β-Adrenergic receptor gene polymorphisms and hemodynamic response to dobutamine during dobutamine stress echocardiography

The Effects of Dobutamine in Septic Shock: An Updated Narrative Review of Clinical and Experimental Studies

The key objective in the hemodynamic treatment of septic shock is the optimization of tissue perfusion and oxygenation. This is usually achieved by the utilization of fluids, vasopressors, and inotropes. Dobutamine is the inotrope most commonly recommended and used for this purpose. Despite the fact that dobutamine was introduced almost half a century ago in the treatment of septic shock, and there is widespread use of the drug, several aspects of its pharmacodynamics remain poorly understood. In normal subjects, dobutamine increases contractility and lacks a direct effect on vascular tone. This results in augmented cardiac output and blood pressure, with reflex reduction in systemic vascular resistance. In septic shock, some experimental and clinical research suggest beneficial effects on systemic and regional perfusion. Nevertheless, other studies found heterogeneous and unpredictable effects with frequent side effects. In this narrative review, we discuss the pharmacodynamic characteristics of dobutamine and its physiologic actions in different settings, with special reference to septic shock. We discuss studies showing that dobutamine frequently induces tachycardia and vasodilation, without positive actions on contractility. Since untoward effects are often found and therapeutic benefits are occasional, its profile of efficacy and safety seems low. Therefore, we recommend that the use of dobutamine in septic shock should be cautious. Before a final decision about its prescription, efficacy, and tolerance should be evaluated throughout a short period with narrow monitoring of its wanted and side effects.

The spectrum of cardiovascular effects of dobutamine - from healthy subjects to septic shock patients

Dobutamine is the inotrope most commonly used in septic shock patients to increase cardiac output and correct hypoperfusion. Although some experimental and clinical studies have shown that dobutamine can improve systemic and regional hemodynamics, other research has found that its effects are heterogenous and unpredictable. In this review, we analyze the pharmacodynamic properties of dobutamine and its physiologic effects. Our goal is to show that the effects of dobutamine might differ between healthy subjects, in experimental and clinical cardiac failure, in animal models and in patients with septic shock. We discuss evidence supporting the claim that dobutamine, in septic shock, frequently behaves as a chronotropic and vasodilatory drug, without evidence of inotropic action. Since the side effects are very common, and the therapeutic benefits are unclear, we suggest that dobutamine should be used cautiously in septic shock. Before a definitive therapeutic decision, the efficacy and tolerance of dobutamine should be assessed during a brief time with close monitoring of its positive and negative side effects.

Effects of sex and the common ADRB1 389 genetic polymorphism on the hemodynamic response to dobutamine

INTRODUCTION

The ADRB1 389 polymorphism affects responses to the β-1 adrenergic receptor (β1AR) agonist in vitro. Previous studies on its effect on the response to dobutamine stress echocardiography were conflicting. In addition, sex differences in the response to dobutamine have been suggested. The aim of this study was to determine whether the ADRB1 389 polymorphism affects the hemodynamic response to dobutamine in healthy individuals including men and women.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

Healthy individuals were recruited according to their ADRB1 49 and 389 genotypes [15 Arg389Arg, 10 Gly389Arg, and 10 Gly389Gly individuals, (all Ser49Ser), 21 men and 14 women]. Dobutamine was infused at 2, 4, and 6 mcg/kg/min. Standardized exercise was performed during the last minute of each infusion.

RESULTS

Resting heart rate (HR) response to 6 mcg/kg/min dobutamine (ΔHR) was 4.7-fold larger in Arg389Arg than in Gly389Gly [(mean ± SD) 12.95 ± 6.99, 2.75 ± 1.65 bpm, respectively, PANOVA=0.012]. Renin response to dobutamine (ΔRenin) was 3.9-fold greater in Arg389Arg than in Gly389Gly (PANOVA=0.032). Among Arg389Gly heterozygotes, ΔHR and ΔRenin were not significantly different from either homozygote group. In multivariate analysis for ΔHR variance, significant contributions were observed for genotype (P=0.011), baseline HR (P=0.011), and borderline effect for sex (P=0.049).

CONCLUSION

In healthy individuals, HR and renin responses to dobutamine were more than three-fold greater among ADRB1 Arg389 compared with Gly389 homozygotes. Future studies on the effect of the ADRB1 389 polymorphism on dobutamine stress echocardiography should compare Arg389 and Gly389 homozygotes.

Role of single nucleotide polymorphisms in pharmacogenomics and their association with human diseases

Global statistical data shed light on an alarming trend that every year thousands of people die due to adverse drug reactions as each individual responds in a different way to the same drug. Pharmacogenomics has come up as a promising field in drug development and clinical medication in the past few decades. It has emerged as a ray of hope in preventing patients from developing potentially fatal complications due to adverse drug reactions. Pharmacogenomics also minimizes the exposure to drugs that are less/non-effective and sometimes even found toxic for patients. It is well reported that drugs elicit different responses in different individuals due to variations in the nucleotide sequences of genes encoding for biologically important molecules (drug-metabolizing enzymes, drug targets and drug transporters). Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most common type of polymorphism found in the human genome is believed to be the main reason behind 90% of all types of genetic variations among the individuals. Therefore, pharmacogenomics may be helpful in answering the question as to how inherited differences in a single gene have a profound effect on the mobilization and biological action of a drug. In the present review, we have discussed clinically relevant examples of SNP in associated diseases that can be utilized as markers for "better management of complex diseases" and attempted to correlate the drug response with genetic variations. Attention is also given towards the therapeutic consequences of inherited differences at the chromosomal level and how associated drug disposition and/or drug targets differ in various diseases as well as among the individuals.

Polymorphisms of β 1-adrenoreceptor gene and cardiovascular complications in patients with thyrotoxicosis

Human cardiac β1-AR perform a crucial role in mediating the cardiostimulating effects of norepinephrine. Gly389Arg and Ser49Gly polymorphisms of β1-adrenoreceptors (β1-AR) can influence the cardiovascular prognosis. However, the possible effect of Gly389Arg and Ser49Gly polymorphisms on heart function in thyrotoxicosis has not been studied. We investigated the possible link between Gly389Arg and Ser49Gly polymorphisms and echocardiography parameters in 165 normotensive patients with a thyrotoxicosis without any cardiovascular disorders. Echo-CG was performed according to standard protocol before and during the thyreostatic treatment. Our data demonstrate that both Gly389Arg and Ser49Gly polymorphisms have very moderate influence on the risk of left ventricular hypertrophy and atrial fibrillation with no statistically significant effects on cardiac function and the development of cardiovascular complications.

Impact of β(1)- and β(2)-adrenergic receptor gene single nucleotide polymorphisms on heart rate response to metoprolol prior to coronary computed tomographic angiography

A slow, steady heart rate (HR) is necessary for optimal image quality during coronary computed tomographic angiography. Beta blockers are often used, but the goal HR is not achieved in some patients. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the β(1) (codons 49 and 389) and β(2) (codons 16, 27, and 164) adrenergic receptor (AR) genes on HR response to metoprolol in 200 adults (mean age 56 ± 11 years) referred for coronary computed tomographic angiography (using a 64-slice scanner). Oral and intravenous (IV) metoprolol was given to achieve a goal HR of <60 beats/min. Overall, 37 patients (18.5%) did not reach the goal HR despite the administration of oral (181 ± 116 mg) and IV (4.2 ± 9.4 mg) metoprolol. Patients with the β(1)-AR Ser49Gly or Gly49Gly genotype (n = 49) more often failed to reach an optimal HR compared to those with the Ser49Ser genotype (n = 151) (29% vs 15%, p = 0.04), despite receiving higher doses of oral (210 ± 115 vs 172 ± 115 mg, p = 0.048) and IV (7 ± 13 vs 3 ± 8 mg, p = 0.02) metoprolol. Similarly, patients with the β(1)-AR Gly389Gly genotype (n = 11) more often failed to reach an optimal HR compared to those with the Arg389Arg and Arg389Gly genotypes (n = 189) (45% vs 17%, p = 0.02), despite receiving higher doses of IV (13 ± 15 vs 4 ± 9 mg, p = 0.002) but not oral (162 ± 105 vs 182 ± 117 mg, p = 0.50) metoprolol. Multivariate analysis identified β(1)-AR SNPs at codons 49 and 389 and β(2)-AR SNP at codon 27 as independent predictors of suboptimal HR response. In conclusion, these data indicate that the selected SNPs of β(1)-AR and β(2)-AR genes influence HR response to metoprolol in patients who undergo coronary computed tomographic angiography.

Effect of the ADRB1 1165C>G and 145A>G polymorphisms on hemodynamic response during dobutamine stress echocardiography

Purpose

The aim of this study was to determine an association between the ADRB1 1165C>G and 145A>G polymorphisms and hemodynamic response [heart rate (HR), systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure] to dobutamine during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE).

Methods

The study involved 144 patients with clinical indications for DSE. The PCR–restriction fragment length polymorphism method was used to identify the ADRB1 1165C>G and 145A>G polymorphisms.

Results

Heart rate during DSE increased in all analyzed study groups. Patients with the ADRB1 1165CC and 1165CG+GG polymorphisms demonstrated similar HR, including magnitude of response [change in heart rate (ΔHR 0–30): 42.1 ± 17.5 vs. 46.1 ± 15.5 bpm, respectively]. HR and ΔHR 0–30 were comparable in ADRB1145AA and 145AG subjects in the course of DSE. SBP and DBP at all stages of DSE were similar in subjects with either polymorphism and did not differentiate patients with the ADRB1 145AA polymorphism from those with the ADRB1 145AG polymorphism, nor those with the ADRB1 1165CC polymorphism from those with the ADRB1 1165CG+GG polymorphism. No differences were noted in the magnitude of response, with the increase in SBP and DBP comparable in all genotypes. Similar observations were made in patients (25/144 studied) with atropine requirements during DSE.

Conclusion

The ADRB1 1165C>G and 145A>G polymorphisms are not associated with the HR, SBP and DBP responses in Polish Caucasian patients requiring diagnostic dobutamine stress echocardiography

Is the Standard Weight-Based Dosing of Dobutamine for Stress Testing Appropriate for Patients of Widely Varying Body Mass Index?

Background: Although a gradual increase in heart rate (HR) during dobutamine stress testing (DST) is desired, few data exists regarding whether this is similarly achieved in patients of widely varying body mass index (BMI). Whether difference in BMI contributes to variation in the hemodynamic and symptomatic response to dobutamine is also unknown. Methods: From prospectively acquired data of 2776 consecutive patients who underwent DST according to standard weight-based clinical protocol, we classified patients into 4 groups of BMI (kg/m 2): <25 (normal), 25 to 29.9 (overweight), 30 to 39.9 (obese), and ≥40 (severely obese) and compared the rate of increase of HR, mean blood pressure, and development of symptoms for the groups. Results: Age was 68 + 12 years, 52% were men, BMI was 29.8 + 6.6 kg/m2 (range 14.5-81.4), 198 (7%) had BMI ≥40, and target HR was achieved in 2433 (88%). The rate of increase in HR was similar for each group of BMI after adjustment for age, gender, baseline HR, negative chronotropic use, and atropine administration. The percentage of patients in each group who achieved target HR was similar and the percentage of target HR achieved at each stage of dobutamine was essentially equivalent. Blood pressure responses and development of symptoms were similar in the 4 groups of BMI. Independent predictors of failure to achieve target HR included age, diabetes mellitus, treatment with negative chronotropic medications, and baseline HR; BMI was not a predictor (odds ratio [OR] 0.98, P = .086). Conclusion: The current weight-based protocol of dobutamine dosing for DST results in similar increases in HR and blood pressure for patients of widely varying BMI.