Nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide for patients with hematologic malignancies

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for patients with advanced hematological malignancies: comparison of fludarabine-based reduced intensity conditioning versus myeloablative conditioning

We compared the outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using reduced intensity and myeloablative conditioning for the treatment of patients with advanced hematological malignancies. A total of 75 adult patients received transplants from human leukocyte antigen-matched donors, coupled with either reduced intensity (n=40; fludarabine/melphalan, 28; fludarabine/cyclophosphamide, 12) or myeloablative conditioning (n=35, busufan/cyclophosphamide). The patients receiving reduced intensity conditioning were elderly, or exhibited contraindications for myeloablative conditioning. Neutrophil and platelet engraftment occurred more rapidly in the reduced intensity group (median, 9 days vs. 18 days in the myeloablative group, p<0.0001; median 12 days vs. 22 days in the myeloablative group, p=0.0001, respectively). Acute graft-versus-host disease (>or=grade II) occurred at comparable frequencies in both groups, while the incidence of hepatic veno-occlusive disease was lower in the reduced intensity group (3% vs. 20% in the myeloablative group, p=0.02). The overall 1-yr survival rates of the reduced intensity and myeloablative group patients were 44% and 15%, respectively (p=0.16). The results of present study indicate that patients with advanced hematological malignancies, even the elderly and those with major organ dysfunctions, might benefit from reduced intensity transplantation.

Comparative outcomes of reduced intensity and myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients under 50 with hematologic malignancies

We have conducted a direct comparison of the outcomes of reduced intensity and myeloablative conditioning in younger adults with hematological malignancies<50 yr. One hundred and five patients received transplants from human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched donors, via either reduced intensity (n=35) or myeloablative conditioning (n=70). The median ages of the reduced intensity and myeloablative groups were 36 and 33 yr (p=0.014). Neutrophil engraftment (i.e. time to absolute neutrophil count>0.5x10(9)/L) occurred more rapidly in the reduced intensity group (median: 10 d; range: 0-21 d) than in the myeloablative group (median: 18 d; range: 11-38 d; p<0.0001). The incidence of grades 2-4 acute graft-vs.-host disease were similar between the reduced intensity and myeloablative groups, at 17% vs. 24% respectively (p=0.40). The cumulative incidence of day 100 non-relapse mortality was 18% in the reduced intensity group, and 21% in the myeloablative group (p=0.88). The overall two-yr survival rates were 43% in the reduced intensity group, and 35% in the myeloablative group (p=0.72). In conclusion, reduced intensity transplantation yielded outcomes comparable with those of myeloablative transplantation in patients under 50 with hematological malignancies.

Fungal infections in bone marrow transplant patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Invasive fungal infections have become the leading infectious cause of death in recipients of hematopoietic cell transplantation. Several factors have led to a renaissance in the study of invasive fungal infections. The growing incidence of both commonly encountered as well as emerging pathogens and the lethality of these infections coupled with the unprecedented number of available broad-spectrum antifungal drugs has lent a renewed vigor and enthusiasm to attempts to understand the pathogenesis of these diseases and, by doing so, improve prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. The following is a review of the primary research published from 2003 to the present that is pertinent to invasive fungal infection in the setting of hematopoietic cell transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

The main themes of published primary research during 2003 to the present include the efficacy and tolerability of antifungal prophylaxis, epidemiologic analyses of risk factors following nonmyeloablative preparative regimens, and more-detailed analyses of nonmyeloid immune responses.

SUMMARY

Although few definitive recommendations emerged from the studies during the review period, these investigations do contribute to a greater understanding of the immunobiology of invasive fungal infection and of the utility and limitations of newer antifungal agents in the prophylaxis or treatment of invasive fungal infection.