Generation of suppressive blood cells for control of allograft rejection

Five-year follow-up of a phase I trial of donor-derived modified immune cell infusion in kidney transplantation

Background

The administration of modified immune cells (MIC) before kidney transplantation led to specific immunosuppression against the allogeneic donor and a significant increase in regulatory B lymphocytes. We wondered how this approach affected the continued clinical course of these patients.

Methods

Ten patients from a phase I clinical trial who had received MIC infusions prior to kidney transplantation were retrospectively compared to 15 matched standard-risk recipients. Follow-up was until year five after surgery.

Results

The 10 MIC patients had an excellent clinical course with stable kidney graft function, no donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies (DSA) or acute rejections, and no opportunistic infections. In comparison, a retrospectively matched control group receiving standard immunosuppressive therapy had a higher frequency of DSA (log rank P = 0.046) and more opportunistic infections (log rank P = 0.033). Importantly, MIC patients, and in particular the four patients who had received the highest cell number 7 days before surgery and received low immunosuppression during follow-up, continued to show a lack of anti-donor T lymphocyte reactivity in vitro and high CD19⁺CD24^hiCD38^hi transitional and CD19⁺CD24^hiCD27⁺ memory B lymphocytes until year five after surgery.

Conclusions

MIC infusions together with reduced conventional immunosuppression were associated with good graft function during five years of follow-up, no de novo DSA development and no opportunistic infections. In the future, MIC infusions might contribute to graft protection while reducing the side effects of immunosuppressive therapy. However, this approach needs further validation in direct comparison with prospective controls.

Trial registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT02560220 (for the TOL-1 Study). EudraCT Number: 2014-002086-30.

Induction of Long-Lasting Regulatory B Lymphocytes by Modified Immune Cells in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

We recently demonstrated that donor-derived modified immune cells (MICs)-PBMCs that acquire immunosuppressive properties after a brief treatment-induced specific immunosuppression against the allogeneic donor when administered before kidney transplantation. We found up to a 68-fold increase in CD19 + CD24 hi CD38 hi transitional B lymphocytes compared with transplanted controls.

METHODS

Ten patients from a phase 1 clinical trial who had received MIC infusions before kidney transplantation were followed to post-transplant day 1080.

RESULTS

Patients treated with MICs had a favorable clinical course, showing no donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies or acute rejections. The four patients who had received the highest dose of MICs 7 days before surgery and were on reduced immunosuppressive therapy showed an absence of in vitro lymphocyte reactivity against stimulatory donor blood cells, whereas reactivity against third party cells was preserved. In these patients, numbers of transitional B lymphocytes were 75-fold and seven-fold higher than in 12 long-term survivors on minimal immunosuppression and four operationally tolerant patients, respectively ( P <0.001 for both). In addition, we found significantly higher numbers of other regulatory B lymphocyte subsets and a gene expression signature suggestive of operational tolerance in three of four patients. In MIC-treated patients, in vitro lymphocyte reactivity against donor blood cells was restored after B lymphocyte depletion, suggesting a direct pathophysiologic role of regulatory B lymphocytes in donor-specific unresponsiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that donor-specific immunosuppression after MIC infusion is long-lasting and associated with a striking increase in regulatory B lymphocytes. Donor-derived MICs appear to be an immunoregulatory cell population that when administered to recipients before transplantation, may exert a beneficial effect on kidney transplants.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER

MIC Cell Therapy for Individualized Immunosuppression in Living Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients (TOL-1), NCT02560220.

Individualised immunosuppression with intravenously administered donor-derived modified immune cells compared with standard of care in living donor kidney transplantation (TOL-2 Study): protocol for a multicentre, open-label, phase II, randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Donor-derived modified immune cells (MIC) induced long-term specific immunosuppression against the allogeneic donor in preclinical models of transplantation. In a phase I clinical trial (TOL-1 Study), MIC treatment resulted in a cellular phenotype that was directly and indirectly suppressive to the recipient's immune system allowing for reduction of conventional immunosuppressive therapy. Here, we describe a protocol for a randomised controlled, multicentre phase-IIb clinical trial of individualised immunosuppression with intravenously administered donor MIC compared with standard-of-care (SoC) in living donor kidney transplantation (TOL-2 Study).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Sixty-three living donor kidney transplant recipients from six German transplant centres are randomised 2:1 to treatment with MIC (MIC group, N=42) or no treatment with MIC (control arm, N=21). MIC are manufactured from donor peripheral blood mononuclear cells under Good Manufacturing Practice conditions. The primary objective of this trial is to determine the efficacy of MIC treatment together with reduced conventional immunosuppressive therapy in terms of achieving an operational tolerance-like phenotype compared with SoC 12 months after MIC administration. Key secondary endpoints are the number of patient-relevant infections as well as a composite of biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, graft dysfunction or death. Immunosuppressive therapy of MIC-treated patients is reduced during follow-up under an extended immunological monitoring including human leucocyte antigen-antibody testing, and determination of lymphocyte subsets, for example, regulatory B lymphocytes (Breg) and antidonor T cell response. A Data Safety Monitoring Board has been established to allow an independent assessment of safety and efficacy.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval has been provided by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (AFmu-580/2021, 17 March 2022) and from the Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines, Paul-Ehrlich-Institute, Langen, Germany (Vorlage-Nr. 4586/02, 21 March 2022). Written informed consent will be obtained from all patients and respective donors prior to enrolment in the study. The results from the TOL-2 Study will be published in peer-reviewed medical journals and will be presented at symposia and scientific meetings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05365672.

Cellular Therapies in Solid Organ Allotransplantation: Promise and Pitfalls

Donor specific transfusions have been the basis of tolerance inducing protocols since Peter Medawar showed that it was experimentally feasible in the 1950s. Though trials of cellular therapies have become increasingly common in solid organ transplantation, they have not become standard practice. Additionally, whereas some protocols have focused on cellular therapies as a method for donor antigen delivery—thought to promote tolerance in and of itself in the correct immunologic context—other approaches have alternatively focused on the intrinsic immunosuppressive properties of the certain cell types with less emphasis on their origin, including mesenchymal stem cells, regulatory T cells, and regulatory dendritic cells. Regardless of intent, all cellular therapies must contend with the potential that introducing donor antigen in a new context will lead to sensitization. In this review, we focus on the variety of cellular therapies that have been applied in human trials and non-human primate models, describe their efficacy, highlight data regarding their potential for sensitization, and discuss opportunities for cellular therapies within our current understanding of the immune landscape.

Phase I trial of donor-derived modified immune cell infusion in kidney transplantation

BACKGROUNDPreclinical experiments have shown that donor blood cells, modified in vitro by an alkylating agent (modified immune cells [MICs]), induced long-term specific immunosuppression against the allogeneic donor.METHODSIn this phase I trial, patients received either 1.5 × 106 MICs per kg BW on day -2 (n = 3, group A), or 1.5 × 108 MICs per kg BW on day -2 (n = 3, group B) or day -7 (n = 4, group C) before living donor kidney transplantation in addition to post-transplantation immunosuppression. The primary outcome measure was the frequency of adverse events (AEs) until day 30 (study phase) with follow-up out to day 360.RESULTSMIC infusions were extremely well tolerated. During the study phase, 10 treated patients experienced a total of 69 AEs that were unlikely to be related or not related to MIC infusion. No donor-specific human leukocyte antigen Abs or rejection episodes were noted, even though the patients received up to 1.3 × 1010 donor mononuclear cells before transplantation. Group C patients with low immunosuppression during follow-up showed no in vitro reactivity against stimulatory donor blood cells on day 360, whereas reactivity against third-party cells was still preserved. Frequencies of CD19+CD24hiCD38hi transitional B lymphocytes (Bregs) increased from a median of 6% before MIC infusion to 20% on day 180, which was 19- and 68-fold higher, respectively, than in 2 independent cohorts of transplanted controls. The majority of Bregs produced the immunosuppressive cytokine IL-10. MIC-treated patients showed the Immune Tolerance Network operational tolerance signature.CONCLUSIONMIC administration was safe and could be a future tool for the targeted induction of tolerogenic Bregs.TRIAL REGISTRATIONEudraCT number: 2014-002086-30; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02560220.FUNDINGFederal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Technology, Berlin, Germany, and TolerogenixX GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany.

Moving from transplant as a treatment to transplant as a cure

Immunosuppression continues to be a necessary component of transplantation, despite its association with a multitude of adverse effects. Numerous efforts have been made to circumvent the need for immunosuppression by using various techniques to achieve donor hyporesponsiveness. In this issue of the JCI, Morath et al. take this endeavor forward. Prior to transplantation, the researchers infused recipients with donor-modified immune cells and achieved immunologic hyporesponsiveness. This successful phase I trial also provides a possible avenue for achieving transplantation without the requisite immunosuppression.

[Immunosuppressive effect of mitomycin C-treated peripheral mononuclear blood cells (MICs) in vascularised composite allotransplantation]

BACKGROUND

Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation (VCA) enables the restoration of complex tissue defects. Since the first successful hand and face transplants were performed, clinical and experimental research has consistently improved immunosuppressive therapies. The incubation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) with mitomycin C (MMC) results in immunomodulatory cells (MICs). In previous studies, the systemic application of MICs on the day of allogeneic hind limb transplantation led to a significant immunosuppression in rats. The aim of this study is to further investigate the optimal point in time of MIC application in a complex VCA model.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In six groups, 60 allogeneic hind limb transplantations were performed. Fully mismatched rats were used as hind limb donors [Lewis (LEW)] and recipients [Brown-Norway (BN)]. Group A received donor-derived MICs seven days preoperatively. Group B received no immunosuppression; group C received untreated PBMCs seven days prior to transplantation. Animals in group D received cell culture media, whereas group E was treated with a standard immunosuppression consisting of tacrolimus and prednisolone. In group F, syngeneic hind limb transplantations (BN→BN) were performed. Transplant rejection was assessed clinically and histologically.

RESULTS

Group A showed a significantly earlier onset of allograft rejection after 3.5 ± 0.2 days (p < 0.01) when compared with control groups B, C and D (5.5 ± 0.7, 5.3 ± 0.7 und 5.7 ± 0.5). Groups E and F showedno allograft rejection.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that the time of application determines the immunomodulatory effects of MICs. Whereas the systemic application of MICs on the day of transplantation led to a significant immunosuppression in previous studies, this study demonstrates that preoperative injections of MICs lead to an acceleration of allotransplant rejection. Follow-up studies are necessary to investigate further modifications of application time as well as dose-effect relations and cell characteristics of these potential immunosuppressive cells.

CD11c+ dendritic cells mediate antigen-specific suppression in extracorporeal photopheresis

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) represents one of the most widespread and effective cell therapies for graft‐versus‐host disease and other T cell‐mediated disorders. However, the key factors affecting the therapeutic efficacy of ECP remain unclear. We hypothesized that therapeutic effects are mediated by ECP‐treated antigen‐presenting dendritic cells (DC). To test this hypothesis, we used the experimental model of contact hypersensitivity (CHS). The ECP’s therapeutic activity improved when the total cell dose of the ECP‐treated cells was increased. We used different haptens during sensitization to demonstrate that the anti‐inflammatory activity of ECP is antigen‐specific. This confirmed the hypothesis that professional antigen‐presenting cells are involved in the mode of action. Also, the ECP’s therapeutic activity was abrogated by the depletion of CD11c⁺ DC, which represents fewer than 1% of all the ECP‐exposed cells. Finally, we confirm the critical importance of CD11c⁺ DC for ECP activity by showing that only a few purified CD11c⁺ DC are sufficient to mediate its therapeutic effect. The finding that ECP‐treated, physiological antigen‐presenting DC alone mediate antigen‐specific modulation of a pathological immune response may result in better‐targeted interventions when treating patients.

Cell therapeutic approaches to immunosuppression after clinical kidney transplantation

Refinement of immunosuppressive strategies has led to further improvement of kidney graft survival in recent years. Currently, the main limitations to long-term graft survival are life-threatening side effects of immunosuppression and chronic allograft injury, emphasizing the need for innovative immunosuppressive regimens that resolve this therapeutic dilemma. Several cell therapeutic approaches to immunosuppression and donor-specific unresponsiveness have been tested in early phase I and phase II clinical trials in kidney transplantation. The aim of this overview is to summarize current cell therapeutic approaches to immunosuppression in clinical kidney transplantation with a focus on myeloid suppressor cell therapy by mitomycin C-induced cells (MICs). MICs show great promise as a therapeutic agent to achieve the rapid and durable establishment of donor-unresponsiveness in living-donor kidney transplantation. Cell-based therapeutic approaches may eventually revolutionize immunosuppression in kidney transplantation in the near future.

The combination of mitomycin-induced blood cells with a temporary treatment of ciclosporin A prolongs allograft survival in vascularized composite allotransplantation

BACKGROUND

Vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) is a rapidly expanding field of transplantation and provides a potential treatment for complex tissue defects. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) shortly incubated with the antibiotic and chemotherapeutic agent mitomycin C (MMC) can suppress allogeneic T cell response and control allograft rejection in various organ transplantation models. MMC-incubated PBMCs (MICs) are currently being tested in a phase I clinical trial in kidney transplant patients. Previous studies with MICs in a complex VCA model showed the immunomodulatory potential of these cells. The aim of this study is to optimize and evaluate the use of MICs in combination with a standard immunosuppressive drug in VCA.

METHODS

Fully mismatched rats were used as hind limb donors [Lewis (RT1¹)] and recipients [Brown-Norway (RT1ⁿ)]. Sixty allogeneic hind limb transplantations were performed in six groups. Group A received donor-derived MICs combined with a temporary ciclosporin A (CsA) treatment. Group B received MICs in combination with a temporarily administered reduced dose of CsA. Group C served as a control and received a standard CsA dose temporarily without an additional administration of MICs, whereas Group D was solely medicated with a reduced CsA dose. Group E received no immunosuppressive therapy, neither CsA nor MICs. Group F was given a continuous standard immunosuppressive regimen consisting of CsA and prednisolone. The endpoint of the study was the onset of allograft rejection which was assessed clinically and histologically.

RESULTS

In group A and B, the rejection-free interval of the allograft was significantly prolonged to an average of 23.1 ± 1.7 and 24.7 ± 1.8 days compared to the corresponding control groups (p < 0.01). Rejection in groups C, D, and E was noted after 14.3 ± 1.1, 7.8 ± 0.7, and 6.9 ± 0.6 days. No rejection occurred in control group F during the follow-up period of 100 days. No adverse events have been noted.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study show that the combination of MICs with a temporary CsA treatment significantly prolongs the rejection-free interval in a complex VCA model. The combination of MICs with CsA showed no adverse events such as graft-versus-host disease. MICs, which are generated by a simple and reliable in vitro technique, represent a potential therapeutic tool for prolonging allograft survival through immunomodulation.

Peripheral blood mononuclear cell secretome for tissue repair

For almost two decades, cell-based therapies have been tested in modern regenerative medicine to either replace or regenerate human cells, tissues, or organs and restore normal function. Secreted paracrine factors are increasingly accepted to exert beneficial biological effects that promote tissue regeneration. These factors are called the cell secretome and include a variety of proteins, lipids, microRNAs, and extracellular vesicles, such as exosomes and microparticles. The stem cell secretome has most commonly been investigated in pre-clinical settings. However, a growing body of evidence indicates that other cell types, such as peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), are capable of releasing significant amounts of biologically active paracrine factors that exert beneficial regenerative effects. The apoptotic PBMC secretome has been successfully used pre-clinically for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction, chronic heart failure, spinal cord injury, stroke, and wound healing. In this review we describe the benefits of choosing PBMCs instead of stem cells in regenerative medicine and characterize the factors released from apoptotic PBMCs. We also discuss pre-clinical studies with apoptotic cell-based therapies and regulatory issues that have to be considered when conducting clinical trials using cell secretome-based products. This should allow the reader to envision PBMC secretome-based therapies as alternatives to all other forms of cell-based therapies.

Autoantigen-specific immunosuppression with tolerogenic peripheral blood cells prevents relapses in a mouse model of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Dendritic cells (DCs) rendered suppressive by treatment with mitomycin C and loaded with the autoantigen myelin basic protein demonstrated earlier their ability to prevent experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), the animal model for multiple sclerosis (MS). This provides an approach for prophylactic vaccination against autoimmune diseases. For clinical application such DCs are difficult to generate and autoantigens hold the risk of exacerbating the disease.

METHODS

We replaced DCs by peripheral mononuclear cells and myelin autoantigens by glatiramer acetate (Copaxone(®)), a drug approved for the treatment of MS. Spleen cells were loaded with Copaxone(®), incubated with mitomycin C (MICCop) and injected into mice after the first bout of relapsing-remitting EAE. Immunosuppression mediated by MICCop was investigated in vivo by daily assessment of clinical signs of paralysis and in in vitro restimulation assays of peripheral immune cells. Cytokine profiling was performed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Migration of MICCop cells after injection was examined by biodistribution analysis of (111)Indium-labelled MICCop. The number and inhibitory activity of CD4(+)CD25(+)FoxP3(+) regulatory T cells were analysed by histology, flow cytometry and in vitro mixed lymphocyte cultures. In order to assess the specificity of MICCop-induced suppression, treated EAE mice were challenged with the control protein ovalbumin. Humoral and cellular immune responses were then determined by ELISA and in vitro antigen restimulation assay.

RESULTS

MICCop cells were able to inhibit the harmful autoreactive T-cell response and prevented mice from further relapses without affecting general immune responses. Administered MICCop migrated to various organs leading to an increased infiltration of the spleen and the central nervous system with CD4(+)CD25(+)FoxP3(+) cells displaying a suppressive cytokine profile and inhibiting T-cell responses.

CONCLUSION

We describe a clinically applicable cell therapeutic approach for controlling relapses in autoimmune encephalomyelitis by specifically silencing the deleterious autoimmune response.

Cell therapy for immunosuppression after kidney transplantation

PURPOSE

To give an overview over cell therapeutic approaches to immunosuppression in clinical kidney transplantation. A focus is on myeloid suppressor cell therapy by mitomycin C-induced cells (MICs).

METHODS

Literature review with an emphasis on already existing therapies.

RESULTS

Several cell therapeutic approaches to immunosuppression and donor-specific unresponsiveness are now being tested in early phase I and phase II trials in clinical kidney transplantation. Cell products such as regulatory T cells or regulatory macrophages, or other myeloid suppressor cell therapies, may either consist of donor-specific, third-party, or autologous cell preparations. Major problems are the identification of the suppressive cell populations and their expansion to have sufficient amount of cells to achieve donor unresponsiveness (e.g., with regulatory T cells). We show a simple and safe way to establish donor unresponsiveness in living-donor kidney transplantation by MIC therapy. A phase I clinical trial is now under way to test the safety and efficacy of this cell therapeutic approach.

CONCLUSIONS

Cell therapeutic approaches to immunosuppression after kidney transplantation may revolutionize clinical transplantation in the future.

Immunosuppressive properties of mitomycin C-incubated human myeloid blood cells (MIC) in vitro

Previous animal studies showed that donor-derived blood cells treated with mitomycin C (MMC) prolong allograft survival when injected into recipients. This model was effective with whole blood, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) (monocytes being the active cell subpopulation) or dendritic cells. In view of a potential clinical application, we study now the immunosuppressive properties of human myeloid cells in vitro. Mature dendritic cells (generated from naïve monocytes) or monocytes treated with mitomycin C do not or only weakly inhibit allogeneic T cells in vitro, whereas cells in an early differentiation state between monocytes and DC exert suppressive activity when treated with MMC. In contrast, DC generated from MMC-treated monocytes show the morphology and phenotype of early immature DC (iDC) and suppress T-cell responses. It is known that untreated monocytes injected into a recipient encounter a cytokine milieu which differentiates them to stimulatory DC. In our in vitro experiment MMC-treated monocytes cultured in a DC-maturing milieu transform themselves into suppressive early iDC. This reproduces a process which takes place when administering MMC-monocytes to a recipient. In conclusion, human MMC-DC or MMC-monocytes are not or only weakly suppressive in vitro. When MMC-monocytes are differentiated to DC the resulting cells become suppressive.