Effect of β1 /β2 -adrenoceptor blockade on β3 -adrenoceptor activity in the rat cremaster muscle artery

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The physiological role of vascular β₃ -adrenoceptors is not fully understood. Recent evidence suggests cardiac β₃ -adrenoceptors are functionally effective after down-regulation of β₁ /β₂ -adrenoceptors. The functional interaction between the β₃ -adrenoceptor and other β-adrenoceptor subtypes in rat striated muscle arteries was investigated.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Studies were performed in cremaster muscle arteries isolated from male Sprague-Dawley rats. β-adrenoceptor expression was assessed through RT-PCR and immunofluorescence. Functional effects of β₃ -adrenoceptor agonists and antagonists and other β-adrenoceptor ligands were measured using pressure myography.

KEY RESULTS

All three β-adrenoceptor subtypes were present in the endothelium of the cremaster muscle artery. The β₃ -adrenoceptor agonists mirabegron and CL 316,243 had no effect on the diameter of pressurized (70 mmHg) cremaster muscle arterioles with myogenic tone, while the β₃ -adrenoceptor agonist SR 58611A and the nonselective β-adrenoceptor agonist isoprenaline caused concentration-dependent dilation. In the presence of β_1/2 -adrenoceptor antagonists nadolol (10 μM), atenolol (1 μM) and ICI 118,551 (0.1 μM) both mirabegron and CL 316,243 were effective in causing vasodilation and the potency of SR 58611A was enhanced, while responses to isoprenaline were inhibited. The β₃ -adrenoceptor antagonist L 748,337 (1 μM) inhibited vasodilation caused by β₃ -adrenoceptor agonists (in the presence of β_1/2 -adrenoceptor blockade), but L 748,337 had no effect on isoprenaline-induced vasodilation.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

All three β-adrenoceptor subtypes were present in the endothelium of the rat cremaster muscle artery, but β₃ -adrenoceptor mediated vasodilation was only evident after blockade of β_1/2 -adrenoceptors. This suggests constitutive β_1/2 -adrenoceptor activity inhibits β₃ -adrenoceptor function in the endothelium of skeletal muscle resistance arteries.

Alternative RNA splicing: contribution to pain and potential therapeutic strategy

•

Alternative pre-mRNA splicing generates multiple proteins from a single gene.

•

Control of alternative splicing is a likely therapy in cancer and other disorders.

•

Key molecules in pain pathways – GPCRs and channels – are alternatively spliced.

•

It is proposed that alternative splicing may be a therapeutic target in pain.

Since the sequencing of metazoan genomes began, it has become clear that the number of expressed proteins far exceeds the number of genes. It is now estimated that more than 98% of human genes give rise to multiple proteins through alternative pre-mRNA splicing. In this review, we highlight the known alternative splice variants of many channels, receptors, and growth factors that are important in nociception and pain. Recently, pharmacological control of alternative splicing has been proposed as potential therapy in cancer, wet age-related macular degeneration, retroviral infections, and pain. Thus, we also consider the effects that known splice variants of molecules key to nociception/pain have on nociceptive processing and/or analgesic action, and the potential for control of alternative pre-mRNA splicing as a novel analgesic strategy.

Alternative Splicing of G Protein-Coupled Receptors: Relevance to Pain Management

Drugs that target G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the primary treatment strategy for patients with acute and chronic pain; however, there is substantial individual variability in both the efficacy and adverse effects associated with these drugs. Variability in drug responses is due, in part, to individuals' diversity in alternative splicing of pain-relevant GPCRs. G protein-coupled receptor alternative splice variants often exhibit distinct tissue distribution patterns, drug-binding properties, and signaling characteristics that may impact disease pathology as well as the extent and direction of analgesic effects. We review the importance of GPCRs and their known splice variants to the management of pain.

β2-adrenergic receptor and astrocyte glucose metabolism

Astrocyte glucose metabolism functions to maintain brain activity in both normal and stress conditions. Dysregulation of astrocyte glucose metabolism relates to development of neuronal disease, such as multiple sclerosis and Alzheimer's disease. In response to acute stress, beta2-adrenergic receptor is activated and initiates multiple signaling events mediated by Gs, Gi, arrestin, or other effectors depending on specific cellular contexts. In astrocytes, beta2-adrenergic receptor promotes glucose uptake through GLUT1 and accelerates glycogen degradation via coupling to Gs and second messenger cAMP-dependent pathway. Beta2-adrenergic receptor may regulate other steps in astrocyte glucose metabolism, such as lactate production or transduction. Inappropriate regulation of beta2-adrenergic receptor activity can disrupt normal glucose metabolism, and leads to accelerate neuronal disease development. It was demonstrated that the absence of beta2-adrenergic receptor in astrocytes occurred in multiple sclerosis patients, and the increased beta2-adrenergic receptor activity relates to Alzheimer's disease. A clear view of beta2-adrenergic receptor-mediated signaling pathways in regulating astrocyte glucose metabolism could help us to develop neuronal diseases treatment by targeting to the beta2-adrenergic receptor.

Altered circadian rhythm of cardiac β3-adrenoceptor activity following myocardial infarction in the rat

Circadian rhythms influence the incidence of adverse cardiac events but the underlying mechanisms are not well defined. We sought to investigate the role of the β3-adrenoceptor (β3-AR) in cardiac circadian disorders and arrhythmia severity after myocardial infarction (MI). MI was created by ligating the left anterior descending coronary artery of the rat heart in situ. Circadian variations of the myocardial expressions of β3-AR and clock genes Bmal1 and Npas2 were examined by real time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, Western blot and immunohistochemistry. Electrocardiograms and myocardial contraction were recorded in vivo and/or ex vivo. Ventricular tachyarrhythmias were induced by isoprenaline. Normal rats showed circadian oscillations in both the myocardial transcriptional expression of β3-AR and the β3-AR-induced positive chronotropic and negative inotropic cardiac effects. However, these circadian rhythms were significantly blunted or even abolished in rats with either acute MI (within 24 h) or healed MI (14 days after coronary ligation). The nocturnal level of β3-AR protein was higher in MI rats than in normal rats. In contrast, the circadian oscillations of the transcripts of Bmal1 and Npas2 in the myocardium were significantly augmented in rats with either acute MI or healed MI. BRL37344, a preferential β3-AR selective agonist, reduced the occurrence of ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) in rats with either acute MI or healed MI. We conclude that circadian rhythms of myocardial β3-AR activities are disturbed after MI and β3-AR activation offers anti-arrhythmic protection.

Beta 3-adrenoreceptor regulation of nitric oxide in the cardiovascular system

The presence of a third beta-adrenergic receptor (beta 3-AR) in the cardiovascular system has challenged the classical paradigm of sympathetic regulation by beta1- and beta2-adrenergic receptors. While beta 3-AR's role in the cardiovascular system remains controversial, increasing evidence suggests that it serves as a "brake" in sympathetic overstimulation - it is activated at high catecholamine concentrations, producing a negative inotropic effect that antagonizes beta1- and beta2-AR activity. The anti-adrenergic effects induced by beta 3-AR were initially linked to nitric oxide (NO) release via endothelial NO synthase (eNOS), although more recently it has been shown under some conditions to increase NO production in the cardiovascular system via the other two NOS isoforms, namely inducible NOS (iNOS) and neuronal NOS (nNOS). We summarize recent findings regarding beta 3-AR effects on the cardiovascular system and explore its prospective as a therapeutic target, particularly focusing on its emerging role as an important mediator of NO signaling in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disorders.

Membrane interactions of G proteins and other related proteins

Guanine nucleotide-binding proteins, G proteins, propagate incoming messages from receptors to effector proteins. They switch from an inactive to active state by exchanging a GDP molecule for GTP, and they return to the inactive form by hydrolyzing GTP to GDP. Small monomeric G proteins, such as Ras, are involved in controlling cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis, and they interact with membranes through isoprenyl moieties, fatty acyl moieties, and electrostatic interactions. This protein-lipid binding facilitates productive encounters of Ras and Raf proteins in defined membrane regions, so that signals can subsequently proceed through MEK and ERK kinases, which constitute the canonical MAP kinase signaling cassette. On the other hand, heterotrimeric G proteins undergo co/post-translational modifications in the alpha (myristic and/or palmitic acid) and the gamma (farnesol or geranylgeraniol) subunits. These modifications not only assist the G protein to localize to the membrane but they also help distribute the heterotrimer (Galphabetagamma) and the subunits generated upon activation (Galpha and Gbetagamma) to appropriate membrane microdomains. These proteins transduce messages from ubiquitous serpentine receptors, which control important functions such as taste, vision, blood pressure, body weight, cell proliferation, mood, etc. Moreover, the exchange of GDP by GTP is triggered by nucleotide exchange factors. Membrane receptors that activate G proteins can be considered as such, but other cytosolic, membranal or amphitropic proteins can accelerate the rate of G protein exchange or even activate this process in the absence of receptor-mediated activation. These and other protein-protein interactions of G proteins with other signaling proteins are regulated by their lipid preferences. Thus, G protein-lipid interactions control the features of messages and cell physiology.