Cervical length and spontaneous prematurity: laying the foundation for future interventional randomized trials for the short cervix

Diagnóstico do parto pré-termo pela medida ultrassonográfica do comprimento do colo uterino

OBJETIVO: Medir o comprimento do colo uterino, utilizando a ultrassonografia transvaginal, em pacientes com quadro clínico compatível com ameaça de parto pré-termo, e correlacionar a medida do colo uterino, em cada caso, com a interrupção espontânea da gravidez dentro de sete dias. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Foram realizados exames ultrassonográficos em 72 pacientes com quadro clínico compatível com ameaça de parto pré-termo. RESULTADOS: A sensibilidade do exame foi de 90,5%, a especificidade, de 98%, o valor preditivo positivo, de 95%, e o valor preditivo negativo, de 96%. A análise foi realizada utilizando-se a medida de 15 mm de comprimento do colo uterino como valor preditivo do parto pré-termo. CONCLUSÃO: Parece ser possível prever o parto pré-termo em pacientes com colo uterino menor que 15 mm. Tal observação poderá trazer contribuição para a administração mais oportuna de corticoides, com o intuito de acelerar a maturidade pulmonar fetal.

Goals and strategies for prevention of preterm birth: an obstetric perspective

Complications of prematurity surpass congenital malformations as the leading cause of infant mortality in the United States. Since 1990, there has been a steady rise in preterm birth, alarming health professionals from all disciplines. This review from a prenatal perspective confirms those concerns and describes the risks and opportunities that may attend efforts to improve the health of fetuses, newborns, and infants. Fetal and live-born outcomes are included.

Avaliação biométrica do colo uterino durante a gestação por meio da ultra-sonografia transvaginal e ressonância magnética

OBJETIVO: Avaliar o comprimento do colo uterino por meio da ressonância magnética e comparar aos achados da ultra-sonografia transvaginal. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Foram realizados exames ultra-sonográficos e de ressonância magnética do colo uterino em 20 pacientes com idade gestacional entre 19 e 30 semanas. As medidas do colo obtidas pelo exame de ressonância magnética foram aferidas por dois especialistas em diagnóstico por imagem, para calcular a variabilidade interobservador do método. RESULTADOS: O cálculo do coeficiente de correlação de Pearson entre as medidas do comprimento cervical indicou correlação significante entre os métodos (r=0,628; p<0,01). A aplicação do teste t pareado não evidenciou diferença significativa entre as medidas aferidas pela ultra-sonografia transvaginal e ressonância magnética (p=0,068). A análise da variabilidade interobservador das medidas do colo obtidas pela ressonância magnética demonstrou alta confiabilidade do método (a=0,96). CONCLUSÃO: A comparação entre os dois métodos de imagem na avaliação da biometria cervical não apresentou diferença estatística, o que reforça a aplicação do exame ultra-sonográfico. Entretanto, em situações nas quais a ultra-sonografia transvaginal apresenta contra-indicações, o exame de ressonância magnética poderá apresentar-se como segunda opção para a avaliação do comprimento cervical.

Primary, secondary, and tertiary interventions to reduce the morbidity and mortality of preterm birth

Interventions to reduce the morbidity and mortality of preterm birth can be primary (directed to all women), secondary (aimed at eliminating or reducing existing risk), or tertiary (intended to improve outcomes for preterm infants). Most efforts so far have been tertiary interventions, such as regionalised care, and treatment with antenatal corticosteroids, tocolytic agents, and antibiotics. These measures have reduced perinatal morbidity and mortality, but the incidence of preterm birth is increasing. Advances in primary and secondary care, following strategies used for other complex health problems, such as cervical cancer, will be needed to prevent prematurity-related illness in infants and children.

Recurrent preterm birth

Recurrent preterm birth is frequently defined as two or more deliveries before 37 completed weeks of gestation. The recurrence rate varies as a function of the antecedent for preterm birth: spontaneous versus indicated. Spontaneous preterm birth is the result of either preterm labor with intact membranes or preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes. This article reviews the body of literature describing the risk of recurrence of spontaneous and indicated preterm birth. Also discussed are the factors which modify the risk for recurrent spontaneous preterm birth (a short sonographic cervical length and a positive cervicovaginal fetal fibronectin test). Patients with a history of an indicated preterm birth are at risk not only for recurrence of this subtype, but also for spontaneous preterm birth. Individuals of black origin have a higher rate of recurrent preterm birth.

Cervical length in women in preterm labor with intact membranes: relationship to intra-amniotic inflammation/microbial invasion, cervical inflammation and preterm delivery

OBJECTIVE

Intra-amniotic infection, diagnosed by microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity (MIAC) and/or the presence of intra-amniotic inflammation (IAI), is related to adverse perinatal outcome in women with preterm labor. Due to the subclinical nature of IAI, a correct diagnosis depends on amniocentesis, which is an invasive method not performed as a clinical routine. The aim of this study was to evaluate if cervical length measured by transvaginal sonography could assist in the identification of women at high risk for IAI.

METHODS

Cervical length was assessed by transvaginal sonography in 87 women with singleton pregnancies in preterm labor (<34 weeks of gestation). Cervical (n=87) and amniotic (n=55) fluids were collected. Polymerase chain reactions for Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis, and culture for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, were performed. Interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8 were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

IAI was present in 25/55 (45%) of the patients presenting with preterm labor who underwent amniocentesis. Women with IAI had a significantly shorter cervical length (median, 10 (range, 0-34) mm) than had those without IAI (median, 21 (range, 11-43) mm) (P<0.0001). Receiver-operating characteristics curve analysis showed that a cervical length (cut-off of 15 mm) predicted IAI (relative risk, 3.6; CI, 1.9-10.0) with a sensitivity of 72%, specificity of 83%, positive predictive value of 78% and negative predictive value of 78%. Cervical length was also significantly associated with preterm birth up to 7 days from sampling and at <or=34 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Cervical length assessed by transvaginal sonography predicts IAI as well as preterm birth and could thereby be a useful clinical tool in the management of patients in preterm labor.

The role of cervical cerclage in obstetric practice: can the patient who could benefit from this procedure be identified?

This editorial critically examines the definition of "cervical insufficiency." The definition, the clinical ascertainment, efforts to develop an objective method of diagnosis, as well as the nature of cervical disease leading to spontaneous mid-trimester spontaneous abortion and preterm delivery are reviewed. The value and limitations of cervical sonography as a risk assessment tool for spontaneous preterm delivery are appraised. The main focus is on the role of cervical cerclage to prevent an adverse pregnancy outcome. The value of assessing the presence or absence of endocervical inflammation in the outcome of cerclage placement is discussed.

Sonographic cervical length in singleton pregnancies with intact membranes presenting with threatened preterm labor

OBJECTIVE

Less than 10% of women presenting with preterm contractions progress to active labor and delivery. This study investigates whether cervical length measurements by ultrasound can discriminate between true and false labor in women presenting with threatened preterm labor.

METHODS

Cervical length was measured by transvaginal ultrasound in 253 women with singleton pregnancies presenting with painful uterine contractions at a median age of 31 (range, 24-35) weeks of gestation. Women presenting in active labor, defined by the presence of cervical dilatation of >or = 3 cm, those with ruptured membranes and those that underwent prior or subsequent cervical cerclage were excluded from the study. The clinical management was determined by the attending obstetrician without taking into account the cervical length. Primary outcome of the study was delivery within 7 days of presentation based on the results of randomized studies on the use of tocolytics in women with preterm labor that reported a prolongation of pregnancy by 7 days.

RESULTS

Delivery within 7 days of presentation occurred in 21/253 (8.3%) pregnancies and this was inversely related to cervical length. Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curves established a cervical length of 15 mm as the most relevant cut-off level for the prediction of preterm delivery within 7 days. In 217 cases the cervical length was > or = 15 mm and only four of these (1.8%) delivered within 7 days. In the 36 women with cervical length < 15 mm, delivery occurred in 17 (47.2%) within 7 days. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that significant independent contribution in the prediction of delivery within 7 days was provided by cervical length, contraction frequency at presentation, previous history of preterm delivery and vaginal bleeding. There was no significant contribution from gestation at presentation, ethnic origin, maternal age, parity, cigarette smoking or the administration of tocolysis, antibiotics or steroids. Similar results were shown in a subanalysis of 162 patients presenting at a gestational age below 32 weeks: 9/19 patients (47.4%) with a cervical length below 15 mm delivered within 7 days compared to 3/143 (2.1%) with a cervical length > or = 15 mm. Univariate as well as multivariate analyses confirmed cervical length to be a significant independent predictor of delivery within 7 days in this population.

CONCLUSIONS

Sonographic measurement of cervical length helps to avoid overdiagnosis of preterm labor in women with preterm contractions and intact membranes.

Preterm delivery: an overview

Preterm delivery is the leading factor causing neonatal mortality and morbidity. We have conducted a PubMed literature search to obtain an update on the etiology, diagnostic problems and therapeutic considerations of preterm delivery. Approximately 5-10% of all births are premature. Preterm labor is associated with preterm rupture of membranes, cervical incompetence, polyhydramnion, fetal and uterine anomalies, infections, social factors, stress, smoking, heavy work and other risk factors. The diagnosis is made on the patients presenting symptoms, clinical findings and of progressive effacement and dilatation of the cervix. Biochemical markers of preterm delivery are of minor importance in daily clinical work. Measurement of the cervix, however, is a practical and valuable tool to predict preterm delivery. Cervical cerclage can be useful in selected cases. Antibiotics may help to prevent preterm labor in cases of known etiologic agents (e.g. preterm rupture of membranes and urinary infection). The use of tocolytic agents such as beta-sympathetic receptor stimulators can be advocated for a few days. There is evidence that their long-term use is not beneficial and could even be harmful to the fetus. Calcium channel blockers (nifedipine) and a new selective oxytocin receptor antagonist, atosiban, appear to be as effective as beta-sympathomimetic drugs on uterine contractions with fewer side-effects. Prostaglandin synthetase inhibitors such as indomethacin may prevent uterine contractions and can be used prior to the 32nd week of pregnancy. A single course of corticosteroid treatment in two doses of 12 mg betamethasone or 6 mg of dexamethasone is important for the prevention of respiratory distress between the 24th and 34th weeks of pregnancy. Multiple doses may be harmful and should be avoided. In these cases management should depend on gestation age (fetal maturity). Uterine contractions after 34 weeks' gestation are not an indication for tocolytic treatment.

Preventing low birth weight: is prenatal care the answer?

OBJECTIVES

To review the evidence of effectiveness of prenatal care for preventing low birth weight (LBW).

METHODS

We reviewed original research, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and commentaries for evidence of effectiveness of the three core components of prenatal care--risk assessment, health promotion and medical and psychosocial interventions--for preventing the two constituents of LBW: preterm birth and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR).

RESULTS

Clinical risk assessment will fail to identify the majority of pregnancies at risk for preterm delivery or IUGR. While biophysical and biochemical modalities appear promising, their cost-effectiveness has not been demonstrated, nor can their routine use be recommended in the absence of effective interventions. Smoking cessation programs appear to be modestly effective. There is insufficient evidence to conclude a benefit for nutrition interventions, work counseling or preterm birth education. Only antenatal corticosteroid therapy has demonstrated a clear benefit in the tertiary prevention of preterm delivery. Interventions for which there is insufficient evidence to conclude a benefit include bed rest, hydration, sedation, cerclage, progesterone supplementation, antibiotic treatment, tocolysis without concomitant use of corticosteroids, thyrotropin-releasing hormone, psychosocial support and home visitation. Additionally, there is a paucity of evidence supporting the effectiveness of prenatal interventions, such as low-dose aspirin, bed rest, maternal hyperoxygenation, plasma volume expansion and antenatal fetal assessment, in preventing IUGR or its associated morbidity and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither preterm birth nor IUGR can be effectively prevented by prenatal care in its present form. Preventing LBW will require reconceptualization of prenatal care as part of a longitudinally and contextually integrated strategy to promote optimal development of women's reproductive health not only during pregnancy, but over the life course.

Reference range for cervical length in twin pregnancies

BACKGROUND

Twin pregnancies are at increased risk of preterm delivery, and cervical length measurement by transvaginal ultrasound examination has been shown to be an effective method of screening for this complication. The aim of the present study is to establish a reference range for cervical length measurement throughout gestation in twin pregnancies.

METHODS

Prospective study involving 144 nonselected twin pregnancies that delivered after 34 weeks and underwent ultrasound examination every 4 weeks for transvaginal measurement of cervical length. Mean cervical length measurements, 95% confidence intervals for the estimate and 95% prediction intervals were established throughout gestation by linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

There was a significant correlation between cervical length measurements and gestational age [cervical length (mm) = - 0.758 * gestation age (weeks) + 56.69, r=- 0.43, p < 0.0001], and mean cervical length shortened by approximately 0.8 mm per week, from 47 mm at 13 weeks to 32 mm at 32 weeks. The corresponding lower limits for the 95% prediction intervals were 29 and 15 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Cervical length shortens gradually throughout gestation in twin pregnancies.

Cervical screening for preterm delivery

The ability of sonographic cervical length screening to detect those at risk of spontaneous preterm delivery has been extensively explored over the past few years. This applies both to high-risk and low-risk groups. Cervical length measurement appears to be superior to biochemical, microbiological or hormonal methods of screening. The screening technique has been standardized, but the cervical length for intervention and the timing and nature of intervention have not been defined. Cervical cerclage appears to be of use to prevent or arrest the progress of cervical dilation in high-risk cases, but the management of the screen-positive low-risk case has yet to be determined. Future management may be stratified according to actual cervical length, and prospective randomized trials of treatment for the short cervix are needed.