Rapid functional cardiac imaging after gadolinium injection: Evaluation of a highly accelerated sequence with sparse data sampling and iterative reconstruction

A new compressed sensing cine cardiac MRI sequence with free-breathing real-time acquisition and fully automated motion-correction: A comprehensive evaluation

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare a new free-breathing compressed sensing cine (FB-CS) cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) to the standard reference multi-breath-hold segmented cine (BH-SEG) CMR in an unselected population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January to April 2021, 52 consecutive adult patients who underwent both conventional BH-SEG CMR and new FB-CS CMR with fully automated respiratory motion correction were retrospectively enrolled. There were 29 men and 23 women with a mean age of 57.7 ± 18.9 (standard deviation [SD]) years (age range: 19.0-90.0 years) and a mean cardiac rate of 74.6 ± 17.9 (SD) bpm. For each patient, short-axis stacks were acquired with similar parameters providing a spatial resolution of 1.8 × 1.8 × 8.0 mm3 and 25 cardiac frames. Acquisition and reconstruction times, image quality (Likert scale from 1 to 4), left and right ventricular volumes and ejection fractions, left ventricular mass, and global circumferential strain were assessed for each sequence.

RESULTS

FB-CS CMR acquisition time was significantly shorter (123.8 ± 28.4 [SD] s vs. 267.2 ± 39.3 [SD] s for BH-SEG CMR; P < 0.0001) at the penalty of a longer reconstruction time (271.4 ± 68.7 [SD] s vs. 9.9 ± 2.1 [SD] s for BH-SEG CMR; P < 0.0001). In patients without arrhythmia or dyspnea, FB-CS CMR provided subjective image quality that was not different from that of BH-SEG CMR (P = 0.13). FB-CS CMR improved image quality in patients with arrhythmia (n = 18; P = 0.002) or dyspnea (n = 7; P = 0.02), and the edge sharpness was improved at end-systole and end-diastole (P = 0.0001). No differences were observed between the two techniques in ventricular volumes and ejection fractions, left ventricular mass or global circumferential strain in patients in sinus rhythm or with cardiac arrhythmia.

CONCLUSION

This new FB-CS CMR addresses respiratory motion and arrhythmia-related artifacts without compromising the reliability of ventricular functional assessment.

Prognosis in patients with coronary heart disease and breath-holding limitations: a free-breathing cardiac magnetic resonance protocol at 3.0 T

Background and purpose

Conventional cardiac magnetic resonance (CCMR) imaging is usually performed with breath-holding (BH), which is adverse in patients with BH limitations. We explored the ability of a free-breathing CMR (fCMR) protocol to prognosticate in patients with coronary heart diseases (CHD) and limited BH ability.

Methods

Sixty-seven patients with CHD and limited BH abilities were prospectively enrolled in this study. All patients underwent comprehensive fCMR imaging at 3.0 T. The fCMR protocols included compressed sensing (CS) single-shot cine acceleration imaging, and motion-corrected (MOCO), single-shot late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging. Image quality (IQ) of the cine and LGE images was evaluated based on the 5-point Likert scale. The value of fMRI in providing a prognosis in patients with CHD was assessed. Statistical methods included the T test, Mann–Whitney test, Kappa test, Kaplan–Meier curve, Log-rank test, Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, and receiver operating characteristic curves.

Results

All IQ scores of the short axis CS-cine and both the short and long axes MOCO LGE images were ≥ 3 points. Over a median follow-up of 31 months (range 3.8–38.2), 25 major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) occurred. In the univariate analysis, infarction size (IS), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), 3D-Global peak longitudinal strain (3D-GPLS), heart failure classification were significantly associated with MACE. When the significantly univariate MACE predictors, added to the multivariate analysis, which showed IS (HR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00–1.05; p = 0.048) and heart failure with preserved EF (HR 0.20; 95% CI 0.04–0.98; p = 0.048) correlated positively with MACE. The optimal cutoff value for LVEF, 3D-GPLS, and IS in predicting MACE was 34.2%, − 5.7%, and 26.1% respectively, with a sensitivity of 90.5%, 64%, and 96.0% and specificity of 72%, 95.2%, and 85.7% respectively.

Conclusions

The fCMR protocol can be used to make prognostic assessments in patients with CHD and BH limitations by calculating IS and LVEF.

Noninvasive rapid cardiac magnetic resonance for the assessment of cardiomyopathies in low-middle income countries

Introduction: Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) is a crucial diagnostic imaging test that redefines diagnosis and enables targeted therapies, but the access to CMR is limited in low-middle Income Countries (LMICs) even though cardiovascular disease is an emergent primary cause of mortality in LMICs. New abbreviated CMR protocols can be less expensive, faster, whilst maintaining accuracy, potentially leading to a higher utilization in LMICs.Areas covered: This article will review cardiovascular disease in LMICs and the current role of CMR in cardiac diagnosis and enable targeted therapy, discussing the main obstacles to prevent the adoption of CMR in LMICs. We will then review the potential utility of abbreviated, cost-effective CMR protocols to improve cardiac diagnosis and care, the clinical indications of the exam, current evidence and future directions.Expert opinion: Rapid CMR protocols, provided that they are utilized in potentially high yield cases, could reduce cost and increase effectiveness. The adoption of these protocols, their integration into care pathways, and prioritizing key treatable diagnoses can potentially improve patient care. Several LMIC countries are now pioneering these approaches and the application of rapid CMR protocols appears to have a bright future if delivered effectively.

Single breath-hold compressed sensing real-time cine imaging to assess left ventricular motion in myocardial infarction

PURPOSE

To evaluate the reliability of a real-time compressed sensing (CS) cine sequence for the detection of left ventricular wall motion disorders after myocardial infarction in comparison with the reference steady-state free precession cine sequence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred consecutive adult patients referred for either initial work-up or follow-up by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in the context of myocardial infarction were prospectively included. There were 77 men and 23 women with a mean age of 63.12±11.3 (SD) years (range: 29-89 years). Each patient underwent the reference segmented multi-breath-hold steady-state free precession cine sequence including one short-axis stack and both vertical and horizontal long-axis slices (SSFP_ref) and the CS real-time single-breath-hold evaluated sequence (CS_rt) providing the same slices. Wall motion disorders were independently and blindly assessed with both sequences by two radiologists, using the American Heart Association left ventricle segmentation. Paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to search for differences in wall motion disorders conspicuity between both sequences and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was performed to assess the diagnosis performance of CS_rt sequence using SSFP_ref as the reference method.

RESULTS

Each patient had at least one cardiac segment with wall motion abnormality on SSFP_ref and CS_rt images. The 1700 segments analyzed with SSFP_ref were classified as normokinetic (360/1700; 21.2%), hypokinetic (783/1700; 46.1%), akinetic (526/1700; 30.9%) or dyskinetic (31/1700; 1.8%). Sensitivity and specificity of the CS sequence were 99.6% (95% CI: 99.1-99.9%) and 99.7% (95% CI: 98.5-100%), respectively. Area under ROC of CS_rt diagnosis performance was 0.997 (95% CI: 0.993-0.999).

CONCLUSION

CS real-time cine imaging significantly reduces acquisition time without compromising the conspicuity of left ventricular -wall motion disorders in the context of myocardial infarction.

The effect of contrast agents on left ventricular parameters calculated by a threshold-based software module: does it truly matter?

The acquisition of short-axis (SA) cine magnetic resonance (MR) images after the administration of contrast agent (CA) is a common, time-saving technique, but a decreased difference in the blood-myocardium contrast on these steady-state free precession (SSFP) cine scans could change the calculated parameters when using threshold-based papillary and trabecular muscle (PTM) quantification. We studied the effect of CA on the parameters calculated from pre- and post-CA SA cine images in noncompaction cardiomyopathy (NC-CMP) and healthy (H) participants using a threshold-based module. A total of 39 individuals (20 patients and 19 healthy) were included prospectively in this study. After the pre-CA SA images were acquired, i.v. gadobutrol (GA) or gadobenate dimeglumine (GD) (GA vs. GD: NC-CMP = 12 vs. 8; C = 12 vs. 7) was administered, and SA scans were repeated after two minutes. A threshold-based PTM software was used for postprocessing. Pre-CA and post-CA SA images were analyzed, and the parameters were compared in both the NC-CMP and H groups. The left ventricular volumes were significantly larger, while the left ventricular myocardial (LVmass) and trabecular mass (LVtrab) values were significantly smaller on the post-CA scans (NC-CMP: pre-CA vs. post-CA, EDV: 74.0 ± 13.6 vs. 81.1 ± 16.3 ml/m², ESV: 25.3 ± 7.3 vs. 30.1 ± 11.2 ml/m², LVmass-ED: 82.5 ± 17.5 vs. 75.7 ± 15.9 g/m², LVtrab-ED: 25.0 ± 6.6 vs. 18.9 ± 4.7 g/m²; Healthy: preCA vs. post-CA, EDV: 69.7 ± 11.9 vs. 72.2  ±  10.7 ml/m², ESV: 22.6 ± 5.7 vs. 23.9 ± 6.3 ml/m², LVmass-ED: 71.3 ± 13.6 vs. 68.7 ± 13.9 g/m², LVtrab-ED: 19.4 ± 2.6 vs. 16.2 ± 3.0 g/m²; p < 0.05). The decreased blood-myocardium contrast difference on post-CA SSFP SA cine images leads to altered cardiac parameters when using threshold-based software for evaluation.