Acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML) with inv (16)(p13;q22) and the rare I type CBFbeta-MYH11 transcript: report of two new cases

NF-κB: A Druggable Target in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Simple Summary

AML is a highly heterogeneous hematological disease and is the second most common form of leukemia. Around 40% of AML patients display elevated nuclear NF-κB activity, providing a compelling rationale for targeting the NF-κB pathway in AML. Here we summarize the main drivers of the NF-κB pathway in AML pathogenesis as well as the conventional and novel therapeutic strategies targeting NF-κB to improve the survival of AML patients.

Abstract

Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is an aggressive hematological malignancy that relies on highly heterogeneous cytogenetic alterations. Although in the last few years new agents have been developed for AML treatment, the overall survival prospects for AML patients are still gloomy and new therapeutic options are still urgently needed. Constitutive NF-κB activation has been reported in around 40% of AML patients, where it sustains AML cell survival and chemoresistance. Given the central role of NF-κB in AML, targeting the NF-κB pathway represents an attractive strategy to treat AML. This review focuses on current knowledge of NF-κB’s roles in AML pathogenesis and summarizes the main therapeutic approaches used to treat NF-κB-driven AML.

Rare type I CBFβ/MYH11 fusion transcript in primary acute myeloid leukemia with inv(16)(p13.1q22): a case report

Inv(16)(p13.1q22) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a common chromosomal abnormality. It leads to the core-binding factor ß-subunit (CBFβ)/smooth muscle myosin heavy chain 11 (MYH11) fusion gene. Different breakpoints were observed in the CBFβ gene at 16q22 and the MYH11 gene at 16p13.1. For this reason, different CBFβ/MYH11 fusion genes are generated, with more than 13 types having been reported to date. Type I CBFβ/MYH11 fusion transcripts are very rare, with only 10 cases being reported to date. This case report describes a primary AML patient with inv(16)(p13.1q22) and a rare type I CBFβ/MYH11 fusion gene. The morphological analysis did not conform to the typical M4eo. Abnormal eosinophils were less than 5%, and there was obvious dysgranulopoiesis. The patient was in hematological and genetic remission for 487 days after the initial chemotherapy cycles. However, the CBFβ/MYH11 fusion had been constantly positive. Moreover, the presence of non-type A fusions may affect its biology and clinical prognosis. Therefore, further studies on understanding its biological and prognostic significance are essential.

Co-expression of the CBFβ-MYH11 and BCR-ABL fusion genes in chronic myeloid leukaemia / Coexistenţa genelor de fuziune CBFβ-MYH11 şi BCR-ABL în leucemia mieloidă cronică

The coexistence of t(9;22) and inv(16) has been described in a very limited number of cases of CML, de novo or therapy-related AML. We report a patient with CML who presented both inversion of chromosome 16 and Philadelphia chromosome and evolved towards the blast phase under treatment with Imatinib. Laboratory diagnosis and monitoring was made by flow cytometry, conventional cytogenetics and molecular genetics techniques. The inv(16), detected by karyotyping in the Philadelphia chromosome positive clone at the moment of the blast transformation, was retrospectively assessed by means of real-time PCR, and was proved to have been present since diagnosis. The bone marrow biopsy performed in the blast phase of CML confirmed the presence of blasts belonging to the myeloid lineage, with indications of monocytic differentiation, frequently associated with inv(16). Moreover, the case also associated a F359V tyrosine kinase domain mutation, resulting in intermediate resistance to Imatinib and Nilotinib, which imposed therapy-switch to Dasatinib. In our case the evolution was progressive, followed by death due to lack of response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors, 18 months after diagnosis. The coexistence of t(9;22) and inv(16) in CML seems to be associated with an aggressive clinical evolution and resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Due to the very small number of cases described in literature, therapeutic decisions are still difficult for patients displaying these abnormalities

Acute myeloid leukemia with t(16;16) (p13;q22) showing a new CBFB-MYH11 fusion transcript associated with an atypical leukemic blasts morphology

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cases with inv(16)(p13q22) or t(16;16)(p13;q22) are characterized by multiple CBFB-MYH11 fusion transcripts, type A being the most frequent. Rare fusion variants are frequently correlated with an atypical cytomorphology, but their biologic and prognostic significance is unclear. We report a case of acute myeloid leukemia with a balanced t(16;16)(p13;q22) and additional monosomy 13 showing a new CBFB-MYH11 fusion transcript variant. The patient also showed an atypical morphology of bone marrow blasts, since about 15% of all blasts showed bilobed nuclei but there was no pathologic eosinophilia. The biologic and prognostic implications of this rare association are discussed.

Immunohistochemical analysis of monocytic leukemias: usefulness of CD14 and Kruppel-like factor 4, a novel monocyte marker

Detection of monocytic differentiation in myeloid neoplasms by immunohistochemical analysis is challenging owing to a lack of sensitive and/or specific antibodies. We tested the usefulness of immunohistochemical analysis for CD14, an antigen commonly detected by flow cytometry, and Krüppel-like factor 4 (KLF4), a potentially novel marker of monocytic differentiation, in a series of myeloid leukemias, including 53 acute myeloid leukemias with monocytic differentiation. These findings were compared with immunohistochemical findings for CD68 (KP-1), CD34, and CD163 and were also correlated with flow cytometric and enzyme cytochemical results. CD163 and CD14 are the most specific markers of monocytic differentiation, followed by KLF4. CD68, in contrast, is the most sensitive monocytic marker, and KLF4 is also significantly more sensitive than CD14 and CD163. These studies show that KLF4 is another marker of monocytic differentiation and that the combination of CD14 and CD163 can increase the diagnostic sensitivity for monocytic neoplasms.

Accelerated leukemogenesis by truncated CBF beta-SMMHC defective in high-affinity binding with RUNX1

Dominant RUNX1 inhibition has been proposed as a common pathway for CBF leukemia. CBF beta-SMMHC, a fusion protein in human acute myeloid leukemia (AML), dominantly inhibits RUNX1 largely through its RUNX1 high-affinity binding domain (HABD). However, the type I CBF beta-SMMHC fusion in AML patients lacks HABD. Here, we report that the type I CBF beta-SMMHC protein binds RUNX1 inefficiently. Knockin mice expressing CBF beta-SMMHC with a HABD deletion developed leukemia quickly, even though hematopoietic defects associated with Runx1-inhibition were partially rescued. A larger pool of leukemia-initiating cells, increased MN1 expression, and retention of RUNX1 phosphorylation are potential mechanisms for accelerated leukemia development in these mice. Our data suggest that RUNX1 dominant inhibition may not be a critical step for leukemogenesis by CBF beta-SMMHC.

Detection of the CBFB/MYH11 fusion gene in de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML): A single-institution study of 224 Japanese AML patients

The cytogenetic findings in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are a powerful prognostic indicator. Among these abnormalities, the World Health Organization has classified inv(16)(p13q22), which is closely associated with the M4E classification in the French-American-British system, as indicating a good-risk AML. However, this chromosomal abnormality can often be difficult to detect. In this study, we used RT-PCR and FISH analysis to examine 224 Japanese adult de novo AML patients for the presence of the CBFB/MYH11 fusion transcript at the time of diagnosis. The CBFB/MYH11 fusion gene was detected in 17 patients (7.6%): eight patients had the inv(16) chromosome and in all of them it was M4E; nine patients did not have abnormalities in chromosome 16. AML with the CBFB/MYH11 fusion gene but without inv(16) was found in M2, M4, and M5, but not in M4E patients. There were no statistically significant differences in the clinical features of patients with the inv(16) and those with the cryptic inv(16) chromosome. These results indicate that even if eosinophilia is not found, molecular screening for CBFB/MYH11 fusion gene should be performed in all AML patients at the time of diagnosis to help guide disease management.

Therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome with inv(16)(p13q22) and I type CBFbeta/MYH11 after autologous transplantation: undetectable fusion transcript in pretransplant progenitor cells

We describe here a unique case of therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome (t-MDS) with inv(16)(p13q22) after autologous stem cell transplantation for lymphoma. The rare and smallest I type CBFbeta/MYH11 fusion transcript with a breakpoint at nucleotide 399 of CBFbeta and at nucleotide 2134 of MYH11 was detected in the bone marrow cells by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis. However, the fusion transcript was undetectable in the pretransplant peripheral blood stem cells. These results suggest that the stem cell damage leading to t-MDS may be induced mainly by the conditioning regimen for transplantation. Taken together with previous reports, the I type fusion transcript is preferentially induced with chemotherapy.

Pathogenesis of acute myeloid leukaemia and inv(16)(p13;q22): a paradigm for understanding leukaemogenesis?

Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) has been proposed to arise from the collaboration between two classes of mutation, a class I, or proliferative, mutation and a class II, or blocking, mutation. A limitation of this so-called 'two-hit' hypothesis has been the lack of identifiable proliferative and blocking mutations in most AML cases. However, it is now known that the CBFbeta-MYH11 fusion gene in AML and inv(16), by disrupting the normal transcription factor activity of core binding factor (CBF), functions as a class II mutation. In addition, nearly 70% of patients with AML and inv(16) are known to possess mutually exclusive mutations of the receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), c-KIT and FLT3, as well as RAS genes, that provide a class I, or proliferative, signal. AML and inv(16), therefore, is one of the best understood of the acute leukaemias at the genetic level and so provides a paradigm for the 'two-hit' hypothesis of leukaemogenesis. This paper reviews the recent advances in the molecular pathology of AML and inv(16) and discusses possible therapeutic implications of the current pathogenetic model.

Molecular basis for a dominant inactivation of RUNX1/AML1 by the leukemogenic inversion 16 chimera

The Runt domain transcription factor, PEBP2/CBF, is a heterodimer composed of 2 subunits. The DNA-binding α subunit, or RUNX protein, interacts with a partner PEBP2β/CBFβ through the evolutionarily conserved Runt domain. Each of the genes encoding RUNX1 and PEBP2β/CBFβ is frequently involved in acute myeloid leukemia. The chimeric protein, CBFβ(PEBP2β)/SMMHC, is generated as a result of inversion of chromosome 16 in such a way to retain the heterodimerization domain of PEBP2β at the amino-terminal side fused to the C-terminal coiled-coil region of smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (SMMHC). Here we show that, in the chimeric protein, the second heterodimerization domain is created by the fusion junction, enabling the chimeric protein to interact with RUNX1 at far greater affinity than PEBP2β and inactivate the RUNX1/AML1 function. To explain why and how heterozygous CBFB/MYH11 can inactivate homozygous RUNX1 near to completion, we propose a new model for this chimeric protein that consists of a Y-shaped dimer with unpaired N-terminal halves followed by a coiled-coil for the C-terminal region. (Blood. 2004;103:3200-3207)

Comprehensive analysis of CBFbeta-MYH11 fusion transcripts in acute myeloid leukemia by RT-PCR analysis

CBFbeta-MYH11 fusion transcripts are expressed in acute myeloid leukemias of the M4Eo subtype. Patients who express CBFbeta-MYH11 fusion transcripts respond favorably to high-dose chemotherapy and are generally spared allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Hence it is important to identify this fusion in all patients with acute myeloid leukemia M4Eo leukemia. The fusion can be detected by cytogenetics, fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH), or by molecular analysis with RT-PCR. Multiple fusion transcripts arising as a result of various breakpoints in the CBFbeta and MYH11 have been identified. In this report we describe a comprehensive RT-PCR assay to identify all known fusion transcripts and provide an algorithm for molecular analysis of CBFbeta-MYH11 fusions from patient specimens. Further, identification of the fusion transcript by such an assay would help in the diagnosis and follow up of patients with cryptic inversion 16 translocations (such as patient 2 in this report) not detected by standard cytogenetics or FISH and for rational design of probes for quantitative analysis by real-time PCR.

FLT3 and MLL intragenic abnormalities in AML reflect a common category of genotoxic stress

MLL rearrangements in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) include translocations and intragenic abnormalities such as internal duplication and breakage induced by topoisomerase II inhibitors. In adult AML, FLT3 internal tandem duplications (ITDs) are more common in cases with MLL intragenic abnormalities (33%) than those with MLL translocation (8%). Mutation/deletion involving FLT3 D835 are found in more than 20% of cases with MLL intragenic abnormalities compared with 10% of AML with MLL translocation and 5% of adult AML with normal MLL status. Real-time quantification of FLT3 in 141 cases of AML showed that all cases with FLT3 D835 express high level transcripts, whereas FLT3-ITD AML can be divided into cases with high-level FLT3 expression, which belong essentially to the monocytic lineage, and those with relatively low-level expression, which predominantly demonstrate PML-RARA and DEK-CAN. FLT3 abnormalities in CBF leukemias with AML1-ETO or CBFbeta-MYH11 were virtually restricted to cases with variant CBFbeta-MYH11 fusion transcripts and/or atypical morphology. These data suggest that the FLT3 and MLL loci demonstrate similar susceptibility to agents that modify chromatin configuration, including topoisomerase II inhibitors and abnormalities involving PML and DEK, with consequent errors in DNA repair. Variant CBFbeta-MYH11 fusions and bcr3 PML-RARA may also be initiated by similar mechanisms.