Toxic epidermal necrolysis and graft vs. host disease: a clinical spectrum but a diagnostic dilemma

Anticancer Drugs Induced Severe Adverse Cutaneous Drug Reactions: An Updated Review on the Risks Associated with Anticancer Targeted Therapy or Immunotherapies

Cutaneous adverse drug reactions are commonly seen in patients with anticancer drug treatment. Anticancer drugs, including chemotherapy, target therapy, and recent immunotherapy causing skin reactions ranging from mild skin rash to life-threatening severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs), such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrosis (TEN) with increase morbidity and mortality while they are receiving cancer treatments, have been proposed to be a result of direct skin toxicity or drug hypersensitivity reactions (these are proposed mechanism, not definite). Differentiating SCARs from other more commonly seen reactions with a better outcome help prevent discontinuation of therapy and inappropriate use of systemic immunosuppressants for presumable allergic reactions, of which will affect the clinical outcome. In this article, we have reviewed published articles from 1950 to August 2017 for SJS/TEN associated with anticancer drugs, including chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. We aimed to provide an overview of SJS/TEN associated with anticancer drugs to increase clinician recognition and accelerate future studies on the pathomechanism and managements.

Life-threatening dermatologic adverse events in oncology

The incidences of life-threatening toxicities such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are inconsistently reported. The potential association of anticancer agents with SJS or TEN has not been systematically investigated. We searched the literature (Ovid: 1950 to June 2013 and PubMed: 1948 to June 2013) using terms for SJS/TEN and anticancer therapies. Primary case reports, case series, and clinical trials were included. In addition, MedWatch, the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), was searched (1968 to August 2012) for SJS/TEN reports associated with anticancer therapies. Proportional reporting ratios (PRR>2, N>3), empirical Bayes geometric mean (EBGM>2, N>3), and lower 95% confidence interval (EBGM0.05>2) were used as thresholds to constitute a signal of association between SJS/TEN and anticancer drugs. There were 46 SJS and 37 TEN cases associated with 18 and 22 anticancer drugs in the literature, respectively. Among cases in the FAERS, significant signals were associated with SJS for bendamustine and with TEN for bendamustine, busulfan, chlorambucil, fludarabine, lomustine, and procarbazine. Several drugs reported in the published literature to be associated with SJS/TEN were not found to have significant signals in FAERS. Proactive pharmacovigilance to detect and define safety signals serves to aid oncology practitioners in the recognition of possible, yet uncommon, serious, and/or life-threatening skin reactions.

Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis and Graft-versus-Host Reaction: Revisiting a Puzzling Similarity

Drug-induced toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) and acute cutaneous graft-versus-host reaction (GVHR) under immunopreventive therapy share some histopathological resemblance. So far, there are no serum biomarkers and no immunohistochemical criteria distinguishing with confidence and specificity the skin lesions of TEN and GVHR. Both diseases present as an inflammatory cell-poor necrotic reaction of the epidermis. This report compares three sets of 15 immunostaining patterns found in TEN, GVHR, and partial thickness thermal burns (PTTB), respectively. Three series of 17 skin biopsies were scrutinized. Irrespective of the distinct causal pathobiology of TEN and GVHR, similar secondary effector cells were recruited in lesional skin. Burns were less enriched in cells of the monocyte-macrophage disease. These cells likely exert deleterious effects in TEN and GVHR and cannot be simply regarded as passive bystanders. These life-threatening conditions are probably nursed, at least in part, by macrophages.

Revisiting cutaneous adverse reactions to pemetrexed

Pemetrexed (Alimta®) is a multitargeted antifolate drug approved as a single agent or in combination with cisplatin for the treatment of a small number of malignancies including advanced and metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and malignant pleural mesothelioma. This review reports the recent peer-reviewed publications and original findings regarding cutaneous adverse reactions (CARs) to pemetrexed. Pemetrexed-related CARs are frequently reported under the unspecific term 'skin rash'. However, more specific diseases were tentatively identified as alopecias, urticarial vasculitis, acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, toxic epidermal necrolysis, radiation recall dermatitis and pityriasis lichenoides. Most of the skin reactions occur shortly after pemetrexed administration. As with methotrexate-related CARs, the cell cycle arrest in the S phase may be regarded as a direct and major cause of the cytotoxic pathobiology. An adverse immune reaction is unlikely. In conclusion, pemetrexed is responsible for CARs exhibiting a variety of clinical presentations. Their origin is likely attributed to direct cytotoxicity following the cell cycle arrest in the S phase and cell necrosis.

Facing up to toxic epidermal necrolysis

Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is a rare but life-threatening mucocutaneous adverse drug reaction. The disease is characterized by a specific and extensive destruction of the epidermis and mucosal epithelia, particularly of the mouth, genitalia and eyes. The TEN pathomechanism is probably initiated by a toxic drug metabolism inside keratinocytes, leading to a self-activation of apoptosis and necrosis. These events are boosted by additional effects of T lymphocytes and macrophages. At present there is still a lack of validated mainstay treatment for TEN. However, a few treatment modalities have been reported to halt TEN progression in some patients.

New insights in toxic epidermal necrolysis (Lyell's syndrome): clinical considerations, pathobiology and targeted treatments revisited

Drug-induced toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), also known as Lyell's syndrome, is a life-threatening drug reaction characterized by extensive destruction of the epidermis and mucosal epithelia. The eyes are typically involved in TEN. At present, the disease has a high mortality rate. Conceptually, TEN and the Stevens-Johnson syndrome are closely related, although their severity and outcome are different. Distinguishing TEN from severe forms of erythema multiforme relies on consideration of aetiological, clinical and histological characteristics. The current understanding of the pathomechanism of TEN suggests that keratinocytes are key initiator cells. It is probable that the combined deleterious effects on keratinocytes of both the cytokine tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha and oxidative stress induce a combination of apoptotic and necrotic events. As yet, there is no evidence indicating the superiority of monotherapy with corticosteroids, ciclosporin (cyclosporine) or intravenous immunoglobulins over supportive care only for patients with TEN. However, the current theory of TEN pathogenesis supports the administration of a combination of antiapoptotic/antinecrotic drugs (e.g. anti-TNF-alpha antibodies plus N-acetylcysteine) targeting different levels of the keratinocyte failure machinery.

Toxic epidermal necrolysis and hemolytic uremic syndrome after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation

TEN and HUS are challenging complications with excessive mortality after HSCT. We report the development of these two conditions in combination in a nine-yr-old boy after HSCT from an unrelated donor. TEN with skin detachment of more than 90% of body surface area developed after initial treatment for GvHD. Within a few days of admission to the burns unit, the patient developed severe hemolysis, hypertension, thrombocytopenia, and acute renal failure consistent with HUS, apparently caused by CSA. The management included intensive care in a burns unit, accelerated drug removal using plasmapheresis, and a dedicated multi-disciplinary team approach to balance immunosuppression and infections management in a situation with extensive skin detachment. The patient survived and recovered renal function but requires continued treatment for severe GvHD. Suspecting and identifying causative drugs together with meticulous supportive care in the burns unit is essential in the management of these patients and long-term survival is possible.

Toxic epidermal necrolysis-like acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus and the spectrum of the acute syndrome of apoptotic pan-epidermolysis (ASAP): a case report, concept review and proposal for new classification of lupus erythematosus vesiculobullous skin lesions

The acute clinical syndrome of toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is currently thought to be a distinct clinical-pathological entity typically resulting from drug hypersensitivity. We describe an adult woman who experienced a fulminate pattern of apoptotic epidermal cell injury following tanning bed exposure while taking naproxen that resulted in a clinical presentation having combined features of drug-induced TEN and an infrequently recognized form of bullous cutaneous lupus erythematosus (LE). This case calls attention to the fact that TEN-like injury can occasionally be seen in settings other than drug hypersensitivity (e.g., LE, acute graft versus host disease) and illustrates the need for a unifying concept in this area. We therefore propose the term 'Acute Syndrome of Apoptotic Pan-Epidermolysis (ASAP)' to designate a clinical syndrome that is characterized by life-threatening acute and massive cleavage of the epidermis resulting from hyperacute apoptotic injury of the epidermis. We also review vesiculobullous skin disorders that can be encountered in LE patients and suggest a new classification scheme for such lesions.

Differential diagnosis of skin lesions after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (i.e. bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation) is a common procedure in the treatment of various haematological disorders such as aplastic anaemia, (pre)leukaemias, some malignant lymphomas, multiple myeloma and immunodeficiency states. Many of these patients develop erythematous skin lesions following transplantation. Although graft- versus-host disease is the major differential diagnosis in these situations, many other causes of erythema are encountered. The large number of transplant patients means that more and more pathologists are confronted with the challenging problem of making a correct diagnosis in these situations. In this review article we therefore describe the different causes of erythema and their differential diagnoses. In most cases the clinical presentation is related to the microscopical features. Besides acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease, we discuss the (common) drug reactions and non-specific features such as Sweet's syndrome, erythema nodosum and eosinophilic folliculitis. In addition, we deal with the recurrence of original diseases and infections. With this knowledge every pathologist should feel comfortable when looking at skin biopsies of patients after haematological stem cell transplantation.

Toxic epidermal necrolysis after the use of high-dose cytosine arabinoside

We report a fatal case of toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) resulting from a high dose of cytosine arabinoside (ARA-C). A 13-year-old girl with acute lymphocytic leukemia was treated according to the protocol of the BFM Group (BFM-95, HRG). On the fifth day after administration of a high dose of ARA-C (2 g/m2 intravenously every 12 hours), she developed bullous lesions on the hands and soles that disseminated, evolving to necrosis, sepsis, and death on the 22nd day. ARA-C is frequently associated with dermatologic toxicity, but this is only the second case of toxic epidermal necrolysis described in connection with this drug.

Drug-induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis

Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) is a rare (occurring in approximately 2 to 3 people/million population/year in Europe and the US), life-threatening, intolerance reaction of the skin. It is most often caused by drugs (most commonly sulfonamides, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antimalarials, anticonvulsants, and allopurinol). SJS/TEN is characterized by a macular exanthema ('atypical targets') which focusses on the face, neck, and the central trunk regions. Lesions show rapid confluence, a positive Nikolsky's sign, and quickly result in widespread detachment of the epidermis and erosions. Mucosal, conjunctival, and anogenital mucous membranes are prominently involved. Histopathology shows satellite cell necrosis in the early stages progressing to full thickness necrosis of the epidermis, contrasting with rather inconspicuous inflammatory infiltrates of the dermis. Damage to the skin is thought to be mediated by cytotoxic T lymphocytes and mononuclear cells which induce apoptosis in keratinocytes expressing drug-derived antigens at their surfaces. No guidelines for the treatment of SJS/TEN exist since no controlled clinical trials have ever been performed. The controversy over whether systemic corticosteroids should be used to curtail progression is still unresolved; while many authors agree that corticosteroids do in fact suppress progression, it is obvious that they also greatly enhance the risk of infection, the complication which most frequently leads to a fatal outcome. It appears reasonable to only administer corticosteroids in the phase of progression and to withdraw them as soon as possible, and to add antibacterials for prophylaxis. Recently, in a small series of patients, intravenous immunoglobulins were presumed to be effective by the blockade of lytic Fas ligand-mediated apoptosis in SJS/TEN. However, these results have to be confirmed by large clinical trials. Supportive treatment and monitoring of vital functions is of utmost importance in SJS/TEN, and out-patient treatment is unacceptable. Recovery is usually slow, depending on the extent and severity and the presence of complications, and may take 3 to 6 weeks. Skin lesions heal without scars as a rule, but scarring of mucosal sites is a frequent late complication, potentially leading to blindness, obliteration of the fornices and anogenital strictures. There is no reliable laboratory test to determine the offending drug; diagnosis rests on the patient's history and the empirical risk of drugs to elicit skin SJS/TEN. Provocation tests are not indicated since re-exposure is likely to elicit a new episode of SJS/TEN of increased severity.

Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma and cutaneous graft-versus-host disease. Two indications for photopheresis in dermatology

Dermatologists are frequently involved in the management of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). The similarities of these two entities are reviewed in the context of clinical and histologic findings, pathogenesis, and therapy. Photopheresis therapy (extracorporeal photochemotherapy) is used in the treatment of both entities, and the mechanisms underlying the responses represent yet another striking similarity of these two crippling dermatologic diseases.