Comparison of different techniques for detection of anti-HLA antibodies in sera from patients awaiting kidney transplantation

C1q-binding anti-HLA antibodies do not predict platelet transfusion failure in Trial to Reduce Alloimmunization to Platelets study participants

BACKGROUND

In the Trial to Reduce Alloimmunization to Platelets (TRAP) study, 101 of 530 subjects became clinically refractory (CR) to platelets (PLTs) without lymphocytotoxicity assay (LCA)-detectable anti-HLA antibodies. The LCA only detects complement-binding antibodies and is less sensitive than newer assays. Utilizing a more sensitive bead-based assay that does not distinguish between complement-binding versus non-complement-binding antibodies, we have previously shown that while many LCA-negative (LCA-) patients do have anti-HLA antibodies, these low- to moderate-level antibodies do not predict refractoriness. As complement can contribute to PLT rejection, we assessed if previously undetected complement-binding antibodies account for refractoriness among LCA- patients.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Samples from 169 LCA- (69 CR, 100 non-CR) and 20 LCA-positive (LCA+; 10 CR, 10 non-CR) subjects were selected from the TRAP study serum repository. Anti-Class I HLA immunoglobulin (Ig)G and C1q-binding antibodies were measured in serum or plasma with bead-based detection assays. Levels of C1q-binding antibodies were compared between CR and non-CR subjects and correlated with corrected count increments (CCIs).

RESULTS

While some of the LCA- subjects had detectable C1q-binding anti-Class I HLA antibodies, and some LCA+ subjects did not, levels were significantly higher among LCA+ subjects. C1q-binding anti-Class I HLA antibody levels did not differ significantly between CR and non-CR among either the LCA- or the LCA+ subjects. Furthermore, there was no significant correlation observed between CCIs and either C1q-binding or any anti-HLA IgG antibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

This work confirms that low- to moderate-level anti-Class I antibodies do not drive PLT rejection, suggesting a role for antibody-independent mechanisms.

Clinical relevance of circulating antibodies and B lymphocyte markers in allograft rejection

The main challenge in solid organ transplantation remains to tackle antibody-mediated rejection. Our understanding of the antibody-mediated response and the capacity to detect it has improved in the last decade. However, the sensitivity and specificity of the current clinical tools to monitor B cell activation are perfectible. New strategies, including the refinement in the characterization of HLA and non-HLA antibodies, as well as a better understanding of the circulating B cell phenotype will hopefully help to non-invasively identify patients at risk or undergoing antibody-mediated allograft damage. The current review discusses the current knowledge of the B cell biomarkers in solid organ transplantation, with a focus on circulating antibodies and peripheral B cells.

Complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) to detect Anti-HLA antibodies: old but gold

BACKGROUND

The criterion (gold) standard to detect anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies is the complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) assay. Recently, more sensitive methods have been used for the same purpose.

METHODS

This study analyzed 70 serum samples of patients with end-stage renal disease using CDC, CDC with the addition of anti-human globulin (CDC-AHG), CDC with the addition of dithiothreitol (CDC-DTT), and the recent solid-phase immunoassay (SPI; Labscreen PRA) to detect anti-HLA antibodies.

RESULTS

Mean percent panel reactive antibodies (PRA) detected by SPI was 37.5% (±34.2) higher than the values detected by the other methods. Comparative analyses revealed significant difference between CDC and CDC-AHG, and between CDC and SPI (P < 0.0001), but not between CDC-AHG and SPI (P = 0.8026).

CONCLUSION

Although the CDC-AHG method is "old," its performance to detect anti-HLA antibodies in the samples analyzed was comparable to the SPI in the evaluation of percent class I PRA.

Sensitive solid-phase detection of donor-specific antibodies as an aid highly relevant to improving allograft outcomes

Transplant recipients who have had sensitizing events such as pregnancies, blood transfusions and previous transplants often develop antibodies directed against human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-molecules of the donor tissue. These pre-formed donor-specific antibodies (DSA) represent a high risk of organ failure as a consequence of antibody-mediated hyper-acute or acute allograft rejection. As a first assay to detect DSA, the complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity assay (CDC) was established more than 40 years ago. However, this assay is characterized by several drawbacks such as a low sensitivity and a high susceptibility to various artificial factors generally not leading to valid and reliable outcomes under several circumstances that are reviewed in this article. Furthermore, only those antibodies that exert complement-fixing activity are detected. As a consequence, novel procedures that act independently of the complement system and that do not represent functional assays were generated in the format of solid phase assays (SPAs) (bead- or ELISA-based). In this article, we review the pros and cons of these sensitive SPA in comparison with the detection of DSA through the use of the traditional methods such as CDC and flow cytometric analyses. Potential drawbacks of the alternative methodological approaches comprising high background reactivity, susceptibility to environmental factors and the possible influence of subjective operators' errors concerning the interpretation of the results are summarized and critically discussed for each method. We provide a forecast on the future role of SPAs reliably excluding highly deleterious DSA, thus leading to an improved graft survival.

Leukoreduction and ultraviolet treatment reduce both the magnitude and the duration of the HLA antibody response

BACKGROUND

Both leukoreduction and ultraviolet (UV) light treatment of blood products have been shown to reduce the incidence of HLA antibody development in recipients, but the impact of these treatments on the magnitude and persistence of the antibody response is less clear.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Longitudinal samples from 319 subjects taken from four different study cohorts were evaluated for HLA antibodies to determine the effects of leukoreduction and UV treatment on HLA antibody generation and persistence.

RESULTS

Subjects receiving leukoreduced or UV-treated blood products were less likely to generate Class I HLA antibodies, and those receiving leukoreduced blood were also less likely to generate Class II HLA antibodies. Among those receiving nonleukoreduced blood, 55% developed Class I HLA antibodies and 51% developed Class II HLA antibodies compared with 28% (Class I) and 15% (Class II) for those receiving leukoreduced blood and 36% (Class I) and 54% (Class II) for those receiving UV-treated blood. Among alloimmunized subjects, leukoreduction resulted in a significant twofold reduction in the magnitude of Class I HLA antibodies, and UV treatment resulted in a significant threefold reduction in the magnitude of Class II HLA antibodies. Both treatments resulted in shorter persistence of Class I HLA antibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate that leukoreduction and UV treatment of blood products results not only in a reduction in the incidence of HLA antibody production, but also in lower and more transient HLA antibody levels among sensitized transfusion recipients.

Low-level HLA antibodies do not predict platelet transfusion failure in TRAP study participants

In the Trial to Reduce Alloimmunization to Platelets (TRAP) study, 101 of 530 participants became refractory to platelet transfusions without evidence of HLA or human platelet antigen (HPA) antibodies. We used a more sensitive bead-based assay to detect and quantify HLA antibodies and a qualitative solid-phase enzyme-linked immunosorbet assay for HPA to determine whether low-level antibodies could predict refractoriness in longitudinal panels from 170 lymphocytotoxicity assay (LCA)(-) and 20 LCA(+) TRAP participants. All TRAP recipients who previously tested LCA(+) were HLA antibody(+), using the bead-based system. Levels of HLA or HPA antibodies did not predict refractoriness among LCA(-) recipients, although higher levels of HLA antibodies were associated with refractoriness among LCA(+) recipients. These data demonstrate that weak to moderate HLA antibody levels detectable by modern binding assays are not associated with platelet refractoriness.

Clinical cytometry and progress in HLA antibody detection

For most solid organ and selected stem cell transplants, antibodies against mismatched HLA antigens can lead to early and late graft failure. In recognition of the clinical significance of these antibodies, HLA antibody identification is one of the most critical functions of histocompatibility laboratories. Early methods employed cumbersome and insensitive complement-dependent cytotoxicity assays with a visual read-out. A little over 20 years ago flow cytometry entered the realm of antibody detection with the introduction of the flow cytometric crossmatch. Cytometry's increased sensitivity and objectivity quickly earned it popularity as a preferred crossmatch method especially for sensitized recipients. Although a sensitive method, the flow crossmatch was criticized as being "too sensitive" as false positive reactions were a know drawback. In part, the shortcomings of the flow crossmatch were due to the lack of corresponding sensitive and specific HLA antibody screening assays. However, in the mid 1990s, solid phase assays, capable of utilizing standard flow cytometers, were developed. These assays used microparticles coated with purified HLA molecules. Hence, the era of solid-phase, microparticle technology for HLA antibody detection was born permitting the sensitive and specific detection of HLA antibody. It was now possible to provide better correlation between HLA antibody detection and the flow cytometric crossmatch. This flow-based technology was soon followed by adaptation to the Luminex platform permitting a mutltiplexed approach for the identification and characterization of HLA antibodies. It is hoped that these technologies will ultimately lead to the identification of parameters that best correlate with and/or predict transplant outcomes.

Agreement among HLA antibody detection assays is higher in ever-pregnant donors and improved using a consensus cutoff

BACKGROUND

HLA antibodies might contribute to the pathogenesis of transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI). HLA antibody detection methods include ELISA, flow cytometry, and multiplex bead-based assays, as well as the older lymphocytotoxicity assay, and it is not obvious how to compare results across platforms.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Five hundred twenty-five serum samples were selected from 7841 donors in the Leukocyte Antibody Prevalence Study (LAPS) repository based on risk for the development of HLA antibodies, using the number of pregnancies as the risk factor. Subjects included 81 males and females with 0 (n = 187), 1 (n = 67), or 2+ pregnancies (n = 190). Replicate frozen serum aliquots were sent blinded to four different HLA antibody assay manufacturers for detection using five different assays.

RESULTS

The flow cytometry and multiplex bead based-assays typically resulted in a larger proportion of HLA antibody positive samples compared with ELISA based assays. Latent variable analysis was used to derive a new set of consensus cutoffs, which yielded similar sensitivities across test platforms and increased concordance amongst assays. Assay agreement was higher in ever pregnant females than in males and never-pregnant females.

CONCLUSIONS

Different assays resulted in varied positivity rates when the manufacturer's suggested cutoffs were used, demonstrating that care needs to be taken when comparing clinical outcomes data generated using different HLA antibody assays and testing platforms. The method used here, involving latent variable analysis, presents one possible approach to calculating comparable cutoffs that result in broad agreement across assays with respect to positivity designation.

Novel solid phase-based ELISA assays contribute to an improved detection of anti-HLA antibodies and to an increased reliability of pre- and post-transplant crossmatching

Antibodies directed against HLA antigens of a given organ donor represent the dominating reason for hyper-acute or acute allograft rejections. In order to select recipients without donor-specific antibodies, a standard crossmatch (CM) procedure, the complement-dependent cytotoxicity assay (CDC), was developed. This functional assay strongly depends on the availability of isolated vital lymphocytes of a given donor. However, the requirements of the donor’s material may often not be fulfilled, so that the detection of the antibodies directed against HLA molecules is either impaired or becomes completely impossible. To circumvent the disadvantages of the CDC procedure, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based and other solid phase-based ELISA-related techniques have been designed to reliably detect anti-HLA antibodies in recipients. Due to the obvious advantages of these novel technologies, when compared with the classical CDC assay, there is an urgent need to implement them as complementary methods or even as a substitution for the conventional CDC crossmatch that is currently being applied by all tissue typing laboratories.

Hyperacute Rejection After Lung Transplantation Caused by Undetected Low-titer Anti-HLA Antibodies

Hyperacute rejection is an early complication of transplantation, caused by the presence in the recipient of pre-formed donor-directed antibodies (Ab). We report a case of fatal early graft dysfunction after lung transplantation in a female recipient with no anti-HLA Ab detected before transplantation. Further immunologic studies revealed the presence, in the pre-transplant serum, of low-titer anti-HLA Ab directed against the donor's HLA, detectable only by flow-cytometry screening for panel-reactive antibodies. This observation emphasizes the importance of sensitive Ab detection in patients awaiting lung transplantation. Women should be specifically targeted for such sensitive Ab detection.

[HLA class I antibody screening and typing in the sera of dialyzed patients with CDC and ELISA techniques: association with graft survival]

AIM

As generally accepted, HLA antibody screening and typing in dialyzed kidney patients are important for the successful outcome of transplantation.

METHOD

Authors investigated the serum samples of 133 patients from the north-eastern region of Hungary for HLA class I antibodies with complement dependent cytotoxicity(CDC) and solid phase enzyme linked immunosorbent (ELISA) techniques (Biotest Abscreen and Abident class I), respectively.

RESULTS

The comparison of the results revealed a strong correlation (c2=7,23, p < 0,01) for antibody screening. However, the two methods detect two slightly different antibody populations. The deviation is mainly to be attributed to the higher sensitivity of ELISA, which resulted in antibody positivity of some CDC negative sera (25/106-23,6%), despite the fact that ELISA detects IgG alone. The authors investigated 56 patients, who had already undergone transplantation but got back on the waiting list later and found that average graft survival was shorter in the group of patients with antibody, regardless to the method applied. However, the difference in graft survival proved to be more significant if the patients were assorted to groups by ELISA rather than CDC positivity (ELISA: 58,4 vs 111,2 months - p < 0,001, CDC:50,5 vs 75,6 months - p > 0,05, n.s.).

CONCLUSION

This observation suggests that the clinical relevance of antibodies detected by ELISA alone -- due to its higher sensitivity -- are not to be ignored. In this context authors emphasize the HLA class I antibody screening and typing in the post-transplantation period.

Effect of Panel-Reactive Antibody in Predicting Crossmatch Selection of Cadaveric Kidney Recipients

AIM

The influence of panel-reactive antibody level (%PRA) on crossmatch results was evaluated among 866 patients on the waiting list for cadaveric renal allografting from January 2001 to August 2005. We evaluated the results for 124 potential donors for a kidney, including 2008 crossmatches. Four hundred eighteen patients were tested against only 1 donor.

METHODS

Serum samples were screened for anti-HLA antibodies using immunoglobulin (Ig)G enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) PRA kit and the %PRA of the most reactive sample (peak) was used for patient stratification, according to sensitization level. Crossmatches were performed on fresh donor T lymphocytes from peripheral lymph nodes, using classical and anti-human-globulin enhanced complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC-T) methods. The tests were performed using peak and current patient sera before and after dithiothreitol treatment. The crossmatch was assumed to be negative when no reactivity was observed in all tests.

RESULTS

The incidences of positive crossmatch were as follows: 72.3%, 14.6%, and 7.2%, among patients with PRA >50%, PRA </=50%, and PRA = 0%, respectively. A negative crossmatch was observed in 6.5% (4 of 62) of the tests among 100% PRA patients.

CONCLUSION

Although %PRA level reflects the HLA sensitization of the patient, IgG ELISA PRA and CDC-T crossmatch may not reflect the same antibodies, and both results must be considered in a transplantation decision.

ELISA methods detect HLA antibodies with variable sensitivity

The accuracy of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody screening results is dependent on the technique employed. In this study, a total of 612 serum samples from patients awaiting kidney transplantation were tested by two different enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods: LAT-M(R) (One Lambda/BMT) and AbScreen(R) (Biotest). The results of these assays were identical for HLA class I and II antibodies in 524 cases (85.6%), and discrepant in the remaining 88 cases (42 class I, 24 class II, 22 class I and II). More specifically, class I results were in agreement in 26 positive and 522 negative cases and in disagreement in 64 cases. Class II results were the same in 50 positive and 516 negative cases and different in 46 cases. Retesting the samples using LAT 1288 (One Lambda/BMT) and considering previous HLA antibody test results and the history of immunising events, the sensitivity and specificity, respectively, of the two methods were determined as follows: class I: 89.6% and 97.5% (LAT-M) vs. 70.6% and 96.8% (AbScreen), class II: 96.5% and 98.4% (LAT-M) vs. 88.3% and 95.5% (AbScreen). These results indicate that a single ELISA does not invariably prove or exclude the presence of HLA antibodies, and that additional testing is required in some cases.

Frequency and Clinical Implications of Development of Donor-Specific and Non–Donor-Specific HLA Antibodies after Kidney Transplantation

The involvement of immunologic and nonimmunologic events in long-term kidney allograft failure is difficult to assess. The development of HLA antibodies after transplantation is the witness of ongoing reactivity against the transplant, and several studies have suggested that the presence of HLA antibodies correlates with poor graft survival. However, they have not discriminated between donor-specific (DS) and non-specific (NDS) antibodies. A total of 1229 recipients of a kidney graft, transplanted between 1972 and 2002, who had over a 5-yr period a prospective annual screening for HLA antibodies with a combination of ELISA, complement-dependent cytotoxicity, and flow cytometry tests were investigated; in 543 of them, the screening was complete from transplantation to the fifth year postgrafting. Correlations were established between the presence and the specificity of the antibodies and clinical parameters. A total of 5.5% of the patients had DS, 11.3% had NDS, and 83% had no HLA antibodies after transplantation. NDS antibodies appeared earlier (1 to 5 yr posttransplantation) than DS antibodies (5 to 10 yr). In multivariate analysis, HLA-DR matching, pretransplantation immunization, and acute rejection were significantly associated with the development of both DS and NDS antibodies and also of DS versus NDS antibodies. The presence of either DS or NDS antibodies significantly correlated with lower graft survival, poor transplant function, and proteinuria. Screening of HLA antibodies posttransplantation could be a good tool for the follow-up of patients who receive a kidney transplant and allow immunosuppression to be tailored.

Detection of anti-HLA antibodies with flow cytometry in needle core biopsies of renal transplants recipients with chronic allograft nephropathy

The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of detecting anti-HLA antibodies in eluates from needle core biopsies of renal transplants with chronic allograft nephropathy. Two methods of screening, the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and flow cytometry (FlowPRA) were compared. Twenty renal transplants with CAN were removed after irreversible graft failure. To assess the feasibility of detecting anti-HLA antibodies in small samples, needle core biopsies were sampled at the same place as surgical samples and at a second cortical area. Antibodies were eluted with an acid elution kit and anti-class I and class II IgG HLA antibodies detected using ELISA and flow cytometry. Flow cytometry was found to be more sensitive than ELISA for detecting anti-HLA antibodies in eluates from renal transplants with CAN (95% vs. 75% of positive cases). Detection of anti-HLA antibodies showed good agreement between surgical samples and needle core biopsies performed at the same place for anti-class I (80% vs. 65%, r=0.724 P<0.01) and anti-class II HLA antibodies (70% vs. 55%, r=0.827 P<0.01). In addition, differences in the detection of anti-class I HLA antibodies in needle core biopsies sampled at different sites suggests that immunization to class I donor antigen could be underestimated in needle core biopsy samples. These data indicate that anti-HLA antibodies can be detected in needle core biopsies from renal transplants. Provided further evaluation is done, elution might be a complementary method to detect anti-HLA antibodies when they are bound to the transplant.