Outcomes in patients admitted for rehabilitation with spinal neurological lesions following intervertebral disc herniation

Nature of the Non-traumatic Spinal Cord Injury Literature: A Systematic Review

Background: Non-traumatic SCI (NTSCI) etiologies represent a markedly heterogeneous cluster of conditions defined within the consensus NTSCI taxonomy. This meta-analysis assembles evidence about the occurrence of NTSCI and its clinical outcomes with respect to 6 research domains. Purpose: To investigate the quality and quantity of clinical NTSCI evidence published in the peer reviewed literature with reference to prognosis, diagnosis, intervention, process of care, methodology, and qualitative approaches. Methods: PubMed and MEDLINE OVID MeSH heading searches were conducted for 5 common-language NTSCI descriptors. Filters were English language and Entrez date (1997-2016). Filters also controlled for case reports, editorials or errata, and invited reviews. NTSCI etiologies incorrectly classified, animal studies, and multidimensional mapping studies were excluded. Full texts were retrieved and ranked for evidence quality according to PRISMA statement guidelines, or PEDro criteria. Data were extracted and simple descriptive statistics applied. Results: The search terms non traumatic and non-traumatic SCI retrieved 282 articles, with 39 duplicates. After exclusion of 117 articles: Level 1V (60); NTSCI incorrectly evaluated (14); publication bias (2); non-English language (1); and animal experiments (1), 126 titles/abstracts were screened and ranked against criteria. Of the 8 papers allocated for full-text review, a subset of 3 articles was ranked level 1A (1) or level 11A (2); mean PEDro score 5.75±0.5. Reasons for full-text exclusions (5) were NTSCI incorrectly classified (1) and statistical limitations (4). Of the 6 domains, prognostics had adequate data yield (86) for evidence synthesis (4.8% ranked level 1A, or 11A). Notable evidence gaps were identified in qualitative (1), methodological (2), and diagnostic (8) domains. Conclusion: Therapeutic approaches require an evidence-based understanding of the distinct contexts in which NTSCI occurs, especially in less resourced settings. Our findings underscore the need for qualitative and quantitative research on the occurrence of NTSCI in all contexts.

Survival after spinal cord injury: a systematic review

Spinal cord injury (SCI) leading to neurological deficits produces long-term effects that persist over a lifetime. Survival analysis of patients with SCI, at individual and population level, is important for public health management and the assessment of treatment achievements. The current study evaluated survival following traumatic and non-traumatic SCI worldwide. A systematic review was conducted, and all included papers were assessed for quality using a purposely designed assessment form. Survival data were presented in Kaplan-Meier curves and compared using the log-rank test. Sixteen studies were included of which 11 concerned traumatic SCI, four non-traumatic SCI, and one both. Crude standard mortality rates (SMRs) revealed that overall mortality in SCI is up to three times higher than in the general population. Survival rates were statistically significantly lower in non-traumatic SCI than in traumatic SCI (log-rank p = 0.000). Age at injury, neurological level, extent of lesion, and year of injury have been described as predictors of survival. Causes of death stem from secondary complications, with failure of the respiratory system being the leading cause. This is the first systematic literature review on survival analysis following SCI worldwide. An increase in survival over time was found. However, the SMRs of individuals with SCI still exceed those of an age-matched non-disabled population, mainly due to secondary complications. Lower survival rates were observed in non-traumatic SCI compared with traumatic SCI.

Effects of etiology on inpatient rehabilitation outcomes in 65- to 74-year-old patients with incomplete paraplegia from a nontraumatic spinal cord injury

OBJECTIVE

To examine differences in rehabilitation outcomes for older patients with a nontraumatic spinal cord injury (NT-SCI) for 5 etiologic diagnoses: degenerative spinal disease (DSD), malignant spinal tumor, benign spinal tumor, vascular ischemia, and spinal abscess.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study that used Medicare claims and assessment data.

SETTING

A total of 479 inpatient rehabilitation hospitals and units.

PATIENTS

A total of 1780 Medicare beneficiaries (65-74 years old) with incomplete paraplegia attributable to NT-SCI who were discharged from inpatient rehabilitation facilities from 2002 through 2005.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Length of stay, discharge Functional Independence Measure (FIM) instrument motor item and subscale scores, and discharge destination.

RESULTS

Demographic characteristics varied by etiology group. Mean +/- SD rehabilitation stays ranged from 13.3 +/- 7.7 days for DSD to 26.4 +/- 13.4 days for vascular ischemia. Adjusted data showed stays differed (P < .001) across etiology groups. Adjusted discharge mean self-care and mobility subscores revealed that patients with DSD and benign tumor were more independent (P < .001) than patients with a malignant tumor or spinal abscess. Patients with vascular ischemia were more dependent (P < .01) in mobility than the DSD and benign tumor groups. Etiologic differences (P < .01) in independence in discharge FIM modifiers for walking (FIM > or = 4), bladder (FIM > or = 6) and bowel management (FIM > or = 6) and bowel accidents/continence (FIM > or = 6), but not bladder accidents (FIM > or = 6), were present. The percent of patients discharged to a community residence ranged from 59.3% to 92.6%. Adjusted data showed that significantly larger percentages (P < .01) of patients in the DSD and malignant tumor groups than in the spinal abscess group were discharged to a community residence (versus nursing home).

CONCLUSION

There are etiologic differences in demographics, rehabilitation length of stay, functional outcomes, and discharge destination in elderly patients with NT-SCI.

Predictors of ambulatory function after decompressive surgery for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression

OBJECTIVE

Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) is a relatively common and debilitating complication of metastatic disease that often results in neurological deficits. This study was designed to explore associations with maintaining and regaining ambulatory function after decompressive surgery for MESCC.

METHODS

Seventy-eight patients undergoing decompressive surgery for MESCC at an academic tertiary care institution between 1995 and 2005 were retrospectively reviewed. Fisher's exact analysis was used to compare preoperative ambulatory and nonambulatory patients. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify associations with either maintaining or regaining the ability to walk.

RESULTS

Patients were followed for 7.1 +/- 1.6 (mean +/- standard deviation) months after surgery. Preoperative nonambulatory patients required more extensive surgery (increased operative spinal levels and number of laminectomies) and had more surgical site complications (wound dehiscences and cerebrospinal fluid leaks) compared with preoperative ambulatory patients. From the multivariate analysis, preoperative ability to walk (relative risk [RR], 2.320; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.301-4.416; P < 0.01) independently increased the likelihood of ambulation at the last follow-up evaluation 2.3-fold. Pathological vertebral compression fracture at presentation (RR, 0.471; 95% CI, 0.235-0.864; P = 0.01) independently decreased the likelihood of ambulation at the time of the last follow-up evaluation 2.1-fold. For patients unable to walk at the time of surgery, preoperative radiation therapy (RR, 0.406; 95% CI, 0.124-0.927; P = 0.03) decreased the likelihood of regaining the ability to walk 2.5-fold. Symptoms present for less than 48 hours (RR, 2.925; 95% CI, 1.133-2.925; P = 0.02) and postoperative radiotherapy (RR, 2.595; 95% CI, 1.039-8.796; P = 0.04) independently increased the likelihood of regaining ambulatory ability 2.9- and 2.6-fold, respectively, by the time of last follow-up evaluation.

CONCLUSION

The identification of these associations with neurological outcome may help guide in the preservation or return of ambulation after surgery for patients with MESCC.

Inflammatory myelopathies and traumatic spinal cord lesions: comparison of functional and neurological outcomes

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Outcomes knowledge is essential to answer patients' questions regarding function, to plan the use of resources, and to evaluate treatments to enhance recovery. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) with those of patients with inflammatory spinal cord lesions (ISCLs).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The authors evaluated 181 subjects with traumatic SCI and 67 subjects with ISCLs. Using a matching cohorts procedure, 38 subjects were selected from each group. The measures used were the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (motor function), the Barthel Index (BI), the Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI), and the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI).

RESULTS

The subjects in the ISCL group were older than those in the SCI group, with a longer interval from onset of lesion to rehabilitation admission and more incomplete lesions. In the matching cohorts, at admission, the traumatic SCI group had RMI and WISCI scores comparable to those of the ISCL group, but the traumatic SCI group had lower scores on the BI (greater dependence on assistance for activities of daily living). At discharge, the 2 groups had comparable functional outcomes. The neurological status of the 2 groups was comparable at admission and discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The results indicate that, at admission, patients with SCI have a greater physical dependence for assistance with activities of daily living than patients with ISCLs who have comparable neurological status. Such a difference depends on factors not related to the spinal cord lesion, such as the presence of associated lesions, the need to wear an orthotic device, or the sequelae of surgery. The outcomes of patients with SCI are determined more by factors such as lesion level and severity and age than by etiology. This finding could have implications for health care planning and rehabilitation research.