Efficacy, safety and predictive factors of therapeutic success with sildenafil for erectile dysfunction in patients with different spinal cord injuries

Sexuality, Intimacy, and Reproductive Health after Spinal Cord Injury

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a life-altering event often accompanied by a host of anxiety-provoking questions and concerns in the minds of affected individuals. Questions regarding the ability to resume sexual activity, partner's satisfaction as well as the ability to have biological children are just a few of the unknowns facing patients following the devastating reality that is SCI. As a result of advances in SCI research over the last few decades, providers now have the knowledge and tools to address many of these concerns in an evidence-based and patient-centered approach. SCI can impair multiple components involved in sexual function, including libido, achieving and maintaining an erection, ejaculation, and orgasm. Many safe and effective fertility treatments are available to couples affected by SCI. Finally, learning to redefine one's self-image, reinforce confidence and self-esteem, and feel comfortable communicating are equally as important as understanding functionality in regaining quality of life after SCI. Thus, this review aims to highlight the current state of SCI research relating to sexual function, reproductive health, and the search for meaning.

Effectiveness of Physical Therapy in Addressing Sexual Dysfunction in Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) frequently report sexual dysfunction, a condition that may result in low sexual satisfaction and decreased quality of life. Although sexual dysfunction is usually treated pharmacologically, physical therapists, especially those trained in pelvic floor physical therapy (PT), are well-equipped to address a variety of impairments that contribute to poor sexual function. The current evidence for effectiveness of PT interventions in improving sexual dysfunction, sexual satisfaction, and the emotional well-being aspect of quality of life was analyzed.

METHODS

The PubMed, CINAHL, and PEDro databases were searched through December 2019. Articles were included if participants had a clinical diagnosis of MS, reported sexual dysfunction or pain with intercourse, and had an intervention within the PT scope that addressed sexual dysfunction. Means and SDs were extracted from each study independently by two authors. Effect sizes (d) and 95% CIs were calculated within and across studies.

RESULTS

Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Combined effects were significant and large across six studies for sexual function (d = 0.82, 95% CI, 0.57-1.06), moderate across seven studies for sexual satisfaction (d = 0.65, 95% CI, 0.43-0.87), and moderately large across two studies for emotional well-being (d = 0.78, 95% CI, 0.17-1.40). Between-group differences reached significance for sexual satisfaction (d = 0.29, 95% CI, 0.03-0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

Sexual function, sexual satisfaction, and emotional well-being can all be effectively addressed with various PT interventions. Highly effective interventions included pelvic floor muscle training and mindfulness. Future research should compare PT interventions with non-PT controls to determine best practice in this population.

Erectile dysfunction in common neurological conditions: A narrative review

Neurogenic erectile dysfunction (NED) can be defined as the inability to achieve or maintain an erection due to central or peripheral neurologic disease. Neurologic diseases can also affect the physical ability and psychological status of the patient. All these factors may lead to a primary or secondary NED. Medication history plays an important role since there are many drugs commonly used in neurologic patients that can lead to ED. The assessment of NED in these patients is generally evolving with the application of evoked potentials technology in the test of somatic and autonomic nerves, and functional magnetic resonance imaging. With the electrophysiological examinations, neurogenic causes can be determined. These tools allow to categorize neurologic lesion and assess the patient prognosis. The first-line treatment for NED is phosphodiesterase inhibitors. Second-line treatments include intracavernous and intraurethral vasoactive injections. Third-line treatments are penile prostheses. The efficacy and safety of each treatment modality depend on the specific neurologic condition. This review discusses the physiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of ED in multiple peripheral and central neurologic conditions, as well as for future research.

A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial assessing the effect of tadalafil (Cialis) on the cardiovascular response in men with complete spinal cord injury above the sixth thoracic level: A Pilot Study

Study design

Double-blind, randomized cross-over placebo-controlled pilot study.

Objectives

To determine the effects of tadalafil on systolic blood pressure (SBP), heart rate (HR), and dizziness of men with American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale-A (AIS-A) spinal cord injury (SCI) between cervical-4 (C4) and thoracic-5 (T5) levels.

Setting

Outpatient rehabilitation clinic.

Design

Double-blind, randomized cross-over placebo-controlled pilot study.

Methods

20 males with AIS-A SCI, C4-T5 received either tadalafil 20 mg or placebo for the first arm, and then were crossed-over after 1 week to the second arm. SBP, HR, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for dizziness upon sitting up from lying were measured at baseline and again 1, 2, 4, 12, 22, 29, and 36 h post dose administration. The change in each outcome measure (SBP, HR, VAS dizziness) was observed from pre-dose to each time point. A change in VAS dizziness of 2 cm or greater (scale 0–10 cm) was considered positive.

Results

SBP did not change significantly in either group. However, HR increased significantly in the tadalafil group at several time points (12 h p < 0.05, 22 h p <0.05, 29 h p <0.01, and 36 h p <0.05), with no change in the placebo group. The VAS dizziness significantly increased (range 2–6 cm changes) at some time point in 1/4 of the subjects after tadalafil, but not in the placebo group; all reports of dizziness were at 12 h or later.

Conclusions

Tadalafil use in people with SCI above T6 is safe with respect to not causing hypotension; hemodynamic changes that occurred 12–36 h post administration were compensated for by elevations in HR.

Sponsorship

The Manitoba Medical Services Foundation and the Health Sciences Centre Foundation.

[Sexual life quality of spinal cord-injured men receiving pharmacological treatment for erectile dysfunction and their partners]

OBJECTIVE

To assess the quality of sexual life reported by spinal cord-injured men treated with oral drugs for erectile dysfunction (ED) and their female partners.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Men with spinal cord injuries (SCI) complaining of ED and their female partners were evaluated using the Sexual Life Quality Questionnaire (SLQQ), a fully validated instrument in Spain. Two studies were conducted. A transversal study (1) on patients who were already on treatment with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5Is) and their partners, with 73 couples providing valid data. An additional prospective study (2) assessed SCI patients naive to PDE5Is in which both the patients and their spouses answered the SLQQ before treatment and after 3 months taking PDE5Is regularly, with 12 couples completing the study.

RESULTS

The SLQQ scores of SC injured men on PDE5Is (study 1) were under the remembered pre-lesion level, with lower scores reported by those with complete lesions (P<.2 vs incomplete). Their partners' SLQQ scores were apparently similar to pre-injury times. The SLQQ scores of the patients and their partners were well correlated (r = 0.57, P<.0001), and they both reported high treatment satisfaction. Study 2: Untreated SCI patients reported very low SLQQ scores that were improved by PDE5Is treatment (P<.004), albeit without reaching the pre-injury level. A similar trend was found in their partners. Again both patients and partners reported high treatment satisfaction scores (P <.001).

CONCLUSION

The sexual life quality levels of SC injured men on PDE5Is and their able-bodied spouses are well correlated. Both partners report high treatment satisfaction scores.

Orgasm and SCI: what do we know?

STUDY DESIGN

narrative review OBJECTIVES: To determine the percentage of persons with SCI able to achieve orgasm and ejaculation, the associations between ejaculation and orgasm and the subjective and autonomic findings during these events, and the potential benefits with regards to spasticity.

SETTING

Two American medical centers METHODS: Data bases were searched for the terms orgasm and SCI and ejaculation and SCI. Search criteria were human studies published in English from 1990 to 12/2/2016.

RESULTS

Approximately 50% of sexually active men and women report orgasmic ability after SCI. There is a relative inability of persons with complete lower motor neuron injuries affecting the sacral segments to achieve orgasm. Time to orgasm is longer in persons with SCIs than able-bodied (AB) persons. With orgasm, elevated blood pressure (BP) occurs after SCI in a similar fashion to AB persons. With penile vibratory stimulation and electroejaculation, BP elevation is common and prophylaxis is recommended in persons with injuries at T6 and above. Dry orgasm occurs approximately 13% of times in males. Midodrine, vibratory stimulation, clitoral vacuum suction, and 4-aminopyridine may improve orgasmic potential.

CONCLUSIONS

Depending on level and severity of injury, persons with SCIs can achieve orgasm. Sympathetically mediated changes occur during sexual response with culmination at orgasm. Future research should address benefits of orgasm. Additionally, inherent biases associated with studying orgasm must be considered.

The treatment of erectile dysfunction in patients with neurogenic disease

Erectile dysfunction (ED) related to compromise of the nervous system is an increasingly common occurrence. This may be due to the multifactorial nature of ED, the myriad of disorders affecting the neurotransmission of erectogenic signals, and improved awareness and diagnosis of ED. Nevertheless, neurogenic ED remains poorly understood and characterized. Disease related factors such as depression, decreased physical and mental function, the burden of chronic illness, and loss of independence may preclude sexual intimacy and lead to ED as well. The amount of data regarding treatment options in subpopulations of differing neurologic disorders remains scarce except for men with spinal cord injury. The treatment options including phosphodiesterase inhibitors, intracavernosal or intraurethral vasoactive agents, vacuum erection devices (VED) and penile prosthetic implantation remain constant. This review discusses the options in specific neurologic conditions, and briefly provides insight into new and future developments that may reshape the management of neurogenic ED.

Efficacy and safety of phosphodieterase-5 inhibitors for treatment of erectile dysfunction secondary to spinal cord injury: a systemic review and meta-analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Systemic reviewObjective:We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of phosphodieterase-5 (PDE5) inhibitors on erectile dysfunction (ED) secondary to spinal cord injury (SCI).

METHODS

A literature review was performed to identify all published randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of PDE5 inhibitors for treatment of ED secondary to SCI. The search included the following database: MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library. The outcomes and complications analyzed involved the Global Efficacy Question (GEQ), sexual encounter profile diary question 2 and 3 (SEP2 and SEP3) and adverse events. All statistical analysis was performed using Stata 12.0 software (Stata Corp., College Station, TX, USA).

RESULTS

Six publications were used in analysis, including six randomized controlled trials that compared PDE5 inhibitors with placebo. Compared with placebo, PDE5 inhibitors were associated with significant improvements in GEQ (OR 11.997, 95% CI 8.073-17.830, P<0.0001), SEP2 (RR 1.847, 95% CI 1.561-2.185, P<0.0001) and SEP3 (RR 2.738, 95% CI 2.084-3.598, P<0.0001). Despite significant greater incidences of some adverse events observed (headache: RR 3.717, 95% CI 2.309-5.982, P<0.0001; flushing: RR 9.281, 95% CI 2.858-30.147, P<0.0001; gastrointestinal discomfort: RR 9.064, 95% CI 2.116-38.827, P=0.003), most adverse events were mild to moderate and transient.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that PDE5 inhibitors are effective and well tolerated to treat ED secondary to SCI compared with placebo, as measured by response to GEQ, SEP2, SEP3 and incidence of adverse events. PDE5 inhibitors could be considered as the first choice in the treatment of ED patients with SCI.

Sexual dysfunction in patients with spinal cord lesions

Many aspects of sexuality can be disrupted following a spinal cord lesion (SCL). It can alter an individual's self-esteem and body image, interfere with positioning and mobility, introduce unexpected problems with incontinence and spasticity, decrease pleasure, and delay orgasm. Sexual concerns in men can involve erectile function, essential for intercourse, ejaculation function, necessary for fertility, and the ability to reach orgasm. In women they can involve concerns with vaginal lubrication, genital congestion, and vaginal infections, which can all go unnoticed, and orgasm, which may be lost. All of these concerns must be addressed during rehabilitation as individuals with SCL continue to live an active sexual life, and consider sexuality among their top priority for quality of life. This chapter describes the impact of SCL on various phases of men's and women's sexual responses and on various aspects of sexuality. Treatments are described in terms of what is currently available and what is specific to the SCL population. New approaches in particular for women are described, along with tips from sexual counseling which consider an overall approach, taking into account the primary, secondary, and tertiary consequences of the SCL on the individual's sexuality. Throughout the chapter, attempts are made to integrate neurophysiologic knowledge, findings from the literature on SCL, and clinical experience in sexual rehabilitation.

Sildenafil: two decades of benefits or risks?

Sildenafil is a selective inhibitor of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP)-specific phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE-5). A patent was registered for this drug in 1990, which expired in 2010. Since expiration, the drug has been marketed under various trade names or as generic drugs. Numerous clinical trials have been conducted addressing the effectiveness of the drug for erectile dysfunction (ED) and its safety regarding the presence or absence of specific comorbidities. After over 20 years in the market, we need to ask: has the scientific community reached a general consensus as to the overall efficacy and safety of the drug? Can we firmly state that the benefits of the drug outweigh its risks? This review suggests that sildenafil is an effective and easily manageable treatment for erectile dysfunction, both in the absence and in the presence of comorbidities. After two decades of the emergence of sildenafil as a drug of choice for the treatment of ED (and the numerous studies and clinical trials undertaken during this time span), it is now possible to state that the benefits of the drug do outweigh the risks, and represent an significant improvement in the quality of life in men with ED.

Infertility in men with spinal cord injury: research and treatment

Spinal cord injury (SCI) occurs most often to young men. Following SCI, most men are infertile due to a combination of erectile dysfunction, ejaculatory dysfunction and semen abnormalities. Erectile dysfunction may be treated by the same therapies that are used in the general population. Similarly, the same treatments that are effective to assist conception in couples with non-SCI male factor patients are effective in assisting conception in SCI male-factor patients. The most apparent differences in male-factor symptoms between SCI and non-SCI patients are the high occurrences of anejaculation and atypical semen profiles in men with SCI. Methods available to assist ejaculation in men with SCI include penile vibratory stimulation and EEJ. Use of surgical sperm retrieval as the first line of treatment for anejaculation in men with SCI is controversial. Most men with SCI have a unique semen profile characterized by normal sperm concentration, but abnormally low sperm motility. Toxic substances in the semen contribute to this problem. Despite impaired sperm parameters, pregnancy outcomes using sperm from men with SCI are similar to pregnancy outcomes using sperm from non-SCI men. Future studies should focus on improving natural ejaculation and improving semen quality in these men.

Efficacy and satisfaction rates of oral PDE5is in the treatment of erectile dysfunction secondary to spinal cord injury: a review of literature

CONCEPT

Decreased sexual function is a major concern of men with spinal cord injuries (SCIs). Treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) through oral pharmacotherapies has been proven to be an effective way to address and treat this concern.

OBJECTIVE

To find an efficacious and satisfactory treatment ED secondary to SCI through the compilation of studies that utilized the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) when testing phosphodiesterase V inhibitors (PDE5i).

METHOD

Ten articles, which used the IIEF to study satisfaction and/or efficacy of PDE5is sildenafil, tadalafil, and vardenafil in the treatment of ED were reviewed and analyzed. Through the use of a self-made grading scale the value of each article was determined for this research.

RESULTS

Sildenafil, tadalafil, and vardenafil all have been proven to be effective in treating ED in men with SCI. While sildenafil is the most thoroughly studied ED treatment for patients with SCI, tadalafil has a longer time duration effectiveness, which allows for more spontaneity in the sexual experience. Minimal adverse effects have been noted in patients with SCI using these medications; headache, flushing, and mild hypotension are the most common. In articles that study satisfaction, patients show great improvement over baseline with the use of these medications.

CONCLUSION

Although there is a need for further research on the safety in long-term use of tadalafil and vardenafil, comparative studies done on all three medications show no statistically significant difference in effectiveness or satisfaction. New medications and treatment options, such as avanafil, are being studied in hope of continued improvement of sexual function in men with SCI.

Sildenafil efficacy in erectile dysfunction secondary to spinal cord injury depends on the level of cord injuries

To evaluate the efficacy of sildenafil in the treatment of neurogenic erectile dysfunction (ED) secondary to upper motor neuron (UMN) and lower motor neuron (LMN) spinal cord injury (SCI). After taking consents 105 patients suffering from ED were enrolled in this prospective study. Seventy-two patients had signs and symptoms of UMN and 33 patients had signs and symptoms of LMN or mixed (UMN and LMN) spinal cord injuries. The patients took 50-100 mg sildenafil or placebo tablet at least 45 min before sexual intercourse. Based on a IIEF questionnaire, success in achieving erection adequate for sexual intercourse was compared between sildenafil and placebo groups in UMN and non-UMN spinal cord injuries. In patients with UMN disease, sildenafil was effective in 82% of patients and its efficacy was statistically higher than placebo (82 vs. 25%, p < 0.05). Twenty-eight per cent of patients with non-UMN disease had a favourable response to sildenafil that was not statistically different from placebo. Sildenafil seems more effective in the treatment of neurogenic ED secondary to UMN spinal cord injury compared with that secondary to LMN injury. Actually, its efficacy on LMN injuries does not seem different from placebo and administration of this treatment may not be effective in spinal cord injury which has caused LMN symptoms.

Ten years of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in spinal cord injured patients

INTRODUCTION

The majority of men with spinal cord injury (SCI) require chronic treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED), but most of them, prior to taking phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors, stopped therapy due to side-effects or low compliance rate.

AIM

Analysis of literature on oral PDE5 inhibitors in individuals with SCI and ED in order to evaluate how much their release changed the management of ED in SCI subjects and what remains to be seen of their potential or limits.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Questionnaires on sexual function.

METHODS

18 internationally published clinical studies that enrolled SCI males treated with at least one of the PDE5 inhibitors were analyzed.

RESULTS

The small numbers of papers with large and diverse outcome measures did not consent a meta-analysis of treatment results. 705 used sildenafil, 305 vardenafil and 224 tadalafil. Median age was less than 40 years. Only 1 study excluded tetraplegic individuals. For measures of ED evaluated, 11 out of 13 studies reported a significant statistical improvement with PDE5 inhibitors versus placebo or erectile baseline (P < 0.01, or p < 0.005). The most frequent predicable factor for the therapeutic success of PDE5 inhibitors was upper motoneuron lesion. Statistical impact on ejaculation success rates was shown in at least one paper for all PDE5 inhibitors (p < 0.05). Overall, 15 patients, (7 using sildenafil), discontinued the therapies due to drawbacks. Only 1 sildenafil study reported a follow-up maximum of 24 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Literature suggests that all oral PDE5 inhibitors represent a safe and effective treatment option for ED caused by SCI. Further research is needed on head-to-head comparative trials and SCI patient preference for these drugs; their impact on ejaculation and orgasm function, their early use after SCI for increasing the recovery rate of a spontaneous erection, and their effectiveness and tolerability in the long-term are still to be investigated.

Vardenafil improves ejaculation success rates and self-confidence in men with erectile dysfunction due to spinal cord injury

STUDY DESIGN

Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of the oral phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitor, vardenafil, on ejaculation rates and self-confidence in men with spinal cord injury (SCI).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Spinal command of male sexual functions is often seriously impaired by traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). A high proportion of men with SCI cannot ejaculate during sexual intercourse. SCI-related ejaculatory disorders are often responsible for male infertility. Sexual dysfunction associated with SCI can also affect men's self-confidence.

METHODS

In this 12-week study, 418 men aged >or=18 years with erectile dysfunction >6 months resulting from a traumatic SCI were randomized to vardenafil (n = 207) or placebo (n = 211) 10 mg for 4 weeks, then maintained or titrated to 5 or 20 mg at weeks 4 and 8. Assessments included questions of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) about ejaculation success and orgasmic perception; the Global Confidence Question; and quality-of-life scales to measure psychological well-being, self-esteem, depression, and mental health status.

RESULTS

Overall per patient ejaculation success rates were significantly greater with vardenafil than placebo over 12 weeks of treatment (19% vs. 10%; P < 0.001). At last observation carried forward, the IIEF "orgasmic function" score increased from 2.9 at baseline to 4.0 for vardenafil and from 3.0 at baseline to 3.4 for placebo. Sixteen percent of men receiving vardenafil and 8% receiving placebo felt orgasm "almost always" or "always" at weeks 8-12, compared with 4% and 6%, respectively, at baseline. Significant improvements in confidence scores were observed with vardenafil compared with placebo (P < 0.0001). There were no clinically significant differences between vardenafil and placebo in the quality-of-life measures at the study endpoint, but these had been in the normal range at baseline.

CONCLUSION

Vardenafil significantly improved ejaculation and self-confidence in men with erectile dysfunction due to SCI.

A placebo-controlled, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, flexible-dose, two-way crossover study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sildenafil in men with traumatic spinal cord injury and erectile dysfunction

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

To show the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of sildenafil in men with erectile dysfunction (ED) associated with complete or incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) and to assess its effects on quality of life (QoL) using the Life-Satisfaction Check List.

METHODS

This was a placebo-controlled, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, flexible-dose, 2-way crossover study with a 2-week washout period between each phase. Patients with ED attributable to SCI (Sexual Health Inventory-Male score < or =21) received 50 to 100 mg sildenafil (n = 24) or placebo (n = 26).

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, sildenafil produced higher levels of successful sexual stimulation, intercourse success, satisfaction with sexual life and sexual relationship, erectile function, overall sexual satisfaction, and an improved Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction score, with no clinically relevant effects on vital signs. Sildenafil seemed more effective in patients with incomplete SCI than in those with complete SCI, producing significant improvements, compared with placebo, in a number of measures only in patients with incomplete SCI. All patients who expressed a preference selected sildenafil over placebo, although the drug had no effect on patient QoL. Sildenafil was well tolerated, with a profile comparable to that of placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with placebo, treatment with oral sildenafil safely and effectively improved erectile function in patients with ED attributable to SCI, especially in those with incomplete injury, and was the agent of choice in those who expressed a preference.

Sexual health outcome measures for individuals with a spinal cord injury: a systematic review

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review of all sexual health outcome measures reporting psychometric properties for a spinal cord injury (SCI) population.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the psychometric evidence for sexual health outcome measures used in a SCI population in order to (1) determine the clinical relevance of current tools and (2) suggest recommendations for future tool development.

SETTING

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched for articles reporting psychometric properties of sexual health outcome measures used in a SCI population. The search was limited to papers published between January 1986 and January 2006. Hand-searching the references of papers obtained from the electronic search identified additional articles.

RESULTS

Four outcome measures met the search criteria: Emotional Quality of the Relationship Scale (EQR), Sexual Activity and Satisfaction Scale (SAS), Sexual Attitude and Information Questionnaire (SAIQ) and Sexual Interest and Satisfaction Scale (SIS). While the clinical utility of these tools may be compromised by their limited scope and advancing age, they may still prove useful for guiding SCI research and clinical practice.

CONCLUSION

There is no clinically agreed upon SCI measurement tool for sexual health outcomes. To adequately assess the complex issue of sexual health, it is recommended that future sexual health outcome measures include both quantitative and qualitative data as well as address several key issues.

Management of sildenafil treatment failures

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although oral type 5 phosphodiesterase inhibitors are considered as first-line therapy for the majority of causes of erectile dysfunction, because of their high efficacy, ease of use, and acceptable safety profile, there are some who fail to respond, mainly because of end-organ failure. This communication reviews the management of sildenafil failures in light of recent advances.

RECENT FINDINGS

Sildenafil failures can be attributed to either lack of efficacy or side effects; issues may involve the physician, patient, and his partner. Physicians may contribute to sildenafil failure and discontinuation because of inadequate instructions, lack of adequate follow-up, suboptimal dosing, lack of adequate trial, and insufficient clarification about safety issues. Studies have demonstrated that progression of endothelial dysfunction and diminished cavernosal smooth-muscle content are recognized organic factors which cause end-organ dysfunction and ultimately treatment failure.

SUMMARY

Proper counseling, medication optimization, and modifying associated risk factors can provide success in men who had initially failed sildenafil therapy for erectile dysfunction. Other treatment modalities that may be considered when sildenafil failure occurs include vacuum devices, intraurethral, and intracavernosal administration of vasoactive drugs alone or combined with sildenafil. Penile prosthesis implantation is considered as a last resort, if all first-line and second-line therapies fail.

Long-term effects of spinal cord injury on sexual function in men: implications for neuroplasticity

STUDY DESIGN

Secure, web-based survey.

OBJECTIVES

Elicit specific information about sexual function from men with spinal cord injuries (SCI).

SETTING

World-wide web.

METHODS

Individuals 18 years or older living with SCI obtained a pass-code to enter a secure website and then answered survey questions.

RESULTS

The presence of genital sensation was positively correlated with the ability to feel a build up of sexual tension in the body during sexual stimulation and in the feeling that mental arousal translates to the genitals as physical sensation. There was an inverse relationship between developing new areas of arousal above the level of lesion and not having sensation or movement below the lesion. A positive relationship existed between the occurrence of spasticity during sexual activity and erectile ability. Roughly 60% of the subjects had tried some type of erection enhancing method. Only 48% had successfully achieved ejaculation postinjury and the most commonly used methods were hand stimulation, sexual intercourse, and vibrostimulation. The most commonly cited reasons for trying to ejaculate were for pleasure and for sexual intimacy. Less than half reported having experienced orgasm postinjury and this was influenced by the length of time postinjury and sacral sparing.

CONCLUSION

SCI not only impairs male erectile function and ejaculatory ability, but also alters sexual arousal in a manner suggestive of neuroplasticity. More research needs to be pursued in a manner encompassing all aspects of sexual function.

Phosphodiesterase inhibitors in the treatment of erectile dysfunction in spinal cord-injured men

STUDY DESIGN

Open, before-after study.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors for erectile dysfunction (ED) in spinal cord-injured (SCI) patients.

SETTING

Home- and clinic-based assessments in the outpatient department at the Centre Bouffard Vercelli, Cerbère France.

METHODS

Clinic trials with Sildenafil (Viagra) on 120 patients, Tadalafil (Cialis) on 54 patients and Vardenafil (Levitra) on 66 patients were performed. Flexible doses of PDE5 inhibitors were given depending on efficacy and tolerability, from 50 to 100 mg for Sildenafil, and from 10 to 20 mg for Vardenafil and Tadalafil. Each trial was performed after a week's interval. The efficacy was self-assessed by the patients on a six-point quantitative scale assessment. The response to treatment was assessed at home in 90 patients (57 patients on Sildenafil, 12 patients on Vardenafil and 21 patients on Tadalafil) using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF).

RESULTS

In clinic trials, PDE5 inhibitors were effective (rigidity enough for penetration) in 85% of the patients on Sildenafil, 74% of the patients on Vardenafil and 72% of the patients on Tadalafil. The mean duration of erection was 34, 28 and 26 min, respectively. Adverse effects were mild, usually attenuated with continued dosing. More than 70% of the patients on Vardenafil and Tadalafil required higher doses of 20 mg, whereas 50 mg of Sildenafil was effective in 55% of the patients. Two-thirds of our patients on Tadalafil reported a duration of action longer than 24 h. The presence of an upper motor neuron lesion was significantly associated with therapeutic success, lower motor neuron lesions and cauda equina patients were poor responders. Other variables such as completeness of lesion had no impact. In the follow-up visits, the IIEF global scores and three IIEF domains (erectile function, intercourse satisfaction and overall satisfaction) were significantly improved in all patients. Patients on Sildenafil showed a significant improvement of orgasmic function, ejaculation (Question 9) and orgasm (Question 10).

CONCLUSION

Sildenafil, Vardenafil and Tadalafil are all effective and well-tolerated treatments for ED in SCI patients. Although no statistical analysis could be applied on these data, these results might indicate that Sildenafil is more effective in treating ED. Clinic trials are important for proper dose titration and appropriate education of the patients.

Efficacy of sildenafil citrate in men with erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy: a systematic review of clinical data

INTRODUCTION

Radical prostatectomy is a frequently used treatment option for prostate cancer; however, prostatectomy is often associated with significant morbidity, including erectile dysfunction (ED).

AIM

To analyze the efficacy of sildenafil citrate in treating ED after radical prostatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MEDLINE and CANCERLIT (1998 to January 2004) were searched for English language articles using the key words prostatectomy, sildenafil, and phosphodiesterase inhibitors. Eleven studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria: primary, discrete data sets of postprostatectomy patients with ED treated with sildenafil monotherapy.

RESULTS

Sample sizes ranged from 13 to 198 (mean age, 61 +/- 3 years). Treatment durations were 4 weeks (or more than four doses) to 1 year, and sildenafil dosing was in the recommended range (25-100 mg). Seven studies reported a response rate (range, 14%-53%) for an end point consistent with the primary analysis outcome (erection sufficient for vaginal intercourse); the combined estimate of probability of response was 35% (95% confidence interval [CI], 24%-48%). There was strong evidence for a lower response rate after non-nerve-sparing (range, 0%-15%) versus nerve-sparing surgery (range, 35%-75%; combined odds ratio [OR] = 12.1; 95% CI, 5.5-26.6) but not after unilateral (range, 10%-80%) versus bilateral nerve-sparing surgery (range, 46%-72%; combined OR = 2.21; 95% CI, 0.75-6.54).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of these studies demonstrate that with sildenafil, more than one third of patients with postprostatectomy ED achieved erection sufficient for intercourse. The odds of responding improved 12-fold with preservation of at least one neurovascular bundle. Early treatment failure does not necessarily imply lack of efficacy in the future, and patients should be encouraged to continue trying sildenafil, titrating up to 100 mg as needed.

Male erectile dysfunction following spinal cord injury: a systematic review

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVE

To review sexuality in persons with spinal cord injuries (SCIs), and to report the effectiveness of erectile interventions.

METHODS

Reports from six databases (1966-2003), selected annual proceedings (1997-2002) and manufacturer's information were screened against eligibility criteria. Included reports were abstracted and data pooled from case-series reports regarding intracavernous injections and sildenafil.

RESULTS

From 2127 unique reports evaluated, 49 were included. Male sexual dysfunction was addressed in these reports of several interventions (behavioural therapy, topical agents, intraurethral alprosatadil, intracavernous injections, vacuum tumescence devices, penile implants, sacral stimulators and oral medication). Penile injections resulted in successful erectile function in 90% (95% CI: 83%, 97%) of men. Sildenafil resulted in 79% (95% CI: 68%, 90%) success; the difference in efficacy was not statistically significant. Five case-series reports involving 363 participants with penile implants demonstrated a high satisfaction rate, but a 10% complication rate.

CONCLUSIONS

A large body of evidence addressing sexuality in males focuses on erection. Penile injection, sildenafil and vacuum devices generally obviate the need for penile implants to address erectile dysfunction. Interventions may positively affect sexual activity in the short term. Long-term sexual adjustment and holistic approaches beyond erections remain to be studied. Rigorous study design and reporting, using common outcome measures, will facilitate higher quality research. This will positively impact patient care.

SPONSORSHIP

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, US Department of Health and Human Services, 2101 East Jefferson Street, Rockville, MD 20852, USA.

Erectile dysfunction in spinal cord injury: a cost-utility analysis

BACKGROUND

There is a high incidence of erectile dysfunction after spinal cord injury. This can have a profound effect on quality of life. Treatment options for erectile dysfunction include sildenafil, intracavernous injections of papaverine/alprostadil (Caverject), alprostadil/papaverine/phentolamine ("Triple Mix"), transurethral suppository (MUSE), surgically implanted prosthetic device and vacuum erection devices. However, physical impairments and accessibility may preclude patient self-utilization of non-oral treatments.

METHODS

The costs and utilities of oral and non-oral erectile dysfunction treatments in a spinal cord injury population were examined in a cost-utility analysis conducted from a government payer perspective. Subjects with spinal cord injury (n=59) reported health preferences using the standard gamble technique.

RESULTS

There was a higher health preference for oral therapy. The cost-effectiveness results indicated that sildenafil was the dominant economic strategy when compared with surgically implanted prosthetic devices, MUSE(R) and Caverject. The incremental cost-utility ratios comparing sildenafil with triple mix and vacuum erection devices favoured sildenafil, with ratios less than CAN$20,000 per quality adjusted life year gained.

CONCLUSION

Based on this study, we conclude that sildenafil is a cost-effective treatment for erectile dysfunction in the spinal cord injury population.

Determination of changes in blood pressure during administration of sildenafil (Viagra®) in patients with spinal cord injury and erectile dysfunction

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, open-label, comparative study, to assess the effects of sildenafil on blood pressure in a population of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI).

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of sildenafil on blood pressure in patients with erectile dysfunction secondary to SCI by comparing changes in blood pressure in SCI patients with a neurologic level below T5 versus higher levels. To establish a relationship between the potential hypotensive effect and protective muscle spasm against blood pressure reduction. To assess the effects of age, complexity and duration of SCI on changes in blood pressure. To record any adverse effects occurring during the study.

SETTING

Spinal Cord Injury Unit, Insular University Hospital of Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain.

SUBJECTS

In total, 22 male SCI patients aged 18 years or older with a history of SCI greater than 3 months in duration.

METHODS

Patients with erectile dysfunction secondary to SCI were included in the study, without excluding patients with a neurologic level above 75 or asymptomatic low blood pressure. Patients with specific contraindications for use of the drug were excluded. A personal history was obtained, and the level of injury (ASIA/IMSOP scales of international standards), impairment grade (ASIA impairment scale), spasticity grade (modified Ashworth scale) and baseline sitting and supine blood pressure values were determined. A single dose of 50 mg of sildenafil was administered, and patients remained sitting at 45 degrees . Blood pressure was monitored every 10 min for 4 h and whenever the patient reported symptoms. Any relevant signs and symptoms manifested during the study period were also recorded. Analysis of the changes in blood pressure values was performed using a paired t-test in each group of patients according to neurologic level and spasticity grade.

RESULTS

A decrease in blood pressure was observed in all patients, although patients with a level of injury at T5 or above and those with a complete SCI showed a less intense decrease (P<0.05). The spasticity grade of the patients was protective against the fall in blood pressure, as it was less significant in patients with grade 3 (P>0.1) than in those with grade 0. Adverse effects were few and transient. None were related to hypotension.

CONCLUSION

Sildenafil caused a decrease in blood pressure in SCI patients with a neurologic level of injury above T5 and complete injuries (grade A), but did not have clinical implications in the patients studied. A higher spasticity grade tends to protect the patient from the fall in blood pressure. Age and duration of injury do not appear to influence this decrease.

Male infertility in spinal cord trauma

Every year there are 10 thousand new cases of patients victimized by spinal cord trauma (SCT) in the United States and it is estimated that there are 7 thousand new cases in Brazil. Eighty percent of patients are fertile males. Infertility in this patient group is due to 3 main factors resulting from spinal cord lesions: erectile dysfunction, ejaculatory disorder and low sperm counts. Erectile dysfunction has been successfully treated with oral and injectable medications, use of vacuum devices and penile prosthesis implants. The technological improvement in penile vibratory stimulation devices (PVS) and rectal probe electro-ejaculation (RPE) has made such procedures safer and accessible to patients with ejaculatory dysfunction. Despite the normal number of spermatozoa found in semen of spinal cord-injured patients, their motility is abnormal. This change does not seem to be related to changes in scrotal thermal regulation, frequency of ejaculation or duration of spinal cord damage but to factors related to the seminal plasma. Despite the poor seminal quality, increasingly more men with SCT have become fathers through techniques ranging from simple homologous insemination to sophisticated assisted reproduction techniques such as intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

Specific aspects of erectile dysfunction in spinal cord injury

According to preliminary studies, the overall incidence of spinal cord injury (SCI; traumatic and medical) in Spain is estimated to be between 12 and 20 per million inhabitants, and almost 80% of these injuries occur in young men. SCI causes organic changes in men leading to erectile dysfunction (ED), impaired ejaculation, and changes in genital orgasmic perception. A vast majority of men with both complete and incomplete SCI will require treatment for ED, and the therapeutic options should include sexual counseling so that the patient can be informed about his disorder and can adjust his sexual behavior accordingly. The first-line treatment of choice is oral drugs, such as phosphodiesterase inhibitors (sildenafil, tadalafil, and vardenafil). Sildenafil has been shown to be highly effective and well tolerated in men with ED of various etiologies, including SCI. Data are also presented on sublingual apomorphine, which has limited indications for the treatment of ED in SCI, and on constrictive rings and vacuum systems. Second-line treatments include intracavernous injections of prostaglandin E(1), papaverine, and phentolamine, alone or in combination, which have been shown to be highly effective in the treatment of ED in men with SCI. Finally, for third-line treatments, the indications for surgical methods are given, including penile prostheses and neuroprosthesis of anterior sacral roots. These devices should be reserved for the cases when the above-mentioned methods have repeatedly failed. Historically, the treatment of ED among patients with SCI has been managed by clinicians in physical medicine and rehabilitation. Thus, the criteria for referral and the competencies of these specialists are established, and they should be included as an integral part of the rehabilitation program.

Future options for combination therapy in the management of erectile dysfunction in older men

The prevalence of erectile dysfunction (ED) has dramatically increased in parallel with the aging of the Western industrialised population. The estimated prevalence of ED worldwide in 1995 was 152 million men. As the population in industrial nations ages, an estimated 322 million men will be affected by ED by the year 2025. Oral drug therapy with the phosphodiesterase (PDE) type 5 inhibitor sildenafil fails in some patients with ED; however, several different classes of drugs demonstrate efficacy in treating ED, creating the potential for pharmacological combination therapy. Pharmaceutical products that lead to the activation of or an increase in cyclic nucleotides (cyclic adenosine monophosphate and cyclic guanosine monophosphate), with or without nitric oxide donors or nitrates, as well as alpha-adrenoceptor antagonists, have been used to treat ED. Sildenafil has been used in combination with alprostadil (prostaglandin E1) and administered via intraurethral or intracavernous route. Successful intercourse using this combination of agents varies from 47% to 100% following failed monotherapy. Various combination therapies for ED are being studied using PDE5 inhibitors, together with other agents, alpha-adrenoceptor antagonists, and testosterone replacement therapy for men with hypogonadism. The combination of centrally acting agents with PDE5 inhibitors, e.g. a regimen of apomorphine plus PDE5 inhibitor, is an attractive approach because the two therapies target different mechanisms. New PDE5 inhibitors such as vardenafil should be tried first as therapy for sildenafil nonresponders before exploring any combination therapy options. Preliminary observations of combination therapy have been encouraging and provide a scientific rationale for prospective, randomised clinical trials with adequate numbers of patients.

Apomorphine sublingual as primary or secondary treatment for erectile dysfunction in patients with spinal cord injury

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of apomorphine sublingual (SL) 3 mg, as a primary or secondary treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED) in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI), and to determine possible differences in efficacy considering clinical, urodynamic and neurophysiological findings.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included 22 patients with chronic SCI and neurogenic ED who were examined physically and by a video-urodynamic evaluation. A neurophysiological evaluation included somatosensory evoked potentials of the pudendal nerve, palmar and plantar sympathetic skin responses and bulbocavernous reflex recordings. Thereafter the patients received 8 tablets of apomorphine SL 3 mg and were asked to complete the International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire before and after treatment. Side-effects, subjective efficacy compared with other treatments and satisfaction with the SL administration were recorded.

RESULTS

Of the 22 men, 11 had upper motor neurone lesions (six complete, five incomplete), eight lower motor neurone lesions (seven complete, one incomplete) and three had mixed lesions. In all, 12 patients took sildenafil citrate and five alprostadil intracavernosally beforehand, and five had used nothing to treat their ED. Seven patients had some response and reported that the drug helped them to obtain an erection, but only two reported erections sufficient for intercourse and would agree to continue apomorphine SL as their standard treatment; all the others reported being disappointed. Nine patients reported side-effects. There were no significant correlations for electrophysiological or urodynamic findings and treatment success. Of the 22 patients 20 preferred SL rather than the normal administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Apomorphine SL, a D1/D2 dopamine agonist, facilitates erectile function in a heterogeneous group of patients with no significant relationship with any of the assessed urodynamic or electrophysiological variables. The overall low rates of response either for primary or secondary treatment suggests that apomorphine will have limited applicability in patients with SCI.

Efficacy of DA-8159, a new PDE5 inhibitor, for inducing penile erection in rabbits with acute spinal cord injury

DA-8159 is a pyrazolopyrimidinone derivative which exhibits potent and selective phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibition. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of DA-8159 on inducing a penile erection in rabbits with an acute spinal cord injury (ASCI). DA-8159 was given either orally (1, 3, or 10 mg/kg) or intravenously (0.1 or 0.3 mg/kg) to conscious male albino rabbits with a surgical transection of the spinal cord at the L2-L4 lumbar vertebra or ischemic-reperfusion SCI rabbits. Erection was evaluated in a time-course manner by measuring the length of the uncovered penile mucosa. DA-8159 induced a dose-dependent erection in both transection and ischemic-reperfusion ASCI rabbits. The efficacy of DA-8159 was potentiated by an intravenous injection of sodium nitroprusside, a nitric oxide donor. Potentiation of the effect by nitric oxide donor implies that DA-8159 can enhance the erectile activity during sexual arousal. These results suggest that DA-8159 may be useful for treating erectile dysfunction in patients with an SCI.

Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors in male sexual dysfunction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors are preferred by most men for the oral treatment of erectile dysfunction. In many guidelines, this therapy is recommended as first-line therapy because of convenience, high efficacy, and low rates of side-effects. Sildenafil was the first drug for the treatment of erectile dysfunction, introduced in 1998. There are now two new phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors, vardenafil and tadalafil, for which approval was recently given in the European Union and is expected this year in the United States.

RECENT FINDINGS

Sildenafil has proved to be a very effective medicinal product. According to initial studies, vardenafil and tadalafil have demonstrated efficacy comparable to that of sildenafil. However, fewer data are available evaluating the adverse effects of vardenafil and tadalafil, particularly on their long-term use and their use in high-risk groups. Interestingly, vardenafil and tadalafil have a higher potency than sildenafil. Moreover, the long life of tadalafil has been associated with an erectogenic potential of the drug lasting for more than 24 h. The advantage of this is the possibility of a patient engaging in sexual activity more than once after a single administration of the drug.

SUMMARY

In the future, in addition to sildenafil, the new phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors vardenafil and tadalafil will play an important role in the management of erectile dysfunction, depending on the patient's health profile.

Sildenafil in erectile dysfunction: a critical review

Sildenafil citrate (Viagra) is a potent orally active cGMP-specific phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor that is effective as a peripheral conditioner in the treatment of male erectile dysfunction (ED) of organic, psychogenic or mixed aetiology. Sildenafil is the first effective oral agent in the management of ED that has had a revolutionary impact on management of ED. The present review has been subdivided into five major sections. Based on the most recent peer-reviewed publications, the first section is aimed at critically evaluating PDE5 selectivity as well as the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the drug, mainly to assess the best doses for each group of patients (i.e. adult and elderly men). Effectiveness in a broad spectrum ED population is the subject of the second section of the review, principally reporting post-marketing company-independent results. Safety and tolerability are the key concerns of the third section, with a broad consideration of the most commonly reported adverse events. Special attention has been paid to the cardiovascular safety of the drug, chiefly outlining the positive and potentially protective cardiac effects of sildenafil. Moreover, the impact of sildenafil in special patient populations is considered, namely in men complaining of diabetes mellitus, depression, neurological disorders, renal failure and those who have undergone a radical prostatectomy. Sildenafil and the ageing male has been especially underlined. Finally, the review covers a few new potential applications of sildenafil in ED patients with regard to high-dose treatment and combination therapy. The review ends with several considerations regarding the direct and/or indirect impact of sildenafil over quality of life and quality of partnership.

Combination therapy for erectile dysfunction: where we are and what's in the future

Penile erection occurs in response to visual, olfactory, imaginative, and tactile stimuli initiated within the brain and/or on the periphery. Responses to these stimuli are mediated by efferent autonomic outflow originating in the sacral spinal cord and transmitted by the cavernosal and penile nerves. A number of neurotransmitters can play an integral role in corpus cavernosum smooth muscle relaxation, in part regulating penile erection through increased smooth muscle synthesis of the secondary messengers cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP). In addition to direct-acting agents, there are indirect-acting smooth muscle-relaxing agents. Phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitors such as sildenafil act indirectly and require sexual stimulation and endogenous nitric oxide production to activate the cGMP pathway effectively. In contrast, agents such as prostaglandin E(1) (PGE(1)) act directly on the trabecular smooth muscle, binding to specific e-prostanoid receptors and increasing cAMP synthesis. For this reason the direct-acting agents do not require sexual stimulation for efficacy. Combination pharmacotherapy has been used experimentally to treat erectile dysfunction for 25 years, using combinations of cAMP synthesis augmentors, smooth muscle relaxants and PDE inhibitors, and alpha-blockers administered via intracavernosal injection. The present era of oral pharmacotherapy treatment has resulted in significant awareness in the field of sexual dysfunction; however, a single agent may not be ideal to sustain penile rigidity, especially if comorbidities and severity of erectile dysfunction are accounted for. The rationale for and recent reports on combination therapy are presented in this review.

The efficacy of sildenafil citrate (Viagra) in clinical populations: an update

Although certain risk factors are known to be associated with erectile dysfunction (ED), the demographic and ED characteristics of the population of men with ED are quite diverse. We examined results from randomized trials of sildenafil citrate (Viagra) to ascertain if efficacy differed across various subgroups of men with ED. In addition, we reviewed findings from long-term extension studies and published accounts of sildenafil use in clinical practice to determine if effectiveness is maintained with long-term sildenafil treatment and to determine if effectiveness in the clinic practice setting is consistent with that reported in clinical trials. Data were pooled from 11 double-blind, placebo-controlled, flexible-dose (taken as needed) studies to assess efficacy (N = 2667) of sildenafil in men (aged 23 to 89 years) with ED of broad-spectrum etiology who were not receiving concomitant nitrate therapy. Efficacy evaluations included the International Index of Erectile Function, a global efficacy question ("Did treatment improve your erections?"), and a patient-recorded event log of sexual activity. Significantly improved erectile function was demonstrated for sildenafil compared with placebo for all efficacy parameters analyzed (P <0.02 to 0.0001), regardless of patient age, race, body mass index, ED etiology, ED severity, ED duration, or the presence of various comorbidities. Long-term effectiveness was assessed in 3 open-label extension studies. Of those who continued long-term therapy (1 to 3 years) with sildenafil, >95% of patients reported that they were satisfied with the effect of treatment on their erections, and that treatment had improved their ability to engage in sexual activity. Findings from published accounts of sildenafil use in the clinical practice setting further demonstrated that sildenafil is an effective treatment for a wide range of patients with ED.

Achieving treatment optimization with sildenafil citrate (Viagra) in patients with erectile dysfunction

Since its approval in 1998, sildenafil citrate (Viagra) has been shown to be efficacious in >100 clinical trials involving >8000 men with erectile dysfunction (ED). In clinical practice, however, many men do not continue long-term use of sildenafil for a variety of reasons; thus, 6 different aspects of optimizing treatment with sildenafil are described here. (1) Intercourse success rates, considered a reflection of real-world effectiveness, were assessed in 1276 patients with ED. Results indicated that the cumulative probability of achieving intercourse success with sildenafil increased with the number of attempts, reaching a plateau after approximately 8 attempts. (2) A comprehensive disease management approach that included a medical history, physical examination, educational material about ED, modifications of risk factors/lifestyle changes, and counseling resulted in successful intercourse in 74% of 111 patients taking sildenafil. (3) A survey conducted among primary care physicians revealed that almost 50% did not routinely question their patients about ED symptoms, although it is known that most patients would prefer their physician to take the initiative. (4) Overall, 55% of 137 men who were previously not successful with sildenafil became successful after reeducation and counseling, which included information on patient and partner expectations, how to properly take the drug, titration to maximum dose, and a minimum trial of 8 attempts for efficacy assessment. (5) Many men with ED have underlying comorbidities or take multiple medications that are risk factors for ED. Controlling these risk factors in 521 men from a multispecialty clinic led to an overall intercourse success rate of 82%; patients with multiple risk factors were less likely to have intercourse success than men with only 1 risk factor. (6) Finally, treatment satisfaction is a pivotal factor in maintaining long-term ED therapy. In an open-label trial, 82% of 443 subjects reported treatment satisfaction with sildenafil. In summary, these findings highlight how important it is for physicians to take a more comprehensive, proactive approach when treating men with ED, including control of risk factors, instructions on how to properly take the drug, partner involvement, and follow-up visits. Using these recommended measures, most men with ED, including those whose treatment was previously unsuccessful, can be treated successfully with sildenafil.

Efficacy and safety of sildenafil citrate (Viagra) in men with erectile dysfunction and spinal cord injury: a review

Spinal cord injury (SCI) affects a substantial number of men who are young, active, and otherwise healthy. Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common consequence of SCI. Since its approval, sildenafil citrate (Viagra) has been shown to effectively treat ED of various etiologies. We review the evidence for the efficacy and safety of sildenafil treatment of ED in men with SCI. A literature search identified 2 randomized controlled trials and 4 prospective case series that evaluated sildenafil treatment for ED from SCI. Efficacy was evaluated using an assessment of global efficacy and a more specific assessment of erectile function. For general efficacy, the proportion of patients who reported improved erections and ability to have intercourse was as high as 94%. Up to 72% of intercourse attempts were successful. For measures of erectile function, 5 of the 6 studies showed statistically significant improvements among sildenafil-treated versus placebo-treated patients. Erectile response rates were generally higher in patients with incomplete versus complete SCI and in patients with upper versus lower motor neuron lesions. Nevertheless, a substantial proportion of patients with complete lesions, regardless of level or lower motor neuron lesions, also benefited from sildenafil. Sildenafil was well tolerated. Incidence rates and types of adverse events that occurred in these studies were similar to those published previously. Symptoms of autonomic dysreflexia were not reported in any study. Existing evidence suggests that oral sildenafil is a highly effective and well-tolerated treatment for ED associated with SCI.