Randomized study comparing omeprazole plus amoxycillin versus omeprazole plus clarithromycin for eradication of Helicobacter pylori

Current role of acid suppressants in Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy

Helicobacter pylori induces chronic active gastritis that may progress to atrophy. Serious clinical consequences are peptic ulcer disease and gastric malignancies. Today, treatment of the infection is an appropriate option and is strongly recommended in various clinical situations. Although many antibiotics are effective against H. pylori in vitro, few substances are suitable for use in vivo. This is because H. pylori lives in a unique environment in which several factors may affect the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of the anti-microbial agents. One of the most important factors is gastric acidity. This article reviews the effects of acid suppression on H. pylori and the associated gastritis, the potential mechanisms by which anti-secretory drugs such as proton pump inhibitors might enhance the activity of anti-microbials in vivo, and the results of clinical trials supporting the current view that proton pump inhibitors are a mainstay in the treatment of this infection.

Omeprazole. A review of its use in Helicobacter pylori infection, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and peptic ulcers induced by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Omeprazole is a well studied proton pump inhibitor that reduces gastric acid secretion. This review examines its use in Helicobacter pylori infection, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) with or without oesophagitis and gastrointestinal damage caused by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Optimal omeprazole regimens for anti-H. pylori therapy are those that administer the drug at a dosage of 40 mg/day (in 1 or 2 divided doses) for 7, 10 or 14 days in combination with 2 antibacterial agents. As a component of 3-drug regimens in direct comparative studies, omeprazole was at least as effective as lansoprazole, pantoprazole, bismuth compounds and ranitidine. However, a meta-analysis suggests that triple therapies with omeprazole are more effective than comparable regimens containing ranitidine, lansoprazole or bismuth. Omeprazole also appears to be successful in triple therapy regimens used in children with H. pylori infection. In patients with acute GORD with oesophagitis, omeprazole is at least as effective as lansoprazole or pantoprazole in promoting healing, and superior to ranitidine, cimetidine or cisapride in oesophagitis healing and symptom relief. Omeprazole was similar to lansoprazole and superior to ranitidine in preventing oesophagitis relapse in patients with all grades of oesophagitis, but may be superior to lansoprazole or pantoprazole in patients with more severe disease. More patients with symptomatic GORD without oesophagitis experienced symptom relief after short term treatment with omeprazole than with ranitidine, cisapride or placebo, and symptoms were more readily prevented by omeprazole than by cimetidine or placebo. Omeprazole was effective in healing and relieving symptoms of reflux oesophagitis in children with oesophagitis refractory to histamine H2 receptor antagonists. Omeprazole is superior to placebo in preventing NSAID-induced gastrointestinal damage in patients who must continue to take NSAIDs. It is also similar to misoprostol and superior to ranitidine in its ability to heal NSAID-induced peptic ulcers and erosions, and superior to misoprostol, ranitidine or placebo in its ability to prevent relapse. In long and short term studies, omeprazole was well tolerated, with diarrhoea, headache, dizziness, flatulence, abdominal pain and constipation being the most commonly reported adverse events. Usual omeprazole dosages, alone or combined with other agents, are 10 to 40 mg/day for adults and 10 to 20 mg/day for children.

CONCLUSIONS

Omeprazole is a well studied and well tolerated agent effective in adults or children as a component in regimens aimed at eradicating H. pylori infections or as monotherapy in the treatment and prophylaxis of GORD with or without oesophagitis or NSAID-induced gastrointestinal damage.

Review article: one-week clarithromycin triple therapy regimens for eradication of Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND

One-week triple therapies have been endorsed as the treatment regimens of choice for eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection. Those that include clarithromycin appear to be the most effective.

AIM

To review reports of triple therapies that include clarithromycin.

METHODS

Reports were identified from the literature to May 1998. The variation between study designs prevents a formal meta-analysis. A measure of the relative efficacies of regimens has, however, been gained by comparison and by pooling of intention-to-treat eradication rates.

RESULTS

One hundred and ninety-two studies were identified which included 264 treatment arms of a 1-week triple therapy composed of clarithromycin with amoxycillin or a nitroimidazole (metronidazole or tinidazole), and either ranitidine bismuth citrate or a proton pump inhibitor (omeprazole, lansoprazole or pantoprazole). From reports of these studies, an intention-to-treat H. pylori eradication rate could be determined from 210 treatment arms of 151 studies.

CONCLUSIONS

There is little to choose between the efficacies of 1-week clarithromycin-based triple therapy eradication regimens. However, those comprising clarithromycin, a nitroimidazole and either ranitidine bismuth citrate or a high dose of omeprazole are, in general, the most effective. Against antibiotic-resistant strains of H. pylori, regimens including ranitidine bismuth citrate may be more effective than those including a proton pump inhibitor.

Prospective evaluation of a new anti-ulcer agent, ecabet sodium, for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND

A new anti-ulcer agent, ecabet sodium, is active against Helicobacter pylori.

AIM

To assess the efficacy of ecabet sodium for the eradication of H. pylori in patients with gastroduodenal diseases.

METHODS

In a prospective, randomized and controlled study, patients infected with H. pylori were assigned to one of the following two groups: group LA, who received lansoprazole 30 mg o.d. + amoxycillin 500 mg q.d.s. after meals for 2 weeks, and group LAE, who received lansoprazole 30 mg o.d. + amoxycillin 500 mg q.d.s. + ecabet sodium 1000 mg b.d. after meals for 2 weeks. H. pylori status was determined before and at least 4 weeks after the therapy by rapid urease test, histology and a urea breath test.

RESULTS

Of 101 patients (mean age 53 years, range 17-77 years, M/F: 68/33) enrolled in the study, 97 patients completed the protocol. Four patients were withdrawn because of diarrhoea (three from group LA) and skin rash (one from group LAE). The eradication of H. pylori was achieved in 28/48 (58%) patients in group LA and 38/49 (78%) patients in group LAE. The rate of eradication of H. pylori produced by the LAE treatment was significantly higher than that produced by the LA treatment. Side-effects appeared in two patients (malaise 1, skin rash 1) in group LAE and in seven patients (diarrhoea 6, dizziness 1) in group LA. These side effects disappeared spontaneously with cessation of the treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Ecabet sodium in combination with lansoprazole and amoxycillin increased the rate of eradication of H. pylori. Ecabet sodium appeared to reduce the incidence of diarrhoea as a side-effect of the dual LA therapy.

New options in Helicobacter pylori eradication: efficacy, resistance and synergy

The eradication of Helicobacter pylori has become the focus of much attention since the first attempts at developing effective therapies some 10 years ago. This review focuses on ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC), the first new drug to be introduced for use in the eradication of H. pylori. RBC when combined with clarithromycin gives consistently high eradication rates (above 80% intention-to-treat assessment in double-blind, international studies) as a simple dual therapy for 14 days or when combined with two antibiotics as a triple therapy for 7 days. RBC enhances the in vitro killing of H. pylori by antibiotics, such as clarithromycin, metronidazole or tetracycline, in a synergistic manner. This effect is seen even when the H. pylori strains are 'resistant' to the antibiotics. Such a synergistic effect probably explains the increased efficacy of RBC-clarithromycin dual therapies compared with clarithromycin dosed with acid-suppressive agents such as H2-receptor antagonists or proton-pump inhibitors.

Clarithromycin dual therapy regimens for eradication of Helicobacter pylori: a review

BACKGROUND

Peptic ulcer disease can be cured by eradication of Helicobacter pylori during treatment to heal the ulcer. Dual therapy regimens were among the first to be granted approval for use. Reports of dual therapies including clarithromycin as the sole antibiotic are reviewed.

METHODS

Reports were identified from literature up to May 1997. Information reviewed included patient population, medical diagnosis, trial design, eradication regimens, and H. pylori eradication rates. The great diversity between studies limits formal meta-analysis but a measure of relative efficacy has been obtained by comparison of eradication rates derived by clearly defined methods and by pooling data.

RESULTS

Seventy-five reports of trials with 104 dual therapy treatment arms were reviewed. H. pylori eradication rates reported with ranitidine bismuth citrate plus clarithromycin range from 70-96% with a pooled observed rate of 85%. With omeprazole plus clarithromycin, reported eradication rates range from 27-90% with the pooled reported rate being 66%. Few data are available with either lansoprazole or ranitidine hydrochloride plus clarithromycin.

CONCLUSION

High H. pylori eradication rates derived by consistent and clearly defined methods have been seen with ranitidine bismuth citrate plus clarithromycin. Lower and more variable rates are reported with clarithromycin and either a proton pump inhibitor or a histamine H2-receptor antagonist.