Training in tooth preparation utilizing a support system

Technical skill training and assessment in dental education

Highly competent clinical practice requires cognitive, psychomotor and affective skills. Therefore, the ultimate goal of dental education is for practitioners to be competent in all of these domains. While many methods have been introduced to assess knowledge and non-technical skills, it is still very difficult for educators to assess technical skill. Assessment methods for technical skills are still not well established because it is very difficult to assure objectivity, validity and fairness. Nonetheless, technical skill is especially important in dental treatments, along with knowledge and attitude. The aim of this review was to summarize the methods of technical skill training in dental education and how they are assessed. This is a literature review. We searched PubMed MEDLINE using terms related to technical skill training and those assessment as of June 2020 and reviewed them. There have been many reports introducing methods of technical skill training and assessment, including the use of digital technology. However, no single assessment method had demonstrated validity of it. Technical skill training is very important in dental education and there are various ways of learning. The validity of current assessment methods is limited; therefore, a combination of several methods may achieve the best results.

Introduction of integrated dental training jaw models and rubric criteria

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of introducing integrated jaw models, rubric criteria and homework tasks to a total clinical simulation training course to improve the clinical competence of preclinical dental students.

METHODS

A total simulation training course, which involved six clinical dentistry departments, was held for 110 preclinical students in 2014 and 2015. We prepared integrated jaw models having several morbidities along with corresponding medical information and homework tasks. The students formulated diagnoses and devised treatment plans before performing dental treatment on the mannequin under the direction of instructors from the respective clinical departments. Their performance was assessed by both students and instructors using the rubric criteria.

RESULTS

Based on quantitative evaluations, the introduction of integrated jaw models appeared to improve the students' ability to formulate diagnoses and devise dental treatment plans and to understand the respective clinical dentistry disciplines. The rubric criteria provided immediate feedback for the students. Based on a comparison of rubric scores, students tended to significantly underestimate their own performance compared with instructors. Moreover, the introduction of homework tasks improved student seriousness.

CONCLUSION

Introducing integrated jaw models, rubric criteria and homework tasks to a total simulation training course may be a good approach for improving student performance in terms of dental diagnoses and treatment.

Influence of preparation design on the quality of tooth preparation in preclinical dental education

Background/purpose

One of the major educational goals in preclinical dental education is to learn tooth preparation techniques. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of different preparation designs on the development of the manual dexterity of students, in order to perform a state-of-the-art tooth preparation.

Material and methods

Seventy-two 1^st semester students were divided into two groups and educated in tooth preparation for a ceramic anterior single crown. One group received cylindrical burs with a rounded edge to prepare a typodont model with a shoulder finishing line, while the other group had cylindrical burs with round noses to prepare a chamfer finishing line. All preparations were digitized and evaluated using special software focusing on the parameters of preparation depth and preparation angle. In addition, violation of the adjacent teeth was estimated. Data was statistically evaluated at a level of significance of 5%.

Results

The preparation design used did not show a statistically significant influence on the preparation depth or on the preparation angle. A trend to a higher tooth structure removal as required was detected. Furthermore, no influence of the type of preparation design on the number of violated adjacent teeth was found.

Conclusion

In preclinical dental education, the type of preparation design was found to have no influence on the measured parameters representing the quality of the preparation.

Evaluation of tooth preparations - a comparative study between faculty members and pre-clinical students

INTRODUCTION

Preparation of teeth is a basic technique for dental treatment and plays an essential role in pre-clinical education. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether undergraduate students' evaluations of prepared teeth were consistent with faculty assessments and correlated with students' performance in test preparations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty four of 52 dental students having attended a pre-clinical course on basic prosthodontic topics including tooth preparation volunteered to participate in this study. The students were given 10 casts each containing one tooth with an intentionally applied preparation fault of a certain type prepared by an experienced clinician. The students were asked to mark on a list the fault type found in every tooth. The association of students' ratings with their performance during the course was analysed by means of a contingency table, and a generalised linear model was used to compare students' and faculty ratings (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

No significant difference between students' and faculty ratings could be found by analysis of deviance (P = 0.953). Significant deviations of fault detection probabilities from their group mean were found for six of ten fault types. No significant association between students' performance in test preparations and students ratings could be found (P = 0.564).

DISCUSSION

It was possible to achieve a level of calibration within the group of students, which was comparable to that in the group of faculty members.

CONCLUSIONS

Calibration of both students and examiners remains to be an issue with the teaching concepts applied in this study.