Treatment with campath-1H for relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation does not abrogate the development of chronic GVHD

Eosinophilic disorders

Eosinophilic inflammatory responses occur in association with multiple disorders. Although the initial cause and the affected organs vary among the different eosinophilic disorders, there are only 2 major pathways that mediate eosinophilia: (1) cytokine-mediated increased differentiation and survival of eosinophils (extrinsic eosinophilic disorders), and (2) mutation-mediated clonal expansion of eosinophils (intrinsic eosinophilic disorders). Independent from the original trigger, the most common cause of eosinophilia is the increased generation of IL-5-producing T cells. In some cases, tumor cells are the source of eosinophil hematopoietins. The intrinsic eosinophilic disorders are characterized by mutations in pluripotent or multipotent hematopoietic stem cells leading to chronic myeloid leukemias with eosinophils as part of the clone. Here, we propose a new classification of eosinophilic disorders on the basis of these obvious pathogenic differences between the 2 groups of patients. We then discuss many known eosinophilic disorders, which can be further subdivided by differences in T-cell activation mechanisms, origin of the cytokine-producing tumor cell, or potency of the mutated stem cell. Interestingly, many subgroups of patients originally thought to have the idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome can be integrated in this classification.

Graft-versus-leukemia in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Immune-mediated anti-leukemia effects, often termed graft-versus-leukemia (GvL), operate after bone marrow or blood cell transplants for acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acute myelogenous leukemia and chronic myelogenous leukemia. Sometimes the magnitude of this anti-leukemia effect exceeds that of high-dose anti-leukemia drugs and radiation and can result in leukemia cure. We analyzed leukemia relapse data after transplants for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in this context. These data support the notion of a strong GvL effect in CLL. However, as most of these data are from studies of allotransplants, it is uncertain whether GvL operates in settings where the anti-leukemia effector cells and target CLL cells are genetically identical except for leukemia-related mutations. It is also uncertain whether GvL is distinct from GvHD. These potential limitations have important implications on whether immune therapy of CLL will work in non-allotransplant settings.

Alemtuzumab in the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Alemtuzumab is a humanized therapeutic monoclonal antibody (MAb) that recognizes the CD52 antigen, expressed on normal and neoplastic lymphocytes, monocytes, and natural killer cells. In 2001, alemtuzumab was approved in the US and Europe to treat B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) that had been treated previously with alkylating agents and was refractory to fludarabine. In heavily pretreated patients this MAb is able to produce response rates of about 40%, and in symptomatic, previously untreated patients response rates of more than 80% can be achieved. Alemtuzumab can also be used in patients with CLL as a preparative regimen for stem cell transplantation (SCT) and to prevent graft versus host disease. Moreover its in vivo use before or after SCT may also potentially result in depletion of residual leukemia cells, especially in the autologous setting. Adverse events associated with alemtuzumab include acute first-dose reaction, hematologic toxicity, and infectious complications. Usually they are predictable, manageable, and acceptable in the context of CLL. However, in a significant percentage of patients, cytomegalovirus reactivation occurs during alemtuzumab therapy, and routine weekly monitoring with the polymerase chain reaction methodology is indicated. Moreover, antiviral and antibacterial prophylaxis is mandatory.