Histopathological findings suggest the diagnosis in an atypical case of Pendred syndrome

Detailed MR imaging assessment of endolymphatic hydrops in patients with SLC26A4 mutations

OBJECTIVE

Mutations in SLC26A4 represent the second most common mutations in deafness patients. The majority of patients with SLC26A4 mutations have a large vestibular aqueduct (LVA). Recently, some reports showed the presence of endolymphatic hydrops (ELH) in patients with LVA on the basis of high-resolution enhanced 3T-MRI. However, detailed evaluation has not been performed. We provide the first report on ELH in LVA patients with biallelic SLC26A4 mutations. In this study, we focused on 1) the findings of ELH in LVA patients with biallelic SLC26A4 mutations, and 2) the findings of the endolymphatic duct (ED) and endolymphatic sac (ES) by using two different gadodimide (Gd) enhancement methods.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Five patients with SLC26A4 mutations underwent enhanced 3T-MRI using the intratympanic (IT) or intravenous (IV) injection of Gd for the diagnosis ELH.

RESULTS

All of the patients had ELH in at least one ear. ELH was identified in the vestibule (8/10 ears) as well as in the cochlea (7/10 ears). With regard to the ED and ES, all ears for which MRI was performed with an IT injection of Gd had black areas in the ES or VA or both; however, all of the ears receiving an IV injection had no black areas and were well enhanced.

CONCLUSIONS

A majority of the patients had severe ELH in the cochleo-vestibular endolymph, with two different patterns observed in the MRI findings of the ED and ES.

Magnetic resonance imaging features of large endolymphatic sac compartments: audiological and clinical correlates

OBJECTIVES

(1) To study the prevalence and characteristics of large endolymphatic sac internal compartments on thin-section T2- and T2*-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, and to relate these to other large endolymphatic sac magnetic resonance imaging features, and (2) to correlate the compartment imaging features, endolymphatic sac size and labyrinthine anomalies with the patients' clinical and audiological data.

METHOD

Magnetic resonance imaging studies for 38 patients with large endolymphatic sac anomalies were retrospectively reviewed in a tertiary referral centre. Endolymphatic sac compartment presence, morphology and imaging signal were assessed. Endolymphatic sac size and labyrinthine anomalies were also recorded. Endolymphatic sac compartments and other imaging features were correlated with clinical and audiological data.

RESULTS

Compartments were present in 57 per cent of the imaged endolymphatic sacs, but their presence alone did not correlate with other imaging features or clinical data. The endolymphatic sac : internal auditory meatus signal ratio was associated with a history of sudden or fluctuating hearing loss. Hearing loss correlated with opercular and extraosseous endolymphatic sac size measurements. A larger midpoint intraosseous endolymphatic sac size was associated with clear fluid loss at cochlear implantation.

CONCLUSION

The magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of large endolymphatic sac compartments have been defined. The endolymphatic sac size and distal compartment signal should be recorded, as these provide prognostic information and assist the planning of appropriate interventions.