Potential anti-cancer and anti-Candida activity of Zn-derived foams

Effects of Titanium Implant Surface Topology on Bone Cell Attachment and Proliferation in vitro

Purpose

Titanium is commonly used for implants because of its corrosion resistance and osseointegration capability. It is well known that surface topology affects the response of bone tissue towards implants. In vivo studies have shown that in weeks or months, bone tissue bonds more efficiently to titanium implants with rough surfaces compared to smooth surfaces. In addition, stimulating early endosseous integration increases the long-term stability of bone-implants and hence their clinical outcome. Here, we evaluated the response of human MG-63 osteoblast-like cells to flat and solid, compared to rough and porous surface topologies in vitro 1–6 days post seeding. We compared the morphology, proliferation, and attachment of cells onto three smooth surfaces: tissue culture (TC) plastic or microscope cover glasses, machined polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK), and machined solid titanium, to cells on a highly porous (average R_a 22.94 μm) plasma-sprayed titanium surface (composite Ti-PEEK spine implants).

Methods

We used immuno-fluorescence (IF) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), as well as Live/Dead and WST-1 cell proliferation assays.

Results

SEM analyses confirmed the rough topology of the titanium implant surface, compared to the smooth surface of PEEK, solid titanium, TC plastic and cover glasses. In addition, SEM analyses revealed that MG-63 cells seeded onto smooth surfaces (solid titanium, PEEK) adopted a flat, planar morphology, while cells on the rough titanium surface adopted an elongated morphology with numerous filopodial and lamellipodial extensions interacting with the substrate. Finally, IF analyses of focal adhesions (vinculin, focal adhesion kinase), as well as proliferation assays indicate that MG-63 cells adhere less and proliferate at a slower rate on the rough than on a smooth titanium surface.

Conclusion

These observations suggest that bone-forming osteoblasts adhere less strongly and proliferate slower on rough compared to smooth titanium surfaces, likely promoting cell differentiation, which is in agreement with other porous implant materials.

Antagonist biocompatibilities of Zn-based materials functionalized with physiological active metal oxides

Zinc coated with nanostructured ZnO flowers has received increasing attention as a versatile biomaterial for medical applications. Whatsoever, the potential of these materials to meet specific medical requirements must be explored. Despite in its infancy, surface functionalization is the key strategy to achieve this goal. The functionalization, successfully achieved with cooper (Cu), iron (Fe) or manganese (Mn) oxides (Ox), was highly dependent on the presence of the flowered structures, with the deep physicochemical characterization of these new surfaces revealing specific metal oxide distributions. The functionalization with these metal oxides resulted in distinct biological and in vitro behaviours. The biological response, assessed by fibroblast viability, hemocompatibility, and chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM), further supported by the in vitro degradation studies, evaluated by immersion and electrochemical techniques, revealed that the deleterious role of CuOx functionalization brought potential for anti-cancer applications; with an antagonist behaviour, the functionalization with MnOx, and in a less extent with FeOx, can be used to favour wound healing in traumatic processes. Despite the possible correlation between biocompatibility and hydroxyapatite precipitation, no correlation could be drawn with the corrosion activity of these surfaces. Overall, the minor addition of relevant physiological as Cu, Fe or Mn oxides resulted in antagonist in vitro responses that can be used as expedite strategies to modulate the behaviour of Zn-based materials, contributing in this way for the design of anti-cancer or wound healing therapies.