A double masked placebo controlled study on the effect of nifedipine on optic nerve blood flow and visual field function in patients with open angle glaucoma

L- and T-type Ca2+ channels dichotomously contribute to retinal ganglion cell injury in experimental glaucoma

Retinal ganglion cell apoptotic death is the main pathological characteristic of glaucoma, which is the leading cause of irreversible blindness. Disruption of Ca²⁺ homeostasis plays an important role in glaucoma. Voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channel blockers have been shown to improve vision in patients with glaucoma. However, whether and how voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channels are involved in retinal ganglion cell apoptotic death are largely unknown. In this study, we found that total Ca²⁺ current densities in retinal ganglion cells were reduced in a rat model of chronic ocular hypertension experimental glaucoma, as determined by whole-cell patch-clamp electrophysiological recordings. Further analysis showed that L-type Ca²⁺ currents were downregulated while T-type Ca²⁺ currents were upregulated at the later stage of glaucoma. Western blot assay and immunofluorescence experiments confirmed that expression of the Ca_V1.2 subunit of L-type Ca²⁺ channels was reduced and expression of the Ca_V3.3 subunit of T-type Ca²⁺ channels was increased in retinas of the chronic ocular hypertension model. Soluble tumor necrosis factor-α, an important inflammatory factor, inhibited the L-type Ca²⁺ current of isolated retinal ganglion cells from control rats and enhanced the T-type Ca²⁺ current. These changes were blocked by the tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor XPro1595, indicating that both types of Ca²⁺ currents may be mediated by soluble tumor necrosis factor-α. The intracellular mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway and nuclear factor kappa-B signaling pathway mediate the effects of tumor necrosis factor-α. TUNEL assays revealed that mibefradil, a T-type calcium channel blocker, reduced the number of apoptotic retinal ganglion cells in the rat model of chronic ocular hypertension. These results suggest that T-type Ca²⁺ channels are involved in disrupted Ca²⁺ homeostasis and apoptosis of retinal ganglion cells in glaucoma, and application of T-type Ca²⁺ channel blockers, especially a specific Ca_V3.3 blocker, may be a potential strategy for the treatment of glaucoma.

[Vasculat treatment concepts in glaucoma patients]

BACKGROUND

Approximately 40% of all open-angle glaucomas do not show high intraocular pressure (IOP). Vascular risk factors play an important role in the pathogeneses of normal pressure glaucoma but high pressure glaucoma is also often accompanied by significant vascular components.

OBJECTIVE

What are the practice relevant possibilities of vascular glaucoma treatment?

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An evaluation of scientific articles from PubMed dealing with vascular glaucoma was carried out.

RESULTS

The treatment of vascular risk factors in glaucoma patients requires a thorough medical history regarding vascular symptoms (peripheral vasospasm, tinnitus, migraine etc.) and information on the presence of systemic diseases. Furthermore, a 24h blood pressure profile and the determination of the fat metabolism status represent important and simple examinations.

CONCLUSION

Besides optimizing systemic blood pressure, reducing an increased central retinal venous pressure, treatment with statins, calcium channel blockers, Ginkgo biloba extract, increased physical exercise and fluid replacement are options to ameliorate vascular conditions. An interdisciplinary cooperation with general practitioners and internists is an important component of holistic treatment.

New directions in the treatment of normal tension glaucoma

Glaucoma is a progressive optic neuropathy that causes characteristic changes of the optic nerve and visual field in relation to intraocular pressure (IOP). It is now known that glaucoma can occur at statistically normal IOPs and prevalence studies have shown that normal tension glaucoma (NTG) is more common than previously thought. While IOP is believed to be the predominant risk factor in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG), IOP-independent risk factors, such as vascular dysregulation, are believed to play an important part in the pathogenesis of NTG. Though certain distinguishing phenotypic features of NTG have been reported, such as an increased frequency of disc hemorrhages, acquired pits of the optic nerve and characteristic patterns of disc cupping and visual field loss, there is much overlap of the clinical findings in NTG with POAG, suggesting that NTG is likely part of a continuum of open angle glaucomas. However, IOP modification is still the mainstay of treatment in NTG. As in traditional POAG, reduction of IOP can be achieved with the use of medications, laser trabeculoplasty or surgery. Studies now show that the choice of medication may also be important in determining the outcomes of these patients. Though it is likely that future treatment of NTG will involve modification of both IOP and IOP-independent risk factors, current efforts to develop IOP-independent neuroprotective treatments have not yet proven to be effective in humans.

Calcium channels and their blockers in intraocular pressure and glaucoma

Several factors besides high intraocular pressure assumed to be associated with the development and progression of glaucoma, and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) have been an anticipated option for glaucoma treatment by improving ocular perfusion and/or exerting neuroprotective effects on retinal ganglion cells with safety established in wide and long-term usage. Decrease in IOP has been reported after topical application of CCBs, however, the effect is much smaller and almost negligible after systemic application. Various CCBs have been reported to increase posterior ocular blood flow in vivo and to exert direct neuroprotection in neurons in vitro. Distribution of the drug at a pharmacologically active concentration in the posterior ocular tissues across the blood-brain barrier or blood-retina barrier, especially in the optic nerve head and retina where the ganglion cells mainly suffer from glaucomatous damage, is essential for clinical treatment of glaucoma. Improved visual functions such as sensitivity in the visual field test have been reported after administration of CCBs, but evidences from the randomized studies have been limited and effects of CCBs on blood flow and direct neuroprotection are hardly distinguished from each other.

Effects of orally administered moxaverine on ocular blood flow in healthy subjects

BACKGROUND

To investigate the effect of orally administered moxaverine (Kollateral forte®) on ocular blood flow in young healthy subjects.

METHODS

Sixteen healthy subjects (eight male/eight female) aged between 20 and 32 years were included in this placebo-controlled, double-masked, two-way crossover study. Volunteers received 900 mg moxaverine-hydrochloride administered orally in three equal doses or placebo identical in appearance on 2 study days. Outcome variables were measured at baseline and 5 h after first drug administration. Laser Doppler flowmetry was used to assess choroidal and optic nerve head blood flow. Blood velocities in the retrobulbar vessels were measured with color Doppler imaging.

RESULTS

Neither moxaverine nor placebo changed mean arterial pressure or intraocular pressure. Neither moxaverine nor placebo had an effect on choroidal (moxaverine: by 9.5 ± 17.2 %, placebo 3.8 ± 18.8 %, p = 0.54 between groups) or optic nerve head blood flow (moxaverine: 4.8 ± 10.4 %, placebo: 1.8 ± 10.9 %, p = 0.52 between groups). Similarly, administration of moxaverine did not change blood flow velocities or calculated resistance index in the retrobulbar vessels compared to placebo.

CONCLUSION

The data of the present study indicate that orally administered moxaverine does not increase ocular blood flow. This is in contrast to previous findings, where parenteral administration of moxaverine lead to a significant increase in choroidal blood flow and blood flow velocities in the retrobulbar vessels. The reason for these differing results is unclear, but may be related to the low bioavailability after oral administration.

Contrast sensitivity, ocular blood flow and their potential role in assessing ischaemic retinal disease

PURPOSE

To examine the definition, evaluation methodology, association to ocular blood flow and potential clinical value of contrast sensitivity (CS) testing in clinical and research settings, focusing in patients with ischemic retinal disease.

METHODS

A review of the medical literature focusing on CS and ocular blood flow in ischemic retinal disease.

RESULTS

CS may be more sensitive than other methods at detecting subtle defects or improvements in primarily central retinal ganglion cell function early on in a disease process. CS testing attempts to provide spatial detection differences which are not directly assessed with standard visual acuity chart testing. Analyzing all studies that have assessed both CS change and ocular blood flow, it is apparent that both choroidal circulation and retinal circulation may have an important role in influencing CS.

CONCLUSION

The concept that CS is directly influenced by ocular blood flow is supported by reviewing the studies involving both. Although the studies in the literature have not established a direct cause and effect relationship per se, the literature review makes it logical to assume that changes in retinal and choroidal blood flow influence CS. This raises the possibility that a subjective visual characteristic, specifically CS, may be able to be evaluated more objectively by studying blood flow. It appears appropriate to study the relationship between blood flow and CS more extensively to develop improved ways of measuring various aspects of blood flow to the eye and to best quantify early changes in visual function.

[Primary open-angle glaucoma and systemic diseases]

The exact pathomechanism of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is still not completely understood. Besides elevated intraocular pressure, which has been identified as a major risk factor, there is mounting evidence for the involvement of systemic factors in the development of glaucomatous damage. Systemic peculiarities described in POAG include cardiovascular, endocrine, neurodegenerative, and sleep alterations. However, some of the studies available on systemic findings in glaucoma patients are contradictory, making further research necessary to identify the exact role of such disturbances in the pathogenesis of the damage. Another difficulty is that many studies are limited by their small sample size, their retrospective nature, and potential selection bias, thus making data interpretation more difficult. Moreover, it is not always clear whether we are dealing with coincidence or a true association between glaucoma and a particular systemic disease. Nevertheless, there is ample evidence for the involvement of vascular factors such as vascular dysregulation and blood pressure in the pathogenesis of POAG.

A Sick Eye in a Sick Body? Systemic Findings in Patients with Primary Open-angle Glaucoma

Despite intense research, the pathogenesis of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is still not completely understood. There is ample evidence for a pathophysiological role of elevated intraocular pressure; however, several systemic factors may influence onset and progression of the disease. Systemic peculiarities found in POAG include alterations of the cardiovascular system, autonomic nervous system, immune system, as well as endocrinological, psychological, and sleep disturbances. An association between POAG and other neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer disease and Parkinson disease, has also been described. Furthermore, the diagnosis of glaucoma can affect the patient's quality of life. By highlighting the systemic alterations found in POAG, this review attempts to bring glaucoma into a broader medical context.

Effect of nimodipine on ocular blood flow and colour contrast sensitivity in patients with normal tension glaucoma

AIM

To investigate the effects of oral nimodipine on ocular haemodynamic parameters and colour contrast sensitivity in patients with normal tension glaucoma (NTG).

DESIGN

The study was performed in a randomised, placebo controlled, double masked, crossover design.

PARTICIPANTS

Nimodipine (60 mg) or placebo was administered to 14 consecutive NTG patients.

METHODS

The effects or oral nimodipine or placebo on ocular and systemic haemodynamic parameters and colour contrast sensitivity along the tritan axis were studied two hours after administration. Optic nerve head blood flow (ONHBF) and choroidal blood flow (CHBF) were assessed with laser Doppler flowmetry. Ocular fundus pulsation amplitude (FPA) was measured with laser interferometry. Colour contrast sensitivity (CCS) was determined along the tritan colour axis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

ONHBF, CHBF, FPA, intraocular pressure and CCS were assessed in patients with NTG.

RESULTS

Mean ocular FPA increased by 14% (SD 14%) (p = 0.0008), ONHBF by 18% (SD 16%) (p = 0.0031), and CHBF by 12% (SD 14%) (p<0.001) after administration of nimodipine. Nimodipine also decreased the threshold of colour contrast sensitivity along the tritan colour axis (-14% (SD 12%); p = 0.048). However, individual changes in FPA, ONHBF, or CHBF were not correlated with changes in threshold of CCS along the tritan colour axis.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that nimodipine increases ONH and choroidal blood flow in NTG patients and improves CCS. The latter effect does not, however, seem to be a direct consequence of the blood flow improvement.

The effects of antiglaucoma and systemic medications on ocular blood flow

Based on the body of evidence implicating ocular blood flow disturbances in the pathogenesis of glaucoma, there is great interest in the investigation of the effects of antiglaucoma drugs and systemic medications on the various ocular vascular beds. The primary aim of this article was to review the current data available on the effects of antiglaucoma drugs and systemic medications on ocular blood flow. We performed a literature search in November 2002, which consisted of a textword search in MEDLINE for the years 1968-2002. The results of this review suggest that there is a severe lack of well-designed long-term studies investigating the effects of antiglaucoma and systemic medications on ocular blood flow in glaucomatous patients. However, among the 136 articles dealing with the effect of antiglaucoma drugs on ocular blood flow, only 36 (26.5%) investigated the effects of medications on glaucoma patients. Among these 36 articles, only 3 (8.3%) were long-term studies, and only 16 (44.4%) were double-masked, randomized, prospective trials. Among the 33 articles describing the effects of systemic medications on ocular blood flow, only 11 (33.3%) investigated glaucoma patients, of which only one (9.1%) was a double-masked, randomized, prospective trial. Based on this preliminary data, we would intimate that few antiglaucoma medications have the potential to directly improve ocular blood flow. Unoprostone appears to have a reproducible antiendothelin-1 effect, betaxolol may exert a calcium-channel blocker action, apraclonidine consistently leads to anterior segment vasoconstriction, and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors seem to accelerate the retinal circulation. Longitudinal, prospective, randomized trials are needed to investigate the effects of vasoactive substances with no hypotensive effect on the progression of glaucoma.