DFT potentials from a chemical perspective: Anatomy of electron (de)localization in molecules and crystals

We introduce a fermionic potential, v f $$ {v}_f $$ , as a comprehensive measure of electron (de)localization in atomic-molecular systems. Unlike other common descriptors as ELF, LOL, etc., it characterizes all physical effects responsible for (de)localization of electrons, namely: an exchange hole depth, its tendency to change, a sensitivity of an exchange correlation hidden in a pair density and kinetic potential to local variations in electron density. Wells in the v f $$ {v}_f $$ distribution correspond to the domains of maximum electron localization, while the potential's barriers prevent delocalization of electrons through them. It also estimates bond orders and successfully reveals the impact of chemical modifications or environmental effects on the delocalization of electrons in molecules and crystals. The v f $$ {v}_f $$ components provide a unique opportunity to compare the influence of the mentioned physical effects on electron (de)localization. This merges physical and chemical views of electron delocalization using functions appearing in density functional theory.

Comparison of DAFH and FALDI-like approaches

Two complementary methodologies for extracting useful insights into electronic structure and bonding from contemporary wavefunctions are compared. The first of these, known as the analysis of domain-averaged Fermi holes (DAFH), mostly provides visually appealing descriptions of the role and the extent of electron sharing in chemical bonding. The second one, known as the fragment, atom, localized, delocalized and interatomic (FALDI) charge density decomposition scheme, uses the partitioning of certain localization and delocalization indices to focus on highly visual contributions associated with individual domains and with pairs of domains, respectively. Four variants of a FALDI-like approach are investigated here in some detail, mostly to establish which of them are the most reliable and the most informative. In addition to ‘full’ calculations that use the correlated pair density, the consequences for the DAFH and FALDI-like procedures of using instead a popular one-electron approximation are explored. Additionally, the geometry dependence of the degree of acceptability of the errors that this introduces for delocalization indices is assessed for different formal bond multiplicities. The familiar molecular test systems employed for these various linked investigations are the breaking of the bonds in H2 and in N2, as well as the nature of the bonding in B2H6, as a simple example of multicenter bonding. One of the key outcomes of this study is a clear understanding of how DAFH analysis and a particular variant of FALDI-like analysis could be most profitably deployed to extract complementary insights into more complex and/or controversial bonding situations.

The Na⋅⋅⋅B Bond in NaBH3 - : A Different Type of Bond

A newly introduced Na-B bond in NaBH₃ ^- has been a challenge for the chemical bonding community. Here, a series of MBH₃ ^- (M=Li, Na, K) species and NaB(CN)₃ ^- are studied within the context of quantum chemical topology approaches. The analyses suggest that M-B interaction cannot be classified as an ordinary covalent, dative, or even simple ionic interaction. The interactions are controlled by coulombic forces between the metals and the substituents on boron, for example, H or CN, more than the direct M-B interaction. On the other hand, while the characteristics of the (3, -1) critical points of the bonds are comparable to weak hydrogen bonds, not covalent bonds, the metal and boron share a substantial sum of electrons. To the best of the author's knowledge, the characteristics of these bonds are unprecedented among known molecules. Considering all paradoxical properties of these bonds, they are herein described as ionic-enforced covalent bonds.

The influence of correlation on (de)localization indices from a valence bond perspective

When going beyond the Hartree-Fock level to correlated methods, one observes a significant reduction in the delocalization index. This is commonly interpreted as a weakening of electron sharing due to electron correlation, although this is rather counter-intuitive to the concomitant energy lowering. In this study, we use an analytical valence bond model and full CI calculations to show that this reduction in the delocalization index actually goes hand in hand with increased covalent contributions at the expense of ionic contributions. This suggests that we should be careful in formulating interpretations of these results in (de)localization indices. Graphical Abstract Variation of the localization Δ(Ω_A, Ω_A) and delocalization index Δ(Ω_A, Ω_B) as a function of the parameter ω. By adjusting this parameter ω from [Formula: see text] to 0, we can gradually change the underlying wave function from a Hartree-Fock to a Heitler-London description.

From quantum fragments to Lewis structures: electron counting in position space

From quantum atoms to electron counting the rs-AdNCP strategy: a Lewis structure through (nc,2e) functions.

Exploring the role of the 3-center–4-electron bond in hypervalent λ3-iodanes using the methodology of domain averaged Fermi holes

λ³-Iodanes are shown to express pronounced 3-center–4-electron bonds whose strength strongly correlates with the kind of ligands, thereby allowing to modulate the reactivity of these reagents.

Insights on spin polarization through the spin density source function

The source function for the spin density s(r) is introduced, allowing the H and O influence on s(r) to be disentangled.

Understanding how spin information is transmitted from paramagnetic to non-magnetic centers is crucial in advanced materials research and calls for novel interpretive tools. Herein, we show that the spin density at a point may be seen as determined by a local source function for such density, operating at all other points of space. Integration of the local source over Bader's quantum atoms measures their contribution in determining the spin polarization at any system's location. Each contribution may be then conveniently decomposed in a magnetic term due to the magnetic natural orbital(s) density and in a reaction or relaxation term due to the remaining orbitals density. A simple test case, ³B₁ water, is chosen to exemplify whether an atom or group of atoms concur or oppose the paramagnetic center in determining a given local spin polarization. Discriminating magnetic from reaction or relaxation contributions to such behaviour strongly enhances chemical insight, though care needs to be paid to the large sensitivity of the latter contributions to the level of the computational approach and to the difficulty of singling out the magnetic orbitals in the case of highly correlated systems. Comparison of source function atomic contributions to the spin density with those reconstructing the electron density at a system's position, enlightens how the mechanisms which determine the two densities may in general differ and how diverse may be the role played by each system's atom in determining each of the two densities. These mechanisms reflect the quite diverse portraits of the electron density and electron spin density Laplacians, hence the different local concentration/dilution of the total and (α–β) electron densities throughout the system. Being defined in terms of an observable, the source function for the spin density is also potentially amenable to experimental determination, as customarily performed for its electron density analogue.

Revisiting the carbonyl n → π* electronic excitation through topological eyes: expanding, enriching and enhancing the chemical language using electron number distribution functions and domain averaged Fermi holes

Interpretations of the S₀ → S₁ transition in formaldehyde arising from the DAFH analysis.