The effect of nitrous oxide on the inhibition of somatosensory evoked potentials by sevoflurane in children

Intraoperative Neuromonitoring for Tethered Cord Surgery in Infants: Challenges and Outcome

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) in surgery for tethered cord in infants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 87 infants who underwent surgery for closed spinal dysraphism under IONM. Their preoperative neurological and urological statuses were compared with postoperative status clinically. The study design was prospective, and the study's duration was from January 2011 to February 2020. IONM was performed (TcMEP and direct mapping) with an Xltek Protektor 32 IOM system, Natus Neurology/medical Inc., Middleton, USA. Statistical analysis in the form of χ2 is conducted using SPSS.

RESULTS

Overall, among 87 patients, clinical improvement was seen in 28 (28/29) patients with motor deficits, 17 (17/24) with bladder deficits, and 18 (18/24) with bowel deficits. The monitorability for motor and sphincter was 97.3% and 90.7%, respectively. The sensitivity of IONM in predicting new motor deficit was 100%, whereas the specificity was 100%. The negative predictive value of predicting motor deficit was 100%, with a diagnostic accuracy of 100%. There were no complications in this cohort related to the IONM.

CONCLUSIONS

The study has highlighted that the use of IONM is sensitive in identifying motor injury in infants with reliable outcome correlation. Assessment, monitoring, and outcome correlation of bladder and sphincteric functions are a challenge in this cohort.

Consensus document for multimodal intraoperatory neurophisiological monitoring in neurosurgical procedures. Basic fundamentals

The present work aims to establish a guide to action, agreed by anaesthesiologists and neurophysiologists alike, to perform effective intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring for procedures presenting a risk of functional neurological injury, and neurosurgical procedures. The first section discusses the main techniques currently used for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. The second exposes the anaesthetic and non-anaesthetic factors that are likely to affect the electrical records of the nervous system structures. This section is followed by an analysis detailing the adverse effects associated with the most common techniques and their use. Finally, the last section describes a series of guidelines to be followed upon the various intraoperative clinical events.

[Intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring with evoked potentials]

During the last 30 years intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring (IOEM) has gained increasing importance in monitoring the function of neuronal structures and the intraoperative detection of impending new neurological deficits. The use of IOEM could reduce the incidence of postoperative neurological deficits after various surgical procedures. Motor evoked potentials (MEP) seem to be superior to other methods for many indications regarding monitoring of the central nervous system. During the application of IOEM general anesthesia should be provided by total intravenous anesthesia with propofol with an emphasis on a continuous high opioid dosage. When intraoperative MEP or electromyography guidance is planned, muscle relaxation must be either completely omitted or maintained in a titrated dose range in a steady state. The IOEM can be performed by surgeons, neurologists and neurophysiologists or increasingly more by anesthesiologists. However, to guarantee a safe application and interpretation, sufficient knowledge of the effects of the surgical procedure and pharmacological and physiological influences on the neurophysiological findings are indispensable.

Neurophysiologic intraoperative monitoring in pediatrics

Neurophysiologic intraoperative monitoring, using somatosensory, brainstem auditory, and visual evoked potentials, transcranial electric motor stimulation, and electromyography, is typically used during complex surgeries involving the motor and sensory cortex, brainstem, cranial nerves, spinal cord, nerve root, peripheral roots, brachial plexus, lumbar plexus, and peripheral nerves. The particular type of surgery and the neurologic structures at risk determine the type of monitoring chosen. Although many methods are the same in adult and pediatric patients, some differences in the pediatric population will be discussed here. In general, monitoring consists of two types. The first involves monitoring data which is obtained on an ongoing basis, with comparisons to data obtained at the outset of surgery (baseline). The second form of monitoring involves mapping neural structures, so that a neural structure in the field is identified accurately, to avoid injuring it, or to demonstrate its degree of neurophysiologic function or impairment. In this paper we discuss both forms of monitoring and their general applications, including unique features or modifications needed in the pediatric population.

Is nitrous oxide use appropriate in neurosurgical and neurologically at-risk patients?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To address controversial issues surrounding the use of nitrous oxide as a component of anesthesia in neurosurgical and neurologically at-risk patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Nitrous oxide has been used as a component of general anesthesia for over 160 years and has contributed to countless apparently uneventful anesthetics in neurologically at-risk patients. Avoidance of nitrous oxide in specific circumstances, such as pre-existing pneumocephalus, during acute venous air embolism, and in patients with disorders of folate metabolism, is warranted. However, various controversies exist regarding the use of this drug in the general neurosurgical population. Specifically, some suggest a possible association between nitrous oxide and the postoperative development of tension pneumocephalus despite lack of data to support this notion. Additionally, data describing alterations of cerebral hemodynamics and metabolism and exacerbation of ischemic neurologic injury by nitrous oxide are inconsistent. Recent data derived from humans having cerebral aneurysm clipping failed to show any long-term adverse effect from the use of nitrous oxide on gross neurologic or cognitive function.

SUMMARY

Except in a few specific circumstances, there exists no conclusive evidence to support the dogmatic avoidance of nitrous oxide in neurosurgical patients.

Comparison between Sevoflurane/Remifentanil and Propofol/Remifentanil Anaesthesia in Providing Conditions for Somatosensory Evoked Potential Monitoring during Scoliosis Corrective Surgery

Somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring is an important tool in spinal corrective surgery. Anaesthesia has a significant influence on SSEP monitoring and a technique which has the least and shortest suppressant effect on SSEP while facilitating a fast recovery from anaesthesia is ideal. We compared the effect of sevoflurane/remifentanil and propofol/remifentanil anaesthesia on SSEPs during scoliosis corrective surgery and assessed patients’ clinical recovery profiles.

Twenty patients with idiopathic scoliosis receiving surgical correction with intraoperative SSEP monitoring were prospectively randomised to receive sevoflurane/remifentanil anaesthesia or propofol/remifentanil anaesthesia. During surgery, changes in anaesthesia dose and physiological variables were recorded, while SSEP was continuously monitored. A simulated ‘wake-up’ test was performed postoperatively to assess speed and quality of recovery from anaesthesia.

The effects of propofol and sevoflurane resulted in SSEP amplitude variability between 18.0% ± 3.5% to 28.7% ± 5.9% and SSEP latency variability within 1.3% ± 0.4% to 2.6% ± 1.2%. Patients receiving sevoflurane had faster suppression and faster recovery of SSEP amplitude compared to propofol (P <0.05), although propofol anaesthesia showed less within-patient variability in Cz amplitude and latency (P <0.05). On cessation of anaesthesia, time to eye-opening (5.2 vs. 16.5 minutes) and toe movement (5.4 vs. 17.4 minutes) was shorter following sevoflurane (all P <0.05).

These findings indicate that propofol produces a better SSEP signal than sevoflurane. However, adjustments in sevoflurane concentration result in faster changes in the SSEP signal than propofol. Assessment of neurological function was facilitated more rapidly after sevoflurane anaesthesia.

Neurophysiological monitoring under anesthesia to position a child with extreme lumbar spine flexion for MRI and CT scan

A novel application of neurophysiological monitoring enabled us safely to anesthetize and position a child with severe lumbosacral spine flexion for diagnostic MRI and CT scan. We conducted a propofol-based anesthetic to optimize somatosensory (SSEP) and transcranial electric motor (tceMEP) evoked potential amplitudes, thereby facilitating dynamic neurological monitoring while fully extending the patient supine. In cases outside the operating room involving extraordinary changes in patient position, anesthesia providers may consider utilizing neurophysiological monitoring.

The effects of propofol, small-dose isoflurane, and nitrous oxide on cortical somatosensory evoked potential and bispectral index monitoring in adolescents undergoing spinal fusion

In this study we compared the effects of propofol, small-dose isoflurane, and nitrous oxide (N(2)O) on cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) and bispectral index (BIS) monitoring in adolescents undergoing spinal fusion. Twelve patients received the following anesthetic maintenance combinations in a randomly determined order: treatment #1: isoflurane 0.4% + N(2)O 70% + O(2) 30%; treatment #2: isoflurane 0.6% + N(2)O 70% + O(2) 30%; treatment #3: isoflurane 0.6% + air + O(2) 30%; treatment #4: propofol 120 microg . kg(-1) . min(-1) + air + O(2) 30%. Cortical SSEP amplitudes measured during anesthesia maintenance with treatment #3 (isoflurane 0.6%/air) were more than those measured during maintenance with treatment #1 (isoflurane 0.4%/N(2)O 70%) (P < 0.0001) and treatment #2 (isoflurane 0.6%/N(2)O 70%) (P < 0.0052). Cortical SSEP amplitudes measured during treatment #4 (propofol 120 microg . kg(-1) . min(-1)/air) were more than treatment #1 (isoflurane 0.4%/N(2)O 70%) (P < 0.0001), treatment #2 (Iso 0.6%/N(2)O 70%) (P < 0.0007), and treatment #3 (isoflurane 0.6%/air) (P < 0.0191). In addition, average BIS values measured during treatments 1, 2, 3 and 4 were 62, 62, 61, and 44 respectively. Only treatment #4 (propofol 120 microg . kg(-1) . min(-1)/air) uniformly maintained BIS values less than 60. Our study demonstrates that propofol better preserves cortical SSEP amplitude measurement and provides a deeper level of hypnosis as measured by BIS values than combinations of small-dose isoflurane/N(2)O or small-dose isoflurane alone.