Effect of the Appended Morpholinyl Group on Photophysical Behavior of Mono- and Bis-cyclometalated Terpyridine Iridium(III) Chromophores

This paper provides extensive studies of [IrCl(Ph-py)(morph-C6H4-terpy-κ3N)]PF6 (1A), [Ir(Ph-py)2(morph-C6H4-terpy-κ2N)]PF6 (2A), [IrCl(Ph-py)(Ph-terpy-κ3N)]PF6 (1B), and [Ir(Ph-py)2(Ph-terpy-κ2N)]PF6 (2B) designed to demonstrate the possibility of controlling the photophysical properties of mono- and bis-cyclometalated complexes [IrCl(Ph-py)(R-C6H4-terpy-κ3N)]PF6 and [Ir(Ph-py)2(R-C6H4-terpy-κ2N)]PF6 through a remote electron-donating substituent introduced into the 4'-position of 2,2':6',2″-terpyridine (terpy) via the phenyl linker. The attachment of the morpholinyl (morph) group was evidenced to induce dramatic changes in the emission characteristics of the monocyclometalated Ir(III) systems with meridionally coordinated R-C6H4-terpy ligand (κ3N). In solution, the obtained complex [IrCl(Ph-py)(morph-C6H4-terpy-κ3N)]PF6 was found to be a rare example of dual-emissive Ir(III) systems. Within the series [Ir(Ph-py)2(R-C6H4-terpy-κ2N)]PF6 bearing the R-C6H4-terpy ligand bound to the central ion in a bidentate coordination mode, the appended electron-donating morpholinyl group induced a minor effect on the emission maximum, but it was found to be an effective tool for extending the excited-state lifetime, further prolonging with the increase of solvent polarity. The results of this work are of high significance for better understanding the push-pull effect and dual-emission phenomena in Ir-based luminophores, as well as developing chromophores with prolonged emission lifetimes.

Triplet Excited States Modulated by Push-Pull Substituents in Monocyclometalated Iridium(III) Photosensitizers

A series of novel monocyclometalated [Ir(tpy)(btp)Cl]⁺ complexes (Ir2-Ir5) were synthesized using 2,2':6',2″-terpyridine (tpy) and 2-(2-pyridyl)benzo[b]thiophene (btp) ligands, as well as their derivatives bearing electron-donating tert-butyl (t-Bu) and electron-withdrawing trifluoromethyl (CF₃) groups. Ir2-Ir5 exhibited visible-light absorption stronger than that of the known complex [Ir(tpy)(ppy)Cl]⁺ (Ir1; ppy = 2-phenylpyridine). Spectroscopic and computational studies revealed that two triplet states were involved in the excited-state dynamics. One is a weakly emissive and short-lived ligand to ligand charge-transfer (LLCT) state originating from the charge transfer from the btp to the tpy ligand. The other is a highly emissive and long-lived ligand-centered (LC) state localized on the btp ligand. Interestingly, the excited state dominant with ³LLCT was completely changed to the ³LC state upon the introduction of substituents on both the tpy and btp ligands. For instance, the excited state of the parent complex Ir2 was weakly emissive (Φ = 2%) and short-lived (τ = 110 ns) in CH₂Cl₂; conversely, Ir5, fully furnished with t-Bu and CF₃ groups, displayed intense phosphorescence with a prolonged lifetime (τ = 14 μs). This difference became increasingly prominent when the solvent was changed to aqueous CH₃CN, most probably due to the ³LLCT stabilization. The predominant excited-state nature was switchable between the ³LLCT and ³LC states depending on the substituents employed; this was demonstrated through investigations of Ir3 and Ir4, bearing either the t-Bu or the CF₃ group, where the complexes exhibited properties intermediate between those of Ir2 and Ir5. All of the Ir(III) complexes were tested as photosensitizers in photocatalytic H₂ evolution over a Co molecular catalyst, and Ir5 outperformed the others, including Ir1, due to improvement in the following key properties: visible-light-absorption ability, excited-state lifetime, and reductive power of the one-electron-reduced species against the catalyst.

Early Metal Di(pyridyl) Pyrrolide Complexes with Second Coordination Sphere Arene-π Interactions: Ligand Binding and Ethylene Polymerization

Early metal complexes supported by hemilabile, monoanionic di(pyridyl) pyrrolide ligands substituted with mesityl and anthracenyl groups were synthesized to probe the possibility of second coordination sphere arene-π interactions with ligands with potential for allosteric control in coordination chemistry, substrate activation, and olefin polymerization. Yttrium alkyl, indolide, and amide complexes were prepared and structurally characterized; close contacts between the anthracenyl substituents and Y-bound ligands are observed in the solid state. Titanium, zirconium, and hafnium tris(dimethylamido) complexes were synthesized, and their ethylene polymerization activity was tested. In the solid state structure of one of the Ti tris(dimethylamido) complexes, coordination of Ti to only one of the pyridine donors is observed pointing to the hemilabile character of the di(pyridyl) pyrrolide ligands.

Realization of Highly Efficient Red Phosphorescence from Bis-Tridentate Iridium(III) Phosphors

Bis-tridentate Ir(III) metal complexes bring forth interesting photophysical properties, among which the orthogonal arranged, planar tridentate chelates could increase the emission efficiency due to the greater rigidity and, in the meantime, allow strong interligand stacking that could deteriorate the emission efficiency. We bypassed this hurdle by design of five bis-tridentate Ir(III) complexes (1-5), to which both of their monoanionic ancillary and dianionic chromophoric chelate were functionalized derivative of 2-pyrazolyl-6-phenylpyridine, i.e. pzpyphH₂ parent chelate. Hence, addition of phenyl substituent to the pyrazolyl fragment of pzpyphH₂ gave rise to the precursors of monoanionic chelate (A1H-A3H), on which the additional tert-butyl and/or methoxy groups were introduced at the selected positions for tuning their steric and electronic properties, while precursors of dianionic chelates was judiciously prepared with an isoquniolinyl central unit on pziqphH₂ in giving the red-shifted emission (cf. L1H₂ and L2H₂). Factors affected their photophysical properties were discussed by theoretical methods based on DFT and TD-DFT calculation, confirming that the T₁ excited state of all investigated Ir(III) complexes shows a mixed metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT), intraligand charge transfer (ILCT), ligand-to-ligand charge transfer (LLCT), and ligand-centered (LC) transition character. In contrast, the poor quantum yield of 3 is due to the facilitation of the nonradiative decay in comparison to the radiative process. As for potential OLED applications, Ir(III) complex 2 gives superior performance with max. efficiencies of 28.17%, 41.25 cd·A^-1 and 37.03 lm·W^-1, CIE_x,y = 0.63, 0.37 at 50 mA cm^-2, and small efficiency roll-off.