An evaluation of the usefulness of mycophenolate mofetil in pemphigus

Focus on pemphigus treatment publications: A bibliometric and visual analysis (1992-2022)

Pemphigus is a chronic recurrent disease in dermatology. Although it is not very common, its treatment has been an increasing concern in recent years because it is difficult and long-lasting. At present, there are many papers on pemphigus treatment, and to better understand the research trends and research frontiers of pemphigus treatment, it is necessary to conduct a comprehensive systematic review and analysis. We combined bibliometric and visualization methods to analyze 1365 papers published in the Web of Science database from 1992 to 2022, including basic information about countries, institutions and authors, to gain a general understanding of the treatment of pemphigus. Among them, the United States is the country with the most output, Iran's Tehran University of Medical Sciences is the institution with the most published works, and Ahmed, A. Razzaque of Tufts University is the most influential scholar. In addition, we also learned about the research hotspots and frontiers of pemphigus treatment through a series of analyses on the frequency, clustering, keywords bursts and cited literature, and we briefly reviewed the highly cited literature. We found that the current research focuses in the study of pemphigus treatment are the types, pathogenesis, and treatment of pemphigus, including glucocorticoids, immunosuppressants and many other major treatment methods. Hailey-Hailey disease, genetic susceptibility, and traditional Chinese medicine are potential research hotspots. Rituximab is a research frontier. In conclusion, we hope to provide new research ideas for promoting the development of pemphigus treatment.

Treatment of pemphigus vulgaris: part 1 - current therapies

Introduction: While biologic agents that can be used for treating pemphigus vulgaris (PV) are increasing, themajority of the world's PV patients can afford only corticosteroids (CS) and some immunosuppressive agents (ISA). Areas covered: The spectrum of side effects encountered when PV patients receive high-dose, long-term CS and ISA are presented based on total dose and duration of therapy. The steroid-sparing effect of individual ISA as documented in published studies and their clinical outcomes, in terms of duration of remissions, frequency of relapses and time to relapse, are presented, so that comparisons are possible. Thus, rational choices can be made for the individual patient. Expert opinion: In 2019, the majority of PV patients globally will continue to be treated with CS and ISA. This review will help clinicians and patients become aware of when to anticipate which side effects and if possible, to prevent or avoid them. It provides guidelines to maximize the clinical benefits of ISA in inducing and maintaining remission and minimizing side effects by monitoring them.

Pemphigus vulgaris disease activity: The role of antibodies to desmogleins and their isotype

BACKGROUND

Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is an autoimmune blistering disease driven by pathogenic antibodies to desmoglein-1 and -3, levels of which correlate with disease activity. Anti-desmoglein-3 IgG4 isotype antibodies are said to predominate in active disease and anti-desmoglein-3 IgG1 in remission; however, these observations arose from vertical studies, with limited assessments of clinical activity. The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between desmoglein autoantibodies, subdivided by isotype and disease activity using the validated PV activity tool "Pemphigus Disease Area Index (PDAI)."

METHODS

Forty PV patients with predominantly mucosal disease were studied prospectively, 24 serially, and PDAI and anti-desmoglein antibodies recorded at each visit over a period of up to 15 months.

RESULTS

At enrolment, only anti-desmoglein-3 IgG4 levels were significantly associated with disease activity but the correlation was weak. During follow-up, within-patient changes in disease activity correlated with changes in anti-desmoglein-3 IgG levels, but correlations were similar for both anti-desmoglein-3 IgG1 and IgG4. These trends were not observed in anti-desmoglein-1 IgG levels, although the majority of patients were negative at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-desmoglein-3 IgG4 levels correlated only weakly with PDAI scores at a single time point. Reciprocity of IgG1 vs IgG4 anti-desmoglein-3 with changes in disease activity over time could not be confirmed, but rather, changes in levels of anti-desmoglein-3 IgG, irrespective of isotype, were useful in following individual patient responses.

Spectrum of orocutaneous disease associations: Immune-mediated conditions

There are a number of diseases that manifest both on the skin and the oral mucosa, and therefore the importance for dermatologists in clinical practice to be aware of these associations is paramount. In the following continuing medical education series, we outline orocutaneous disease associations with both immunologic and inflammatory etiologies.

Practical Management of Immunosuppressants in Dermatology

The treatment of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases is challenging because of their frequency and complexity. Treatment of these diseases is based on the suppression of the patient's immune system using corticosteroids, corticosteroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents, and biologic drugs, making an understanding of the management of immunosuppressive therapy essential. Before an immunosuppressive agent is prescribed, a study must be carried out to identify contraindications, detect latent infections, and determine the most appropriate dose. During treatment, regular monitoring is required to detect adverse effects. The clinician must be familiar with the time lag between start of treatment and onset of the immunosuppressive effect as well as the maximum recommended duration of treatment and cumulative dose for each drug. As dermatologists we are accustomed to using these immunosuppressive agents, but we should have a good knowledge of the guidelines for their use and the monitoring required in each case if we are to reduce variability and avoid potentially serious adverse effects.

Mycophenolate mofetil and skin diseases

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunosuppressive drug the efficiency of which has been established in renal transplantation. Recent studies suggest that it may also be effective in the treatment of variant skin diseases especially if the skin lesions are triggered by lymphocytes. Studies have shown efficacy in autoimmune bullous dermatoses, atopic dermatitis and psoriasis. However, there are no placebo-controlled trials that support the use of MMF as first line therapy in these skin diseases.

Mycophenolate mofetil and skin diseases

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunosuppressive drug the efficiency of which has been established in renal transplantation. Recent studies suggest that it may also be effective in the treatment of variant skin diseases especially if the skin lesions are triggered by lymphocytes. Studies have shown efficacy in autoimmune bullous dermatoses, atopic dermatitis and psoriasis. However, there are no placebo-controlled trials that support the use of MMF as first line therapy in these skin diseases.

Management of Pemphigus Vulgaris

INTRODUCTION

Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is a chronic, autoimmune, vesiculobullous disease. As a result of the relative rarity of PV, published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are limited, which makes it difficult to evaluate the efficacy of different treatment regimens in this disease. This also precludes conduct of a meta-analysis.

METHODS

English-language publications describing treatment outcomes of patients with PV were identified by searches of electronic databases through May 2015, and additionally by review of the bibliography of these publications. A total of 89 papers, which included 21 case reports, 47 case series, 8 RCTs, and 13 observational studies, were identified. The findings from these publications, including information on disease course and prognosis, medications used, treatment responses, and side effects, are summarized in the tables and text of this review.

RESULTS

Prior to availability of corticosteroid therapy, PV had a high fatality rate. Early publications from the 1970s reported high-dose, prolonged corticosteroid use and significant associated side effects. Later reports described use of corticosteroids along with steroid-sparing adjuvants, which allows a reduction in the total dose of corticosteroids and a reduction in observed mortality and morbidity. For the majority of patients in these reports, a long-term course on medications lasting about 5-10 years was observed; however, subgroups of patients requiring shorter courses or needing longer-term therapy have also been described. Early diagnosis of PV and early initiation of treatment were prognostic factors. In recent publications, commonly used initial regimens include corticosteroids in combination with mycophenolate or azathioprine; whereas, for patients with inadequate response to these regimens, adjuvants such as intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) or rituximab are used.

CONCLUSION

The review findings emphasize the importance of early diagnosis, early initiation of treatment, and use of steroid-sparing adjuvants to allow a reduced total dose and duration on corticosteroids. Also highlighted is the need for more RCTs.

Management of pemphigus vulgaris: challenges and solutions

The main objective in the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris is to control the disease, prevent relapses, and avoid adverse events associated with the prolonged use of steroids and immunosuppressive agents. Systemic corticosteroids remain the gold standard treatment for pemphigus vulgaris. Azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil are the first line of steroid-sparing treatment. Rituximab is extremely effective in recalcitrant pemphigus, when other treatments fail to control the disease. The European Dermatology Forum recommends tapering prednisolone by 25% every 2 weeks after the consolidation phase, and a 5 mg reduction every 4 weeks when the dose is reduced to <20 mg. If the patient relapses, options include increasing steroids back to the previous dose, adding an immunosuppressant if using steroid monotherapy, or replacing a first-line immunosuppressant by another if already on combination therapy.

Refractory pemphigus vulgaris treated with rituximab and mycophenolate mofetil

The main treatment for pemphigus vulgaris are systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents, but due to adverse reactions and therapeutic failure, new drugs such as rituximab and mycophenolate mofetil have been used. In this case report are described two cases of severe pemphigus vulgaris refractory to various treatments, with resolution after use of rituximab and mycophenolate mofetil, associated with corticosteroids. A higher-than-usual dose of rituximab was employed, without the occurrence of serious adverse reactions. Mycophenolate mofetil was added as adjunctive therapy due to lack of response to azathioprine.

Mycophenolate Mofetil as an Adjuvant Therapy for Classic and Endemic Pemphigus Foliaceus

Pemphigus foliaceus is an autoimmune cutaneous disease with subcorneal acantholysis and pathogenic IgG4 autoantibodies directed against desmoglein 1. We present our experience with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in the treatment of one case of endemic pemphigus foliaceus (fogo selvagem) and two cases of the classic form. All patients had severe, refractory disease and developed marked adverse effects due to long-term corticosteroid therapy. MMF proved to be an effective corticosteroid-sparing agent at doses varying from 35 to 45 mg/kg/d. It was well tolerated, and we found no significant adverse effects from this drug.

Mycophenolate mofetil and enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus

What is known and objective: Pemphigus is a severe, potentially life-threatening autoimmune blistering disease. The use of corticosteroids has dramatically improved the prognosis and changed its course. However, current morbidity of pemphigus is largely iatrogenic, caused by side effects of the long-term, high-dose corticosteroid therapy that is necessary to sustain disease control. In order to minimize side effects, a range of corticosteroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents have been introduced, including mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS). A systematic review was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of MMF and EC-MPS in the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus.

METHODS

A retrospective literature search was conducted through multiple electronic databases (PubMed, Medline, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews) for reports on the use of mycophenolic acid (MPA) in the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies with a total of 239 patients have evaluated the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliac;eus with MPA. The majority of patients had refractory disease treated with corticosteroids as monotherapy or associated to adjuvant agents.

DISCUSSION

The results of this review suggest that MPA, as MMF or EC-MPS, may be a promising adjuvant or alternative therapy for the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus. It appears safe, at least in the medium term and its adverse events seem to be dose dependent.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

The use of mycophenolate is first-line adjuvant therapy in the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus.

Therapeutic effect of mizoribine on pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus

We evaluated the effectiveness of mizoribine, a newly developed immunosuppressive agent, as an adjuvant therapy in the treatment of both pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus. Eleven pemphigus patients (eight pemphigus vulgaris and three pemphigus foliaceus) received the combination therapy of prednisolone and mizoribine. Complete remission was observed in three of the eight patients with pemphigus vulgaris and in one of the three patients with pemphigus foliaceus. The four patients with complete remission had a rapid clinical response and achieved remission at a median of 11.8 months. Partial remission was achieved in two of the three patients with pemphigus foliaceus. The median time to achieve partial remission was 16.0 months. Six (55.6%) of the 11 patients with pemphigus had complete or partial remission and were able to taper their prednisolone. The cumulative probability of having a complete remission was 64.3% at 19 months of follow-up using Kaplan-Meier analysis. The effectiveness of the additional mizoribine therapy could be attributed to its corticosteroid-sparing properties as well as its immunosuppressive effects. The serum concentration titer of mizoribine was around 1.0 μg/mL 2 hours after administration. Patients who were not improved by the additional mizoribine might require a continuously higher dose of mizoribine to achieve effective therapy.

Alopecia as a rare but distinct manifestation of pemphigus vulgaris

BACKGROUND

Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) patients may develop scalp erosions, however, the development of alopecia has been reported to be extremely rare.

OBJECTIVE

To delineate the clinicopathological features of alopecia in PV and provide insight into the pathogenesis of this rarely observed manifestation.

METHODS

A retrospective case note review was performed on five PV patients presenting with progressive hair loss and alopecic patches. Data were collected on demographics and clinical findings. Results for hair pull tests, direct immunofluorescence study of plucked hairs, established laboratory tests to detect anti-desmoglein 1 and 3 autoantibodies and scalp swab culture were recorded. A combination of vertical and horizontal sectioning technique enabled detailed histopathological analysis of alopecic patches. Clinical course was monitored.

RESULTS

Anagen hair follicles with the outer root sheath structure were easily pulled from perilesional scalp, with intercellular IgG deposition on the outer root sheath keratinocytes. Acantholysis between outer root sheath keratinocytes extending from the infundibulum to suprabalbar level was evident in anagen hair follicles of affected lesions. Perifollicular cell infiltration was observed in the lesions where scalp swabs detected micro-organisms. The bulge stem cell area was mostly intact. Alopecia was non-scarring and following 4 weeks of therapy hair re-growth was seen in all patients.

CONCLUSION

In PV, the combination of anti-desmoglein autoantibody-mediated acantholysis in conjunction with secondary factors, such as inflammatory changes due to infection, may cause weakening of hair follicle anchorage resulting in hair loss and alopecic patches. This unusual clinical phenotype should alert physicians to PV as a potential diagnosis.

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of mycophenolate mofetil for pemphigus

INTRODUCTION

Pemphigus is an autoimmune blistering disease of the skin and mucous membranes characterized by the development of autoantibodies against the desmosomal proteins, desmoglein-1 and -3. Before the advent of corticosteroids, therapy was almost fatal. The introduction of high-dose corticosteroid therapy has reduced mortality rates to ∼ 10%, but long-term use of steroids can lead to side effects, many of which are severe and associated with significant morbidity. Thus, the major goal of pemphigus therapy has been to reduce the patient's cumulative exposure to systemic corticosteroids. Over the last 2 decades, a range of corticosteroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents have been described, but these therapies are not without potentially serious complications. Despite the range of treatment options, a proportion of patients do not achieve remission, while others show an initial treatment response but remain poorly controlled. The recent availability of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), originally developed for preventing allograft rejection, appears to be effective in autoimmune blistering diseases in combination with systemic corticosteroid or as a monotherapy.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to provide an extensive overview of the literature on the clinical pharmacokinetics of MMF in pemphigus treatment and a brief summary of current pharmacodynamic information. After completing this learning activity, readers should be able to summarize the pharmacology of MMF as an immunosuppressant; recognize its potential role in the treatment of pemphigus, including general dosing guidelines and laboratory monitoring schedules, use in patient populations and potential adverse effects; and identify future considerations and developing areas of research regarding the use of mycophenolic acid in the treatment of autoimmune blistering diseases.

EXPERT OPINION

Current morbidity of pemphigus is largely iatrogenic, caused by side effects of the long-term, high-dose corticosteroid therapy that is necessary to sustain disease control. MMF demonstrates complex pharmacokinetics and displays large between-subject pharmacokinetic variability. Experience with MMF has demonstrated long-term safety and tolerability in the treatment of pemphigus.

Association Between Cancer and Immunosuppressive Therapy—Analysis of Selected Studies in Pemphigus and Pemphigoid

Objective:

To determine whether there is an association between the use of immunosuppressive agents (ISAs) and cancer in patients with pemphigus and pemphigoid—rare, potentially fatal diseases of the skin and mucous membranes, often requiring long-term use of ISAs.

Data Source:

Literature was accessed through PubMed (all years available), using the search terms cancer, immunosuppressive agents, pemphigoid, and pemphigus.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

A retrospective review of the literature was conducted. Inclusion criteria for studies were: (1) English language, (2) diagnosis of pemphigus and/or pemphigoid based on histology and immunopathology, (3) more than 10 patients evaluated, (4) investigators had a high index of suspicion of cancer and patients were monitored for it, (5) follow-up information was provided for at least 1 year after initiation of therapy, and (6) absence of diagnosis of cancer before initiation of an ISA. Case reports were not included in the analysis.

Data Synthesis:

A total of 929 patients diagnosed with either pemphigus or pemphigoid in 17 studies were identified. Patients were divided into 2 groups. Group A comprised patients treated with azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporins, or mycophenolate mofetil in combination with prednisone. In Group A. 22 cases of cancer were reported in 21 of the 218 patients (9.6%). Group B comprised patients treated with systemic corticosteroids only. In this group, cancer was reported in 11 of the 711 patients (1.5%). In this study there was no control group (untreated patients) and the sample sizes were small.

Conclusions:

Preliminary data suggest a possible association between the use of azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, and cyclosporine and increased susceptibility to cancer in patients with pemphigus and pemphigoid.

Treatment of refractory blistering autoimmune diseases with mycophenolic acid

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppressive drugs are used as steroid-sparing agents in the management of blistering autoimmune diseases. Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is a relatively new adjuvant drug that selectively inhibits T and B lymphocyte proliferation by suppressing de novo purine synthesis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of MPA in refractory blistering autoimmune diseases and the safety profile of a recent formulation, enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS), in comparison with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twelve patients with various bullous dermatoses (three pemphigus vulgaris, one pemphigus herpetiformis, three bullous pemphigoid (BP), two cicatricial pemphigoid (CP) and three epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA)) were enrolled in the study. In 10 cases, MPA was administered in combination with systemic corticosteroids, while in two patients with severe diabetes mellitus MPA was employed as monotherapy. The total time on MPA varied from 2 to 8 months. Four patients were given MMF (2,000 mg daily), seven received EC-MPS (1,440 mg daily) and one received both sequentially.

RESULTS

Complete remission, lasting for a mean time of 6.1 months, was achieved in 10 patients. Partial remission was obtained in two patients with disseminated CP and EBA. Both MMF and EC-MPS were well tolerated, but the latter was better in terms of gastrointestinal adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

MPA may be proposed as a first-line adjuvant agent for pemphigus as well as for refractory BP and CP. MPA monotherapy has to be considered in selected cases of BP and pemphigus. The highly promising results obtained in EBA suggest a future key role for MPA in the management of this disease.

Oral mucosal disease: Pemphigus

Pemphigus defines a group of rare mucocutaneous autoimmune diseases of which pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is the most common. The aetiology and pathogenesis of PV are not completely clear, but there is a fairly strong genetic background: ethnic groups such as Ashkenazi Jews and people of Mediterranean and Indian origin are particularly susceptible and there is a link to HLA class II alleles. The initiating event in PV is not clear, but circulating IgG autoantibodies develop, directed particularly against the intercellular cadherin desmoglein 3 (Dsg3) in desmosomes of stratified squamous epithelium. Oral lesions often herald the disease and are initially vesiculobullous, but they rupture readily to leave ulcers. Involvement of other mucosa and skin is almost inevitable and PV is potentially life threatening. The diagnosis is confirmed by biopsy with histological examination and immunostaining. Management is largely by systemic immunosuppression with corticosteroids, usually azathioprine or other agents, but newer treatments with potentially fewer adverse effects look promising.

Multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of dapsone as a glucocorticoid-sparing agent in maintenance-phase pemphigus vulgaris

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy of dapsone as a glucocorticoid-sparing agent in maintenance-phase pemphigus vulgaris (PV).

DESIGN

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with a crossover arm for those who failed treatment.

SETTING

A US multicenter outpatient study. Patients A total of 19 subjects enrolled among 5 centers, 9 randomized to receive dapsone and 10 to receive placebo. Inclusion criteria were biopsy and direct immunofluorescence-proven PV controlled with glucocorticoids and/or cytotoxic agents, disease in maintenance phase, and aged 18 to 80 years. Physicians had tried at least 2 tapers of glucocorticoids unsuccessfully and had 30 days of stable steroid dosage. Treatment for any patient unable to taper glucocorticoids by more than 25% within 4 months was declared a failure, and the patient was allowed to switch to the opposite medication while maintaining the double-blind. Main Outcome Measure The ability of patients to taper to 7.5 mg/d or less within 1 year of reaching the maximum dosage of the study drug.

RESULTS

Of the 9 patients receiving dapsone, 5 were successfully treated, 3 failed treatment, and 1 dropped out of the study. Of the 10 patients receiving placebo, 3 were successfully treated, and 7 failed treatment. This primary end point favored the dapsone-treated group but was not statistically significant (P = .37). Four patients who failed treatment while receiving placebo were switched to treatment with dapsone. Of these, 3 were successfully treated after switching to dapsone treatment, and 1 failed treatment. We found that, overall, 8 of 11 patients (73%) receiving dapsone vs 3 of 10 (30%) receiving placebo reached the primary outcome of a prednisone dosage of 7.5 mg/d or less.

CONCLUSION

This trial demonstrates a trend to efficacy of dapsone as a steroid-sparing drug in maintenance-phase PV.

Randomized controlled open-label trial of four treatment regimens for pemphigus vulgaris

BACKGROUND

Pemphigus is a severe autoimmune blistering disease affecting the skin and mucosa. Mortality is high in the absence of treatment. Nowadays, treatment is based mainly on corticosteroids and cytotoxic drugs; however, because of the rarity of the disease worldwide, there is not yet a standard treatment based on randomized controlled trials, and the treatment used is based mainly on the experience of experts.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of 4 treatment regimens for pemphigus vulgaris: prednisolone alone, prednisolone plus azathioprine, prednisolone plus mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone plus intravenous cyclophosphamide pulse therapy.

METHODS

One hundred twenty new cases of pemphigus vulgaris were enrolled. These patients were randomly allocated into 1 of 4 treatment groups (each comprising 30 patients) and received prednisolone (P), prednisolone and azathioprine (P/A), prednisolone and mycophenolate mofetil (P/MM), and prednisolone and intravenous cyclophosphamide pulse therapy (P/PC). They were followed up for 1 year at the Pemphigus Research Unit.

RESULTS

In groups P, P/A, P/MM, and P/PC, 23 (76.5%), 24 (80%), 21 (70%), and 22 (73.3%) of the patients, respectively, followed the regimen for the full 1-year period. The mean total dose of prednisolone administered in groups P, P/A, P/MM, and P/PC was 11631 mg (standard deviation [SD] = 7742), 7712 mg (SD = 955), 9798 mg (SD = 3995), and 8276 mg (SD = 810), respectively. The mean total dose of prednisolone in group P (prednisolone alone) was 11,631 mg, The mean total dose of prednisolone in the 3 cytotoxic groups was 8652 mg. By using analysis of variance, the difference was statistically significant (P = .047). In the cytotoxic groups, there was a significant difference between the P/A and P/MM groups (P = .007), but not between P/A and P/PC (P = .971), and P/MM and P/PC (P = .670). Side effects were not significantly different among the 4 groups.

LIMITATIONS

Larger sample sizes and blind design are suggested for future studies.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of prednisolone is enhanced when it is combined with a cytotoxic drug. The most efficacious cytotoxic drug to reduce steroid was found to be azathioprine, followed by cyclophosphamide (pulse therapy), and mycophenolate mofetil.

Gold: an old drug still working in refractory pemphigus

BACKGROUND

The mainstay of treatment for pemphigus is systemic corticosteroids. Different adjuvants have been used to reduce side-effects of long-term corticotherapy. Gold is an anti-inflammatory drug used in autoimmune diseases, whose use has waned with the advent of new immunosuppressive agents.

OBJECTIVE

To study the outcome of the use of intramuscular gold treatment of pemphigus vulgaris refractory to previous therapies.

METHODS

Thirteen patients with pemphigus vulgaris who had failed to respond to several prior therapies were treated with aurothiomalate, as a steroid-sparing agent. Patients were monitored to assess disease activity and gold toxicity.

RESULTS

Seven patients achieved complete remission. Four patients were able to taper prednisone doses, although pemphigus flared when prednisone was discontinued or reduced. Toxicity was observed in the other two patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In 53.4% of the patients, the use of chrysotherapy resulted in the complete clearing of the disease, discontinuation of all systemic therapies and induced a long-term clinical remission. Prednisone doses were able to be reduced in the remaining 46.6%. Any side-effects were reversible with drug discontinuation. Gold therapy showed efficacy as a secondary line treatment in refractory pemphigus vulgaris.

Pemphigus: a treatment update

Pemphigus is a group of rare autoimmune mucocutaneous bullous diseases with potential significant morbidity and mortality. The two main subtypes are pemphigus vulgaris (PV) and pemphigus foliaceus (PF). Systemic corticosteroid use and other advances in management have dramatically decreased the mortality rate for pemphigus. At present, the primary cause of morbidity and mortality is complications from treatment. Thus, the goal of pemphigus management is to induce and maintain remission with the lowest possible doses of medication and with the fewest side effects. Although our scientific knowledge of pemphigus is advancing and our treatment options are expanding, there are still very few randomized, controlled studies to evaluate the true effectiveness of the available therapies. Here we review the available treatment options and novel therapies for pemphigus and the supporting data.