Timing of Ovulation and Conception Rate in Primiparous and Multiparous Cows after Synchronization of Ovulation with GnRH and PGF2alpha

Replacement of the first GnRH by estradiol in the breeding Ovsynch of Double Ovsynch protocol could improve fertility in Holstein dairy cows

Unlike GnRH, estradiol could induce emergence of a new follicular wave regardless of the size of follicle. Therefore, the present study was conducted to understand whether replacement of the first GnRH by estradiol in the breeding protocol of Double Ovsynch program could enhance fertility. Cows were randomly assigned to two groups, including Double Ovsynch protocol (Control; n = 120) and Ovsynch-estradiol-PGF2α-GnRH (EPG) protocol (Treatment; n = 120). Cows in both groups were subjected to presynchronization Ovsynch. Seven days later, cows in the control group received GnRH, which was followed by PGF2α and GnRH 7 days and 9 days plus 8 h later, respectively. Cows in treatment group received estradiol 7 days after the second GnRH of presynchronization Ovsynch, which was followed by PGF2α and GnRH 7 days and 10 days plus 8 h later, respectively. Cows were subjected to timed AI (TAI) 16 h after final GnRH in both groups. Pregnancy per AI (P/AI) was greater in cows in treatment than control group (64.17 % vs. 44.17 %, respectively; P = 0.02). Cows with a follicle with diameter ≥ 10 mm (F10) at the beginning of EPG in treatment group had greater P/AI than cows without a F10 at the beginning of breeding Ovsynch in control group (P ≤ 0.05). Pregnancy per AI was greater in cows with a CL at the beginning of EPG in treatment group than cows without a CL at the same timepoint in treatment group, and cows with or without a CL at the beginning of breeding Ovsynch in control group (P ≤ 0.05). In conclusion, inclusion of estradiol in Double Ovsynch protocol as a replacement for the first GnRH of breeding Ovsynch could improve fertility, particularly in cows with a CL at the initiation of EPG.

Probability of pregnancy and risk factors of the Ovsynch program and its modification in dairy cows – a review

The Ovsynch programme is one of the most frequently used procedures in managing dairy cattle reproduction. There are many studies evaluating the effectiveness of the Ovsynch programme. However, few of them assess the impact of factors that can lead to a decrease in the pregnancy rate and thus, reduce the success of the Ovsynch programme. This review aims to examine the impact of both individual and environmental factors on the likelihood of pregnancy. The risk factors described include: the body condition, age, number and stage of lactation, production level, occurrence of diseases and postpartum complications, functional status of the ovaries, oestrous cycle phase, temperature, season and year, and program start-up after calving. Possible modifications of the Ovsynch programme are presented in order to increase its effectiveness and to determine the best time to start it. Additionally, attention was paid to pregnancy losses during the Ovsynch programme which ultimately decrease pregnancy rates. The impact of this many factors on the efficiency of the Ovsynch suggests the need to adjust the synchronization program each time to the individual situation of the herd.

The association of ruminal pH and some metabolic parameters with conception rate at first artificial insemination in Thai dairy cows

The objective of this study was to determine the association of metabolic parameters and cow associated factors with the conception rate at first insemination (FCR) in Thai dairy cows. The investigation was performed with 529 lactations from 32 smallholder dairy farms. At 3-6 weeks after parturition, blood samples and ruminal fluid were collected. Body condition scores (BCS) of cows were scored 1 week before expected calving date and at blood sampling date. Ruminal pH was measured at 2-4 h after morning feeding in ruminal fluid collected by ruminocentesis. Serum beta-hydroxybutyrate and serum urea nitrogen were measured by kinetic enzyme method. Cows with first insemination (AI) between 41 and 114 days postpartum were identified after pregnancy diagnosis for FCR. Breed, parity, interval from calving to first AI, BCS before calving, BCS after calving, loss in BCS after calving, SBHB, SUN, ruminal pH, and postpartum problems were selected as independent variables for a model with FCR as a dependent variable. A multivariable logistic regression model was used with farm as a random effect. Overall FCR was 27.2 %. The FCR depended on interval from calving to first AI, BCS before calving, and ruminal pH. The FCR between 69 and 91 days postpartum was significantly highest (45 %). Before calving, a cow with high BCS (≥ 3.5) had significantly greater FCR than a cow with low BCS (≤ 3.25; P<0.01). An increased ruminal pH raised significantly FCR (OR=2.53; P=0.03).

Comparison of responses to Ovsynch between Holstein-Friesian and Swedish Red cows

The Ovsynch protocol was designed to synchronize ovulation, thereby allowing timed artificial insemination (TAI) of all cows without detection of estrus. However, the effectiveness of Ovsynch in different breeds of dairy cows has not been previously compared. The aim of this study was to compare the response to Ovsynch in cycling lactating Holstein-Friesian (HF) and Swedish Red (SR) dairy cows. A total of 495 cyclic cows (n=347 HF, n=148 SR) were housed together and treated with Ovsynch (GnRH-7 d-PGF2α-56 h-GnRH-16 to 18 h-TAI). Ovulatory responses, synchronization rate, maximal follicle size at the time of AI, and percentage of pregnant cows per AI (P/AI at 31 and 62 d after AI) were compared between breeds. Ultrasonography was performed during Ovsynch at first GnRH, PGF2α, at time of AI, and 7 d after AI. Ovulatory response and synchronization rate were similar in HF versus SR cows (60.2 vs. 62.2%; 88.4 vs. 88.5%, respectively). Cows that ovulated to the first GnRH of Ovsynch had smaller follicle size at AI (15.9±0.1 vs. 16.4±0.2 mm). Maximal follicle size at AI was greater for HF (16.4±2.2 mm) than SR (15.5±2.3 mm) cows. The P/AI was greater for SR than HF cows at the 62-d pregnancy diagnosis (56.1 vs. 46.1%). In addition, pregnancy loss between 31 and 62 d of pregnancy was greater in HF (10.1%) than SR (3.5%) cows. Fertility was less in HF cows during the hot season (57.7 in cold vs. 38.1% in the hot season), whereas such a decrease was not observed in SR (60.0 in cold vs. 53.5% in the hot season) cows. Thus, although the GnRH treatments of Ovsynch were equally effective in SR and HF cows, pregnancy outcomes (P/AI at d 62 and pregnancy survival) were greater in SR than HF cows, and P/AI in SR cows was not compromised during the hot season as was found for HF cows.

Altering the time of the second gonadotropin-releasing hormone injection and artificial insemination (AI) during Ovsynch affects pregnancies per AI in lactating dairy cows

Based on previous research, we hypothesized that Cosynch at 72 h [GnRH-7 d-PGF(2alpha)-72 h-GnRH + artificial insemination (AI)] would result in a greater number of pregnancies per AI (P/AI) than Cosynch at 48 h. Further, we hypothesized that P/AI would be improved to a greater extent when GnRH was administered at 56 h after PGF(2alpha) before AI at 72 h due to a more optimal interval between the LH surge and AI. Nine hundred twenty-seven lactating dairy cows (n = 1,507 AI) were blocked by pen, and pens rotated through treatments. All cows received GnRH followed 7 d later by PGF(2alpha) and then received one of the following: 1) GnRH + timed AI 48 h after PGF(2alpha) (Cosynch-48); 2) GnRH 56 h after PGF(2alpha) + timed AI 72 h after PGF(2alpha) (Ovsynch-56); or 3) GnRH + timed AI 72 h after PGF(2alpha) (Cosynch-72). Pregnancy diagnoses were performed by ultrasound at 31 to 33 d post-AI and again at 52 to 54 d post-AI. Overall P/AI were similar for the Cosynch-48 (29.2%) and Cosynch-72 (25.4%) groups. The Ovsynch-56 group had a greater P/AI (38.6%) than Cosynch-48 or Cosynch-72. Presynchronized first-service animals had greater P/AI than cows at later services in Cosynch-48 (36.2 vs. 23.0%) and Ovsynch-56 (44.8 vs. 32.7%) but not in Cosynch-72 (24.6 vs. 26.2%). Similarly, primiparous cows had greater P/AI than multiparous cows in Cosynch-48 (34.1 vs. 22.9%) and Ovsynch-56 (41.3 vs. 32.6%), but not Cosynch-72 (29.8 vs. 25.3%). In conclusion, we found no advantage to Cosynch at 72 h vs. 48 h. In contrast, we found a clear advantage to treating with GnRH at 56 h, 16 h before a 72-h AI, probably because of more-optimal timing of AI before ovulation.

Timing of Ovulation and Fertility of Heifers After Synchronization of Oestrus with GnRH and Prostaglandin F2alpha

Synchronization of oestrus and/or ovulation can reduce workload in heifer reproductive management. The objective of this study was to compare two protocols to synchronize oestrus and/or ovulation using GnRH and prostaglandin F(2alpha) (PGF(2alpha)) in dairy heifers concerning their effect on follicular dynamics and reproductive performance. Four trials were carried out. In trial 1, 282 heifers were treated with GnRH and PGF(2alpha) 7 days apart (GP protocol). One group was inseminated on detection of oestrus (IDO 1), and the other group received two timed artificial inseminations (AI) 48 and 72 h after PGF(2alpha) administration (TAI 1). In trial 2, 98 heifers were synchronized with the same GP protocol. Heifers in IDO 2 were treated as in IDO 1, heifers in TAI 2 received two TAI 48 and 78 h after PGF(2alpha) administration. In trial 3, heifers in IDO 3 (n = 71) were again treated as in IDO 1. Heifers in TAI 3 (n = 166) received a second dose of GnRH 48 h after PGF(2alpha) (GPG protocol) and TAI together with this treatment and 24 h later. Trial 4 compared the timing of ovulation after the GP and the GPG protocol, using a subgroup of the heifers from trials 1 to 3. The ovaries of the heifers were scanned via ultrasound at 48, 56, 72, 80, 96 and 104 h after PGF(2alpha) administration. Timing of ovulation and size of the ovulatory follicles were compared between the two groups. In trials 1 to 3, conception rates to first service were between 49 and 66%. They did not differ significantly between IDO and TAI groups within or between trials. Pregnancy rates per synchronization were numerically higher in the TAI groups, but the difference was not significant. Conception rates to breeding on spontaneous oestrus in heifers returning to oestrus were higher than that after synchronized oestrus. In trial 4, more heifers ovulated before the end of the observation period in GPG than in GP (96.5% vs 74.7%; p < 0.001). Overall, ovulatory follicles were smaller in GPG (13.1 +/- 1.9 mm vs 14.3 +/- 1.9 mm; p < 0.001).