Evaluation of a low-threshold clinic for opiate-dependent drug users

Defining Low-threshold Buprenorphine Treatment

: Buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder is safe and effective, but only a fraction of Americans who need treatment receive it. One reason for this is that many buprenorphine treatment programs have rigid requirements for entry and continuation, limiting the number of people who receive treatment. "Low-threshold treatment" is a term used to describe an alternative approach that attempts to remove as many barriers to treatment as possible. However, few studies have described its essential features. In this article, we define low-threshold treatment and propose the approach be guided by the following principles: same-day treatment entry; harm-reduction approach; flexibility; and wide availability in places where people with opioid use disorder go. We discuss the evidence and rationale for these principles and directions for future research.

Psychological predictors of retention in a low-threshold methadone maintenance treatment for opioid addicts: a 1-year follow-up study

This study investigated the role of psychological variables and judicial problems in treatment retention for a low-threshold methadone program in Montreal, Canada. Logistic regression analyses were computed to examine associations between psychological variables (psychological distress, self-esteem, stages of change), criminal justice involvement, and treatment retention for 106 highly-disorganized opioid users. Higher methadone dosage was associated with increased odds of treatment retention, whereas criminal charges and lower self-esteem decreased these odds. Psychological variables could be identified early in treatment and targeted to increase potential treatment retention. Financial support for this study was provided by the Fonds de Recherche en Santé du Québec.

Reduction in injection-related HIV risk after 6 months in a low-threshold methadone treatment program

This study assessed injection-related HIV risk behavioral changes among opioid users 6 months after enrollment in low-threshold (harm reduction based) metha-done maintenance treatment (MMT) programs within needle exchange services in Kingston and Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Changes were assessed for all participants (whole cohort), participants who continued to use illicit drugs by any route (drug-using subcohort); and those who continued to inject drugs (injecting subcohort). In this prospective observational cohort study, an interviewer-administered questionnaire examining injection-related HIV risk behaviors was administered to 183 study participants at entry to treatment and 6 months later. Changes in risk behaviors were analyzed using conditional logistic regression which took into account the paired nature of the data. We found that the proportion of participants injecting drugs, sharing needles, sharing drug equipment, indirectly sharing and using shooting galleries declined with follow-up for the whole cohort. Within the drug-using subcohort, there was a decrease in the proportion of individuals who injected drugs, while within the injecting subcohort the sharing of injection equipment and the use of shooting galleries declined. Our findings suggest that low-threshold MMT programs can reduce the risk of HIV without the enforcement of abstinence-based policies.

[Treatment retention and evolution of clientele in a low threshold methadone substitution treatment program in Montreal]

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate client treatment retention and evolution in terms of living conditions, at-risk behaviours, and the use of psychoactive substances (PAS) over a one-year period, following admission into a low-threshold methadone program in Montreal.

METHOD

Individual interviews were administered to 114 clients from Relais-Méthadone (RM) at admission and one year after treatment initiation. Participants reported on PAS consumption and unsafe practices of drug use and sexual behaviours at high risk for transmission of HIV, sexually transmitted infections (STI) and other blood-borne viruses (BBV). Services utilized by clients were documented from Relais-Méthadone files. Bivariate analyses were used to compare data recorded at admission and one-year follow-up.

RESULTS

The treatment retention rate after one year at RM was 64%. However, by taking into account those clients who were transferred to a regular program during the study period, as well as those who voluntarily tapered their methadone treatment (16.7%), the status of 80.7% of clients demonstrated improvement one year after admission into treatment. Furthermore, the clients who remained in treatment for a year for whom information was available (n = 60) showed a tendency towards more stable living conditions. They also demonstrated a significant decrease in both the number of PAS injections and in risky behaviours related to drug consumption. A statistically significant decrease in the frequency of heroine and cocaine use was also observed. By contrast, however, two thirds of the individuals in treatment after a year (n = 42) maintained or increased their daily consumption of other PAS.

DISCUSSION

The treatment retention rate is comparable to other low or regular threshold substitution programs. The results support previous studies showing that the methadone substitution treatment reduces heroine and cocaine consumption, and decreases the number of unsafe behaviours that could potentially transmit HIV, STI and BBV for the majority of clients who remained in treatment. Future research could focus attention on people who abandon treatment and those who present at-risk behaviours during treatment.

Determinants of health-related quality of life of opiate users at entry to low-threshold methadone programs

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to conduct an exploratory analysis of factors associated with poor health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among opiate users at entry to low-threshold methadone treatment.

METHODS

The SF-36 questionnaire was administered to 145 opiate users at enrollment into low-threshold methadone maintenance programs. ANOVA and correlational analyses were performed to investigate the determinants of poor physical and mental composite summary scales (PCS and MCS) of the SF-36 among opiate users. Stepwise regression methods were also employed to fit PCS and MCS multivariate models.

RESULTS

Age, employment status, chronic medical conditions, hospitalization, emotional abuse, sexual abuse and age at first injection episode were significantly associated with PCS. Mental health problems, sexual abuse, physical abuse, the use of sedatives, the use of cocaine, the number of days of cocaine use, sedative use and multiple substance use in the past month were significantly associated with MCS. The variances in the MCS and PCS were not readily explained by any one factor.

CONCLUSION

The multiplicity of factors influencing HRQOL of opiate users suggests the need for a range of services within the context of a methadone program, addressing primary medical care needs as well as treatment for both mental health problems and abuse issues.

[Accessibility to methadone substitution treatment: the role of a low-threshold program]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accessibility to a Montreal low-threshold methadone program (Relais-Méthadone). This program is aimed at a marginalized population of heroin addicts who are injection drug users (IDU).

METHOD

The data (n = 141 clients) were collected during the first year of the program implementation with questionnaires administered by the programme workers.

RESULTS

Analysis of the characteristics of the clients revealed that the program does reach the target population. The program's clientele is characterized by long-time and frequent heroin use, unstable lifestyles, and the presence of numerous behaviours that put them at high risk for HIV transmission. The retention of clients in the program is very high (88%) within the first 30 days.

INTERPRETATION

These results demonstrate the importance and value of flexible intervention programs in reaching a marginalized clientele exposed to the HIV virus, who would not have access to regular programs characterized by restrictive selection criteria and limited availability.