Efficacy and tolerance of a 6-month treatment course of daily interferon-alpha 2a for chronic hepatitis C with cirrhosis. The Australian Hepatitis C Study Group

Advances in viral hepatitis: 50 years of Australian gastroenterology

Viral hepatitis classification, treatments and pathogenesis has been increasingly defined over the past 50 years. Australian researchers have made significant contributions in the areas of viral hepatitis A vaccine development, treatment outcomes for chronic hepatitis B and C, the role of liver transplantation and the pathogenesis of injury and disease progression. This review outlines some of these contributions.

Therapeutic mechanism of interferon's anti-hepatic fibrosis action

Hepatic fibrosis is a common pathological change occurring in chronic liver disease which is induced by a variety of etiological factors. Hepatic fibrosis is a dynamic process, and a reversible pathological change. However, when it has progressed to hepatic cirrhosis, it is irreversible. Therefore, to block or reverse the course of hepatic fibrosis is a very significant target for the treatment of chronic liver disease. Interferon (IFN) has extensive functions, including anti-viral, anti-tumor and immunological roles. Recent research has reported that IFN possesses an anti-hepatic fibrosis function, with potential clinical application. However, the exact mechanism underlying its anti-hepatic fibrosis action remains unknown. Some scholars believe that this mechanism involves interferon's anti-viral effects, the inhibition of hepatic stellate cell (HSC) activation, the promotion of HSC apoptosis, the inhibition of extracellular matrix (ECM) synthesis and the promotion of ECM degradation.

The Impact of Haematopoietic Growth Factors on the Management and Efficacy of Antiviral Treatment in Patients with Hepatitis C Virus

Aim

To evaluate the benefits of haematopoietic growth factors (HGFs) during the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection with severe haematotoxicity.

Methods

This was a 1-year retrospective study of HCV-positive patients receiving pegylated interferon and ribavirin. Patients received different HGFs, depending on certain criteria: they received erythropoietin (EPO) when their haemoglobin (Hb) levels were less than 10 g/dl and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) when their neutrophil count was less than 750 cells/mm3. Haematological data, adherence and virological response were analysed and compared according to HGF use.

Results

In total, 132 patients were studied and 31 (23.5%) required HGF. Under multivariate analysis, baseline Hb levels of less than 13g/dl or a drop in Hb levels of over 2% per week predicted severe anaemia, and a base-line neutrophil count under 2900/mm3 predicted severe neutropaenia. HGF administration restored Hb values and the neutrophil count to above 10 g/dl and 1500 cells/mm3, respectively, in all 31 patients. Adherence to antiviral treatment was achieved in 25% of patients versus 58% of controls without severe haematotoxicity. The primary and sustained virological response did not differ statistically between HGF support and the control group (61% versus 57% and 32% versus 39%, respectively).

Conclusion

HGF administration counteracts the severe haematological adverse effects which occur during antiviral therapy and maintains the rate of sustained response.

Pegylated interferon-alpha 2b-ribavirin combination in Egyptian patients with genotype 4 chronic hepatitis

Egypt has a high prevalence rate of hepatitis C (HCV) infection and as much as 90% is genotype 4. Response to interferon (IFN) varies with viral genotype and degree of fibrosis. Genotype 4 is poorly sensitive to standard IFN and IFN-ribavirin combination. We evaluated pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN)-alpha2b in our patients. Sixty-one patients with compensated chronic HCV genotype 4 were enrolled in two groups: group A (31 patients) received IFN-alpha2b 3 MU three times per week and group B (30 patients) received 1.5 mug/kg PEG-IFN-alpha2b once weekly. Ribavirin was added to each regimen in a dose of 800-1200 mg based on body weight. Patients were followed up for 24 weeks to assess the sustained response (SR). End-of-treatment response (ETR) was achieved in 11 of 31 patients (35.48%) in group A, and 13 of 30 patients (43.33%) in group B (P < 0.05). Only eight patients in group A and 10 in group (B) achieved a sustained virological response (25.8 and 33.3%, respectively) (P < 0.05). By computing ETR, SR or relapse and pretreatment baseline data (pretreatment, viral load, alanine transaminases, necroinflammatory and hepatic fibrosis), both inter- and intragroup, no significant correlations could be detected. In terms of safety and tolerability, PEG-IFN-alpha2b and IFN-alpha2b were comparable. In spite of mild insignificant increase in ETR and SR with the pegylated form, the poor response of genotype 4 in Egypt (genotype 4a) to different forms of IFNs may be related to an intrinsic resistance to the direct antiviral effect of IFN.

N/A

N/A

Interferon-alpha (IFN alpha) daily dose versus IFN alpha plus ribavirin for treatment-naive chronic hepatitis c patients infected by genotype 1b

INTRODUCTION

Infection with hepatitis C virus genotype 1b (HCV1b) is known to be a predictive factor of poor response to both interferon-alpha (IFN alpha) alone and IFN alpha plus ribavirin combination therapy.STUDY DESIGN, PATIENTS AND METHODS: This randomised study evaluated the efficacy and safety of daily IFN alpha administration versus the combination of IFN alpha plus ribavirin in treatment-naive patients infected with chronic HCV1b. Sixty-two patients were randomised to receive either human leucocyte IFN alpha 6MU three times weekly for 12 months plus ribavirin 15 mg/kg/day for the first 6 months (group A: 29 patients), or human leucocyte IFN alpha 3MU daily for 12 months (group B: 33 patients). Response was evaluated by monitoring serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and HCV-RNA levels during treatment and follow-up (12 months).

RESULT AND CONCLUSION

Both treatment schedules were relatively well tolerated. Normal ALT levels and negative serum HCV-RNA were observed in 16 of 29 patients (55%) of group A and in 18 of 33 patients (54.5%) of group B at the end of treatment, as well as in 10 of 29 patients (34.5%) of group A and in 12 of 33 patients (36%) of group B at the end of the follow-up. There was no significant difference between the response rates obtained with the two regimens. In naive patients with chronic HCV1b infection, the efficacy of daily administration with IFN alpha is similar to that of IFN alpha plus ribavirin administered three times a week.

Effects of interferon treatment response on liver complications of chronic hepatitis C: 9-year follow-up study

OBJECTIVES

Fibrotic severity, biochemical indices of poor liver function, and sporadic transmission are independent predictors of liver complications among people with chronic hepatitis C. After accounting for these factors, we tested whether interferon treatment or the treatment response reduces the rate of liver cancer, liver-related death or transplantation, and other liver complications during extended follow-up.

METHODS

Liver clinic cohort of 455 patients with histologically proven chronic hepatitis C was followed prospectively for median 9 yr (IQ 6, 11 yr); 384 received interferon, 343 completed a treatment course. Liver complications were assessed in relation to treatment and treatment response in univariate and multivariate models, and survival to onset of liver-related complications was determined.

RESULTS

The annual incidence of total liver complications was 1.5% in treated and 2.9% in untreated patients and appeared quasilinear throughout 9-yr follow-up. Interferon treatment did not influence the rate of liver complications. However, the rate of complications increased exponentially with transition of the treatment response from sustained viral response (SVR), through response-relapse to nonresponse (or no treatment). By univariate analysis, response to interferon treatment was a significant predictor of complications. After adjustment for fibrosis score, serum albumin concentration and mode of transmission in a multivariate model, treatment response just failed to reach significance (p= 0.058) as a predictor of outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Response to antiviral therapy, and particularly SVR, appears to reduce liver complications in chronic hepatitis C. However, in the absence of an antiviral treatment response, a course of interferon does not reduce risks of liver cancer or liver failure.

Cost-effectiveness of adjuvant interferon therapy after surgical resection of Hepatitis C-related hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

To evaluate cost-effectiveness of adjuvant interferon therapy used with surgical resection of hepatitis C-related primary hepatocellular carcinoma.

DESIGN

We constructed a Markov model that simulated adjuvant interferon therapy after resection of hepatitis C-related hepatocellular carcinoma, and evaluated life expectancy, costs, and cancer recurrence. The reference case is a 60-year-old man with hepatitis C-related compensated cirrhosis.

RESULTS

At the baseline, adjuvant interferon therapy yielded 6.1 life years with a cost of dollars 77000, and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of dollars 15700/life year compared with no interferon therapy. The proportion of patients who experienced recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma until death was reduced from 87.6% to 62.9% using adjuvant interferon therapy. The incidence of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after interferon influenced the cost-effectiveness of adjuvant interferon therapy. A threshold analysis showed that adjuvant interferon therapy was not cost-effective (ICER = dollars 27000/year) if the annual incidence of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after interferon is 16% (baseline 8.9%). The proportions of patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma were 74.4% and 86.9% at the annual recurrence rates after interferon of 16% and 35%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant interferon therapy after surgical resection of primary hepatitis C-related hepatocellular carcinoma improves life expectancy through suppression of recurrent cancer with acceptable cost-effectiveness.

Hepatitis C virus genotype 3 is cytopathic to hepatocytes: Reversal of hepatic steatosis after sustained therapeutic response

On the basis of cross-sectional studies, it has been proposed that hepatic steatosis is a cytopathic effect of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 3 but not genotype 1 infections. We tested this hypothesis by examining whether antiviral treatment altered hepatic steatosis in chronic hepatitis C. In 28 patients with genotype 1 and 34 with genotype 3 HCV, we determined the severity of steatosis in pre- and posttreatment liver biopsies using computer-assisted morphometric image analysis as well as conventional semiquantitative scoring. Before treatment, hepatic steatosis was present in 16 (57%) patients infected with HCV genotype 1 and 21 (62%) of those with genotype 3. Sustained viral response (SVR) was achieved in 9 (32%) patients with genotype 1 and 22 (65%) with genotype 3. In neither group were there significant changes in body weight or alcohol consumption between pre- and posttreatment biopsies. In patients with HCV genotype 1, there was no change in hepatic steatosis after treatment, irrespective of the treatment response. Among those infected with genotype 3, SVR significantly reduced steatosis (P <.001), but there was no change in steatosis among those without a SVR. By logistic regression analysis, SVR was the only variable predictive of improvement in hepatic steatosis (OR = 36, 95% CI = 2.7-481, P =.007). In conclusion, these data provide strong support for a direct causal association between HCV genotype 3 infection and hepatic steatosis.

Evaluation of Loading Dose of IFN in HCV Patients: Prospective, Uncontrolled Study

Current treatment regimens with either long-term interferon (IFN) monotherapy or interferon-ribavirin combination achieve a sustained response of 6-21%. To improve the efficacy of IFN several strategies have been devised, including the use of higher doses of IFN, prolonged courses or pegylated IFN. Some recent reports have suggested that daily administration of IFN in the early phase of therapy (induction dose) may be more efficacious than the classic thrice-weekly regimen. There is no available data about the combination of induction dose regimen of IFN and ribavirin.

Our objective was to evaluate prospectively the efficacy and safety of a 5mu IFN induction dose in combination with ribavirin in HCV patients. End treatment response (ETR) was 36.7% of the 30 patients included in the study, while 81.1% ofresponders could remain viral negative for one year after discontinuation of treatment (sustained response). Though responders had higher pretreatment levels of viraemia and ALT, it was still without statistical signficance. Also, there was no statistical histological difference between both groups. There was a significant correlation between response rate and post induction viraemia level (p < 0.05) but no similar relation to post-induction ALT level. We conclude that induction dose regimen seems to have no effect on ETR but may improve sustained response. Also, post-induction viral load level is a good predictor for both ET and sustained responses.

Daily or three times per week interferon alpha-2b in combination with ribavirin or interferon alone for the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C not responding to previous interferon alone

BACKGROUND/AIMS

We compared the efficacy and safety of the combined therapy of daily interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin with those of interferon alpha-2b three times per week alone or in combination with ribavirin in non-responder patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.

METHODS

A total of 376 patients were randomly assigned to receive interferon alpha-2b (6 MU three times per week for 24 weeks followed by 3 MU three times per week for 24 weeks) alone (group A) or in combination with ribavirin for 48 weeks (group B), or daily interferon alpha-2b (3 MU per day for 24 weeks followed by 3 MU three times per week for 24 weeks) and ribavirin (group C).

RESULTS

After 24 weeks of therapy, HCV RNA was undetectable in 11.7, 24.0, and 37.8% for groups A, B, and C, respectively. Sustained virological response was more frequent in patients who received combination therapy with three times weekly interferon (20.9%) or daily interferon (26.0%) than in patients who received interferon alone (5.8%) (P<0.001). The predictive HCV parameters for sustained response were a low viral load on day 7 and a negative HCV RNA on week 12.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, in non-responder patients with chronic hepatitis C, virological response with daily interferon and ribavirin, compared to interferon monotherapy, was significantly improved during treatment, although sustained virological response was similar for both combination therapies with ribavirin and three times a week or daily interferon.

Daily or three times a week interferon alfa-2b in combination with ribavirin or interferon alone for the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Data on hepatitis C virus (HCV) viral dynamics and on the effect of interferon in blocking virion production have suggested a rationale for daily administration of interferon in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection. We compared the efficacy and safety of daily interferon alfa-2b in combination with ribavirin with those of interferon alfa-2b three times a week alone or in combination with ribavirin.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 321 patients with chronic hepatitis C to receive standard-dose interferon alfa-2b alone or in combination with ribavirin for 48 weeks or daily interferon alfa-2b (3 million units per day for 12 weeks then 3 million units three times per week for 24 weeks) and ribavirin (36 week treatment).

RESULTS

The rate of sustained virologic response (defined as an undetectable serum HCV-RNA level 72 weeks after initiation of treatment) was higher in patients who received combination therapy with three times weekly interferon (51.7%) or daily interferon (46.1%) than in patients who received interferon alone (25%) (P=0.0001 and P=0.002, respectively). Independent predictive factors for sustained virologic response were combination therapy, weight, genotype and viral load. In conclusion, in patients with chronic hepatitis C, combination therapy with induction treatment (daily interferon for 12 weeks) and shorter duration of treatment was not different from combination therapy for 48 weeks without induction treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Induction treatment with interferon for 12 weeks and combination therapy for a total duration of 36 weeks could therefore be cost effective.

Induction interferon therapy in naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C: increased end-of-treatment virological responses but absence of long-term benefit

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The low efficacy of interferon monotherapy and data from viral kinetic studies led us to evaluate the efficacy of interferon administered daily in chronic hepatitis C.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-eight naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C and active liver disease randomly received 3 or 5 MU IFN-alpha daily for 1 month, followed by the same dose three times a week for 11 months. Results were compared to a three-times-a-week scheme of 3 MU IFN-alpha for 1 year.

RESULTS

At the end of the induction period, 27 out of 38 (71%) patients had cleared HCV-RNA with a significantly higher rate in the 5 MU than in the 3 MU group (17 out of 18 or 94% vs. 10 out of 20 or 50%, P=0.003). The end-of-treatment virological response rate was 66% (25 out of 38) in the induction groups and 40% (10 out of 25) in the control group (P=0.04). Six months after completion of therapy, the sustained response rate dropped to 29% (11 out of 38) compared to 28% (7 out of 25) in the standard regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

In chronic hepatitis C, treatment with 5 or 3 MU IFN-alpha daily during the first month of a standard IFN regimen leads to significantly increased end-of-treatment virological responses, but long-term responses are similar to those of standard IFN monotherapy.

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature on the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE search (1986-December 1999) using key words such as HCV, hepatitis, non-A and non-B hepatitis, as well as terms regarding treatment during that time period.

DATA SYNTHESIS

HCV infection was initially treated with interferon monotherapy, but only a minority of patients responded to long-term therapy. A higher rate of response in both interferon-naïve patients and interferon-relapsers has been achieved by using the combination of interferon and ribavarin. Other treatment regimens including high-dose interferon protocols, ursodeoxycholic acid, amantadine, and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs have been less promising. Many alternative therapies are being investigated.

CONCLUSIONS

HCV infection is a major public health problem. It is now possible to achieve a cure in nearly 50% of the patients with this infection. Many additional therapies are being evaluated in order to achieve a higher cure rate.

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection in patients with cirrhosis

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection eventually leads to cirrhosis in 20-30% of patients and to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in 1-5% of patients. Rates of sustained virological response with standard interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) are low in patients without cirrhosis (generally < 20%) and are even lower in those with cirrhosis. Combination therapy with IFN and ribavirin improves response rates in patients with chronic hepatitis C without cirrhosis, and the results from subgroups of HCV-infected patients with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis are encouraging. Importantly, treatment with IFN slows progression of liver fibrosis, regardless of HCV genotype or early response to therapy, and reduces the risk of HCC by two- to fivefold. The risk of development of HCC is also lower in patients who show at least a partial response to IFN therapy compared with those who show no response. There is a clear need for more definitive studies of treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C and cirrhosis, ideally using therapies with greater efficacy. Nonetheless, based on the potential to slow the progression of liver fibrosis (regardless of treatment response) and to reduce the risk of HCC, a greater number of HCV-infected patients with cirrhosis should be considered as candidates for IFN treatment. Preliminary data indicate that pegylated IFNs have improved virological response rates and may have additional clinical benefits in the prevention or reduction of fibrosis and retardation of progression of cirrhosis and HCC in these patients.

Methodological issues in papers on IFN therapy: time for reappraisal

We conducted an analytical review of 194 full papers on interferon (IFN) therapy for chronic hepatitis C to evaluate current methodology (i.e. study design, criteria for evaluating the efficacy of therapy and predictors of response). Of the papers evaluated, 64 were randomized controlled trials (RCT), 40 were non-randomized controlled trials (NRCT) and 90 were observational studies (OS). The methodological analysis was focused mainly on clinical trials. The number of patients enrolled in RCT was higher compared with the number enrolled in NRCT. Uniform enrolment criteria were used in less than 50% of the trials. Only 20% of RCT and 2.5% of NRCT used criteria for defining sample size. The response rate was calculated on an intention-to-treat basis in 36 of the RCT and in 14 of the NRCT. The outcome of treatment and the criteria employed to define the response to treatment were found to be far from standardized. In 51.5% of the RCT and 42.5% of the NRCT, normalization of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level at the end of follow-up was the only marker of response studied. Only 57.6% of the trials considered histological evidence as an important outcome. Among the clinical trials, 71.1% evaluated predictors of good response to IFN therapy. In 51% of the OS, ALT normalization by the end of follow-up was the only criterion for defining response. In conclusion, to ensure a high level of reliability in comparing or combining the results of different studies, some basic general requirements must be followed when planning trials on antiviral therapy.

Interferon Therapy in Liver Cirrhosis Type C

Objective:

To review current information on the role of interferon (IFN) therapy in patients with liver cirrhosis type C.

Data Sources:

All relevant articles from 1989 to December 1998 were identified by a MEDLINE search using the terms interferon treatment and liver cirrhosis. Some studies were identified from bibliographies of selected articles.

Study Selection:

More than 97 articles were identified. Reports were included if they contained new or relevant information on the hepatitis C virus (HCV), IFN therapy in liver fibrosis and cirrhosis, outcome of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), or adverse effects related to IFN. Abstracts were included only when they added information not otherwise available in the literature.

Data Synthesis:

Response to IFN is unfavorably influenced by the presence of cirrhosis; there are several other predictors of response. IFN therapy can decrease the risk of development of HCC in some patients. In patients with compensated cirrhosis type C, a higher dosage of IFN-alfa and longer duration of therapy are associated with a better response. Combined therapy with IFN-alfa 2b and ribavirin is more effective than therapy with IFN-alfa alone. Therapy with human lymphoblastoid IFN (L-IFN) produces sustained response rates equivalent to those of recombinant IFN-alfa. Consensus IFN (CIFN) is more effective than IFN-alfa 2b. Larger dosages of CIFN are associated with better results. Normal alanine transaminase concentration and the absence of serum HCV RNA after treatment and again after 24 weeks of observation indicate a successful end point of IFN therapy. Adverse effects related to IFN treatment are usually minor.

Conclusions:

Although the presence of cirrhosis predicts a poor response to IFN treatment, some patients benefit from this therapy. Reasonable treatment regimens for patients with compensated HCV cirrhosis include IFN-alfa therapy, 6 MU subcutaneously three times weekly for 12 months, L-IFN 3 MU intramuscularly three times weekly for six months, or CIFN 9 or 12 μg subcutaneously three times weekly for six months. Patients receiving IFN should be seen every two to four weeks, with frequent monitoring of complete blood count and serum transaminase concentrations.

Antiviral therapy of HBV- and HCV-induced liver cirrhosis

Antiviral therapy is generally indicated in patients who have histologic evidence of chronic hepatitis and ongoing viral replication. The aim of treatment is to normalize alanine aminotransferase levels and to eliminate virus replication. Interferon-alfa (IFN-alpha) is the most used agent. The standard treatment regimen for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive cirrhosis is based on IFN-alpha given alone, but the efficacy of new antivirals (famciclovir, lamivudine) with or without IFN-alpha is currently under investigation. Conversely, the therapy of antiHBe-positive cirrhosis is far from being satisfactory. The results of treatment of patients affected by type C cirrhosis with IFN-alpha alone have been disappointing, as 10-15% of treated patients shows a sustained virologic response. Although current evidence suggests that the combination of ribavirin and IFN-alpha might be more efficacious than IFN alone in increasing the response rate in patients in the advanced fibrotic stage, the efficacy of this regimen for patients with well-compensated HCV-related cirrhosis is still unknown and prospective well-designed studies are urgently needed. Patients with decompensated cirrhosis are not generally treated unless they are included in liver transplantation programs. Prospective long-term trials with large sample sizes are needed to determine if responders to IFN-alpha have a low incidence of liver-related complications and hepatocellular carcinoma.

New schedules of interferon for chronic hepatitis C

Current treatment regimens with either long-term interferon monotherapy or interferon-ribavirin combination achieve sustained response rates of 40-50%. Options to improve the sustained response to interferon include longer treatment duration, higher fixed doses throughout the course of therapy, de-escalating strategies in which more intensive treatment is given during the initial weeks of treatment (so-called induction dosing) or escalation strategies in which the dose is progressively increased until a response occurs. Published literature supports the use of a treatment period of at least 12 months. Although higher doses which are fixed throughout the treatment course result in a moderate increase in sustained response rate, this may not be justified by the cost and added side effects. Although high dose induction strategies may result in a more rapid decline in serum HCV RNA levels, it is not yet known whether this will result in better longterm outcome. Preliminary evidence suggests that the benefit may be confined to subgroups of patients who might be predicted to have a poor response to standard therapy, such as those with high pre-treatment viral levels.

Risk factors for development of hepatocellular carcinoma among Australians with hepatitis C: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

Older patients with cirrhosis due to hepatitis C are at risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but additional risk factors may vary between countries.

AIM

In the present study, we sought to identify additional risk factors for HCC among a cohort of Australian patients with chronic hepatitis C.

METHODS

Case-control study of patients with advanced fibrosis stage hepatitis C who developed HCC during five-year follow up at a referral liver clinic. Cases were compared to twice the number of age-matched patients with chronic hepatitis C of similar fibrotic severity who did not develop HCC over a similar interval, using conditional logistic regression analysis (CLRA) and multivariate analysis. The main outcome measures were demographic and disease-related variables at first presentation in relation to the development of HCC.

RESULTS

HCC developed in 17 cases, an annual incidence among those considered to be at risk of 2%. The duration of follow up since first assessment was comparable among the cases and 34 selected age-matched controls (4.1 and 5.2 years respectively, p=0.5). Cases were more often male (p=0.03), born in Asia (p=0.05), and had poorer liver function as indicated by serum albumin concentration (p=0.02). Anti-hepatitis B core-antibody (anti-HBc) was detected in 59% (ten/17) of cases, compared to 21% (seven/34) of the controls (p=0.01). No patient with a sustained response to interferon developed HCC during follow up. There were no significant differences in the mode of HCV transmission, HCV genotype, alcohol exposure, serum bilirubin level or prothrombin time between the cases and the controls. Although the data set was small, multivariate CLR analysis identified serum albumin < or = 35 g/L and anti-HBc positivity to be independent risk factors for development of HCC.

CONCLUSIONS

Among older Australian patients (over the age of 40 years) with advanced fibrosis stage hepatitis C, the annual incidence of HCC is about 2%. Those who have low serum albumin and evidence of previous exposure to hepatitis B virus (anti-HBc positivity) appear to have the highest risk of developing HCC during follow up, but males and those born in Asia could also be at increased risk.

Treatment of hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis: a randomized, controlled trial of interferon alfa-2b versus no treatment

To examine the effects of interferon (IFN) therapy on clinical, biochemical, and histological features in patients with compensated hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related cirrhosis, we have conducted a randomized, controlled trial of IFN therapy versus observation. Eight centers included a total of 99 patients with biopsy-proven cirrhosis. IFN-alpha2b, 3 million units three times per week, or no antiviral therapy was given for 48 weeks. Twenty-three patients dropped out. End-of-treatment biochemical response was not observed in any of the 39 controls but was observed in 6 of the 47 treated patients (P <.02); sustained biochemical response was obtained in only 2 treated patients. Controls and treated patients did not significantly differ with regard to the changes in serum level of albumin, bilirubin, alpha-fetoprotein, in plasma prothrombin, in histological activity, or liver collagen content. During trial or follow-up (160 +/- 57 weeks), hepatocellular carcinoma developed in 9 controls and 5 treated patients (NS); decompensation of cirrhosis occurred in 5 controls and 7 treated patients. Seven controls and 10 treated patients died. In conclusion, in patients with compensated HCV-related cirrhosis, a 48-week course of IFN therapy is safe and is able to induce end-of-treatment biochemical response in a significant proportion of patients. However, a 48-week course of IFN therapy usually fails to achieve sustained response and, within the limit of this study, did not significantly improve the 3-year outcome. Therefore, a longer course of IFN therapy or combination therapy with ribavirin should be evaluated in patients with HCV-related cirrhosis.

Molecular epidemiology of hepatitis C in Australia

The aim of this study was to determine the distribution of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes in Australian patients with hepatitis C and to identify factors associated with particular genotypes. Serum isolates of HCV-RNA were genotyped using a commercial oligonucleotide hybridization (line probe) assay. Relationships between demographic factors, mode of HCV transmission and HCV genotype were assessed by logistic regression analysis. Among 463 patients with hepatitis C, 425 tested positive for HCV-RNA and a single HCV genotype was identified in 420 cases. The patients' places of birth were Australia or New Zealand (62%), Asia (13%), Europe (12%), Mediterranean (6%), Middle East (6%) and other countries (< 1%). The most common genotypes were type 1 (52%) or type 3 (32%); type 2 (9.3%), type 4 (5.5%) and type 6 (1.7%) were less common. Patients with genotype 1b were older (48 +/- 13 years, P< 0.001) and patients with genotype 3 were younger than the remaining patients (37 +/- 11 years vs 42 +/- 12 years, P< 0.001). Among type 1 isolates, 1b was more common for patients born outside Australia compared with those born in Australia (50% vs 13%, P< 0.001) whereas non-1b subtypes were more common among Australian-born patients. Likewise, 21 of 23 (91%) patients with type 4 were from Egypt and six of seven (86%) with type 6 were from Vietnam. The relative importance of parenteral risk factors for HCV also varied according to geographic origin. Thus, a definite risk factor for HCV acquisition was identified in > 95% of Australian-born patients, but in only 33% of Asian or Mediterranean-born patients. Logistic regression analysis indicated that region of birth and risk factor (intravenous drug use or not) would allow 98% of type 4 cases and 76% of type 1b cases to be identified correctly. In summary, region of birth, patterns of migration over time and risk factors for transmission of HCV interact to determine the distribution of HCV genotypes in a multi-racial community like Australia.