A study of bispectral analysis and auditory evoked potential indices during propofol-induced hypnosis in volunteers: the effect of an episode of wakefulness on explicit and implicit memory

An integrated information theory index using multichannel EEG for evaluating various states of consciousness under anesthesia

BACKGROUND

The integrated information theory (IIT) of consciousness introduces a measure Φ to quantify consciousness in a physical system. Directly related to this, general anesthesia aims to induce reversible and safe loss of consciousness (LOC). We sought to propose an electroencephalogram (EEG)-based IIT index ΦEEG to evaluate various states of consciousness under general anesthesia.

METHODS

Based on the definition of mutual information, we estimated the ΦEEG by maximizing the integrated information under various time lags. We used the binning method to cut the nonGaussian EEG data for estimating mutual information. We tested two EEG databases collected from propofol- (n=20) and sevoflurane-induced (n=15) anesthesia, and especially, we compared the ΦEEG of drowsy (n=7) and responsive participants (n=13) under propofol anesthesia. We compared the effectiveness of ΦEEG with the estimated bispectral index (eBIS).

RESULTS

In all EEG frequency bands, we observed a negative correlation between ΦEEG and end-tidal sevoflurane concentration under sevoflurane-induced anesthesia (p<0.001,BF10>6000). Under propofol-induced anesthesia, drowsy participants in moderate sedation (6.96±0.26(mean±SD)) showed decreased alpha-band ΦEEG compared with baseline (7.40±0.53,p=0.016,BF10=3.58), no significant difference was observed for responsive participants. Oppositely, the responsive participants in moderate sedation (-5.32±0.38) showed decreased eBIS compared with baseline (-4.94±0.40,p=0.03,BF10=2.41).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings may enable monitors of the anesthetic state that can distinguish consciousness and unconsciousness rather than the changes of anesthetic concentrations. The alpha-band ΦEEG is promising for deriving the gold standard for depth of anesthesia monitoring.

The Science of Transitional States of Consciousness and Euthanasia

The science of transitional states of consciousness is reviewed. Despite intensive study, determining the subjective experience of animals during transitional states of consciousness remains inherently limited. Until better assessment tools become available, behavior-based observations, such as loss of righting reflex/loss of posture, remain among our most useful guides to the onset of unconsciousness in animals. To minimize potential animal suffering and to ensure a truly unconscious state is unambiguously achieved, a state of general anesthesia relying on gamma amino butyric acid type A agonists or N-methyl-d-aspartate antagonist agents continues to be a necessary component of the companion animal euthanasia process.

Non-instrumental clinical monitoring does not guarantee an adequate course of general anesthesia. A prospective clinical study

BACKGROUND

Clinical monitoring is the most common method of adjusting the appropriate level of general anesthesia. However, episodes of intraoperative awareness (AWR) are still reported, suggesting that clinical observations may not be sufficient in some cases. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of clinical and instrumental neuromonitoring with auditory evoked potentials (AEP) in an intraoperative analysis of the proper level of general anesthesia.

METHODS

Patients scheduled for elective surgery were randomly divided into two groups. Subjects in the first group underwent intravenous, in the second group volatile anesthesia. The adequacy of anesthesia was analyzed using clinical parameters. All the participants were instrumentally monitored with the autoregressive AEP index (AAI). After the anesthesia, patients filled out a questionnaire on possible AWR.

RESULTS

Data of 208 patients (87 in the first, and 121 in the second group) were analyzed. Before surgery there were no changes in AAI values between groups (80 vs. 78, P=0.5192). The mean values of clinical parameters changed, but five minutes after the nociceptive stimuli. The mean values of AAI at analyzed time points were specific for general anesthesia. In patients under intravenous anesthesia, we found more episodes of too low (46/608 vs.15/847, P<0.000) anesthesia. One case of AWR was found in the TIVA group.

CONCLUSIONS

AAI index is good indicator of patients' level of consciousness during general anesthesia. Standard clinical monitoring provides appropriate level of the procedure. However, it is insufficient during TIVA and does not prevent episodes of AWR.

Physiologic Measures of Animal Stress during Transitional States of Consciousness

Determination of the humaneness of methods used to produce unconsciousness in animals, whether for anesthesia, euthanasia, humane slaughter, or depopulation, relies on our ability to assess stress, pain, and consciousness within the contexts of method and application. Determining the subjective experience of animals during transitional states of consciousness, however, can be quite difficult; further, loss of consciousness with different agents or methods may occur at substantially different rates. Stress and distress may manifest behaviorally (e.g., overt escape behaviors, approach-avoidance preferences [aversion]) or physiologically (e.g., movement, vocalization, changes in electroencephalographic activity, heart rate, sympathetic nervous system [SNS] activity, hypothalamic-pituitary axis [HPA] activity), such that a one-size-fits-all approach cannot be easily applied to evaluate methods or determine specific species applications. The purpose of this review is to discuss methods of evaluating stress in animals using physiologic methods, with emphasis on the transition between the conscious and unconscious states.

Hipnose, imobilidade tônica e eletroencefalograma

OBJETIVO: Apresentar uma revisão sobre as características da atividade elétrica cerebral que acompanha a hipnose animal, estado induzido em laboratório em mamíferos por manipulações experimentais, bem como sobre as alterações encontradas no EEG durante o estado de hipnose, visando à discussão dos resultados encontrados na busca de evidências dos fundamentos filogenéticos que possam conduzir ao entendimento dos rudimentos neurais da hipnose humana. MÉTODO: Livros e bases eletrônicas de dados foram consultados. Critério de inclusão: artigos originais publicados entre 1966-2012. Critério de exclusão: artigos que se afastavam da visão eletroneurofisiológica da hipnose. RESULTADOS: Foram encontradas 662 referências, tendo sido selecionados os artigos e livros referenciados. Além desses artigos, foi incluído no estudo o artigo de Hoagland, publicado em 1928, que é um clássico na área de imobilidade tônica em vertebrados. CONCLUSÕES: O estado de hipnose humano resulta de processamentos em inúmeros circuitos paralelos distribuídos em uma complexa rede neuronal, envolvendo, dessa forma, uma ampla área do encéfalo. Na trajetória evolutiva, a grande ampliação dos recursos corticais pode ter tornado as respostas de imobilidade tônica passíveis de modulação consciente, respostas essas ainda presentes nos humanos e que se manifestam involuntariamente em situações de grande ameaça. Vários estudos têm evidenciado mecanismos neurofisiológicos capazes de reforçar a visão da hipnose não só como um eficiente recurso para procedimentos médicos e odontológicos, funcionando como auxiliar na analgesia e sedação, mas também como excelente ferramenta psicoterapêutica.

Nervus medianus evoked potentials and bispectral index during repeated transitions from consciousness to unconsciousness

BACKGROUND

We investigated the relationship between median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) and the bispectral index (BIS) during alternating periods of consciousness and propofol-induced unconsciousness.

METHODS

Loss of consciousness (LOC) was repetitively induced by bolus injections of propofol in 24 patients undergoing elective surgery in spinal anaesthesia. SSEP and the BIS were recorded during LOC and recovery of consciousness (ROC). The level of consciousness was clinically assessed by the observer's assessment of alertness/sedation scale. Propofol venous plasma concentrations were measured simultaneously.

RESULTS

At LOC, all SSEPs latency components were prolonged (P<0.001), whereas amplitudes of the components > or = 45 ms were smaller (P=0.008) and the BIS values were lower (P<0.001). None of the EEG variables regained baseline levels during ROC. Regression analyses revealed that the SSEP components (five latencies and five amplitudes) explained 33% of the variance when predicting ROC; the BIS explained 12%. The combination of SSEP and BIS explained 37% of variance in this patient sample. Propofol venous plasma concentration was 1.2 (0.8) microg ml(-1) during LOC and 0.4 (0.5) microg ml(-1) during ROC.

CONCLUSIONS

The present results indicate the usefulness of combining variables of the evoked and spontaneous EEG to measure different levels of consciousness, because the SSEP provide additional information beyond the BIS. Inter-individual variability of all the EEG variables limits their predictive potency of ROC after propofol infusion.

Incidence of and risk factors for awareness during anaesthesia

Explicit recall of events during general anaesthesia is detected by direct questioning, as patients may not report awareness spontaneously or if they are questioned non-specifically. More than one interview is needed and credibility of reports should always be verified. The overall incidence of awareness has decreased over the last 40 years and is now 0.1-0.2%. Prospective study of patients who undergo general anaesthesia is the only valid method for determining the incidence of awareness. Studies of patients recruited through referrals by colleagues or advertisements, studies of compensation claims and those carried out through quality improvement systems are inadequate. Several factors increase the risk of awareness, including light anaesthesia, some types of surgery, a history of awareness, chronic use of central nervous system depressants, younger age, obesity, inadequate or misused anaesthesia delivery systems, insufficient knowledge about awareness, and ignoring the use of electroencephalographic monitors when the risk is otherwise increased.

Correlation of the A-Line™ ARX index with acoustically evoked potential amplitude †

BACKGROUND

Automated indices derived from mid-latency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEP) have been proposed for monitoring the state of anaesthesia. The A-Line ARX index (AAI) has been implemented in the A-Line monitor (Danmeter, V1.4). Several studies have reported variable and, in awake patients, sometimes surprisingly low AAI values. The purpose of this study was to reproduce these findings under steady-state conditions and to investigate their causes.

METHODS

Ten awake unmedicated volunteers were studied under steady-state conditions. For each subject, the raw EEG and the AAI were recorded with an A-Line monitor (V1.4) during three separate sessions of 45.0 (1.6) min duration each. MATLAB (Mathworks) routines were used to derive MLAEP responses from EEG data and to calculate maximal MLAEP amplitudes.

RESULTS

The AAI values ranged from 15 to 99, while 11.4% fell below levels which, according to the manufacturer, indicate an anaesthetic depth suitable for surgery. Inter-individual and intra-individual variation was observed despite stable recording conditions. The amplitudes of the MLAEP varied from 0.8 to 42.0 microV. The MLAEP amplitude exceeded 2 microV in 75.3% of readings. The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between the MLAEP amplitude and the AAI value was r=0.89 (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The version of the A-Line monitor used in this study does not exclude contaminated MLAEP signals. Previous publications involving this version of the A-Line monitor (as opposed to the newer A-Line/2 monitor series) should be reassessed in the light of these findings. Before exclusively MLAEP-based monitors can be evaluated as suitable monitors of depth of anaesthesia, it is essential to ensure that inbuilt validity tests eliminate contaminated MLAEP signals.

Total intravenous anesthesia/target-controlled infusion and auditory-evoked potentials in day surgery mammoplasty

Total intravenous anesthesia and the new parameter for administering the most recent drugs, target-controlled infusion, as well as the introduction of new short half-life molecules that do not accumulate have made anesthesia in day surgery safer. In this study, the use of auditory-evoked potentials monitoring made it possible to determine the target plasma concentration of propofol that induces a narcosis sufficiently deep and strictly necessary for effectiveness, thus minimizing the anesthesiologic risk linked to the use and the dosing of the drug, reducing the hospitalization time, and decreasing the side effects for patients undergoing day surgery mammoplasty.

Cerebral state monitor, a new small handheld EEG monitor for determining depth of anaesthesia

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The cerebral state index (CSI) derived from a new small handheld electroencephalogram monitor was studied during routine day surgical anaesthesia titrated according to the bispectral index (BIS). The objective was to determine the degree of agreement between the two monitors.

METHODS

Anaesthesia was induced with propofol and fentanyl (0.1 mg) in 38 patients undergoing general anaesthesia for routine day-surgery. Maintenance anaesthesia (sevoflurane (20/38), desflurane (10/38) or propofol (8/38)) titrated by BIS XP (Aspect Medical, Natwick, MA, USA) and BIS and CSI (cerebral State Monitor, Danmeter; Odense, Denmark) index values were recorded every minute. No patient received muscle relaxation. Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation rating scale was used to assess level of sedation.

RESULTS

Pair-wise recordings (914) of CSI and BIS were collected. The indices showed similar pattern and decreased with increasing level of sedation, however with large ranges for each level of sedation. Median indices were similar during surgery (BIS: 50 (14-89); CSI: 51 (7-88)) and both indices increased (P 20% from BIS-index in 24% of readings, and on rare occasions CSI indices deviated >100% from the BIS reading. When BIS < 40, CSI decreased slower than BIS and with wider spreading.

CONCLUSIONS

When used for day-surgery anaesthesia without muscle relaxation, CSI and BIS show similar patterns and numerical values but with the incidence of occasionally large discrepancies between pair-wise readings. Which monitor is the more dependable remains to be established and cannot be implied from this initial explorative study.

Comparison of the EEG-based SNAP index and the Bispectral (BIS) index during sevoflurane-nitrous oxide anaesthesia

The BIS monitor (Aspect Medical Inc, Newton, USA) was the first electroencephalogram (EEG)-based monitor of the hypnotic effect reflected by a dimensionless figure ranging from 100 (awake state) to 0 (flat line EEG). Its widespread use makes it the most-studied and the best-known among same intended devices. Its algorithm processes low-frequency EEG oscillations in order to provide the Bispectral index. A BIS index ranging from 40 to 60 has been established as the proper for surgical performance. The BIS monitor permits a closer approach to the hypnotic component of anaesthesia beyond clinical signs and may reduce the probability of intraoperative awareness; therefore, it has become a recommended monitoring tool in routine practice. The SNAP monitor (Nicolet Biomedical, Madison WI, USA) is also intended for monitoring the hypnotic effect of anaesthetics, which is in turn displayed as an index ranging from 100 to 0, with 100 meaning a fully awake state and 0 meaning no brain activity. The algorithm of the SNAP monitor is featured by its additional processing of ultra-high EEG frequencies, which seem to be involved in the formation of consciousness. The use of these frequencies would theoretically improve responsiveness during increased brain activity. We studied its behaviour patterns and capability to monitor the hypnotic effect induced by sevoflurane-nitrous oxide by comparison with the BIS index. Seventy patients ASA I-III were induced with propofol, fentanyl and rocuronium, and maintained with sevoflurane-N(2)O. BIS and SNAP indices were simultaneously recorded before induction, after intubation, after incision, at the following 10, 30 and 50 minutes, awakening and extubation time points, together with heart rate and blood pressure. The Pearson correlation was R(2) = 0.68 (p < .05). The Bland and Altman test showed a bias of 14.3 for SNAP index values with respect to BIS index values. We concluded that the SNAP index correlates with variations in the hypnotic effect induced by sevoflurane-nitrous oxide anaesthesia when compared with the BIS index. In this context, a SNAP index ranging from 58 to 70 would be equivalent to the BIS index range 40 to 60 and, therefore, the accurate for surgical performance.

Changes in the auditory evoked potentials index by induction doses of four different intravenous anesthetics

BACKGROUND

Many studies have investigated the electroencephalographic changes during the induction and maintenance of anesthesia. However, no comparative studies have been performed on the effects of intravenous anesthetics on the auditory evoked potentials index (AAI). The present study was performed to compare the changes in AAI caused by induction doses of thiopental, propofol, midazolam and ketamine.

METHODS

Eighty females, aged 30-70 years, referred for mastectomy, had anesthesia induced with thiopental 4 mg/kg, propofol 2 mg/kg, midazolam 0.1 mg/kg or ketamine 1 mg/kg (each 20 patients). The response to verbal command and the AAI were measured every minute for 5 min.

RESULTS

The AAI decreased to less than 40 within 1 min with thiopental and propofol. The AAI increased after 3 min with thiopental, but remained low with propofol. The AAI gradually decreased to less than 40 within 4 min with midazolam, but was higher than the AAI with propofol or thiopental. The AAI increased significantly with ketamine. The AAIs at the loss of verbal command were 19 +/- 7 with thiopental, 21 +/- 8 with propofol, 31 +/- 10 with midazolam and 92 +/- 2 with ketamine.

CONCLUSION

The AAI correlated with changes in hypnotic level, as measured by the response to verbal command, with induction doses of thiopental, propofol and midazolam, but not with ketamine. The AAI decreased to lower levels with propofol and thiopental than with midazolam at the induction of anesthesia.

A-line autoregression index monitoring to titrate inhalational anaesthesia: effects on sevoflurane consumption, emergence time and memory

BACKGROUND

A-line autoregression index (AAI) is a parameter derived from auditory evoked potentials proposed as depth of anaesthesia monitor. We evaluated the effects of AAI guidance on sevoflurane consumption, emergence time, explicit and implicit memory.

METHODS

One hundred patients submitted to major abdominal surgery were randomized into two groups. In group A (n = 50), sevoflurane was titrated according to AAI (target = 20 +/- 5), in group B (n = 50) according to clinical signs. Anaesthesia was induced with fentanyl, propofol, atracurium and maintained with sevoflurane. The mean value of sevoflurane consumption (g/min) and emergence time has been assessed in both groups. After emergence, A test of explicit memory was administered. We assessed implicit memory using a category generation test.

RESULTS

In group A, mean sevoflurane consumption was significantly (P = 0.0001) reduced by 20.4% and mean emergence time was significantly (P = 0.00012) shorter by 2 min with respect to group B. No patients experienced explicit memory while the difference between the two groups in implicit memory results was not significant (P = 0107).

CONCLUSIONS

AAI titration of anaesthesia allows a significant reduction in sevoflurane consumption and emergence time without significant effects on the incidence of explicit and implicit memory. Nevertheless the relationship between AAI and memory requires studies in larger groups of patients.

Clinical comparison of three different anaesthetic depth monitors during cardiopulmonary bypass

The lack of a gold standard complicates the evaluation and comparison of anaesthetic depth monitors. This randomised study compares three different depth-of-anaesthesia monitors during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) at 34 degrees C with fentanyl/propofol anaesthesia adjusted clinically and blinded to the monitors. Coronary artery bypass grafting patients (n = 21) were randomly assigned to all three possible paired combinations of three monitors: Bispectral Index (Aspect Medical), AAI auditory evoked potential (Danmeter), Entropy (Datex-Ohmeda). Indices were manually recorded every 5 min during CPB. Agreement between paired indices was classified as good, non-, or disagreement. Anaesthesia was classed as adequate, inadequate, or excessive according to recommended index values. Of the 255 paired indices recorded, 62% showed good agreement, 33% showed non-agreement, and 5% showed disagreement. Using good agreement between two monitors as a gold standard, a quarter of the measurements indicate inappropriate anaesthetic depth monitoring during CPB with clinically titrated anaesthetic depth.

Comparison of Alaris AEP index and bispectral index during propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia

BACKGROUND

The Alaris AEP monitor(TM) (Alaris, UK, version 1.4) is the first commercially available auditory evoked potential (AEP) monitor designed to estimate the depth of anaesthesia. It generates an "Alaris AEP index" (AAI), which is a dimensionless number scaled from 100 (awake) to 0. This study was designed to compare AAI and BIS(TM) (Aspect, USA, version XP) values at different levels of anaesthesia.

METHODS

Adult female patients were premedicated with diazepam 0.15 mg kg(-1) orally on the morning of surgery. Electrodes for BIS and Alaris AEP monitoring and a headphone to give auditory stimuli were applied as recommended by the manufacturers. Anaesthesia was induced with remifentanil (0.4 microg kg(-1) min(-1)) and a propofol target-controlled infusion (Diprifusor(TM) TCI, AstraZeneca, Germany) to obtain a predicted concentration of initially 3.5 microg ml(-1). After loss of consciousness the patients were given 0.5 mg kg(-1) of atracurium. After tracheal intubation, remifentanil was given at 0.2 microg kg(-1) min(-1) and the propofol infusion was adjusted to obtain BIS target values of 30, 40, 50, and 60. AAI and BIS values were recorded and matched with the predicted propofol effect-site concentrations. Prediction probability was calculated for consciousness vs unconsciousness. Values are mean (SD).

RESULTS

Fifty female patients, 53 (15), range 18-78 yr, ASA I or II were studied. Mean values before induction of anaesthesia were 95 (4), range 99-82 for BIS and 85 (12), range 99-55 for AAI. With loss of eyelash reflex both values were significantly reduced to 64 (13), range 83-39 for BIS (P<0.05) and 61 (22), range 99-15 for AAI (P<0.05). The prediction probability P(K) for consciousness vs unconsciousness (i.e. loss of eyelash reflex) was better for BIS (P(K)=0.99) than for AAI (P(K)=0.79). At a BIS of 30, 40, 50, and 60 the corresponding AAI values were 15 (6), 20 (8), 28 (11), and 40 (16), and these were significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

During propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia a decrease of the depth of anaesthesia as indicated by BIS monitoring is accompanied by corresponding effects shown by the AAI. However, wide variation in the awake values and considerable overlap of AAI values between consciousness and unconsciousness, suggests further improvement of the AAI system is required.

Correlation beween AAI-index and the BIS-index during propofol hypnosis: a clinical study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the degree of linearity and correlation between the anaesthetic depth indices BIS and AAI over a wide range of hypnotic depth using propofol.

METHODS

20 ASA I patients were studied during propofol induction. Co-induction with 0.05 mg fentanyl and 30 mg propofol iv before initiation of the study. Thereafter repeated doses of propofol 0.5 mg/kg iv. every minute until BIS < 30. Loss of responsiveness to verbal command was determined by repeated loud commands to the patient. BIS (Aspect 2000 XP, BIS algorithm 4.0, system rev. 3.12, Aspect Medical Systems; Natick, MA, U.S.A.) and AAI-index (A-Line Auditory Evoked Potential Monitor, version 1.4, Danmeter A/S; Odense, Denmark) were determined simultaneously (n = 15). BIS alone without acoustical stimulation was studied in a control group (n = 5).

MAIN RESULTS

Both indices decreased with increasing dose, and there was a high correlation between the two (r2 = 0.82). The indices showed however different values and while BIS were quite linear, the AAI-index had a more on-offb ehaviour.

CONCLUSION

The AAI-index correlates with the BIS-index during propofol hypnosis in the absence of surgical stimulation. Neither the BIS-index, heart rate, nor systemic blood pressure were influenced by the acoustical stimulation from the A-line monitor. Both indices decreased in relation to increasing doses of propofol, but the AAI-index was lower both before becoming unconscious, during transition to unconsciousness, and during the deeper levels of sedation. The AAI-index lacks linearity at both very low and higher levels of propofol sedation with a nearly on-off behaviour for wakefulness vs hypnosis.

Auditory evoked potential monitoring with the AAITM-index during spinal surgery: decreased desflurane consumption

BACKGROUND

The auditory evoked potential (AEP) is sensitive to the depth of anesthesia. The A-line monitor is a novel device that processes the amplitude and latency of the AEP during the mid-latency time window to provide a simple numerical index, the AAItrade mark-index. The hypothesis of the present study was that titration of anesthetic depth (desflurane) by means of the AAItrade mark-index could decrease the consumption of the main anesthetic and shorten emergence times.

METHODS

Thirty ASA I-II patients scheduled for elective open spine surgery under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to two groups. Group I (n=15), the main anesthetic, desflurane, was titrated with a target AAItrade mark-index of 20+/-5. Group II (n=15), desflurane was titrated according to routine clinical signs, including heart rate, blood pressure, sweating and tears. No fixed MAC-multiple was sought. The primary study variable was desflurane consumption; and secondary study variables were time to extubation and orientation.

RESULTS

All patients had an uncomplicated course and no patients showed signs of awareness or had any recall postoperatively. AAItrade mark-index guidance reduced desflurane consumption by 29% and improved emergence. Time until extubation and orientation and ability to state name and date of birth was significantly shortened among AAItrade mark-index titrated patients.

CONCLUSION

Titrating depth of desflurane anesthesia using AAItrade mark-index guidance decreased main anesthetic consumption and improved emergence during spine surgery.

Sevoflurane requirements during ambulatory surgery: a clinical study with and without AEP-index guidance

BACKGROUND

Several monitors have been developed to measure anesthetic depth. The auditory evoked response uses an auditory signal to actively test the level of brain activity. The aim of the present study was to determine whether sevoflurane titration with A-line auditory guidance from the evoked potential monitor would reduce gas consumption and improve recovery times.

METHODS

Patients (n=60, aged 18-65 years) undergoing elective knee arthroscopy were randomized to titrate the main anesthetic sevoflurane with O2:N2O (1:2), either clinically (30 patients) or in combination with a target auditory evoked potential index of 30+/-5 (30 patients) using the A-line monitor (version 1.4, Danmeter A/S; Odense, Denmark). Induction was supplemented with fentanyl, and randomized to 0.05, 0.10 and 0.15 mg immediately before propofol (10 in each group). Sevoflurane consumption and emergence times were the primary and secondary study end-points.

RESULTS

Guidance from the A-line monitor did not reduce the sevoflurane consumption time or the emergence, regardless of the fentanyl dose. However, it did reduce the time from the recovery room to discharge eligibility (P<0.05). Sevoflurane consumption decreased inversely with the fentanyl dose (P<0.01), with no impact on emergence times.

CONCLUSION

The auditory evoked potential index provided by the A-line monitor does not decrease sevoflurane consumption or emergence times for ambulatory knee arthroscopy.