Comparison of flow cytometry and enzyme cytochemistry for the detection of myeloperoxydase in acute myeloid leukaemia: interests of a new positivity threshold

Comparison of Immunohistochemistry, Cytochemistry, and Flow Cytometry in AML for Myeloperoxidase Detection

Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) as per World Health Organization (WHO 2008) classification is on the basis of the antigenic characterization, enzymes restriction in the neoplastic myeloid cells and the specific translocations/mutations. AML can be assessed and differentiated by flowcytometry (FCM)/immunohistochemistry (IHC)/cytochemistry techniques. Myeloperoxidase (MPO) is an unequivocal marker to differentiate AML from the acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Despite FCM popularity, it has its limitations, in form of 'dry-tap', cost, and inability of being performed by retrospective analysis. IHC, though an old technique has overcome these disadvantages of FCM. Cytochemistry, on the other hand has its own advantages in being cost-effective; technically easy to do while its disadvantages are its inability to be carried out in the old samples, 'dry-tap' conditions in aleukemic leukemia. There has been non-uniformity in the literature among these techniques especially concerning their sensitivity for MPO. A prospective study was done at All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi from 01 July 2014 to 30 Nov 2015 to include 120 diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia cases. Myeloperoxidase stain was done by cytochemistry, immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry and results were compared. There were 28 cases which showed discrepancies. Out of these 28 cases immunohistochemistry showed positivity in majority (22 cases) followed by flow cytometry (14 cases). Therefore it is important to employ more than one technique and IHC must be included for detection of MPO in all suspected cases of AML especially when negative with FCM .

Importance of CD117 in the Assignation of a Myeloid Lineage in Acute Leukemias

The correct classification of acute leukemias (AL) is an essential part in the evaluation of any patient with this disease. Historically, CD117 has been an important asset in the diagnosis of patients with mixed-phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL). In an attempt to simplify the diagnosis of MPAL with fewer and more lineage specific markers, the World Health Organization (WHO) proposed in 2008 a new criteria for the diagnosis of this type of AL, which excluded CD117 from the myeloid markers that are utilized to diagnose MPAL. In order to assess whether CD117 is necessary in the diagnosis of MPAL, we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of CD117 for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in 331 patients with AL. The calculated sensitivity of CD117 for AML was 85.88% (103/120), while the specificity was 83.9% (177/211). Besides myeloperoxidase (MPO), which was used as the gold standard in differentiating AML from other type of ALs, the most specific markers for AML in our study were CD14 and CD64 (99.5 and 95.6%). Although the specificity of CD117 in this study is not as high as CD14 and CD64, markers concomitantly used in this this study and in the WHO classification, based on the results of other researches (i.e. the specificity of CD117 for AML was 100% in one study) and due to the fact that its specificity for AML in this study is relatively high, we recommend the use CD117 in assigning a myeloid lineage in MPAL.

Clinical Significance of Isolated Myeloperoxidase Expression in Pediatric B-Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Objectives

Diagnosis of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) requires immunophenotypic evidence of B-lineage and absence of specific myeloid or T-lineage markers. Rare cases of otherwise typical B-ALL express myeloperoxidase (MPO) detectable by flow cytometry with an absence of other myeloid markers, but the clinical significance of this finding is not well studied.

Methods

A retrospective cohort analysis of flow cytometry and clinical data was performed to investigate the clinical outcome of this specific group of patients.

Results

Twenty-nine cases of otherwise typical B-ALL that expressed MPO by flow cytometry (B-ALL-isoMPO) without expression of other myeloid markers were identified. The B-ALL-isoMPO group had a significantly increased incidence of relapse (univariate log rank P  = .0083; multivariate hazard ratio, 2.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-5.85; P  = .034) and significantly worse event-free survival by univariate analysis (log rank P  = .0066) compared with a reference group of patients with B-ALL from the same time period (n = 264).

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the first report to document the clinical outcomes in a group of pediatric patients with B-ALL that expresses MPO in the absence of other myeloid markers. This group had an increased rate of relapse and a worse event-free survival than the patients with B-ALL who did not express MPO.

[Expression of cMPO in 502 cases of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and its diagnosis significance in AML subtypes]

目的

探讨髓过氧化物酶（cMPO）在急性髓系白血病（AML）患者中的表达及其在诊断分型中的意义。

方法

采用CD45/SSC双参数散点图设门方法对502例AML患者进行八色流式细胞术免疫表型分析，观察患者白血病细胞cMPO表达的阳性率和阳性强度。

结果

502例AML患者cMPO总体阳性率为58.0%，其中阳性占21.5%，弱阳性占34.1%，部分阳性占2.4%；阴性占42.0%。各亚型中，AML伴t(15;17）（q22;q12）/PML-RARα的cMPO阳性率最高，为100%，阳性强度多数接近正常粒细胞水平；其次为AML伴t(8;21）（q22;q22）/RUNX1-RUNX1T1，阳性率为91.4%，阳性强度多为弱阳性；AML微分化型和急性巨核细胞白血病患者cMPO表达皆为阴性；余各亚型阳性率在22.7%~76.2%。

结论

各亚型AML cMPO的阳性率及阳性强度存在显著差异。

Acute leukemias of ambiguous origin

OBJECTIVES

This session of the Society for Hematopathology/European Association for Haematopathology Workshop focused on acute leukemias of ambiguous origin.

METHODS

We provide an overview of mixed-phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL) as recognized in the current World Health Organization classification and summarize diagnostic criteria for major categories of MPAL: B/myeloid, T/myeloid, B/T, and B/T/myeloid.

RESULTS

Most MPAL cases submitted were B/myeloid and T/myeloid MPAL, the most frequent types, but three cases of B/T MPAL were also submitted, and examples of all categories are illustrated. We emphasize that a comprehensive approach to immunophenotyping is required to accurately establish the diagnosis of MPAL. Flow cytometry immunophenotyping using a large panel of antibodies is needed as well as confirmatory immunohistochemical analysis and cytochemistry studies for myeloperoxidase and nonspecific esterase. We discuss technical issues in determining blast lineage and possible pitfalls in MPAL diagnosis. In particular, rare cases of B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) can express myeloperoxidase but are otherwise consistent with B-ALL and should be treated as such. Last, we review the differential diagnosis between acute undifferentiated leukemia and acute myeloid leukemia with minimal differentiation.

CONCLUSIONS

There was an agreement that diagnosis of MPAL can be challenging, especially if applied flow cytometry panels are not comprehensive enough.

Can threshold for MPO by flow cytometry be reduced in classifying acute leukaemia? A comparison of flow cytometric and cytochemical myeloperoxidase using different flow cytometric cut-offs

Objectives Myeloperoxidase (MPO) detection either by enzyme cytochemistry (cMPO) or flow cytometry (fMPO) plays a major role in acute leukaemia (AL) diagnosis as per World Health Organization (WHO) 2008 classification. Although 3% cMPO was recommended as positivity, no specific cut-off had been mentioned by WHO for fMPO. Various authors recommend different cut-offs ranging from 3 to 28% for fMPO. The aim of this study was to analyse fMPO cut-offs ranging from 3 to 10% in classifying AL and to assess whether a new cut-off could be suggested. Methods Totally, 216 cases of AL were retrospectively analysed for fMPO ranging from 3 to 10% and compared with gold standard. Presence of cMPO (≥3%) and/or expression of two or more pan-myeloid markers (CD13, CD33, and CD117) in the absence of CD19 and CD3 were kept as gold standard for diagnosis of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). Results Sensitivities for classifying AL as AML/mixed phenotypic acute leukaemia (MPAL) at 3, 5.4, and 10% were 98.3, 98.3, and 96.6%, respectively, whereas specificities at this cut-off were 22.2, 91, and 71%, respectively. Discussion Only few studies have been done in this aspect to define a consistent cut-off for fMPO for proper classification of acute leukaemias. This was one of the largest and few studies available till date in this regard. Conclusion The newer cut-off for fMPO (5.4%) emerged out from our study with best sensitivity and specificity for accurately classifying AL cases into acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, AML, and MPAL.

Evaluation of peroxidase activity by alpha-naphthol/pyronine staining compared with benzidine staining in 101 acute leukemia cases

Cytochemical detection of myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity, a strong marker for myeloid differentiation, is usually performed by benzidine dihydrochloride staining, with the threshold at 3%. Several reports have demonstrated the potential toxicity of benzidine, and bans have been issued, under French law, prohibiting female technicians from being exposed to the aromatic hydrocarbon group, including benzidine. The aim of this study was to test an alpha-naphthol and pyronine-based substitute using a standardized kit (MYELOPEROXIDASE KIT, RAL [Réactifs RAL, Martillac, France]) to measure MPO activity in blast cells. This prospective, multicenter study made it possible to analyze 101 acute leukemia (AL) cases; it has also demonstrated both the 96% specificity and the 99% sensitivity of the method, with a threshold for positive staining of 3%, as well as good correlation (r = 0.95) between the staining method tested and the benzidine staining method. When using the alpha-naphthol/pyronine-based staining for MPO, the mean number of positive blast cells is statistically lower than that obtained using benzidine, but without incidence on AL classification. These results allow us to conclude that this method makes it possible to classify acute blood diseases by measuring MPO activity using reagents permitted by law, according to a standardized and reproducible protocol.

Immunohistochemistry is a more sensitive marker for the detection of myeloperoxidase in acute myeloid leukemia compared with flow cytometry and cytochemistry

Myeloperoxidase (MPO) is an unequivocal marker of myeloid differentiation which is routinely detected using cytochemistry (CC), flow cytometry (FC) and immunohistochemistry (IH). Several studies have compared the use of two of these methods, but to our knowledge none has compared all three techniques. We compared the performance of these three modalities in the detection of MPO in 158 cases of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). Discrepancies were noted in a total of 28 cases. Of 110 cases in which all three modalities were performed, 23 cases showed discrepancies. CC was the least sensitive marker, being negative in 11 of 23 cases in the presence of positive IH and/or FC. IH was the most sensitive marker with only one case being negative in the presence of a positive result by FC and/or CC. The results highlight the necessity of employing more than one method in determining the presence of MPO and confirm the important role of IH in the diagnosis of AML particularly in cases where MPO is not detected by CC and FC.

Acute leukemia immunohistochemistry: a systematic diagnostic approach

CONTEXT

The diagnosis and classification of leukemia is becoming increasingly complex. Current classification schemes incorporate morphologic features, immunophenotype, molecular genetics, and clinical data to specifically categorize leukemias into various subtypes. Although sophisticated methodologies are frequently used to detect characteristic features conferring diagnostic, prognostic, or therapeutic implications, a thorough microscopic examination remains essential to the pathologic evaluation. Detailed blast immunophenotyping can be performed with lineage- and maturation-specific markers. Although no one marker is pathognomonic for one malignancy, a well-chosen panel of antibodies can efficiently aid the diagnosis and classification of acute leukemias.

OBJECTIVE

To review important developments from recent and historical literature. General immunohistochemical staining patterns of the most commonly encountered lymphoid and myeloid leukemias are emphasized. The goal is to discuss the immunostaining of acute leukemias when flow cytometry and genetic studies are not available.

DATA SOURCES

A comprehensive review was performed of the relevant literature indexed in PubMed (National Library of Medicine) and referenced medical texts. Additional references were identified in the reviewed manuscripts.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunophenotyping of blasts using an immunohistochemical approach to lymphoid and myeloid malignancies is presented. Initial and subsequent additional antibody panels are suggested to confirm or exclude each possibility in the differential diagnosis and a general strategy for diagnostic evaluation is discussed. Although the use of immunohistochemistry alone is limited and evaluation by flow cytometry and genetic studies is highly recommended, unavoidable situations requiring analysis of formalin-fixed tissue specimens arise. When performed in an optimized laboratory and combined with a careful morphologic examination, the immunohistochemical approach represents a useful laboratory tool for classifying various leukemias.

Myeloperoxidase cytochemical negativity: an unexpected but intrinsic property of blasts of all phases of chronic myeloid leukemia

Myeloperoxidase (MPO) cytochemical activity, recognized as a very important hallmark of myeloblasts, is generally negative in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) blast crisis (BC). Because this finding is unexpected, being not in keeping with the myeloproliferative nature of CML, we tried to ascertain if MPO cytochemical negativity could be an intrinsic property of blasts of CML and hence present in the preblastic phases as well. Myeloperoxidase cytochemistry of peripheral blood blasts in 161 cases of CML, including 103 in chronic phase (CP) and 29 each in accelerated phase (AP) and BC, was assessed and compared with that of 30 cases of acute myeloid leukemia, AML-M2. Blasts of 97 (94.2%) of 103 cases of CP, 28 (96.6%) of 29 cases of AP, and 22 (75.9%) of 29 cases of BC were negative for MPO (<3% MPO-positive blasts). Compared with the strong MPO positivity, both in terms of intensity and proportion, in the AML-M2 cases, the positivity in the CML cases was generally weak and was seen in a small number of blasts (5-15%), except in one case of BC with 20% positive blasts. Absence or, at times, weak MPO cytochemical activity is an intrinsic property of blasts of all phases of CML, and use of the term myeloblast in CML should be understood to refer to a cell with this property. This also explains why MPO cytochemistry, despite its high reputation as a myeloid-lineage marker, generally does not help in CML BC. CML BC should therefore be considered as a possible diagnosis along with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, AML-M0, AML-M7, etc., in the setting of MPO-negative blasts. Similarity between MPO expression pattern in CML, i.e., negative in blasts and positive in the more mature cells, and that during maturation of normal myeloid series of cells shows the deranged myelopoiesis of CML to be undisturbed at least with respect to MPO expression. There is need for a more comprehensive study of blasts of preblastic phases.