A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of UVA-1 in the treatment of dyshidrotic eczema

Efficacy and Satisfaction of Low Doses UVA1 Phototherapy: A Spanish Experience from a Single Centre

Background: UVA1 phototherapy is a treatment used for multiple dermatological conditions. The optimal therapeutic regimens and dosing of UVA1 are a matter of debate. The dosages used vary widely between published studies and there are no evidence-based protocols that provide data on dosage, duration, or the role of maintenance therapy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the experience in our medical center regarding treatment with UVA1, as well as the degree of patient satisfaction with the treatment according to their pathology. Methods: We present a retrospective evaluation of outcomes, treatment tolerability, and satisfaction in adult patients using a low dose of UVA1 phototherapy, administered in our dermatologic service between 2019 and 2022. Results: A total of 78 patients were treated with UVA1, of whom 46 patients (59%) were over 18 years old, completed treatment, and gave their consent. The overall objective clinical response rate was 91.30% (42/46), achieving a complete response in 17 (36.96%) patients, partial response in 25 (54.34%), and no response in 4 (8.70%). The complete response rates recorded were high in morphea, scleredema, or chronic hand eczema. In terms of the level of satisfaction objectively measured by TSQM-9 version 1.4, highlighting high scores obtained in mastocytosis, systemic sclerosis, morphea, scleredema, chronic hand eczema, or prurigo nodularis (over 65 points). Conclusions: We present a review of treatment with UVA1 phototherapy at low doses with good response in a wide variety of dermatological pathologies.

Low Dose Oral Alitretinoin With Narrowband Ultraviolet B Therapy for Chronic Hand Dermatitis

Background

Chronic hand dermatitis (CHD) is difficult to treat and has high individual and societal burdens. Phototherapy and oral alitretinoin are safe monotherapies for CHD, but their combination has not been assessed.

Objective

To assess the effectiveness and safety of low dose oral alitretinoin combined with phototherapy versus high dose oral alitretinoin for CHD refractory to topical corticosteroids.

Methods

This retrospective study of adult patients with CHD refractory to topical corticosteroid therapy compared low dose oral alitretinoin (10 mg three times weekly) combined with narrowband ultraviolet B therapy (three times weekly; LDA-UVB) to high dose oral alitretinoin (30 mg daily; HDA) for 16 weeks. Outcomes were improvement in disease severity measured by the Physician’s Global Assessment and quality of life measured with the Dermatology Life Quality Index.

Results

The mean age of the study population (n = 64) was 41.25 years and 57.8% were male. Both cohorts experienced improvements in disease severity and quality of life after 16 weeks, however, significantly more participants who received LDA-UVB (n = 21/33, 63.6%) achieved “clear” or “almost clear” assessments compared to those who received HDA (n = 12/31, 38.7%; P < .05). Adverse effects were significantly more prevalent in the HDA group (P < .0001) and included headache, elevated cholesterol, and dry lips.

Conclusions

The combination of low dose oral alitretinoin with narrowband-UVB therapy was more effective and had fewer adverse effects compared to high dose oral alitretinoin for participants with CHD refractory to topical corticosteroid therapy.

Utilizing UVA-1 Phototherapy

There is a long history of utilization of phototherapy for treatment of skin conditions. Because of its longer wavelength, UVA1 phototherapy is able to penetrate into the dermis and subcutis. This depth of penetration, combined with its unique immunomodulating properties, makes UVA1 an effective treatment modality for many immune-mediated skin diseases. In some cases, it performs better than other types of phototherapy.

Interventions for hand eczema

BACKGROUND

Hand eczema is an inflammation of the skin of the hands that tends to run a chronic, relapsing course. This common condition is often associated with itch, social stigma, and impairment in employment. Many different interventions of unknown effectiveness are used to treat hand eczema.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of topical and systemic interventions for hand eczema in adults and children.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following up to April 2018: Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, AMED, LILACS, GREAT, and four trials registries. We checked the reference lists of included studies for further references to relevant trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared interventions for hand eczema, regardless of hand eczema type and other affected sites, versus no treatment, placebo, vehicle, or active treatments.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Primary outcomes were participant- and investigator-rated good/excellent control of symptoms, and adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 60 RCTs, conducted in secondary care (5469 participants with mild to severe chronic hand eczema). Most participants were over 18 years old. The duration of treatment was short, generally up to four months. Only 24 studies included a follow-up period. Clinical heterogeneity in treatments and outcome measures was evident. Few studies performed head-to-head comparisons of different interventions. Risk of bias varied considerably, with only five studies at low risk in all domains. Twenty-two studies were industry-funded.Eighteen trials studied topical corticosteroids or calcineurin inhibitors; 10 studies, phototherapy; three studies, systemic immunosuppressives; and five studies, oral retinoids. Most studies compared an active intervention against no treatment, variants of the same medication, or placebo (or vehicle). Below, we present results from the main comparisons.Corticosteroid creams/ointments: when assessed 15 days after the start of treatment, clobetasol propionate 0.05% foam probably improves participant-rated control of symptoms compared to vehicle (risk ratio (RR) 2.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.38 to 3.91; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 3, 95% CI 2 to 8; 1 study, 125 participants); the effect of clobetasol compared to vehicle for investigator-rated improvement is less clear (RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.86 to 2.40). More participants had at least one adverse event with clobetasol (11/62 versus 5/63; RR 2.24, 95% CI 0.82 to 6.06), including application site burning/pruritus. This evidence was rated as moderate certainty.When assessed 36 weeks after the start of treatment, mometasone furoate cream used thrice weekly may slightly improve investigator-rated symptom control compared to twice weekly (RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.61; 1 study, 72 participants) after remission is reached. Participant-rated symptoms were not measured. Some mild atrophy was reported in both groups (RR 1.76, 95% CI 0.45 to 6.83; 5/35 versus 3/37). This evidence was rated as low certainty.Irradiation with ultraviolet (UV) light: local combination ultraviolet light therapy (PUVA) may lead to improvement in investigator-rated symptom control when compared to local narrow-band UVB after 12 weeks of treatment (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.16; 1 study, 60 participants). However, the 95% CI indicates that PUVA might make little or no difference. Participant-rated symptoms were not measured. Adverse events (mainly erythema) were reported by 9/30 participants in the narrow-band UVB group versus none in the PUVA group. This evidence was rated as moderate certainty.Topical calcineurin inhibitors: tacrolimus 0.1% over two weeks probably improves investigator-rated symptom control measured after three weeks compared to vehicle (14/14 tacrolimus versus 0/14 vehicle; 1 study). Participant-rated symptoms were not measured. Four of 14 people in the tacrolimus group versus zero in the vehicle group had well-tolerated application site burning/itching.A within-participant study in 16 participants compared 0.1% tacrolimus to 0.1% mometasone furoate but did not measure investigator- or participant-rated symptoms. Both treatments were well tolerated when assessed at two weeks during four weeks of treatment.Evidence from these studies was rated as moderate certainty.Oral interventions: oral cyclosporin 3 mg/kg/d probably slightly improves investigator-rated (RR 1.88, 95% CI 0.88 to 3.99; 1 study, 34 participants) or participant-rated (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.69 to 2.27) control of symptoms compared to topical betamethasone dipropionate 0.05% after six weeks of treatment. The risk of adverse events such as dizziness was similar between groups (up to 36 weeks; RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.86, n = 55; 15/27 betamethasone versus 19/28 cyclosporin). The evidence was rated as moderate certainty.Alitretinoin 10 mg improves investigator-rated symptom control compared with placebo (RR 1.58, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.07; NNTB 11, 95% CI 6.3 to 26.5; 2 studies, n = 781) and alitretinoin 30 mg also improves this outcome compared with placebo (RR 2.75, 95% CI 2.20 to 3.43; NNTB 4, 95% CI 3 to 5; 2 studies, n = 1210). Similar results were found for participant-rated symptom control: alitretinoin 10 mg RR 1.73 (95% CI 1.25 to 2.40) and 30 mg RR 2.75 (95% CI 2.18 to 3.48). Evidence was rated as high certainty. The number of adverse events (including headache) probably did not differ between alitretinoin 10 mg and placebo (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.55; 1 study, n = 158; moderate-certainty evidence), but the risk of headache increased with alitretinoin 30 mg (RR 3.43, 95% CI 2.45 to 4.81; 2 studies, n = 1210; high-certainty evidence). Outcomes were assessed between 48 and 72 weeks.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Most findings were from single studies with low precision, so they should be interpreted with caution. Topical corticosteroids and UV phototherapy were two of the major standard treatments, but evidence is insufficient to support one specific treatment over another. The effect of topical calcineurin inhibitors is not certain. Alitretinoin is more effective than placebo in controlling symptoms, but advantages over other treatments need evaluating.Well-designed and well-reported, long-term (more than three months), head-to-head studies comparing different treatments are needed. Consensus is required regarding the definition of hand eczema and its subtypes, and a standard severity scale should be established.The main limitation was heterogeneity between studies. Small sample size impacted our ability to detect differences between treatments.

Ultraviolet-A1 phototherapy in Asian skin: A review of 159 cases in Singapore

Background

Ultraviolet-A1 phototherapy has been used to treat many inflammatory dermatoses.

Aims

To determine the efficacy and safety of ultraviolet-A1 phototherapy in Asian skin.

Materials and Methods

We performed a review of records of patients undergoing ultraviolet-A1 phototherapy at our dermatology unit in Singapore from January 2007 to January 2011. Their electronic medical records were reviewed and a standardized questionnaire was filled up for data collection and tabulation. Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests were used to compare the difference in response between various groups for each characteristic. P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Our study comprised of 159 patients, of which 103 were patients with hand and foot eczema, 21 with atopic dermatitis, 17 with scleroderma and the remaining with miscellaneous dermatoses. Of these patients, 47.6% of patients with hand and feet eczema had good response after 10 sessions, which increased to 75% after 20 sessions and to 84.6% after 30 sessions. After 10 sessions, 47.6% of patients with atopic dermatitis had good response, which increased to 66.7% after 20 sessions. After 30 sessions, all the three remaining patients with atopic dermatitis experienced good response. For patients with scleroderma, only 11.8 and 10% had good response after 10 and 20 sessions, respectively, which increased to 40% after 30 sessions.

Limitations

Limitations of our study include its retrospective design and, consequently, the lack of standardized treatment protocol, as well as subjective assessment in terms of clinical improvement.

Conclusions

Ultraviolet-A1 phototherapy appears to be efficacious for the treatment of hand and foot eczema as well as atopic dermatitis. However, in patients with scleroderma, the response was partial and needed a longer duration of treatment.

S1-Leitlinie zur UV-Phototherapie und Photochemotherapie

Die heilsame Wirkung des Sonnenlichts war teilweise schon im Altertum bekannt und fand in der zweiten Hälfte des 19. Jahrhunderts wieder zunehmend Beachtung. Den Beginn der modernen Phototherapien markiert die Entwicklung einer Apparatur zur ultravioletten Bestrahlung der Hauttuberkulose durch Finnsen zu Beginn des zwanzigsten Jahrhunderts. Zur Therapie von Hauterkrankungen finden beinahe ausschließlich die spektralen Bereiche unterhalb des sichtbaren Lichtes (ultraviolett) Anwendung. Seit den 1970er Jahren stehen zunehmend leistungsfähige künstliche Strahlenquellen bereit für die Therapie mit UVB, UVA und die Kombination von UVA mit Photosensibilisatoren (Photochemotherapie). Hohe strukturelle und prozedurale Qualitätsstandards sind unabdingbare Voraussetzung für die Durchführung einer gleichermaßen wirkungsvollen wie auch sicheren Phototherapie. Die Leitlinie formuliert den aktuellen Konsens führender Experten auf dem Gebiet der Phototherapie in Bezug auf die Indikationen für die jeweiligen Therapieverfahren, deren Gegenanzeigen und Nebenwirkungen und insbesondere für die Wahl der korrekten Dosis zu Beginn und im Verlauf einer Therapie sowie das Management von Nebenwirkungen.

Hand dermatitis: a review of clinical features, prevention and treatment

Hand dermatitis is a socially significant health problem. This review provides a discussion on the clinical features and patterns as well as the differential diagnosis of hand dermatitis, because these are essential for proper diagnosis in clinical practice. The morphology, however, is poorly related to the etiology in chronic cases. In all cases of chronic hand dermatitis, a full diagnostic examination should be undertaken and the etiology should be clarified and addressed in the treatment concept, instead of just moving directly from a morphological diagnosis to therapy. Preventive measures should be included in the treatment concept according to etiology. A stepwise approach for escalating therapy is advised, including basic topical therapy, topical corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, as well as phototherapy and systemic therapy with corticosteroids, alitretinoin, cyclosporine, methotrexate, azathioprine, and others.

Management of Chronic Hand Eczema

Management of hand eczema is complex because of the broad range of different pathogeneses, courses, and prognoses. Furthermore, the efficacy of most available treatments is not well established and the more severe forms can have a major impact on the patient's quality of life. Patient education, preventive measures, and the use of emollients are the mainstays in the management of hand eczema. High-potency topical corticosteroids are the treatment of choice, with calcineurin inhibitors used for maintenance. Phototherapy or systemic treatments are indicated in patients who do not respond to topical treatments. Switching from topical treatments should not be delayed to avoid sensitizations, time off work, and a negative impact on quality of life. Alitretinoin is the only oral treatment approved for use in chronic hand eczema.

Canadian hand dermatitis management guidelines

BACKGROUND

Hand dermatitis (HD) is one of the most common skin conditions; however, it is not a homogeneous disease entity. The severity of HD may range from very mild cases to severe chronic forms, which may result in prolonged disability and, occasionally, refractory HD. Chronic hand dermatitis (CHD) is associated with a high health- economic burden and significant loss of quality of life.

OBJECTIVE

Although numerous treatment options are available, the management of CHD is often difficult and unsatisfactory. There is a paucity of well-designed, randomized, controlled clinical trials in support of the efficacy of established treatment modalities.

CONCLUSION

These guidelines cover the epidemiology, burden, quality of life, etiology, diagnosis, classification, and prevention of HD and provide guidance on management using an approach that is as evidence based as possible.

Pompholyx: a review of clinical features, differential diagnosis, and management

Pompholyx is a vesicobullous disorder of the palms and soles. The condition is hard to treat because of the peculiarities of the affected skin, namely the thick horny layer and richness of the sweat glands. In this article, we review the available therapies, and score the treatments according to the level of evidence. The cornerstones of topical therapy are corticosteroids, although calcineurin inhibitors also seem to be effective. Topical photochemotherapy with methoxsalen (8-methoxypsoralen) is as effective as systemic photochemotherapy or high-dose UVA-1 irradiation. Systemic therapy is often necessary in bullous pompholyx. Corticosteroids are commonly used although no controlled study has been published to date. For recalcitrant cases, corticosteroids are combined with immunosuppressants. Alitretinoin has efficacy in chronic hand dermatitis including pompholyx. Another evolving treatment seems to be the intradermal injection of botulinum toxin. Radiotherapy might be an option for selected patients not responding to conventional treatment. In practice, patients benefit most from a combination of treatments.

Innovative management of severe hand dermatitis

The successful treatment of hand dermatitis (HD) depends less on the selection of the proper topical steroid or a particular systemic agent than on addressing any underlying cause or perpetuating factor. Thus, innovative treatment is based on comprehensively addressing the patient's problem. Aggressive approaches may be required for the most severe forms of HD.

Update on the use of alitretinoin in treating chronic hand eczema

Chronic hand eczema is a debilitating dermatological condition with significant economic, social, and functional impacts. To date, conventional treatments such as topical corticosteroids, phototherapy, and systemic immunosuppressants have yielded disappointing results, owing to either a lack of efficacy or significant adverse events. Oral alitretinoin (9-cis-retinoic acid) is a unique panagonist retinoid with immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory activity that has emerged as a novel treatment for chronic hand eczema. Several large-scale clinical studies have demonstrated oral alitretinoin’s high efficacy rate of 28% to 89%, its safe tolerability profile, and its positive impact on quality of life, validating it as a therapeutic option for patients with severe chronic hand eczema refractory to standard treatment.

[Therapy of occupational skin diseases]

Hand eczema is one of the most frequent skin diseases. About 5-10% of population has chronic hand eczema. In addition, hand eczema accounts for more than 90% of occupational skin diseases. The therapy of hand eczema is expensive and often leads to a loss in quality of life. The therapy is complex, not always successful and can lead in the worst case to the patient being forced to give up or change their profession. We review the therapeutic options to treat occupational hand eczema.

[New and rarley used treatment options for refractory hand eczema: local UVA-1 phototherapy, retinoids, calcineurin inhibitors]

Hand eczema (HE) is one of the most frequent skin diseases. HE has a wide spectrum, with variable etiology, severity, and morphology. It often displays a chronically relapsing course with a poor prognosis, and has a high impact on the quality of life. Although different treatment options exist, the management of patients with chronic HE is often unsatisfactory. We highlight new and rarely used approaches to treat chronic HE uncluding local UVA-1-phototherapy, retinoids including the new oral retinoid alitretinoin, and calcineurin inhibitors.

Disidrose: aspectos clínicos, etiopatogênicos e terapêuticos

A disidrose e as erupções disidrosiformes são dermatoses vesiculosas muito freqüentes e de localização palmar e/ou plantar, de difícil tratamento e de evolução recidivante. Sua cura definitiva depende da descoberta do agente etiológico e da possibilidade de sua retirada definitiva. Fatores emocionais, atopia, medicamentos, substâncias de contato, etc. têm sido relatados como seus causadores. Além do tratamento com corticosteróides, atualmente novas drogas têm sido indicadas nos casos mais graves e/ou refratários.

Management of chronic hand eczema

Hand eczema (HE) is one of the most frequent skin diseases and has often a chronically relapsing course with a poor prognosis resulting in a high social and economic impact for the individual and the society. In this article, we highlight the results of an expert workshop on the 'management of severe chronic hand eczema' with the focus on the epidemiology, the burden of severe HE, its classification and diagnostic procedures, and the current status of treatment options according to an evidence-based approach (randomized controlled clinical trials, RCTs). We conclude that despite the abundance of topical and systemic treatment options, disease management in patients with severe chronic HE is frequently inadequate. There is a strong need for RCTs of existing and new treatment options based on clearly diagnosed subtypes of HE and its severity.

Dyshidrosis: Epidemiology, Clinical Characteristics, and Therapy

Dyshidrosis is a common chronic dermatitis of the hands and feet that may cause significant physical discomfort, psychological distress, and occupational impairment. Topics reviewed in this article include epidemiology, clinical findings, quality of life, and therapeutic considerations. Dyshidrosis is often difficult to manage; therefore, extra attention is given in this review article to current treatment options.

Dermatitis de manos

Hand dermatitis is a common skin disease that often has a chronic and relapsing course. Several subtypes of hand dermatitis have been described. In this review, we describe the clinical characteristics of each form of hand eczema, laboratory tests helpful in the diagnosis, and treatment options for this condition.

[Therapy of hand eczema. What can we learn from the published clinical studies?]

Hand eczema is a very common skin disease, which can be induced by different causes. Although many interventions ranging from topical corticosteroids and UV therapy to oral cyclosporine and retinoids are available, the treatment of hand eczema can be very difficult and frustrating. The objective of our study was to assess the external evidence of different treatment modalities for hand eczema. Electronic databases (Cochrane, MEDLINE, Embase, Pascal, Jicst-Eplus, Amed) were systematically searched for clinical trials on therapy for hand eczema. Additionally, four general medical journals (BMJ, JAMA, Lancet, NEJM) and 17 specialists dermatological journals were hand searched from 1977 to August 2004. A total of 100 studies were found and 31 identified as randomised clinical trials (RCTs) dealing with different interventions. Due to the poor quality of most of these RCTs, they are inadequate as a guide to clinical practice. There is a need for high-quality RCTs on therapy for hand eczema regarding established as well as new treatment options taking different subgroups of hand eczema into consideration.

Pharmacotherapy of pompholyx

Pompholyx is an inflammatory vesicobullous disorder of the palms and soles. The condition is difficult to treat because of the peculiarities of the affected skin, namely, the thick horny layer and richness of sweat glands. The cornerstones of topical therapy are corticosteroids, although calcineurin inhibitors seem to be effective as well. Topical photochemotherapy with 8-methoxypsoralen is as effective as systemic photochemotherapy or high-dose ultra violet Type A-1 irradiation. Systemic therapy is often necessary in bullous pompholyx. Corticosteroids are used commonly, although no controlled studies have been published. For recalcitrant cases corticosteroids are combined with immunosuppressants. A new evolving treatment seems to be the intradermal injection of botulinum toxin.