Myeloid maturation block by AML1-MTG16 is associated with Csf1r epigenetic downregulation

Silence of a dependence receptor CSF1R in colorectal cancer cells activates tumor-associated macrophages

BACKGROUND

Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R), a classic tyrosine kinase receptor, has been identified as a proto-oncogene in multiple cancers. The CSF1/CSF1R axis is essential for the survival and differentiation of M2-phenotype tumor-associated macrophages (M2 TAMs). However, we found here that the CSF1R expression was abnormally down-regulated in colorectal cancer (CRC), and its biological functions and underlying mechanisms have become elusive in CRC progression.

METHODS

The expression of class III receptor tyrosine kinases in CRC and normal intestinal mucosa was accessed using The Cancer Genome Atlas and Gene Expression Omnibus datasets and was further validated by our tested cohort. CSF1R was reconstructed in CRC cells to identify its biological functions in vitro and in vivo. We compared CSF1R expression and methylation differences between CRC cells and macrophages. Furthermore, a co-culture system was used to mimic a competitive mechanism between CSF1R-overexpressed CRC cells and M2-like macrophages. We utilized a CSF1R inhibitor PLX3397 to ablate M2 TAMs and evaluated its efficacy on CRC treatment in animal models.

RESULTS

We found here that the CSF1R is silenced in CRC, and the reintroduced expression of the receptor in CRC cells can be cleaved by caspases and constrain tumor growth in vitro and in vivo, functioning as a tumor suppressor gene. We further identified CSF1R as a novel dependence receptor, which has the potential to act as either a tumor suppressor gene or an oncogene, depending on its activated state. In CRC tumors, CSF1R expression is enriched in TAMs, and its expression is associated with poor prognosis in patients ith CRC. In a co-culture system, CRC cells expressing CSF1R compete with M2-like macrophages for CSF1R ligands, resulting in a decrease in CSF1R activation and cell proliferation in macrophages. Blocking CSF1R by PLX3397 could deplete M2 TAMs and augments CD8⁺ T cell infiltration, effectively inhibiting tumor growth and metastasis and improving responses to chemotherapy and immunotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Our findings revealed that CSF1R is a novel identified dependence receptor silenced in CRC. The silence abalienates its ligands to stimulate CSF1R expressed on M2 TAMs, which is an appealing therapeutic target for M2 TAM depletion and CRC treatment.

High Expression of CSF-1R Predicts Poor Prognosis and CSF-1Rhigh Tumor-Associated Macrophages Inhibit Anti-Tumor Immunity in Colon Adenocarcinoma

Background

Colony stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF-1R) is a single channel III transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) and plays an important role in immune regulation and the development of various cancer types. The expression of CSF-1R in colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) and its prognostic value remain incompletely understood. Therefore, we aim to explore the prognostic value of CSF-1R in COAD and its relationship with tumor immunity.

Methods

CSF-1R expression in a COAD cohort containing 103 patients was examined using immunohistochemistry (IHC). The relationship between CSF-1R expression and clinicopathological parameters and prognosis was evaluated. Dual immunofluorescence staining was conducted to determine the localization of CSF-1R in COAD tissues. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis were performed to evaluate independent prognostic factors. Transcriptomic profiles of CSF-1R^high and CSF-1R^low tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) were investigated. Gene enrichment analysis was used to explore the signal pathways related to CSF-1R. In addition, the relationship between CSF-1R in tumor microenvironment (TME) and tumor immunity was also studied.

Results

IHC analysis showed that CSF-1R was overexpressed in COAD, and higher expression was associated with shorter overall survival (OS). Immunofluorescence staining showed that CSF-1R was co-localized with macrophage marker CD68. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that CSF-1R was an independent prognostic factor for COAD. The results of gene enrichment analysis showed that CSF-1R was involved in tumor immune response and regulation of TME. In addition, CSF-1R was significantly correlated with TME, immune cell infiltration, TMB, MSI, Neoantigen, and immune checkpoint molecules.

Conclusion

CSF-1R can serve as an independent prognostic factor of COAD and promising immunotherapeutic target of COAD.

Transcriptional mechanisms that control expression of the macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor locus

The proliferation, differentiation, and survival of cells of the macrophage lineage depends upon signals from the macrophage colony-stimulating factor (CSF) receptor (CSF1R). CSF1R is expressed by embryonic macrophages and induced early in adult hematopoiesis, upon commitment of multipotent progenitors to the myeloid lineage. Transcriptional activation of CSF1R requires interaction between members of the E26 transformation-specific family of transcription factors (Ets) (notably PU.1), C/EBP, RUNX, AP-1/ATF, interferon regulatory factor (IRF), STAT, KLF, REL, FUS/TLS (fused in sarcoma/ranslocated in liposarcoma) families, and conserved regulatory elements within the mouse and human CSF1R locus. One element, the Fms-intronic regulatory element (FIRE), within intron 2, is conserved functionally across all the amniotes. Lineage commitment in multipotent progenitors also requires down-regulation of specific transcription factors such as MYB, FLI1, basic leucine zipper transcriptional factor ATF-like (BATF3), GATA-1, and PAX5 that contribute to differentiation of alternative lineages and repress CSF1R transcription. Many of these transcription factors regulate each other, interact at the protein level, and are themselves downstream targets of CSF1R signaling. Control of CSF1R transcription involves feed–forward and feedback signaling in which CSF1R is both a target and a participant; and dysregulation of CSF1R expression and/or function is associated with numerous pathological conditions. In this review, we describe the regulatory network behind CSF1R expression during differentiation and development of cells of the mononuclear phagocyte system.

Homology modeling and molecular dynamics studies of Wilms' tumor gene 1 frameshift mutations in exon 7

As a transcription factor, the Wilms' tumor 1 (WT1) gene plays an important role in leukemogenesis. The impact of WT1 gene mutations has been reported in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, the number of available studies on the spatial configuration changes following WT1 mutation is limited. In this study, we sequenced the mutation in exon 7 of the WT1 gene in 60 children with newly diagnosed AML and the spatial configuration of WT1 with frameshift mutations in exon 7 was evaluated using the software for homology modeling and optimization of molecular dynamics. Three cases with frameshift mutations in exon 7 were identified (3/60; mutation rate, 5%). One case had a mutation that had been previously described, whereas the remaining two mutations were first described in our study. Of the three cases, one case presented with antecedent myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and the remaining two cases exhibited primary resistance to induction chemotherapy. The spatial configuration analysis demonstrated that the three mutations affected the spatial structure of exon 7 and even affected exon 8 compared to its wild-type. This study demonstrated that the frameshift mutation in exon 7 of the WT1 gene is a poor prognostic factor for children with AML, partly through the spatial configuration changes following frameshift mutations of WT1, which highlights the structure-based function analysis and may facilitate the elucidation of the pathogenesis underlying WT1 gene mutations.

RUNX1: A microRNA hub in normal and malignant hematopoiesis

Hematopoietic development is orchestrated by gene regulatory networks that progressively induce lineage-specific transcriptional programs. To guarantee the appropriate level of complexity, flexibility, and robustness, these networks rely on transcriptional and post-transcriptional circuits involving both transcription factors (TFs) and microRNAs (miRNAs). The focus of this review is on RUNX1 (AML1), a master hematopoietic transcription factor which is at the center of miRNA circuits necessary for both embryonic and post-natal hematopoiesis. Interference with components of these circuits can perturb RUNX1-controlled coding and non-coding transcriptional programs in leukemia.

Opposing effects of Runx2 and estradiol on breast cancer cell proliferation: in vitro identification of reciprocally regulated gene signature related to clinical letrozole responsiveness

PURPOSE

To assess the clinical significance of the interaction between estrogen and Runx2 signaling, previously shown in vitro.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

MCF7/Rx2(dox) breast cancer cells were treated with estradiol and/or doxycycline to induce Runx2, and global gene expression was profiled to define genes regulated by estradiol, Runx2, or both. Anchorage-independent growth was assessed by soft-agar colony formation assays. Expression of gene sets defined using the MCF7/Rx2(dox) system was analyzed in pre- and on-treatment biopsies from hormone receptor-positive patients undergoing neoadjuvant letrozole treatment in two independent studies, and short-term changes in gene expression were correlated with tumor size reduction or Ki67 index at surgery.

RESULTS

Reflecting its oncogenic property, estradiol strongly promoted soft-agar colony formation, whereas Runx2 blocked this process suggesting tumor suppressor property. Transcriptome analysis of MCF7/Rx2(dox) cells treated with estradiol and/or doxycycline showed reciprocal attenuation of Runx2 and estrogen signaling. Correspondingly in breast cancer tumors, expression of estradiol- and Runx2-regulated genes was inversely correlated, and letrozole increased expression of Runx2-stimulated genes, as defined in the MCF7/Rx2(dox) model. Of particular interest was a gene set upregulated by estradiol and downregulated by Runx2 in vitro; its short-term response to letrozole treatment associated with tumor size reduction and Ki67 index at surgery better than other estradiol-regulated gene sets.

CONCLUSION

This work provides clinical evidence for the importance of antagonism between Runx2 and E2 signaling in breast cancer. Likely sensing the tension between them, letrozole responsiveness of a genomic node, positively regulated by estradiol and negatively regulated by Runx2 in vitro, best correlated with the clinical efficacy of letrozole treatment.

Down-regulation of microRNAs 222/221 in acute myelogenous leukemia with deranged core-binding factor subunits

Core-binding factor leukemia (CBFL) is a subgroup of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) characterized by genetic mutations involving the subunits of the core-binding factor (CBF). The leukemogenesis model for CBFL posits that one, or more, gene mutations inducing increased cell proliferation and/or inhibition of apoptosis cooperate with CBF mutations for leukemia development. One of the most common mutations associated with CBF mutations involves the KIT receptor. A high expression of KIT is a hallmark of a high proportion of CBFL. Previous studies indicate that microRNA (MIR) 222/221 targets the 3' untranslated region of the KIT messenger RNA and our observation that AML1 can bind the MIR-222/221 promoter, we hypothesized that MIR-222/221 represents the link between CBF and KIT. Here, we show that MIR-222/221 expression is upregulated after myeloid differentiation of normal bone marrow AC133(+) stem progenitor cells. CBFL blasts with either t(8;21) or inv(16) CBF rearrangements with high expression levels of KIT (CD117) display a significantly lower level of MIR-222/221 expression than non-CBFL blasts. Consistently, we found that the t(8;21) AML1-MTG8 fusion protein binds the MIR-222/221 promoter and induces transcriptional repression of a MIR-222/221-LUC reporter. Because of the highly conserved sequence homology, we demonstrated concomitant MIR-222/221 down-regulation and KIT up-regulation in the 32D/WT1 mouse cell model carrying the AML1-MTG16 fusion protein. This study provides the first hint that CBFL-associated fusion proteins may lead to up-regulation of the KIT receptor by down-regulating MIR-222/221, thus explaining the concomitant occurrence of CBF genetic rearrangements and overexpression of wild type or mutant KIT in AML.

Runx2 transcriptome of prostate cancer cells: insights into invasiveness and bone metastasis

Background

Prostate cancer (PCa) cells preferentially metastasize to bone at least in part by acquiring osteomimetic properties. Runx2, an osteoblast master transcription factor, is aberrantly expressed in PCa cells, and promotes their metastatic phenotype. The transcriptional programs regulated by Runx2 have been extensively studied during osteoblastogenesis, where it activates or represses target genes in a context-dependent manner. However, little is known about the gene regulatory networks influenced by Runx2 in PCa cells. We therefore investigated genome wide mRNA expression changes in PCa cells in response to Runx2.

Results

We engineered a C4-2B PCa sub-line called C4-2B/Rx2^dox, in which Doxycycline (Dox) treatment stimulates Runx2 expression from very low to levels observed in other PCa cells. Transcriptome profiling using whole genome expression array followed by in silico analysis indicated that Runx2 upregulated a multitude of genes with prominent cancer associated functions. They included secreted factors (CSF2, SDF-1), proteolytic enzymes (MMP9, CST7), cytoskeleton modulators (SDC2, Twinfilin, SH3PXD2A), intracellular signaling molecules (DUSP1, SPHK1, RASD1) and transcription factors (Sox9, SNAI2, SMAD3) functioning in epithelium to mesenchyme transition (EMT), tissue invasion, as well as homing and attachment to bone. Consistent with the gene expression data, induction of Runx2 in C4-2B cells enhanced their invasiveness. It also promoted cellular quiescence by blocking the G1/S phase transition during cell cycle progression. Furthermore, the cell cycle block was reversed as Runx2 levels declined after Dox withdrawal.

Conclusions

The effects of Runx2 in C4-2B/Rx2^dox cells, as well as similar observations made by employing LNCaP, 22RV1 and PC3 cells, highlight multiple mechanisms by which Runx2 promotes the metastatic phenotype of PCa cells, including tissue invasion, homing to bone and induction of high bone turnover. Runx2 is therefore an attractive target for the development of novel diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic approaches to PCa management. Targeting Runx2 may prove more effective than focusing on its individual downstream genes and pathways.

Loss of MTG16a (CBFA2T3), a novel rDNA repressor, leads to increased ribogenesis and disruption of breast acinar morphogenesis

Human MTG16a (CBFA2T3), a chromatin repressor with nucleolar localization, was described to act as a suppressor of breast tumourigenesis. Here we show that MTG16a is a novel ribosomal gene repressor, which can counteract MYC-driven activation of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) transcription. We also show that either knocking down MTG16a by RNA interference, or sequestering MTG16a outside the nucleolus of human breast epithelial cells, hampers acinar morphogenesis concomitant with up-regulation of rRNA synthesis and increased ribogenesis. This is the first demonstration that loss of MTG16a function in the nucleolus of breast epithelial cells can induce morphological and molecular changes typical of breast cancer initiation.

Novel RNA-binding properties of the MTG chromatin regulatory proteins

Background

The myeloid translocation gene (MTG) proteins are non-DNA-binding transcriptional regulators capable of interacting with chromatin modifying proteins. As a consequence of leukemia-associated chromosomal translocations, two of the MTG proteins, MTG8 and MTG16, are fused to the DNA-binding domain of AML1, a transcriptional activator crucial for hematopoiesis. The AML1-MTG fusion proteins, as the wild type MTGs, display four conserved homology regions (NHR1-4) related to the Drosophila nervy protein. Structural protein analyses led us to test the hypothesis that specific MTG domains may mediate RNA binding.

Results

By using an RNA-binding assay based on synthetic RNA homopolymers and a panel of MTG deletion mutants, here we show that all the MTG proteins can bind RNA. The RNA-binding properties can be traced to two regions: the Zinc finger domains in the NHR4, which mediate Zinc-dependent RNA binding, and a novel short basic region (SBR) upstream of the NHR2, which mediates Zinc-independent RNA binding. The two AML1-MTG fusion proteins, retaining both the Zinc fingers domains and the SBR, also display RNA-binding properties.

Conclusion

Evidence has been accumulating that RNA plays a role in transcriptional control. Both wild type MTGs and chimeric AML1-MTG proteins display in vitro RNA-binding properties, thus opening new perspectives on the possible involvement of an RNA component in MTG-mediated chromatin regulation.

RUNX1-MTG16 fusion gene in acute myeloblastic leukemia with t(16;21)(q24;q22): case report and review of the literature

We report here a 73-year old female who was admitted for hematomas, dyspnea, and fever. Hematological data showed pancytopenia with 9% blast cells positive for CD13, CD33, CD34, HLAD2, and myeloperoxydase. A diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) type 2 (FAB classification) was made. Banding cytogenetic techniques performed on bone marrow cells showed a 48,XX,+8,+9,del(9)(q22q33)x2 ,t(16;21)(q24;q22)[20]/46,XX[2] karyotype. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with BACs covering the RUNX1 (alias AML1) (band 21q22) and MTG16 (band 16q24) gene showed a fusion of both genes. The t(16;21)(q24;q22) has been described in 16 AML cases, including ours. Eleven patients had received chemotherapy for a previous cancer, most of them were been treated with DNA-topoisomerase II inhibitors known to be associated with chromosomal translocations involving the RUNX1 gene. The significant homology between MGT16 and MTG8 suggests that the RUNX1-MTG16 fusion gene induced by the t(16;21)(q24;q22) is a variant of the RUNX1-MTG8 that shares similar activity.

A distinct epigenetic signature at targets of a leukemia protein

Background

Human myelogenous leukemia characterized by either the non random t(8; 21)(q22; q22) or t(16; 21)(q24; q22) chromosome translocations differ for both their biological and clinical features. Some of these features could be consequent to differential epigenetic transcriptional deregulation at AML1 targets imposed by AML1-MTG8 and AML1-MTG16, the fusion proteins deriving from the two translocations. Preliminary findings showing that these fusion proteins lead to transcriptional downregulation of AML1 targets, marked by repressive chromatin changes, would support this hypothesis. Here we show that combining conventional global gene expression arrays with the power of bioinformatic genomic survey of AML1-consensus sequences is an effective strategy to identify AML1 targets whose transcription is epigenetically downregulated by the leukemia-associated AML1-MTG16 protein.

Results

We interrogated mouse gene expression microarrays with probes generated either from 32D cells infected with a retroviral vector carrying AML1-MTG16 and unable of granulocyte differentiation and proliferation in response to the granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), or from 32D cells infected with the cognate empty vector. From the analysis of differential gene expression alone (using as criteria a p value < 0.01 and an absolute fold change > 3), we were unable to conclude which of the 37 genes downregulated by AML1-MTG16 were, or not, direct AML1 targets. However, when we applied a bioinformatic approach to search for AML1-consensus sequences in the 10 Kb around the gene transcription start sites, we closed on 17 potential direct AML1 targets. By focusing on the most significantly downregulated genes, we found that both the AML1-consensus and the transcription start site chromatin regions were significantly marked by aberrant repressive histone tail changes. Further, the promoter of one of these genes, containing a CpG island, was aberrantly methylated.

Conclusion

This study shows that a leukemia-associated fusion protein can impose a distinct epigenetic repressive signature at specific sites in the genome. These findings strengthen the conclusion that leukemia-specific oncoproteins can induce non-random epigenetic changes.