Fetal RHD genotyping in maternal serum during the first trimester of pregnancy

Confirmed non-invasive prenatal testing for foetal Rh blood group genotyping along with bi-allelic short insertion/deletion polymorphisms as a positive internal control

BACKGROUND

Determination of foetus rhesus blood group at risk of hemolytic disease has potential application for early non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). There are several challenges in developing NIPT rhesus blood group genotyping assays by using cell-free foetal DNA (cff-DNA) in plasma of RhD-negative pregnant women. So, the aim of this study was optimization of Real-time PCR assay for NIPT rhesus genotyping and development of Bi-allelic short insertion/deletion polymorphisms (INDELs) as internal control to optimise and validate rhesus genotyping based on Real-time PCR to avoid false or negative results.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

NIPT Rhesus genotyping including RHD (exon 7), RHCc, and RHEe genes were performed by TaqMan Real-time PCR on 104 maternal samples at different gestation ages (12 to ≥40 weeks) from 51 alloimmunized pregnant women. The sensitivity protocol was confirmed with standard DNA samples. Eight selected INDELs were designed and used to detectable cff-DNA in maternal plasma. INDELs frequency and inheritance were determined on 6 family and 61 unrelated individuals. Finally, multiplex Real-time PCR was performed for each sample with INDELs pairs and Rh probes.

RESULTS

The results showed 100% accuracy rhesus typing for RHD, RHC and RHE assays and 95.7% accuracy for RHc. Also, eight selected INDELs as internal control for NIPT were 100% concordance for typed samples.

CONCLUSION

The Real-time PCR assay is a suitable method with high sensitivity and specificity for rhesus typing as NIPT for prediction of hemolytic disease in foetuses. The INDELs described here are suitable internal control for confirmation of NIPT on cff-DNA.

Non-invasive prenatal rhesus D genotyping using cell-free foetal DNA

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES

Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) of rhesus D (RHD) genotype using cell-free foetal DNA is extensively used in many developed countries. Studies on NIPD from India are scarce. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the performance of non-invasive foetal RHD genotyping by targeting exon 10 of the RHD gene using cell-free DNA.

METHODS

DNA was extracted from the maternal plasma of alloimmunized and non-alloimmunized women between 7 and 34 wk of gestation. RHD sequence was determined by quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Results were compared with RhD phenotype obtained from cord blood samples of neonates.

RESULTS

A total of 135 samples from RhD-negative pregnant women were collected. The foetal RHD status was conclusive in all 135 (100%) cases. The highest number of cases reported for RHD genotyping were from Punjab (38.5%) followed by Haryana (24.4%), Himachal Pradesh (17.0%) and Chandigarh Union Territory (13.3%). The non-invasive test correctly predicted the foetal RhD phenotype in 133 of 135 cases, making the accuracy of the test as 98.51 per cent [95% confidence interval (CI): 97.90-99.50%]. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the test were 99.18 per cent (95% CI: 95.52-99.98%) and 92.31 per cent (95% CI: 63.97-99.81%), respectively, with negative and positive predictive values of 99.80 per cent (95% CI: 94.85-99.87%) and 96.31 per cent (95% CI: 62.87-98.84%), respectively.

INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS

Non-invasive foetal RHD determination by single-exon quantitative PCR exhibited high accuracy and could be used in routine clinical practice after confirmatory studies are done.

Diagnostic accuracy of fetal rhesus D genotyping using cell-free fetal DNA during the first trimester of pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Rhesus D genotyping with cell-free fetal DNA currently is used throughout the world. Although this technique has spread rapidly, its optimal use is still a matter of debate. This screening test has been introduced mainly for the treatment of RhD-negative pregnant women during the third trimester of pregnancy, thereby avoiding systematic anti-D prophylaxis, yet such a strategy has proved cost-ineffective. Publications reporting on fetal RHD genotyping with cell-free DNA in maternal plasma, specifically during the first trimester of pregnancy, are scarce in the scientific literature.

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to assess the performance of noninvasive fetal Rhesus D genotyping in the first trimester of pregnancy with a single-exon real-time polymerase chain reaction assay.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective observational multicenter study. Cell-free fetal DNA was extracted from maternal blood of both nonimmunized and immunized women at 10-14 weeks of gestation. RHD sequence was determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction, with amplification of exon 10. Results were compared with RhD phenotype data that were obtained by cord blood sampling of neonates.

RESULTS

In total, 416 serum samples from RhD-negative pregnant women were collected during the first trimester of pregnancy. The test's overall sensitivity and specificity were 100% (95% confidence interval, 96.9-100.0) and 95.2% (95% confidence interval, 90.5-97.6), respectively. The negative and positive predictive values were 99.8% (95% confidence interval, 94.9-100.0) and 97.1% (95% confidence interval, 94.2-98.6), respectively. Fetal RHD status was inconclusive in 9 cases (2.2%).

CONCLUSION

Noninvasive fetal RHD determination by single-exon quantitative polymerase chain reaction during the first trimester of pregnancy exhibits high accuracy.

[Analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal blood for detection of fetal trisomy 21 in high-risk population: Couples acceptance and grounds for refusal]

OBJECTIVES

To assess the determinants associated with the use of analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal blood for detection of trisomy 21 in high-risk women.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prospective study conducted in a single center between July 15, 2014 and December 15, 2014 on 99 consecutive women with increased risk of trisomy 21 above 1/250.

RESULTS

Analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal blood for detection of fetal trisomy 21 was proposed to 95 women out of 99, among them, 43 women (45.3%) required the test. Among these 43 women, 17 (38.6%) had a higher socio-economic status versus 10 (19.2%) among the women who did not request the test (P=0.03). The most common reason given by the 52 women who did not request the analysis of cell-free DNA was the cost, for 30 of them (57.7%), then because the test was not providing certainty for the diagnostic of trisomy 21 for 23 women (44.2%).

CONCLUSION

Analysis of cell-free DNA on maternal blood for detection of trisomy 21 does not seem accepted by the majority of women. The cost is probably the main reason for not using this test, but it seems that the lack of diagnostic certainty is also an obstacle for some women.

The Most Favourable Procedure for the Isolation of Cell-Free DNA from the Plasma of Iso-Immunized RHD-Negative Pregnant Women

BACKGROUND

The ability to achieve quality recovery of cell-free foetal DNA is important for making non-invasive prenatal diagnoses. In this study, we performed quantitative and qualitative analyses of isolated DNA from maternal plasma, using different DNA-isolation methods.

METHOD

DNA was isolated from 30 iso-immunized women via the QIAamp column-based method, using four different elution volumes and two conventionally based methods. Real-time polymerase chain-reaction quantification of RHD and β-globin genes was performed in order to determine foetal-specific sequences and total genome equivalents, respectively.

RESULTS

The column-based method at a 3 μl elution volume yielded the highest quality and quantity of total DNA (67.0±0.6 ng/μL). At a 3 μl elution volume, the β-globin and RHD-gene sequences were estimated to be the highest among all isolation procedures, with 2778.13±1.5 and 66.9±0.6 GEq/mL, respectively, and a 100% sensitivity for RHD-gene sequence detection. Among the two conventional manual methods, the boiling lysis method yielded a higher DNA concentration (53.8±0.8 ng/μL) and purity (1.73±0.05). In addition, the method's sensitivity for foetal-detection sequences was only 80%, whereas the salting-out method's sensitivity was just 70%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the theory that the QIAamp method is a specific and sensitive approach for purifying and quantifying plasma DNA, when used in the minimum elution volume.

Non-Invasive Prenatal RHD Genotyping Using Cell-Free Fetal DNA from Maternal Plasma: An Italian Experience

BACKGROUND

This study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of a non-invasive approach to fetal RHD genotyping using cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma and a combination of methodological strategies.

METHODS

Real-time PCR (qPCR) was performed on 216 RhD-negative women between weeks 10+0 and 14+6 of gestation (1st qPCR). qPCR was repeated (2nd qPCR) to increase the amount of each sample for analysis, on 95 plasma aliquots that were available from first trimester blood collection (group 1) and on 13 samples that were collected between weeks 18+0 and 25+6 of gestation (group 2). qPCR was specific for exons 5 and 7 of the RHD gene (RHD5 and RHD7). The results were interpreted according to the number of positive replicates of both exons.

RESULTS

1st qPCR: diagnostic accuracy was of 93.3%. Diagnostic accuracy increased from 90.5% (1st qPCR) to 93.7% (2nd qPCR) in group 1 and from 84.6% (1st qPCR) to 92.3% (2nd qPCR) in group 2. These increments were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Our approach to RHD genotyping in early pregnancy yielded high diagnostic accuracy. Increasing the amount of DNA analyzed in each sample did not improve significantly the diagnostic accuracy of the test.

Clinical application of midtrimester non-invasive fetal RHD genotyping and identification of RHD variants in a mixed-ethnic population

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the suitability of non-invasive prenatal RHD genotyping in non-immunized midtrimester pregnant women from a mixed ethnic population, to prevent unnecessary anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis and to identify RHD variants

METHODS

Rhesus D-negative pregnant women were offered fetal RHD genotyping at 24 gestational weeks. A total of 284 samples were tested for RHD status using multiplex rt-PCR amplification of exons 5 and 7 of the RHD gene and exons 6 and 10 in selected cases. Women carrying RHD-negative fetuses were counseled about their option to avoid routine antenatal anti-D immunoglobulin administration. Diagnostic accuracy of RHD genotyping was compared with postnatal Rhesus D serotyping.

RESULTS

A total of 184 positives (65%), 91 negatives (32%) and 7 cases (2.5%) compatibles with RHD variants were detected by RHD genotyping. No false negative results were found, and a single false positive was observed in a twin pregnancy. Genotyping was accepted when offered by 94% of women (284/302), and anti-D immunoglobulin was avoided in 95% (90/95) of RHD-negative fetuses.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-invasive routine antenatal RHD genotyping at 24 weeks of pregnancy is a highly accurate method, resulting in the avoidance of 95% of unnecessary administrations of anti-D immunoglobulin, with no false negative results.

Non-invasive prenatal diagnostics using next generation sequencing: technical, legal and social challenges

INTRODUCTION

Newly developed non-invasive prenatal diagnostic techniques, using maternal blood samples, have the potential to reduce or obviate the need for invasive prenatal diagnostic practices such as amniocentesis or chorionic villous sampling. This will lead to a change in how obstetric care is extended by health care providers to pregnant women at-risk of bearing an aneuploid child.

AREAS COVERED

The process leading to the development of fetal aneuploidy detection via the analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal plasma by massive parallel sequencing. Optimization of these strategies and approaches used in the recent or up-coming commercial launches. In addition, this review provides insight into legal implications, potential patent disputes, ethical and societal concerns raised by this development, such as whole genome data storage, retrieval and access.

EXPERT OPINION

There is a need for engagement by professional societies, to ensure correct usage of these newly emerging technologies and their restriction to high-risk pregnancies. National agencies need to ensure the necessary degree of high quality required for prenatal diagnosis.

Tracking fetal development through molecular analysis of maternal biofluids

Current monitoring of fetal development includes fetal ultrasonography, chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis for chromosome analysis, and maternal serum biochemical screening for analytes associated with aneuploidy and open neural tube defects. Over the last 15 years, significant advances in noninvasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) via cell-free fetal (cff) nucleic acids in maternal plasma have resulted in the ability to determine fetal sex, RhD genotype, and aneuploidy. Cff nucleic acids in the maternal circulation originate primarily from the placenta. This contrasts with cff nucleic acids in amniotic fluid, which derive from the fetus, and are present in significantly higher concentrations than in maternal blood. The fetal origin of cff nucleic acids in the amniotic fluid permits the acquisition of real-time information about fetal development and gene expression. This review seeks to provide a comprehensive summary of the molecular analysis of cff nucleic acids in maternal biofluids to elucidate mechanisms of fetal development, physiology, and pathology. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Molecular Genetics of Human Reproductive Failure.

Fetal RHD genotyping by analysis of maternal plasma in a mixed population

BACKGROUND

Maternal plasma analysis for the determination of the fetal RHD status is an exciting tool for the management of RhD-negative pregnant women, specially sensitized women. We assessed the accuracy of fetal RHD genotyping by analysis of maternal plasma in a multi-ethnic population.

METHODS

We analyzed plasma samples from 88 RhD-negative pregnant women between 11 and 39 weeks of gestation, median age of 28 years old to determine the fetal RHD genotype. This population was from Southeastern Brazil with high mixed ethnic background. Fourteen patients (16%) had anti-D alloantibody. We used Taqman primers and probes to detect by real-time PCR, exons 4, 5, and 10 of RHD. As internal controls we used primers/probes sets to SRY and CCR5. Peripheral or umbilical cord bloods from respective neonates were collected during delivery and hemagglutination was performed.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight samples (66%) were genotyped as RHD+, 27 samples (31%) showed complete absence of RHD and 3 samples (3 %) presented a D variant (RHDψ). All the results agreed with the neonatal typing, including the three fetuses with the RHDψ, phenotyped as RhD-negative. Thus, the accuracy of the fetal RHD genotyping in this mixed population was 100%. The earliest pregnancy in which fetal RHD was detected was 11 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that the accuracy of RHD gene using three regions (exons 4, 5, and 10) can be sufficient for clinical application in a multi-ethnic population. This knowledge helped us on the development of a feasible protocol for fetal RHD genotyping on DNA from maternal plasma for our population.

A new fetal RHD genotyping test: costs and benefits of mass testing to target antenatal anti-D prophylaxis in England and Wales

BACKGROUND

Postnatal and antenatal anti-D prophylaxis have dramatically reduced maternal sensitisations and cases of rhesus disease in babies born to women with RhD negative blood group. Recent scientific advances mean that non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD), based on the presence of cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma, could be used to target prophylaxis on "at risk" pregnancies where the fetus is RhD positive. This paper provides the first assessment of cost-effectiveness of NIPD-targeted prophylaxis compared to current policies.

METHODS

We conducted an economic analysis of NIPD implementation in England and Wales. Two scenarios were considered. Scenario 1 assumed that NIPD will be only used to target antenatal prophylaxis with serology tests continuing to direct post-delivery prophylaxis. In Scenario 2, NIPD would also displace postnatal serology testing if an RhD negative fetus was identified. Costs were estimated from the provider's perspective for both scenarios together with a threshold royalty fee per test. Incremental costs were compared with clinical implications.

RESULTS

The basic cost of an NIPD in-house test is £16.25 per sample (excluding royalty fee). The two-dose antenatal prophylaxis policy recommended by NICE is estimated to cost the NHS £3.37 million each year. The estimated threshold royalty fee is £2.18 and £8.83 for Scenarios 1 and 2 respectively. At a £2.00 royalty fee, mass NIPD testing would produce no saving for Scenario 1 and £507,154 per annum for Scenario 2. Incremental cost-effectiveness analysis indicates that, at a test sensitivity of 99.7% and this royalty fee, NIPD testing in Scenario 2 will generate one additional sensitisation for every £9,190 saved. If a single-dose prophylaxis policy were implemented nationally, as recently recommended by NICE, Scenario 2 savings would fall.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, NIPD testing to target anti-D prophylaxis is unlikely to be sufficiently cost-effective to warrant its large scale introduction in England and Wales. Only minor savings are calculated and, balanced against this, the predicted increase in maternal sensitisations may be unacceptably high. Reliability of NIPD assays still needs to be demonstrated rigorously in different ethnic minority populations. First trimester testing is unlikely to alter this picture significantly although other emerging technologies may.

Assessment of the female fetal DNA concentration in the plasma of the pregnant women as preeclampsia indicator--preliminary report

OBJECTIVES

This research was designed to analyze the presence of fetal female DNA, expressed in copy number, in the plasma of the pregnant woman with preeclampsia-complicated pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN

Twenty-four pregnant women with female fetuses identified by means of ultrasound scanning were enrolled in this pilot study. The study group consisted of 12 pregnant women with symptoms of preeclampsia, with 12 healthy women, matched for gestational age, as controls.

RESULTS

Mean DNA number of genomic equivalents per reaction in the group was 201 geq/PCR (from 44.9 to 375) and increased over time after onset of PE, which was the reason for pregnancy termination. In the group of women with preeclampsia, a notably higher DNA copy number in comparison to the control group was noted (p=0.0003 U Mann-Whitney test).

CONCLUSIONS

The pilot study presented in this work confirms that also in the case of preeclampsia-complicated pregnancy with female fetuses it is possible to implement the method of fetal DNA quantification. Use of the presented methods confirms that in severe preeclampsia-complicated pregnancies an increase of the number of DNA genomic equivalents per reaction in comparison to the control group is observed. Due to the small study group further research on the described issue is vital, but this study proves that it is also feasible among women carrying female fetuses.

The SAFE project: towards non-invasive prenatal diagnosis

After the revolutionary detection of ffDNA (free fetal DNA) in maternal circulation by real-time PCR in 1997 and advances in molecular techniques, NIPD (non-invasive prenatal diagnosis) is now a clinical reality. Non-invasive diagnosis using ffDNA has been implemented, allowing the detection of paternally inherited alleles, sex-linked conditions and some single-gene disorders and is a viable indicator of predisposition to certain obstetric complications [e.g. PET (pre-eclampsia)]. To date, the major use of ffDNA genotyping in the clinic has been for the non-invasive detection of the pregnancies that are at risk of HDFN (haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn). This has seen numerous clinical services arising across Europe and many large-scale NIPD genotyping studies taking place using maternal plasma. Because of the interest in performing NIPD and the speed at which the research in this area was developing, the SAFE (Special Non-Invasive Advances in Fetal and Neonatal Evaluation) NoE (Network of Excellence) was founded. The SAFE project was set up to implement routine, cost-effective NIPD and neonatal screening through the creation of long-term partnerships within and beyond the European Community and has played a major role in the standardization of non-invasive RHD genotyping. Other research using ffDNA has focused on the amount of ffDNA present in the maternal circulation, with a view to pre-empting various complications of pregnancy. One of the key areas of interest in the non-invasive arena is the prenatal detection of aneuploid pregnancies, particularly Down's syndrome. Owing to the high maternal DNA background, detection of ffDNA from maternal plasma is very difficult; consequently, research in this area is now more focused on ffRNA to produce new biomarkers.

Non-invasive fetal RHD genotyping tests: a systematic review of the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy in published studies

Articles reporting the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive prenatal diagnostic (NIPD) tests for RHD genotyping using fetal material extracted from maternal blood have been published steadily for over a decade. Health care providers in Europe have started to use this technology for management of the small number of sensitised pregnancies (ca. 220-600 per annum in the Netherlands, Germany, France and the UK). Scientists and clinicians are also advocating widespread implementation for the far larger number of non-sensitised RhD-negative pregnancies (ca. 34,000-125,000 per annum in the same countries). Large-scale, prospective trials are only now underway. Estimates of the technical performance of these tests are currently based on results from small-scale studies, together with formal meta-analysis. The issue of early assessment of test performance is one faced by many new genetic tests. As part of a wider study we have investigated the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy in publications and produced guidelines for future studies. A systematic search of the literature identified 27 papers which met predefined inclusion criteria. All 27 papers were, first, assessed against an international quality (STARD) checklist for reporting of diagnostic accuracy and, second, against our own in-house NIPD proforma to assess the implications of the quality of reporting specifically for the RhD NIPD test. Authors were found to generally present an optimistic view of NIPD, bearing in mind weaknesses identified in reporting and conduct of their studies and the analysis of results, as evidenced by the low STARD scores. The NIPD proforma identified that specific biases were potentially introduced through selective population sampling and/or failure to report the make-up of the population tested, omission of inconclusive results, inconsistencies in the handling of repeat results on a sample, and lack of adequate controls. These factors would inevitably affect the validity of diagnostic accuracy as reported in individual publications, as well as any subsequent meta-analyses. Together, published reports to date may provide a biased picture of the actual potential of NIPD testing for fetal RHD genotyping. Generalisation of the available evidence on diagnostic accuracy, especially to large-scale implementation of NIPD testing of non-sensitised women, will also require that decision makers consider further aspects such as test reliability and cost of routine testing in clinical practice. It is recommended that all studies of diagnostic accuracy of NIPD tests adhere to the STARD quality checklist in order to improve reporting, thereby, minimising bias and increasing the comparability of studies. Researchers should also consider specific shortcomings for NIPD and avoid selective participant sampling; report population characteristics; report handling of replicate sampling as well as their failure rates; and include controls for genotypes tested in the study. Furthermore, meta-analyses should consider the quality, as well as the sample size, of NIPD studies in their analysis. Larger trials, required to produce results that are valid and meaningful for clinical practice, must also adhere to these reporting standards.

Prenatal diagnosis: update on invasive versus noninvasive fetal diagnostic testing from maternal blood

The modern obstetrics care includes noninvasive prenatal diagnosis testing such as first trimester screening performed between 11 and 14 weeks' gestation and second trimester screening performed between 15 and 20 weeks. In these screening tests, biochemical markers are measured in the maternal blood with or without ultrasound for fetal nuchal translucency with reported accuracy of up to 90%. Invasive procedures, including amniocentesis or chorionic villi sampling, are used to achieve over 99% accuracy. During these procedures direct fetal material is examined and, therefore, these tests are highly accurate with the caveat of a small risk for pregnancy loss. Much research now focuses on other noninvasive highly accurate and risk-free tests that will identify fetal material in the maternal blood. Fetal cells and fetal DNA/RNA provide fetal information but are hard to find in an overwhelming background of maternal cells and in the absence of specific fetal cell markers. The most experience has been accumulated with fetal rhesus and fetal sex determination from maternal blood, with an accuracy of up to 100% by using gene sequences that are absent from maternal blood. Although not clinically applicable yet, fetal cells, fetal DNA/RNA and fetal proteomics in combination with cutting edge technology are described to prenatally diagnose aneuploidies and single-gene disorders.

High throughput non-invasive determination of foetal Rhesus D status using automated extraction of cell-free foetal DNA in maternal plasma and mass spectrometry

PURPOSE

To examine the potential high throughput capability and efficiency of an automated DNA extraction system in combination with mass spectrometry for the non-invasive determination of the foetal Rhesus D status.

METHODS

A total of 178 maternal plasma samples from RHD-negative pregnant women were examined, from which DNA was extracted using the automated Roche MagNA Pure system. Presence of the foetal RHD gene was detected by PCR for RHD exon 7 and subsequent analysis using the Sequenom MassArray mass spectrometric system.

RESULTS

We determined that as little as 15 pg of RHD-positive genomic DNA could be detected in a background of 585 pg of RHD-negative genomic DNA. The analysis of the clinical samples yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 96.1 and 96.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our study indicated that automated DNA extraction in combination with mass spectrometry permits the determination of foetal Rhesus D genotype with an accuracy comparable to the current approaches using real-time PCR.

Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis and determination of fetal Rh status

RhD blood group incompatibility between a pregnant woman and her fetus can result in maternal alloimmunization and consequent haemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN) in subsequent pregnancies. The D-negative blood group is found in 15% of whites, 3-5% of black Africans, and is rare in Asians. Recent technological advances in non-invasive prenatal determination of the fetal RHD status using cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) have opened new avenues for the management of D-negative pregnant women. In this review applications for the high risk women, as well as potential for routine screening will be discussed. The use of non-invasive prenatal diagnosis and the management of other blood incompatibilities will also be discussed.

Workshop report on the extraction of foetal DNA from maternal plasma

OBJECTIVE

Cell free foetal DNA (cff DNA) extracted from maternal plasma is now recognized as a potential source for prenatal diagnosis but the methodology is currently not well standardized. To evaluate different manual and automated DNA extraction methods with a view to developing standards, an International Workshop was performed.

METHODS

Three plasma pools from RhD-negative pregnant women, a DNA standard, real-time-PCR protocol, primers and probes for RHD were sent to 12 laboratories and also to one company (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). In pre-tests, pool 3 showed a low cff DNA concentration, pool 1 showed a higher concentration and pool 2 an intermediate concentration.

RESULTS

The QIAamp DSP Virus Kit, the High Pure PCR Template Preparation Kit, an in-house protocol using the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit, the CST genomic DNA purification kit, the Magna Pure LC, the MDx, the M48, the EZ1 and an in-house protocol using magnetic beads for manual and automated extraction were the methods that were able to reliably detect foetal RHD. The best results were obtained with the QIAamp DSP Virus Kit. The QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit showed very comparable results in laboratories that followed the manufacturer's protocol and started with > or = 500 microL plasma. One participant using the QIAamp DNA Blood Midi Kit failed to detect reliably RHD in pool 3.

CONCLUSIONS

This workshop initiated a standardization process for extraction of cff DNA in maternal plasma. The highest yield was obtained by the QIAamp DSP Virus Kit, a result that will be evaluated in more detail in future studies.

Routine fetal RHD genotyping with maternal plasma: a four-year experience in Belgium

BACKGROUND

The objective was to evaluate the diagnostic value of RHD fetal genotyping from the plasma of D- mothers as soon as 10 weeks' gestation in a routine clinical practice in Belgium.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A prospective study was conducted between November 2002 and December 2006. DNA extraction was performed in an automated closed tube system. Fetal RHD/SRY genotypes were detected in the plasma of 563 pregnant mothers by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) targeting multiple exons 4, 5, and 10 of the RHD gene and targeting an SRY gene sequence. These were compared to the D phenotypes determined in the 581 babies they delivered.

RESULTS

By combining amplification of three exons, the concordance rate of fetal RHD genotypes in maternal plasma and newborn D phenotypes at delivery was 100 percent (99.8% including one unusual false-positive). The presence of nonfunctional RHD genes and the absence of a universal fetal marker, irrespective of fetal sex, did not influence the accuracy of fetal RhD status prediction. The RHD genotyping from 18 twin pregnancies was also assessed. Five weak D women were excluded from the RHD fetal genotyping prediction. Three discrepant results (0.5%) between predicted fetal genotype and cord blood phenotype were not confirmed by the baby phenotypes from venipuncture blood.

CONCLUSION

Prenatal prediction of fetal RHD by targeting multiple exons from the maternal plasma with real-time PCR is highly sensitive and accurate. Over 4 years, this experience has highly modified our management of D- pregnant women.

La surveillance immunohématologique de la femme enceinte et la nouvelle politique de prévention de l’allo-immunisation anti-RH1

Despite the generalization of immunoprophylaxis by anti-RH immunoglobulins since 1970 and improved management of at-risk pregnancies, allo-immunization due to the RH1 antigen (formerly known as Rhesus D or Rh D) remains widespread. In fact, anti-RH1 antibodies currently constitute over one-third of the immune antibodies detected after pregnancy. At the same time, allo-immunizations against others antigens than anti-RH1, especially anti-RH4 (anti-c) and anti-KEL1 (anti-Kell) increase. Allo-immunization, its follow-up during pregnancy, and its prevention are therefore still topical, and concern all the pregnant women. Immunohematological tests used in antenatal patients have gone a long way. However, despite a great deal of progress, we should not loose sight of the fact that these tests give only an indirect measurement and will only help the obstetrician, in conjunction with other fetal parameters to assess the severity of the haemolytic disease. The best method to assess the severity is the determination of the level of fetal hemoglobin after fetal blood sampling but this procedure is not without risk. Since 13 years, it is possible to determine the fetal RHD genotype of using amniocytes and to day directly with maternal plasma. All pregnant women should be blood-typed for ABO-RH-KEL1 and the blood tested for clinically irregular antibodies. The trend in anti-RH levels is more important than the level itself. Manual titration is simple but only provides rough, semiquantitative estimates of anti-RH concentration. Quantitative hemagglutination methods, using auto-analyzers and appropriate anti-RH1 standards, measured in mug/ml, are sensitive, rapid and have acceptable intra-laboratory reproducibility. RH:-1 women who are non-sensitized against RH1 antigen during and at the end of their pregnancy with a RH1 child. RH prophylaxis includes targeted prophylaxis after feto-maternal hemorrhage and now routine antenatal RH prophylaxis at the 28th week of gestation. It has been necessary to synthesize the indications of RH prophylaxis and immunohematological tests to assure an efficient therapeutic prevention.

Prenatal diagnosis using cell-free nucleic acids in maternal body fluids: A decade of progress

The ability to detect cell-free fetal nucleic acids in pregnant women has greatly evolved over the past decade. Dozens of papers have explored the biology, kinetics, and clinical significance of both cell-free fetal DNA and mRNA in the maternal circulation. As a result, our overall understanding of fetal nucleic acid trafficking has expanded. To date, two applications, gender determination and fetal RhD status, have translated into clinical medicine. However, with advanced molecular techniques such as mass spectrometry, real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and gene expression arrays, the ease with which fetal genes can be detected within the mother has greatly improved. Newly identified placental and fetal mRNA transcripts as well as an epigenetically modified placental DNA marker, maspin, have universal applicability. Global expression analyses of fetal mRNA in both amniotic fluid and blood provide new insights into fetal development and pathology. Prenatal diagnosis is poised to evolve from detection of aneuploidy to detection of deviation from normal development, which should provide novel opportunities for fetal treatment.

Évaluation de la détermination du statut Rhésus-D fœtal sur plasma maternel par la technique d’hemi-nested PCR

AIMS

The aim of our study was to evaluate the possibility of identifying the fetal RhD status in maternal plasma using conventional hemi nested PCR analysis.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

After informed written consent, 20 mL of peripheral blood were collected in 99 D-negative pregnant women either at an amniocentesis for prenatal diagnosis or at a prenatal checkup. Fetal DNA extracted from 400 microL of maternal plasma was analyzed by two different operators with a hemi-nested PCR extending an area of the RhD gene exon 10. The results were compared to the fetal RhD status obtained by PCR amniotic fluid analysis or blood analysis of newborns after delivery. The influence of mother's and baby's phenotype were also studied.

RESULTS

Among the 99 D-negative pregnant women, all Caucasian, 47 were in their second trimester and 52 in their third trimester (mean: 27.20 weeks of gestation +/-8.25). Sixty-nine fetuses were D-positive and thirty D-negative. The sensitivity and specificity of our technique were respectively 100% and 86.7% and 15% of discordant results were observed between the two operators. Four false positives were observed. According to maternal phenotype, a fetal unexpressed RHD gene was suspected in only one case because of a particular fetal phenotype (ddCcEe).

CONCLUSION

A conventional hemi nested PCR analysis of maternal plasma could be used for accurate fetal RhD status. However this procedure is difficult to apply for routine analysis because of the importance of anti-contamination measures required to obtain good results. Real time quantitative PCR analysis on fetal DNA is more suitable. Whatever the operating procedure used, polymorphism of RhD gene may follow in either false negative from presence of rearranged gene or false positive from occasional presence of a non functional RHD gene.

Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive fetal Rh genotyping from maternal blood--a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the reported diagnostic accuracy, the validity, and the current limitations of fetal Rh genotyping from peripheral maternal blood based on the existing English-written publications.

STUDY DESIGN

A search of the English literature describing fetal RhD determination from maternal blood was conducted. From each study, we determined the number of samples tested, fetal RhD genotype, the source of the fetal DNA (maternal plasma, serum, or fetal cells), gestational age, and confirmation of fetal Rh type. The presence of alloimmunization and exclusions of tested samples were noted. For the meta-analysis we calculated composite estimates using 2 random effects models, weighted GLM and Bayesian. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated.

RESULTS

We identified 37 English-written publications that included 44 protocols reporting noninvasive Rh genotyping using fetal DNA obtained from maternal blood on a total of 3261 samples. A total of 183 (183/3261, 5.6%) samples were excluded from the meta-analysis. The overall diagnostic accuracy after exclusions was 94.8%. The gestational ages ranged between 8 and 42 weeks gestation. Maternal serum and plasma were found to be the best source for accurate diagnosis of fetal RhD type in 394/410 (96.1%) and 2293/2377 (96.5%), respectively. There were 719/783 (91.8%) alloimmunized patients that were correctly diagnosed. There were 16 studies that reported 100% diagnostic accuracy in their fetal RhD genotyping.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive fetal Rh determination using maternal peripheral blood is 94.8%. Its use can be applicable to Rh prophylaxis and to the management of Rh alloimmunized pregnancies. Improvements of the technique and further study of structure and rearrangements of the RhD gene may improve accuracy of testing and enable large-scale, risk-free fetal RhD genotyping using maternal blood.

Non-Invasive Detection of Fetal Rhesus D Status: A Comparison between Polymerase Chain Reaction and Flow Cytometry

OBJECTIVE

A non-invasive prenatal determination of the fetal RhD status might be useful for the management of pregnancies in RhD-negative women whose partners are RhD positive.

METHODS

Maternal peripheral blood of 32 RhD-negative women (17-24 weeks of gestation) was collected, and circulating fetal cells were enriched by CD71 mini-magnetic activated cell sorting. The RhD status of the fetuses was assessed using multiparametric flow cytometry, and results were compared to those of reverse transcriptase (RT)-polymerase chain reaction (PCR), or PCR, which acted as control. Flow-cytometric study of fetal cells employed monoclonal antibodies directed against CD71, glycophorin A (GPA) and RhD antigens.

RESULTS

The median percentage of CD71- and RhD-positive cells was 0.83% (range 0.14-6.44%), and that of CD71 and GPA-positive cells was 10.07% (range 0.52-45.84%). Flow-cytometric analysis correlated with RT-PCR results of RNA obtained from whole maternal blood. In 1 case, an incorrect result was due to the failure of the amplification of the specific RhD band on RNA extracted from the CD71-positive fraction. In two instances, we observed false-positive results for RhD in PCR of DNA obtained from maternal plasma.

CONCLUSION

Based on our results, flow-cytometric analysis might be proposed as a clinical tool for the non-invasive prenatal determination of the fetal RhD status independently of fetal gender.

Non-invasive antenatal RHD typing

The existence of cell free fetal DNA, derived from apoptotic syncytiotrophoblast, in the maternal circulation has opened new possibilities of non-invasive prenatal diagnosis. Although still some technical problems exists, especially the lack of a generic positive control on the presence of fetal DNA and the aspecific amplification of background maternal DNA, non-invasive prenatal RHD typing has been successfully introduced in several laboratories, especially in Europe. The diagnostic accuracy reaches>99%. In the Netherlands PCR guided administration of antenatal anti-D prophylaxis is cost-effective and nearby. In this review the main characteristics and applications of cell free fetal DNA are discussed, with an emphasis on prenatal RHD genotyping.

Genetic characterisation of circulating fetal cells allows non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of cystic fibrosis

OBJECTIVES

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an autosomal recessive disease due to mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene. The purpose of this study was to develop a molecular method to characterise both paternal and maternal CFTR alleles in DNA from circulating fetal cells (CFCs) isolated by ISET (isolation by size of epithelial tumour/trophoblastic cells).

METHODS

The molecular protocol was defined by developing the F508del mutation analysis and addressing it both to single trophoblastic cells, isolated by ISET and identified by short tandem repeats (STR) genotyping, and to pooled trophoblastic genomes, thus avoiding the risk of allele drop out (ADO). This protocol was validated in 100 leucocytes from F508del carriers and subsequently blindly applied to the blood (5 mL) of 12 pregnant women, at 11 to 13 weeks of gestation, whose offspring had a 1/4 risk of CF. Ten couples were carriers of F508del mutation, while two were carriers of unknown CFTR mutations.

RESULTS

Results showed that one fetus was affected, seven were heterozygous carriers of a CFTR mutation, and four were healthy homozygotes. These findings were consistent with those obtained by chorionic villus sampling (CVS).

CONCLUSION

Our data show that the ISET-CF approach affords reliable prenatal diagnosis (PND) of cystic fibrosis and is potentially applicable to pregnant women at risk of having an affected child, thus avoiding the risk of iatrogenic miscarriage.

Diagnosis and management of Rh alloimmunization

OBJECTIVE

To assess the current problem of alloimmunization in a tertiary referral center in Croatia. The results obtained were compared to data published worldwide.

METHODS

Retrospective case analysis included women with Rhesus (Rh) alloimmunization treated in our department from January 1997 to January 2003. Data of interest included the incidence, prevention, diagnosis and treatment, with the final point being perinatal mortality and morbidity.

RESULTS

23 pregnant women with alloimmunization were identified. The incidence was 0.138% of deliveries in the same time period. The median gestational age at diagnosis/referral was 22 (range 9-37) weeks. Anti-D antigen, alone or in combination with the other antigens, was responsible for more than 90% of the alloimmunization cases included. A defined protocol for prevention of Rh D immunization after previous delivery was not followed properly in 9/19 cases. A particular problem was prophylaxis after previous pregnancy termination (TOP), whereby only 1/14 woman received adequate prophylaxis and only after 2 of 5 TOPs. Regarding fetal treatment, 9/23 women had a total of 24 intrauterine intravascular blood transfusions. Overall, perinatal mortality was 13%, and the median gestational age at delivery was 34 (range 31-40) weeks. In all there were 31 fetal exchange transfusions after delivery performed in 14/20 newborns.

CONCLUSION

Despite precise diagnostic criteria and modern therapeutic options, alloimmunization remains a problem in Croatia. It is still related with a high perinatal mortality and morbidity. The main problem is inadequate prevention.

Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of fetal Rhesus D: ready for Prime(r) Time

Rhesus (Rh) D blood group incompatibility between the pregnant woman and her fetus is a significant problem due to the possibility of maternal alloimmunization and consequent hemolytic disease of the newborn. The RhD-negative blood group is found in 15% of whites, 3-5% of black Africans, and is rare in Asians. Advances in both our understanding of the RHD locus and its variants, as well as technical improvements in the extraction and amplification of cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma, have led to incorporation of noninvasive diagnosis of RHD genotype into routine prenatal care in the United Kingdom, France, and the Netherlands. In this commentary we examine the experience to date with large-scale clinical trials performed in the European Union, describe approaches to reduce false-positive and false-negative results, and review ongoing research to standardize assays and reduce costs using automated assays. False-negative cases are mainly due to either a lack of fetal DNA in the maternal sample due to early gestation or insensitive methods. False-positive cases are due to genotypic variants observed in individuals of African ancestry. Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of fetal Rhesus D genotype is sensitive and accurate and has been widely validated in Europe. The United States should begin to undertake clinical trials to bring this technology to patient care as soon as possible.

Noninvasive prenatal RHD genotyping by real-time polymerase chain reaction using plasma from D-negative pregnant women

OBJECTIVE

Prenatal noninvasive determination of fetal Rh status is an important aid to the management of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. We performed real-time polymerase chain reaction on fetal DNA derived from maternal plasma to determine fetal Rh status.

STUDY DESIGN

Cell-free plasma DNA from 98 D-negative pregnant women was tested for the presence of exons 4, 5, and 10 of RHD. The presence of fetal DNA was confirmed by detection of SRY or biallelic insertion/deletion polymorphisms in the maternal plasma and buffy coat.

RESULTS

Seventy-two D-positive infants and 26 D-negative infants were determined by serologic studies. All 3 RHD exon sequences were detected in 68 of 72 mothers of D-positive infants. The presence of fetal DNA in mothers of D-negative infants was confirmed in all 10 boys and in 14 of 16 girls.

CONCLUSION

Fetal RHD genotyping in this study correctly predicted fetal Rh status in 92 of 98 (94%) cases.

Noninvasive determination of fetal RHD status by examination of cell-free DNA in maternal plasma

BACKGROUND

Cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma opens the way for routine risk-free diagnosis of fetal D status of D- mothers. The focus was on accuracy of RHD typing and confirmation of fetal DNA in maternal plasma while RHD was not detected.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Plasma DNA was extracted (by manual and/or automatic method) from 255 D- pregnant women and amplified in exons 7 and 10 and intron 4 of RHD gene with real-time polymerase chain reaction. The presence of fetal DNA was confirmed by testing SRY and, when negative, by one of 11 different polymorphisms found in the father but not in the mother. The results were compared with the D status of the newborns.

RESULTS

After exclusion of 25 cases (10%) because of material shortage, in 230 cases (90%) available for complete study, the predictive value of the procedure of fetal RHD testing (RHD genotyping plus confirmation of fetal DNA) was 99.6 percent. SRY detection confirmed fetal DNA presence in maternal plasma in all boys, whereas the detection of various polymorphisms in all girls but one.

CONCLUSIONS

Fetal RHD genotyping from maternal plasma may be used with confidence, although additional polymorphisms for confirmation of fetal DNA should be included for 100 percent predictive value (instead of 99.6%).

Fetal DNA detection in maternal plasma throughout gestation

The presence of fetal DNA in maternal plasma may represent a source of genetic material which can be obtained noninvasively. We wanted to assess whether fetal DNA is detectable in all pregnant women, to define the range and distribution of fetal DNA concentration at different gestational ages, to identify the optimal period to obtain a maternal blood sample yielding an adequate amount of fetal DNA for prenatal diagnosis, and to evaluate accuracy and predictive values of this approach. This information is crucial to develop safe and reliable non-invasive genetic testing in early pregnancy and monitoring of pregnancy complications in late gestation. Fetal DNA quantification in maternal plasma was carried out by real-time PCR on the SRY gene in male-bearing pregnancies to distinguish between maternal and fetal DNA. A cohort of 1,837 pregnant women was investigated. Fetal DNA could be detected from the sixth week and could be retrieved at any gestational week. No false-positive results were obtained in 163 women with previous embryo loss or previous male babies. Fetal DNA analysis performed blindly on a subset of 464 women displayed 99.4, 97.8 and 100% accuracy in fetal gender determination during the first, second, and third trimester of pregnancy, respectively. No SRY amplification was obtained in seven out of the 246 (2.8%) male-bearing pregnancies. Fetal DNA from maternal plasma seems to be an adequate and reliable source of genetic material for a noninvasive prenatal diagnostic approach.

DNA identification of fetal cells isolated from cervical mucus: potential for early non-invasive prenatal diagnosis

OBJECTIVES

To develop a reliable method to isolate fetal cells for genetic diagnosis.

DESIGN

Aspiration of cervical mucus from pregnant women in the first trimester.

SETTING

Pregnant women were recruited before an elective termination of pregnancy.

POPULATION

Sixty pregnant women (7-10 weeks of gestation).

METHODS

Fetal cells were isolated from aspirated cervical mucus of pregnant women using a combination of enzymatic digestion, fluorescent immunohistochemistry, micromanipulation and single-cell DNA allelic profiling.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The isolation and identification of fetal cells.

RESULTS

The transformation of the tenacious cervical mucus into a single-cell suspension enabled the isolation and identification of fetal cells by fluorescent immunohistochemistry. Confirmation of fetal origin was accomplished by single-cell DNA allelic profiling alongside known maternal cells.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel non-invasive method is rapid and efficient with results attainable within 24 hours as early as seven weeks of gestation. The technique would offer earlier reassurance and the option of first trimester therapeutic abortions to both high and low risk pregnant women.

Fetal RhD genotyping by maternal serum analysis: a two-year experience

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of the none-invasive prenatal determination of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based fetal RhD genotyping.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective case series was undertaken on all RhD-negative pregnant women presenting for genetic counseling in our prenatal diagnosis center from January 2001 until December 2002. Results were compared with serologic RhD typing of the newborns.

RESULTS

Among the 285 pregnant women who participated in the study, fetal RhD status could be determined for 283 patients. In 2 cases, the RhD-negative phenotype of the mother was not the result of a complete RHD gene deletion, and therefore, the status of the fetus could not be determined. Neither false-negative nor false-positive results were observed.

CONCLUSION

The present report demonstrates that a reliable fetal RHD genotype determination can be achieved with 100% accuracy. It is therefore possible to consider that such an assay could be systematically proposed to all RhD-negative pregnant women in order to more effectively utilize RhD prophylaxis.

Large-scale pre-diagnosis study of fetal RHD genotyping by PCR on plasma DNA from RhD-negative pregnant women

BACKGROUND

The routine prenatal determination of fetal RhD blood group would be very useful in the management of pregnancies in RhD-negative women, as up to 40% of these pregnancies bear a RhD-negative fetus. The fetal DNA present in maternal plasma offers an opportunity for risk-free prenatal diagnosis.

AIM

This study focused on the feasibility and accuracy of large-scale RhD fetal diagnosis in non-immunized and anti-D immunized RhD-negative women.

METHODS

Plasma DNA was extracted from 893 RhD-negative pregnant women and amplified in exons 7 and 10 of the RHD gene using conventional and real-time PCR. The results were then compared with the RHD fetal genotype determined on amniotic cells and/or the RhD phenotype of the red blood cells of the infants at birth.

RESULTS

After exclusion of 42 samples from women exhibiting a nonfunctional or rearranged RHD gene, fetal RhD status was predicted with a 99.5% accuracy. A strategy is also proposed to avoid the small number of false-positive and -negative results.

CONCLUSION

Fetal RHD genotyping from maternal plasma DNA in different clinical situations may be used with confidence.

Reliable quantification of hematopoietic chimerism after allogeneic transplantation for acute leukemia using amplification by real-time PCR of null alleles and insertion/deletion polymorphisms

Increasing mixed chimerism (MC) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) has been associated with a high risk of relapse in acute leukemia. We evaluated a new method for chimerism detection, based on the quantitative real-time PCR (qrt-PCR) amplification of null alleles or insertion/deletion polymorphisms (indels). All qrt-PCR assays with null alleles and indels attained a sensitivity of at least 10(-4), as well as good intra- and interassay concordance, and a high accuracy in experiments with cell mixtures. Informativeness was found in 80.3% of the 61 donor/recipient pairs tested. Nonrelapsed patients showed a progressive decrease in peripheral blood chimerism to values below 0.01% (complete chimerism (CC)). Bone marrow chimerism failed to reach CC more than 4 years after SCT. Increasing MC was observed prior to relapse in 88.2% of patients. Compared with conventional PCR amplification of variable number of tandem repeats, qrt-PCR predicted a significantly higher number of relapses (88.2 vs 44.4%) with a median anticipation period of 58 days. In conclusion, chimerism determination by qrt-PCR amplification of null alleles and indels constitutes a useful tool for the follow-up of patients with acute leukemia after SCT, showing better results than those obtained with conventional PCR.