Comparison of the effect of two groups of diuretics on renin secretion in the anaesthetized dog

Diuretic Resistance

Diuretic resistance is defined as a failure to achieve the therapeutically desired reduction in edema despite a full dose of diuretic. The causes of diuretic resistance include poor adherence to drug therapy or dietary sodium restriction, pharmacokinetic issues, and compensatory increases in sodium reabsorption in nephron sites that are not blocked by the diuretic. To illustrate the pathophysiology and management of diuretic resistance, we describe a patient with nephrotic syndrome. This patient presented with generalized pitting edema and weight gain despite the use of oral loop diuretics. Nephrotic syndrome may cause mucosal edema of the intestine, limiting the absorption of diuretics. In addition, the patient's kidney function had deteriorated, impairing the tubular secretion of diuretics. He was admitted for intravenous loop diuretic treatment. However, this was ineffective, likely due to compensatory sodium reabsorption by other tubular segments. The combination of loop diuretics with triamterene, a blocker of the epithelial sodium channel, effectively reduced body weight and edema. Recent data suggest that plasmin in nephrotic urine can activate the epithelial sodium channel, potentially contributing to the diuretic resistance in this patient. This case is used to illustrate and review the mechanisms of, and possible interventions for, diuretic resistance.

Comparison of the acute renal and peripheral vascular responses to frusemide and bumetanide at low and high dose

1. The effects of equipotent doses of frusemide (10 mg and 100 mg) and bumetanide (250 micrograms and 2.5 mg) upon renal and peripheral vascular responses, urinary prostaglandin excretion, plasma renin activity, angiotensin II and noradrenaline were compared in nine healthy volunteers. 2. Frusemide (10 mg and 100 mg) and bumetanide (2.5 mg) increased renal blood flow acutely compared with placebo but bumetanide (250 micrograms) had no effect. The changes in peripheral vascular responses were not significantly different from placebo. 3. Urinary prostaglandin metabolite excretion was acutely increased by all treatments, with no inter-treatment difference. Plasma renin activity was increased acutely by both doses of frusemide and by bumetanide (2.5 mg) compared with placebo and to bumetanide (250 micrograms). There were no differences between the latter two treatments. Angiotensin II was increased significantly 30 min after frusemide 100 mg and bumetanide 2.5 mg, and by all four treatments at 50 min when compared with placebo. There were no significant differences between either of the low doses or the higher doses. Plasma noradrenaline was unchanged by all treatments. 4. Frusemide 100 mg and bumetanide 2.5 mg have the same effects on the renal vasculature and the renin-angiotensin-prostaglandin system. Under the conditions of this study, frusemide 10 mg had different effects on plasma renin activity than bumetanide 250 micrograms.

Comparison of the acute vascular effects of frusemide and bumetanide

The acute peripheral vascular and diuretic effects of intravenous frusemide 10 mg and 20 mg were compared with those of bumetanide 250 micrograms and 500 micrograms in a group of 10 salt depleted volunteers. Significant reductions in forearm blood flow (FBF) were observed after frusemide 10 mg (-0.77 ml 100 ml-1 min-1 P less than 0.05) and 20 mg (-0.75 ml 100 ml-1 min-1 P less than 0.01 at 15 min). No changes were observed after bumetanide. The reductions in blood flow produced by frusemide were significantly different from those of bumetanide (P less than 0.05) at 15 min. Increases in venous capacitance (VC) and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) were observed after frusemide but these differences were not statistically different from placebo or bumetanide. No increases were seen after bumetanide. Plasma aldosterone concentrations were unchanged after either drug but plasma renin activity (PRA) was increased after frusemide 10 mg (4.42 +/- 1.01----8.50 +/- 1.90 ng A I ml-1 h-1 P less than 0.01) and 20 mg (4.01 +/- 0.72----7.81 +/- 2.27 ng A I ml-1 h-1 P less than 0.05). No increases were observed after bumetanide and significant differences between bumetanide and frusemide were observed (P less than 0.01). This study demonstrates that the acute peripheral arterial effects of frusemide are not observed after comparable diuretic doses of bumetanide. The differences appear to be related to the ability of the drugs to stimulate acute renin release from the kidney.

Bumetanide. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use

Bumetanide is a potent 'loop' diuretic for the treatment of oedema associated with congestive heart failure, hepatic and renal diseases, acute pulmonary congestion and premenstrual syndrome and in forced diuresis during and after surgery. Bumetanide may be given orally, intravenously or intramuscularly and produces a rapid and marked diuresis, and increased urinary excretion of sodium, chloride and other electrolytes (within 30 minutes) which persists for 3 to 6 hours. Its principal site of action is on the ascending limb of the loop of Henle, with a secondary action on the proximal tubule. Pharmacologically, bumetanide is about 40-fold more potent than frusemide (furosemide), with the exception of its effects on urinary potassium excretion where its potency is lower. Studies in patients with oedema due to congestive heart failure, pulmonary oedema or hepatic disease show that oral or intravenous bumetanide 0.5 to 2 mg/day produces results comparable to those with frusemide 20 to 80 mg/day. In acute pulmonary oedema, intravenous bumetanide produces a very rapid diuresis. Higher doses of bumetanide may be required (up to 15 mg/day) in patients with chronic renal failure or nephrotic syndrome. In these patients muscle cramps are not uncommon with bumetanide, but glomerular filtration rates are unaffected. In most studies, diuretic effects were accompanied by decreased bodyweight, abdominal girth and improvements in a variety of haemodynamic parameters. Comparison of bumetanide with frusemide at a dose ratio of 1 : 40 reveals no significant differences in clinical response with the exception of renal disease, where patients with oedema appear to respond better to bumetanide. Combination with thiazide diuretics enhances the clinical response to bumetanide. Potassium supplements and spironolactone may be beneficial additions to bumetanide where patients at risk of hypokalaemia can be identified. Clinically important side effects are infrequent, with audiological impairment occurring to a lesser extent than with frusemide. Bumetanide thus offers an important alternative to frusemide when a 'loop' diuretic is indicated.

Furosemide fails to alter plasma active or inactive renin in conscious sheep but does so in anaesthetized animals

Regulation of plasma levels of active and inactive renin was investigated using sheep with indwelling artery, vein and bladder catheters. Control and experimental studies were carried out in the same animals on different days. Volume depletion during any single experiment was limited to a maximum of 50 ml. Despite large changes in sodium and water excretion, the diuretic furosemide at two dose levels, 1 and 10 mg/kg, failed to alter plasma levels of either active or inactive renin in conscious sheep. Induction of pentobarbitone anaesthesia in the sheep did not, per se, alter either plasma active or inactive renin. Furosemide (10 mg/kg) in anaesthetized animals produced a similar diuresis and natriuresis response to conscious sheep, but plasma active renin increased by 270% and inactive renin decreased to zero. In conscious sheep given an infusion of papaverine, furosemide also produced an increase in plasma active renin and a concurrent decrease in the inactive form. In both anaesthetized animals and in conscious sheep infused with papaverine, furosemide-induced intrarenal vasodilation, as evidenced by changes in clearance of p-aminohippuric acid, was much reduced in comparison to the conscious animals. This may be significant in relation to the control of renin secretion. It appears that the macula densa sodium receptor, which is considered to regulate renin release, will only function after it has been primed by other intra- or extrarenal factors. This is discussed, particularly in relation to the possible role played by the prostaglandin system.

Sequential changes in plasma renin activity and plasma catecholamines in mildly hypertensive patients during acute, furosemide-induced body-fluid loss

To evaluate the role of adrenergic mechanisms in the acute response of renin to furosemide, plasma renin activity (PRA) and plasma catecholamine concentrations were measured for 3 h after i.v. administration of furosemide 1 mg/kg to 8 patients with mild essential hypertension. Furosemide induced a prompt and long-lasting increase in renin, with PRA more than doubled at all times. The increase in PRA within the first 30 min paralleled the peak increases in urinary water and sodium flow rates, and significant decreases in plasma volume and central venous pressure. There was no change in plasma catecholamine concentrations. Plasma noradrenaline was increased significantly at 60 min and adrenaline at 90 min, once furosemide had induced a marked loss of body-fluid and approximately 65% decrease in central venous pressure. Both catecholamines remained elevated until the end of the study, whereas urinary water and sodium flow rates had returned to their pre-treatment values by 150 min. Mean blood pressure was essentially unchanged throughout the study, whereas heart rate increased significantly after 90 min. The findings suggest that in mildly hypertensive patients adrenergic mechanisms are not involved in the initial renin response to furosemide, but they come into play later, probably as a result of reflex sympathetic activation triggered by marked volume depletion.

Response of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system to upright tilting and to intravenous frusemide: effect of prior metoprolol and propranolol

1 Upright tilting in normal volunteers caused increases in plasma active and total renin, angiotensin II and aldosterone; a slight but significant fall in inactive renin accompanied these changes. 2 The alterations in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system on tilting took up to 1 h upright to become fully established. 3 Large intravenous doses of propranolol or metoprolol attenuated, without abolishing, the rises in active renin, angiotensin II, and aldosterone; the attenuation was most evident soon after tilting and was largely overcome by 1 h upright. Inactive renin did not fall significantly after beta-adrenoceptor blockade. 4 Intravenous frusemide caused immediate rises in plasma active, total and inactive renin, angiotensin II, and aldosterone, which then declined over 2 h despite increasing cumulative sodium losses. 5 Intravenous propranolol or metoprolol attenuated, without abolishing, these early increases in the components of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system after frusemide. 6 Prior oral metoprolol or propranolol, while significantly slowing the heart, did not limit the early rise in plasma angiotensin II following intravenous frusemide. 7 Thus in contrast to previous workers, we did not find that propranolol eliminated the response of the renin-angiotensin system to upright tilting; in part this difference appeared to be due to the longer tilt we employed. 8 Also in contrast to earlier work, we found attenuation by both intravenous propranolol and metoprolol of the immediate rise in renin after intravenous frusemide.

Sympathetic and renin-angiotensin system influence on blood pressure and renal blood flow of two-kidney, one clip Goldblatt hypertensive dog

Conscious normotensive and two-kidney, one clip Goldblatt hypertensive dogs were studied to determine the influence of the sympathetic and renin-angiotensin systems on the blood pressure and renal blood flow. Renal blood flow was monitored in a single kidney of the normotensive dogs and in the contralateral kidney of the hypertensive dogs. Saralasin was infused intravenously (i.v.) at 1 microgram/kg/min for 15 minutes in untreated and guanethidine-treated animals. Guanethidine (i.v.) decreased blood pressure (BP) in the hypertensives at X = 16 days after Goldblatt clamp application, but not in the normotensives, and did not affect renal blood flow or vascular resistance in either group. Saralasin produced approximately the same BP decrease in both untreated and guanethidine-treated hypertensives at X = 12 days after Goldblatt clamp application; the combined effect of the drugs was greater than saralasin alone. Blood flow and vascular resistance of the hypertensives' contralateral kidney were not significantly affected by saralasin in these experiments. No sustained effect on BP or renal blood flow was obtained with saralasin in the normotensives. Administration of furosemide was utilized to increase plasma renin activity (PRA) in another series of experiments. In both normotensives and hypertensives, PRA was elevated at 2-3 hours after furosemide application, being greater in the hypertensives. When the renin-angiotensin system was activated in this manner, saralasin had a significant hypotensive and renal vasodilator effect in the hypertensives, but not in the normotensives.