1
|
Abstract
Risk and surveillance have emerged as two prominent themes concerning the substantive topic of public health and prevention. While these themes have largely been addressed as discrete issues within the sociology of health and illness, of late there has been a concerted effort to address the relationship between the two. This paper examines an aspect of prevention which is often implicitly identified in terms of both risk and surveillance; that of cervical screening in Britain. First I discuss how risk and surveillance have been brought together in the sociology of health and illness and outline some limitations in their application to substantive topics such as prevention. Second, I introduce cervical screening and proceed with a discussion of textual and interview data which throws light on the status of risk in cervical screening as both an objective and subjective category.
Collapse
|
2
|
Fiebig DG, Haas M, Hossain I, Street DJ, Viney R. Decisions about Pap tests: What influences women and providers? Soc Sci Med 2009; 68:1766-74. [DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2008] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
3
|
Broughton S, Thomson K. Women with learning disabilities: risk behaviours and experiences of the cervical smear test. J Adv Nurs 2008. [DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01555.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
4
|
Consedine NS, Krivoshekova YS, Harris CR. Bodily embarrassment and judgment concern as separable factors in the measurement of medical embarrassment: psychometric development and links to treatment-seeking outcomes. Br J Health Psychol 2007; 12:439-62. [PMID: 17640455 DOI: 10.1348/135910706x118747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Understanding why people do not always engage in medical examinations that might benefit them is a public health issue which is receiving increased attention. One area of promise involves the study of medical embarrassment, although current studies are weakened in that they measure medical embarrassment in a theoretically naïve and unidimensional manner and have assumed that embarrassment is exclusively a barrier to the timely seeking of treatment. DESIGN Convenience sampling was used to recruit 116 male and 134 female students (mean age = 19.94 years, 47.2% Caucasian, 20.4% African-American, 32.4% Asian) from two large universities in different parts of the United States. METHODS Participants completed a comprehensive measure of medical embarrassment, reported on previous treatment avoidance because of embarrassment, and recorded the frequency of psychological, general and sex-related visits across the previous 5 years. RESULTS As expected, medical embarrassment was not unidimensional and appeared to have two distinct factors--bodily embarrassment and judgment concern. Bodily embarrassment generally predicted less frequent medical contact although not equally so across domains and it interacted with judgment concern in several cases, providing preliminary evidence that there are situations in which aspects of medical embarrassment may actually facilitate greater medical contact. CONCLUSIONS The data highlight the importance of considering the role of emotions other than fear in health behaviour and the means by which they may facilitate or deter the timely seeking of diagnosis and treatment.
Collapse
|
5
|
Whynes DK, Clarke K, Philips Z, Avis M. Cervical cancer screening and perceived information needs. HEALTH EDUCATION 2005. [DOI: 10.1108/09654280510602507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PurposeTo identify women's sources of information about cervical cancer screening, information which women report receiving during Pap consultations, information they would like to receive, and the relationships between perceived information needs, personal characteristics and information sources.Design/methodology/approachLogistic regression analysis of questionnaire data obtained from 408 screen‐eligible women resident in east central UK.FindingsProgramme documentation and the Pap consultation represent the main sources of information, although a sizeable proportion rely on other sources (e.g. mass media). The range and frequency of information services which women report receiving during their Pap consultations are variable, and around one‐sixth of women report never receiving information. “Always wanting information” is predictable from subject characteristics, which do not map precisely, owing to the variation in frequency of information being supplied. Age and women's main sources of information are significant predictors of perceived information shortfall, and such shortfalls are associated with dissatisfaction with the screening programme.Originality/valueCovers all aspects of women's attitudes towards satisfactory or unsatisfactory availability of external information in the matter of screening for cervical cancer in the UK.
Collapse
|
6
|
Miles A, Cockburn J, Smith RA, Wardle J. A perspective from countries using organized screening programs. Cancer 2004; 101:1201-13. [PMID: 15316915 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 145] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Cancer screening may be offered to a population opportunistically, as part of an organized program, or as some combination of the preceding two options. Organized screening is distinguished from opportunistic screening primarily on the basis of how invitations to screening are extended. In organized screening, invitations are issued from centralized population registers. In opportunistic screening, however, due to the lack of central registers, invitations to screening depend on the individual's decision or on encounters with health care providers. The current article outlines key differences between organized and opportunistic screening. In the current study, literature searches were performed using PubMed and MEDLINE. Additional data were assembled from interviews with health officials in the five countries investigated and from the authors' personal files. Opportunistic screening was found to be distinguishable from organized screening on the basis of whether screening invitations were issued from centralized population registers. Organized screening programs also assumed centralized responsibility for other key elements of screening, such as eligibility requirements, quality assurance, follow-up, and evaluation. Organized programs focused on reducing mortality and morbidity at the level of the population rather than at the level of the individual. Thus, programs did not necessarily offer the most sensitive screening test for a particular cancer, and tests sometimes were offered at suboptimal intervals with respect to individual-level protection. Nonetheless, organized systems paid greater attention to the quality of screening, as measured by factors such as cancer detection rates, tumor characteristics, and false-positive biopsy rates. As a result, participants in organized screening programs received greater protection from the harmful effects associated with screening. In addition, organized programs worked more systematically toward providing value for money in an inevitably resource-limited environment. Although organized and opportunistic models of screening can yield similar uptake rates, organized programs exhibited greater potential ability to reduce cancer incidence and mortality, because of the higher levels of population coverage and centralized commitment to quality and monitoring; were more likely to be cost-effective; and offered greater protection against the harmful effects associated with poor quality or overly frequent screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Miles
- Cancer Research UK Health Behaviour Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND The introduction of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing into cervical screening has the potential to alter public perceptions of cervical cancer by making explicit the role of a sexually transmitted virus in its etiology. HPV knowledge has been found to be poor, although there is evidence of public awareness of a link between sexual activity and cervical cancer risk. We explored beliefs about the risk factors for cervical cancer in a large population sample. METHODS Face-to-face interviews were carried out with a representative sample of the British population. All participants were asked what they thought increased a women's chances of developing cervical cancer. RESULTS The response rate was 71% (n = 1940). The most common single response was 'don't know' (38%). Forty-one percent of respondents mentioned factors relating to sex, but only 14% were aware of a link with sexual transmission and fewer than 1% named HPV. Women and more educated people had better knowledge of the established risk factors. The patterning of risk factor awareness by age varied across risk factors. CONCLUSIONS Awareness of the role of a sexually transmitted virus in the etiology of cervical cancer is very low in Britain. Provision of information associated with the introduction of HPV testing could change public perceptions of cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jo Waller
- Cancer Research UK Health Behaviour Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, UCL, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Park S, Yoo I, Chang S. Relationship between the intention to repeat a papanicolaou smear test and affective response to a previous test among Korean women. Cancer Nurs 2002; 25:385-90. [PMID: 12394565 DOI: 10.1097/00002820-200210000-00008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The purposes of this descriptive cross-sectional study were to describe (1). women's affective (emotional) responses before, during, and after a Papanicolaou smear test and after receiving the test result and (2.) the difference in affective response between women who did or did not intend to repeat the Papanicolaou smear test in the future. The theory of reasoned action was used as the theoretical basis for this study. Participants were selected by convenience sampling and included 515 women aged 24 to 69 years who had a previous Papanicolaou smear test, did not have cervical cancer, and who agreed to participate. Affective response was measured with an instrument developed by Park. Intention to repeat the Papanicolaou smear test was measured with a single question on intention of repeating the Papanicolaou smear test. Women with intention to repeat the Papanicolaou smear test showed higher apprehension after the test ( = 2.695, =.04) and higher positive affective responses such as feeling relieved, great, and comfortable after receiving the test result ( = 3.014, =.003). This result suggests that women with the intention to repeat the test are more concerned with the test result and that emotional relief after confirming normal findings is an important motivator for repeating the Papanicolaou smear test.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Somi Park
- Department of Nursing, Wonju College of Medicine Yonsei University, Korea.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
|
10
|
Abstract
This review focuses on why people decide to obtain or to avoid screening for cancer. We discuss three topics: (a) physician prompts that may elicit compliant screening behavior, (b) the independent and joint effects of risk perceptions and worry, and (c) the costs and benefits of getting screened. Overall, the data suggest that each of these factors will influence screening. So, for example, people are more likely to seek screening if a physician recommends the behavior, if they feel personally vulnerable and worry a little about cancer, if insurance covers the screening, and if they believe that the test is an effective early detection procedure. Future research needs include studies comparing theories, longitudinal rather than cross-sectional studies, and true experiments. We also need to know more about why physicians are such powerful change agents and the trade-offs of increasing personal risk versus exacerbating worry. Practical recommendations for promoting cancer screening include encouraging physician interventions, explaining risk, and lowering the costs while emphasizing the benefits of screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K D McCaul
- Department of Psychology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
In this paper, the literature on embarrassment, the related topics of delicacy and privacy, and the implications for nursing and medical practice are discussed, drawing on empirical data from an observational study of fertility clinics, plus other studies involving consultation and/or examination relating to sexual issues. It will be argued that current data are too patchy to give clear guidelines for professional practice, but that the issues should be explored in a more systematic way in (inter)professional education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Meerabeau
- School of Health, University of Greenwich, Avery Hill Campus, Mansion Site, Bexley Road, London SE9 2PQ, England
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Cancer is a major killer of modern man, yet despite recent advances in knowledge of cancer and its causes, prevention remains a significant challenge within healthcare. Theories of health promotion give an insight into the perspectives on disease prevention whilst frameworks for disease prevention can be useful in helping identify and address the difficulties inherent in preventing this deadly disease. Within this paper Caplan's framework forms the basis for discussion of the issues related to cancer prevention in the United Kingdom as part of nursing's health promotion role. It is suggested that a 'chain of prevention' would ideally exist linking the laboratory scientists researching cancer and the general public. 'Weak links' are identified prior to suggestions for remedial strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L R Cutler
- Rotherham Intensive Therapy Unit, University of Sheffield, England.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
|
14
|
Paskett ED, McMahon K, Tatum C, Velez R, Shelton B, Case LD, Wofford J, Moran W, Wymer A. Clinic-based interventions to promote breast and cervical cancer screening. Prev Med 1998; 27:120-8. [PMID: 9465362 DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1997.0254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast and cervical cancer continue to claim the lives of women. Early detection modalities for these cancers are available; however, utilization rates are far from optimal. Studies have documented the motivating effect that physician recommendations have on compliance with preventive health behaviors. The goal of this study was to develop and implement strategies to improve the use of cervical and breast cancer screening among African-American women age 40 and older who resided in low-income housing communities. METHODS Baseline surveys among clinic providers and a random sample of women in the target population indicated areas to be included in intervention material. Community health center-based strategies included educational interventions for providers and patients, follow-up interventions for abnormal screening tests, and the implementation of a computer tracking system. Pap smear and mammogram utilization rates at the health center were tracked throughout the project period to assess the effect of the clinic-based interventions. RESULTS Both Pap smear and mammography rates increased over time. Fifteen cases of breast cancer and 1 case of invasive cervical cancer have been detected. Compliance rates for follow-up for cervical dysplasia have increased from 50 to 90%. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that clinic-based interventions can improve the use of breast and cervical cancer screening and follow-up among low-income women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E D Paskett
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Text from a public health brochure on pap smears was analysed with particular reference to ways in which the language used conveys particular messages about women and their bodies. In the text, 'humans' were found to be excluded as such. Both the pap smear service provider and the women who are the recipients of this service--and at whom such brochures are targeted--are objectified and their characteristics of human existence (i.e. ontological capacities) were restricted. The language of the pamphlet invokes an image for women associated with vaginal (penile penetrative) sex. The discourse also is found to be didactic, biomedical and written in the voice of the service provider. Further, the encounter of pap smear events is contextualized as procedural such that not only is the woman 'done to' in the process of having a cervical smear test but the woman's and provider's experiences of the encounter are silenced. It is concluded that the texts may be viewed as misogynist and that such texts do not take account of the complexity of women's decisions to 'submit to' or comply with cervical cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Lane
- Nursing Professional Development Unit-Research, Westmead Hospital, New South Wales, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ibbotson T, Wyke S, McEwen J, Macintyre S, Kelly M. Uptake of cervical screening in general practice: effect of practice organisation, structure, and deprivation. J Med Screen 1996; 3:35-9. [PMID: 8861049 DOI: 10.1177/096914139600300109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES - To investigate associations between uptake for cervical screening in general practice and the organisation of screening, features of practice structure, and deprivation. SETTING - Greater Glasgow Health Board area in the west of Scotland, which covers a socioeconomically varied population. METHODS - General practice questionnaire survey and interview based study. The main outcome measure was the uptake rate for each participating practice over the five and a half years ending 31 December 1993. This was used to determine whether practices achieved 80% uptake to trigger maximum payment for cervical screening services. RESULTS - Forty seven percent (n = 92) of all practices in the Greater Glasgow Health Board area agreed to take part in the research, with complete data collected for 87 practices. Participation varied according to number of partners in the practice and the average deprivation score of the practice. Uptake rates ranged from 48-2% to 92-9% (median 77.5%, interquartile range 69.8% to 83.4%). Thirty seven practices (43%) achieved the 80% target. None of the recommended features of good organisation of cervical screening showed any statistically significant association with uptake rates. In stepwise multiple regression four variables were shown to have independent associations with uptake. These were the number of partners in the practice, the average deprivation of the practice, the presence of a female general practitioner, and using a practice's own lists for sending out letters of invitation. In stepwise logistic regression just two of these variables contributed to the prediction of achieving 80% uptake namely, average deprivation and number of partners. There were no significant interactions between deprivation and the organisation of screening in relation to uptake. CONCLUSIONS - Organising cervical screening in general practice according to accepted standards is less important in predicting uptake than more intractable features of the practice such as the size of the partnership, its average deprivation level, the presence of a female general practitioner, and using their own (presumed more accurate) register of addresses to call women. A flexible incentive scheme may more fairly reward the efforts of those general practitioners who achieve high uptake rates but who do not trigger remuneration at the 80% level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Ibbotson
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|