utilized as a key tool in the development of safe intrapartum care in both emergency and non-emergency settings, in innovation and product development.

Anal Sphincter Injury Associated with Vaginal Twin Delivery

OBJECTIVE

Obstetric anal sphincter injury remains the most common cause of fecal incontinence in women, and research in twin pregnancies is sparse. This study aimed to examine risk factors for sphincter injury in twin deliveries over a 10-year period.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective study of twin vaginal deliveries in a tertiary-level hospital over 10 years. We examined the demographics of women who had a vaginal delivery of at least one twin. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine risk factors.

RESULTS

There were 1,783 (2.1%) twin pregnancies, of which 556 (31%) had a vaginal delivery of at least one twin. Sphincter injury occurred in 1.1% (6/556) women with twins compared with 2.9% (1720/59,944) singleton vaginal deliveries. Women with sphincter injury had more instrumental deliveries (83.3 vs. 27.6%; p = 0.008). On univariate analysis, only instrumental delivery was a significant risk factor (odds ratio: 2.93; p = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

Sphincter injury occurs at a lower rate in vaginal twin pregnancies than in singletons. No twin-specific risk factors were identified. Discussion of the risk of sphincter injury should form part of patient counseling with regard to the mode of delivery.

Reducing caesarean rates in a public maternity hospital by implementing a plan of action: a quality improvement report

BACKGROUND

Caesarean rates increased in different parts of the world, rising from 20% to 33% in the USA and from 40% to 55% in Brazil between 1996 and 2011; however, there was no reduction in morbimortality rates. Several factors have been suggested as responsible for this increase, such as health judicialisation, fear of the painful process on the patients' part and reduction of medical training in vaginal delivery and labour complications. It is urgent to reverse this process and, therefore, a model of actions was created with the intention of engaging the team in order to reduce caesarean rates in a Brazilian hospital.

METHODOLOGY

The model was based on the following actions: encouragement of labour analgesia; execution of written reports of any cardiotocographic examination; plan-do-study-act cycles for nursing orientations about the positions that favour pregnant women during labour; creation of a birth induction form; monthly feedback with physicians and nurses on caesarean rates achieved; verification of the caesarean rate by medical staff with individual feedback; daily round of medical coordination for case discussions; disclosure of caesarean rates on hospital posters; and constant dissemination of literature with strategies to reduce caesarean delivery. This plan of action started in January 2016. The mean caesarean section rate in the 31 months preceding the interventions (period A) was then compared with the 31 subsequent months (period B).

RESULTS

Both periods presented caesarean rates with normal distribution. The mean caesarean rate was 29.24% (range: 38.69%-23.89%, SD 3.24%) vs 25.84% (range: 17.96%-34.97%, SD 3.92%, p<0.05), respectively, for periods A and B.

CONCLUSION

After the implementation of the plan of action, there was a reduction in caesarean rates in this hospital.

Vaginal operative delivery in Germany: a national survey about experience and self-reported competency

Background: To determine German obstetricians' self-perceived experience with vacuum and forceps deliveries.Patients and methods: Using a web-based survey, German obstetricians were invited to participate in a survey. This survey was approved by the German society of obstetrics and gynecology.Results: Surveys of 635 obstetricians were received. All obstetricians reported performing significantly less forceps than vacuum deliveries. Almost all obstetricians want to perform more delivery, which indicates the willingness to learn both. More obstetricians felt confident to perform vacuum than forceps. In a similar obstetrical indication, most of the obstetricians would prefer to perform a vacuum assisted delivery. The majority of the obstetricians wished to receive more training in vaginal operative deliveries.Conclusion: Most of the German obstetricians prefer to use vacuum-assisted vaginal deliveries and feel less confident to perform forceps deliveries. Standardized training to improve the quality of care is recommended.

Complications of operative vaginal delivery and provider volume and experience

Objective: To evaluate associations between operative vaginal delivery complications and provider experience (operative vaginal delivery volume and time since residency).Methods: We included all operative vaginal deliveries between 2008 and 2014 at a tertiary care teaching hospital, stratified into forceps-assisted and vacuum-assisted deliveries. Complications included severe perineal lacerations (3rd and 4th degree) and neonatal injuries (subgaleal/subdural/cerebral hemorrhage, facial nerve injury, and scalp injury), which were identified by International Classification Diagnosis-9 codes. Providers were categorized by operative vaginal delivery volume (mean annual forceps- or vacuum-assisted deliveries over the study interval) and time since residency. Regression analyses were used to compare complication rates by provider volume and time since residency, adjusting for potential confounders, using 0-1 deliveries per year and <5 years since residency as reference groups.Results: Nine hundred and thirty-four forceps and 1074 vacuums occurred. For forceps-assisted deliveries, severe perineal injury was decreased among providers with >10 forceps per year (aOR 0.50 [95%CI 0.30-0.81]) and at 15-19 years (aOR 0.45 [95% CI 0.22-0.94], and ≥25 years (aOR 0.45 [0.27-0.73]) since residency. There were no associations with neonatal injuries. Among vacuum-assisted deliveries, severe perineal injury decreased at ≥25 years since residency (aOR 0.35 [95%CI 0.17-0.74], with no association with provider volume. Neonatal injury decreased at 5-9 years (aOR 0.53 [95%CI 0.30-0.93]), and 15-19 years since residency (aOR 0.53 [95%CI 0.29-0.97]), due to differences in scalp injuries. Neonatal injuries other than scalp injury were rare.Conclusion: Severe perineal lacerations decreased with increasing operative vaginal delivery experience, primarily among forceps-assisted vaginal delivery. Providers >5 years since residency may have lower scalp injury with vacuums, but this cohort was largely underpowered for neonatal injury.

Video-Based Teaching in Patient and Instrument Selection for Operative Vaginal Deliveries

OBJECTIVE

Worldwide, the rate of operative vaginal deliveries has decreased, and as a result trainees are lacking exposure and training. The aim of this study was to determine whether a video-based masterclass can improve trainees' confidence, comfort, and knowledge in performing second stage labour assessments and selecting appropriate patients and instruments for operative vaginal deliveries.

METHODS

Current University of Toronto obstetrics and gynaecology residents were invited to participate. The intervention included two videos on second stage assessment: (1) selecting the appropriate patient and (2) selecting the appropriate instrument for an operative vaginal delivery. Trainees' comfort and confidence were assessed pre- and post-intervention. A focus group was conducted that assessed trainees' knowledge acquisition. Descriptive thematic analysis was performed, and common themes were extracted.

RESULTS

On average, residents have performed more vacuum deliveries than forceps deliveries as primary operators (26.4 vs. 7.9). Following the video intervention, there was a statistically significant improvement (P ≤ 0.05) in trainees' comfort in the following areas: (1) understanding the maternal pelvis, (2) choosing instruments, (3) choosing forceps, (4) deciding the location of delivery, (5) identifying favourable clinical factors, and (6) identifying poor prognostic clinical factors. There was no difference in trainees' self-confidence. Major themes from focus group data included new knowledge gained on second stage assessment techniques, new approaches to existing knowledge, and the multiple challenges and barriers that exist to learning.

CONCLUSION

Video-based education on second stage labour assessment and operative vaginal delivery improves trainees' comfort and serves as a valuable complementary tool to clinical learning.

Forceps-assisted vaginal delivery: the landscape of obstetrics and gynecology resident training

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the current landscape of forceps-assisted vaginal delivery (FAVD) training in the USA (US) amongst obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) residents. We investigated national and regionalization of resident interest by trainee level and skill acquisition in a climate of FAVD decline.

STUDY DESIGN

An anonymous 20-question survey was distributed to US OB/GYN residency programs. Census Bureau-designated regions were used. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze survey responses. Respondents were compared by postgraduate year (PGY) and region.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 434 OB/GYN residents over one academic year with representation from all US regions. PGY-3 and PGY-4 residents completed statistically significant more FAVDs compared to PGY-1 and PGY-2 residents combined (p < 0.0001). By region, there was a significant difference in the number of FAVDs completed. The Midwest performed the most and Northeast performed the least (p < .0001). There was a statistically significant difference in simulation experiences by PGY (p < .0001) and by region (p = .0003) and in selfreported preparedness to perform FAVDs independently by PGY and by region.

CONCLUSIONS

Residents are motivated to learn FAVD. Our study is the first to demonstrate that residents are not obtaining adequate experience irrespective of geographic region. Current training should implement simulation and continued acquisition of training in FAVD.

The future of population medicine: Investigating the role of advanced practice providers and simulation education in special patient populations

Advanced practice providers (APPs) have come to play an increasingly significant role in the United States healthcare system in the past five decades, particularly in primary care. The first portion of this paper will explore the utilization of APPs in specific patient populations: pediatrics, obstetrics, geriatrics, and psychiatry. After a brief discussion of the demand for these specialties, the authors will outline the educational preparation and competencies that nurse practitioners and physician assistants must achieve before working with these special populations. Finally, the authors will discuss the current and future roles of APPs in pediatric, obstetric, geriatric, and psychiatric populations. Simulated patient interactions and scenarios have become integrated into clinical education for many health care providers. Although traditionally utilized only in emergency medicine education, medical simulation has grown to become a staple of training in nearly every area of medicine. Healthcare providers of all levels can benefit from both individual and team-based training designed to improve everything from patient communication to procedural competence. The flexible nature of simulation training allows for customized teaching that is directly relevant to a specific specialty. The second half of this paper will demonstrate simulation's versatilite applications in the specialty areas of urgent care, pediatrics, mental health, geriatrics, and obstetrics.

Single prior caesarean section and risk of anal sphincter injury

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Injury to the anal sphincter at vaginal delivery remains the leading cause of faecal incontinence in women. Previous studies reported an increased incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) in women attempting vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC). The aim of the paper was to establish whether women in their second pregnancy, with one previous uterine scar, are at a higher risk of OASI compared with nulliparous women.

METHODS

All primiparous and secundiparous women with a previous caesarean section who delivered from 2008 to 2017 were analysed in a single-centre retrospective study. The primary endpoint was OASI. Labour characteristics in both groups were compared, and a multiple regression model was created.

RESULTS

There were 8573 vaginal deliveries of nulliparous women and 3453 deliveries of women in their second pregnancy with a previous caesarean section, of whom 550 had a successful VBAC. There was no significant difference in the rate of OASI between primiparous women and those who had a successful VBAC: 3.5% (297/8573) versus 3.1% (17/550), P = 0.730). Foetal macrosomia (>4 kg) and forceps delivery were risk factors for sphincter injury, while episiotomy and epidural anaesthesia were protective.

CONCLUSIONS

VBAC does not confer an increased risk of OASI after a first delivery by caesarean section when compared with nulliparous women. The rate of successful VBAC may be contributory and suggests that the risk conferred by VBAC may be unit-specific. Unit and national-level audit is necessary to investigate this risk further.

Incidence and risk factors of severe lacerations during forceps delivery in a single teaching hospital where simulation training is held annually

AIM

This study was conducted to evaluate the incidence of severe lacerations during forceps delivery and the risk factors associated with such delivery in a hospital where simulation training is held annually.

METHODS

The medical records of 857 women who underwent forceps delivery at term with singleton cephalic presentation from 2010 to 2015 were reviewed. The relationship between clinical characteristics and birth canal trauma was analyzed. Birth canal trauma included third and fourth degree perineal lacerations. Univariable and multivariable models of logistic regression were employed to estimate the raw odds ratio and were adjusted for cofactors with 95% confidence intervals. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.

RESULTS

The incidence of severe lacerations was 10.1%. Birth weight, fetal head station, the rate of malrotation and the number of extractions were higher in women with severe lacerations (P < 0.01), whereas the use of obstetric anesthesia was lower in women with such lacerations (P < 0.01). Neither the indication for forceps delivery nor the qualifications of the operator had any influence on the incidence of severe lacerations.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of severe lacerations was relatively low. Risk factors for severe lacerations with forceps delivery were identified as birth weight, fetal head station, malrotation and the number of extractions. Obstetric anesthesia may protect against severe lacerations.

Association Between Senior Obstetrician Supervision of Resident Deliveries and Mode of Delivery

OBJECTIVE

In December 2012, the Mount Sinai Hospital implemented a program to have senior obstetricians (more than 20 years of experience) supervise residents on labor and delivery during the daytime. The objective of this study was to estimate the association of resident supervision by senior obstetricians with mode of delivery.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of all resident deliveries at Mount Sinai from July 2011 to June 2015. We included all patients with live, term, singleton, vertex fetuses. We compared delivery outcomes between patients delivered before December 2012 and patients delivered December 2012 and later using logistic regression analysis to control for age, body mass index, parity, induction, and prior cesarean delivery. During the study period there were no other specific departmental initiatives to increase forceps deliveries aside from having six obstetricians with significant experience in operative deliveries supervise and teach residents on labor and delivery.

RESULTS

There were 5,201 live, term, singleton, vertex deliveries under the care of residents, 1,919 (36.9%) before December 2012 and 3,282 (63.1%) December 2012 or later. The rate of forceps deliveries significantly increased from 0.6% to 2.6% (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 8.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.1-23.1), and the rate of cesarean deliveries significantly decreased from 27.3% to 24.5% (adjusted OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.55-0.83). There were no statistically significant differences in the rates of third- or fourth-degree lacerations or 5-minute Apgar scores less than 7. Among nulliparous women, the forceps rate increased from 1.0% to 3.4% (adjusted OR 4.87, 95% CI 1.74-13.63) and the cesarean delivery rate decreased from 25.6% to 22.7% (adjusted OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.53-0.89). The increase in forceps deliveries and the decrease in cesarean deliveries were seen only in daytime hours (7 AM to 7 PM), that is, the shift that was covered by senior obstetricians.

CONCLUSION

Having senior obstetricians supervise resident deliveries is significantly associated with an increased rate of forceps deliveries and a decreased rate of cesarean deliveries.

An international assessment of trainee experience, confidence, and comfort in operative vaginal delivery

AIM

The aim of this study was to assess Irish and Canadian obstetricians in training ("trainees") experience, confidence, and comfort in performing operative vaginal delivery (OVD).

STUDY DESIGN

Trainees in Obstetrics and Gynaecology in the University of Toronto and the Royal College of Physicians of Ireland (RCPI) were invited to participate in an anonymous online survey reviewing experience as primary operator of OVD. Trainee confidence and comfort was self-assessed based upon their last few OVDs.

RESULTS

The response rate was 55% amongst Canadian trainees (31/56) and 44% amongst Irish trainees (21/48). When comparing Irish with Canadian trainee experience, the median numbers of vacuum and forceps deliveries performed by Irish trainees as primary operator were reported to be higher [125 (range 10-150) vs 20 (range 5-40); p < 0.0001 (ventouse), 45 (range 10-150) vs 6 (range 1-12); p = 0.0001 (forceps)]. Despite this, trainee confidence between the groups did not differ [confidence score: 18.7 (SD 3.2) vs 17.8 (SD 3.5), p = 0.3]. There were some differences regarding comfort in certain aspects of OVD, most notably increased comfort in Irish trainees in pre-procedure assessment skills of OVD.

CONCLUSION

With falling OVD rates worldwide, training experience is declining. Despite higher numbers of OVD within the Irish trainee group, there was no difference in trainee confidence between the two groups. These results suggest that a high number of cases as primary operator may not be required to establish operator confidence in performing a procedure. Irish trainees self-reported more comfort in non-technical skills of OVD, suggesting a step-wise effect of experience on first technical and then non-technical skills.

Evaluation of delivery options for second-stage events

BACKGROUND

Cesarean delivery in the second stage of labor is common, whereas the frequency of operative vaginal delivery has been declining. However, data comparing outcomes for attempted operative vaginal delivery vs cesarean in the second stage are scant. Previous studies that examine operative vaginal delivery have compared it to a baseline risk of complications from a spontaneous vaginal delivery and cesarean delivery. However, when a woman has a need for intervention in the second stage, spontaneous vaginal delivery is not an option she or the provider can choose. Thus, the appropriate clinical comparison is cesarean vs operative vaginal delivery.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to compare outcomes by the first attempted operative delivery (vacuum, forceps vs cesarean delivery) in patients needing second-stage assistance at a fetal station of +2 or below.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted secondary analysis of an observational obstetric cohort in 25 academically affiliated US hospitals over a 3-year period. A subset of ≥37 weeks, nonanomalous, vertex, singletons, with no prior vaginal delivery who reached a station of +2 or below and underwent an attempt at an operative delivery were included. Indications included for operative delivery were: failure to descend, nonreassuring fetal status, labor dystocia, or maternal exhaustion. The primary outcomes included a composite neonatal outcome (death, fracture, length of stay ≥3 days beyond mother's, low Apgar, subgaleal hemorrhage, ventilator support, hypoxic encephalopathy, brachial plexus injury, facial nerve palsy) and individual maternal outcomes (postpartum hemorrhage, third- and fourth-degree tears [severe lacerations], and postpartum infection). Outcomes were examined by the 3 attempted modes of delivery. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated for primary outcomes adjusting for confounders. Final mode of delivery was quantified.

RESULTS

In all, 2531 women met inclusion criteria. No difference in the neonatal composite outcome was observed between groups. Vacuum attempt was associated with the lowest frequency of maternal complications (postpartum infection 0.2% vs 0.9% forceps vs 5.3% cesarean, postpartum hemorrhage 1.4% vs 2.8% forceps vs 3.8% cesarean), except for severe lacerations (19.1% vs 33.8% forceps vs 0% cesarean). When confounders were taken into account, both forceps (OR, 0.16; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.49) and vacuum (OR, 0.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.17) were associated with a significantly lower odds of postpartum infection. The neonatal composite and postpartum hemorrhage were not significantly different between modes of attempted delivery. Cesarean occurred in 6.4% and 4.4% of attempted vacuum and forceps groups (P = .04).

CONCLUSION

In patients needing second-stage delivery assistance with a station of +2 or below, attempted operative vaginal delivery was associated with a lower frequency of postpartum infection, but higher frequency of severe lacerations.

Role of operative vaginal deliveries in prevention of cesarean deliveries

Although the number of cesarean deliveries increased from 23% to 34.7% between 1996 and 2006, forceps and vacuum use declined, from 6.3% to 1.7% and 6.8% to 5.5%, respectively. When spontaneous vaginal delivery in the second stage of labor is not a possibility, operative vaginal delivery may be a safe, acceptable alternative to cesarean delivery. We explore indications for operative deliveries and the benefits and risks as compared with cesarean. In addition, we review the barriers to forceps and vacuum use and the importance of continued training to increase the number of providers who are able to safely perform these skills.

The Changing Scenario of Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Training

BACKGROUND

Significant changes have been noted in aspects of obstetrics-gynecology (ob-gyn) training over the last decade, which is reflected in Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) operative case logs for graduating ob-gyn residents.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to understand the changing trends of ob-gyn residents' experience in obstetric procedures over the past 11 years.

METHODS

We analyzed national ACGME procedure logs for all obstetric procedures recorded by 12 728 ob-gyn residents who graduated between academic years 2002-2003 and 2012-2013.

RESULTS

The average number of cesarean sections per resident increased from 191.8 in 2002-2003 to 233.4 in 2012-2013 (17%; P < .001; 95% CI -47.769 to -35.431), the number of vaginal deliveries declined from 320.8 to 261 (18.6%; P < .001; 95% CI 38.842-56.35), the number of forceps deliveries declined from 23.8 to 8.4 (64.7%; P < .001; 95% CI 14.061-16.739), and the number of vacuum deliveries declined from 23.8 to 17.6 (26%; P < .001; 95% CI 5.043-7.357). Between 2002-2003 and 2007-2008, amniocentesis decreased from 18.5 to 11 (P < .001, 95% CI 6.298-8.702), and multifetal vaginal deliveries increased from 10.8 to 14 (P < .001, 95% CI -3.895 to -2.505). Both were not included in ACGME reporting after 2008.

CONCLUSIONS

Ob-gyn residents' training experience changed substantially over the past decade. ACGME obstetric logs demonstrated decreases in volume of vaginal, forceps, and vacuum deliveries, and increases in cesarean and multifetal deliveries. Change in experience may require use of innovative strategies to help improve residents' basic obstetric skills.

Does the number of forceps deliveries performed in residency predict use in practice?

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine whether a threshold number of forceps deliveries in residency predicts use of forceps in independent practice.

STUDY DESIGN

We surveyed obstetrics and gynecology residency graduates of 2 academic programs from 2008 through 2012 regarding the use of operative vaginal delivery in practice. At these programs, residents are trained in both forceps and vacuums. Individual case log data were obtained with the number of forceps deliveries performed by each respondent during residency. Respondents were grouped as currently using any forceps or vacuums alone. A logistic regression model estimated the probability of forceps use, predicted by the number of residency forceps deliveries. From the resulting receiver-operating characteristic curve, we assessed sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and area under the curve.

RESULTS

The response rate was 85% (n = 58) and 90% (n = 52) practice obstetrics. Seventy-nine percent (n = 41) use forceps in practice. The mean number of forceps performed during residency was 22.3 ± 1.3 (mean ± SE) in the any-forceps group and 18.5 ± 2.1 in the vacuums-only group (P = .14). Although the model performed only moderately (area under the curve, 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42-0.81), more than 13 residency forceps deliveries corresponded to a 95% sensitivity (95% CI, 84-99) and a positive predictive value of 83% (95% CI, 69-92) for using forceps in practice. The specificity of this threshold is 27% (95% CI, 6-61).

CONCLUSION

Although exceeding 13 forceps deliveries made it highly likely that obstetricians would use them in practice, further study is necessary to set goals for a number of resident forceps deliveries that translate into use in practice.

Persistent occiput posterior

Persistent occiput posterior (OP) is associated with increased rates of maternal and newborn morbidity. Its diagnosis by physical examination is challenging but is improved with bedside ultrasonography. Occiput posterior discovered in the active phase or early second stage of labor usually resolves spontaneously. When it does not, prophylactic manual rotation may decrease persistent OP and its associated complications. When delivery is indicated for arrest of descent in the setting of persistent OP, a pragmatic approach is suggested. Suspected fetal macrosomia, a biparietal diameter above the pelvic inlet or a maternal pelvis with android features should prompt cesarean delivery. Nonrotational operative vaginal delivery is appropriate when the maternal pelvis has a narrow anterior segment but ample room posteriorly, like with anthropoid features. When all other conditions are met and the fetal head arrests in an OP position in a patient with gynecoid pelvic features and ample room anteriorly, options include cesarean delivery, nonrotational operative vaginal delivery, and rotational procedures, either manual or with the use of rotational forceps. Recent literature suggests that maternal and fetal outcomes with rotational forceps are better than those reported in older series. Although not without significant challenges, a role remains for teaching and practicing selected rotational forceps operations in contemporary obstetrics.

Prospective cohort study of a new vacuum delivery device to assist with complicated labour in low-resource settings

OBJECTIVES

Currently available vacuum devices used to assist women undergoing complicated labour are unsuitable for use in low-resource settings. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of a new low-cost vacuum device, named Koohi Goth Vacuum Delivery System (KGVDS), designed for use in low-resource settings.

METHODS

A hospital-based, multicentre, prospective cohort study with no control group was conducted in Karachi, Pakistan. After training, KGVDS devices were made available for use by labour room staff at their discretion when instrumental delivery was indicated. Women to whom KGVDS was applied were followed from the start of labour until discharge. Feasibility was assessed in terms of successful expulsion of the foetal head following application of KGVDS and ease of use ratings. Safety was assessed by observing maternal and newborn post-delivery outcomes prior to discharge.

RESULTS

Koohi Goth Vacuum Delivery System was applied to 137 women requiring instrumental delivery, of whom 111 (81%; 95% CI = 74-88%) successfully expelled the foetal head assisted by KGVDS and 103 (75%) stated that they would agree to use KGVDS again. There were no serious maternal or neonatal injuries or infections related to KGVDS use. The mean score for 'ease of use' given by doctors and midwives using the device was 8 of 10.

CONCLUSIONS

Koohi Goth Vacuum Delivery System was feasible and safe to use for assisting complicated deliveries in low-resource hospitals in this initial evaluation. Our results indicate that this new device may have the potential to improve birth outcomes in settings where most mortality occurs and that further evaluations should be conducted.

Mode of delivery and the probability of subsequent childbearing: a population-based register study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between mode of first delivery and probability of subsequent childbearing.

DESIGN

Population-based study.

SETTING

Nationwide study in Sweden.

POPULATION

A cohort of 771 690 women who delivered their first singleton infant in Sweden between 1992 and 2010.

METHODS

Using Cox's proportional-hazards regression models, risks of subsequent childbearing were compared across four modes of delivery. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated, using 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Probability of having a second and third child; interpregnancy interval.

RESULTS

Compared with women who had a spontaneous vaginal first delivery, women who delivered by vacuum extraction were less likely to have a second pregnancy (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.95-0.97), and the probabilities of a second childbirth were substantially lower among women with a previous emergency caesarean section (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.84-0.86) or an elective caesarean section (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.80-0.83). There were no clinically important differences in the median time between first and second pregnancy by mode of first delivery. Compared with women younger than 30 years of age, older women were more negatively affected by a vacuum extraction with respect to the probability of having a second child. A primary vacuum extraction decreased the probability of having a third child by 4%, but having two consecutive vacuum extraction deliveries did not further alter the probability.

CONCLUSIONS

A first delivery by vacuum extraction does not reduce the probability of subsequent childbearing to the same extent as a first delivery by emergency or elective caesarean section.

Obstetric care consensus no. 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery

In 2011, one in three women who gave birth in the United States did so by cesarean delivery. Cesarean birth can be life-saving for the fetus, the mother, or both in certain cases. However, the rapid increase in cesarean birth rates from 1996 to 2011 without clear evidence of concomitant decreases in maternal or neonatal morbidity or mortality raises significant concern that cesarean delivery is overused. Variation in the rates of nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex cesarean births also indicates that clinical practice patterns affect the number of cesarean births performed. The most common indications for primary cesarean delivery include, in order of frequency, labor dystocia, abnormal or indeterminate (formerly, nonreassuring) fetal heart rate tracing, fetal malpresentation, multiple gestation, and suspected fetal macrosomia. Safe reduction of the rate of primary cesarean deliveries will require different approaches for each of these, as well as other, indications. For example, it may be necessary to revisit the definition of labor dystocia because recent data show that contemporary labor progresses at a rate substantially slower than what was historically taught. Additionally, improved and standardized fetal heart rate interpretation and management may have an effect. Increasing women's access to nonmedical interventions during labor, such as continuous labor and delivery support, also has been shown to reduce cesarean birth rates. External cephalic version for breech presentation and a trial of labor for women with twin gestations when the first twin is in cephalic presentation are other of several examples of interventions that can contribute to the safe lowering of the primary cesarean delivery rate.

Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery

In 2011, 1 in 3 women who gave birth in the United States did so by cesarean delivery. Cesarean birth can be lifesaving for the fetus, the mother, or both in certain cases. However, the rapid increase in cesarean birth rates from 1996 through 2011 without clear evidence of concomitant decreases in maternal or neonatal morbidity or mortality raises significant concern that cesarean delivery is overused. Variation in the rates of nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex cesarean births also indicates that clinical practice patterns affect the number of cesarean births performed. The most common indications for primary cesarean delivery include, in order of frequency, labor dystocia, abnormal or indeterminate (formerly, nonreassuring) fetal heart rate tracing, fetal malpresentation, multiple gestation, and suspected fetal macrosomia. Safe reduction of the rate of primary cesarean deliveries will require different approaches for each of these, as well as other, indications. For example, it may be necessary to revisit the definition of labor dystocia because recent data show that contemporary labor progresses at a rate substantially slower than what was historically taught. Additionally, improved and standardized fetal heart rate interpretation and management may have an effect. Increasing women's access to nonmedical interventions during labor, such as continuous labor and delivery support, also has been shown to reduce cesarean birth rates. External cephalic version for breech presentation and a trial of labor for women with twin gestations when the first twin is in cephalic presentation are other of several examples of interventions that can contribute to the safe lowering of the primary cesarean delivery rate.

Prevention of the first cesarean delivery: the role of operative vaginal delivery

While the cesarean delivery (CD) rates have increased worldwide, operative vaginal delivery (OVD) rates continue to decline, with the United States having some of the lower rates amongst developed countries. It is clear that the use of forceps or vacuum can safely assist in accomplishing a vaginal delivery and prevent a cesarean during the IInd stage of labor performed for a variety of maternal or fetal indications. In the absence of randomized trials between OVD's and immediate CD's for anticipated difficult births the question of the balance of risks between the two interventions remains unanswered. Properly performed OVD's are associated with lower maternal morbidity compared with cesarean, without an increase in significant neonatal morbidity. In order to reverse the current trends and for these skills to continue active training in OVD's is clearly needed during and after residency. The availability of clinicians with expertise in OVD's should aid in decreasing the rates of CD and the training of newer generations of practitioners. The professional endorsement of OVD's is also fundamental not only to frame the practice for physicians but to promote and improve the general acceptance of assisted deliveries and facilitate the societal discourse to reduce CD rates.