Thorpe SJ, Fox B, Turner C, Scott M. Competitive enzyme-linked immunoassay of monoclonal immunoglobulin G anti-D preparations.
Transfus Med 2003;
13:153-9. [PMID:
12791083 DOI:
10.1046/j.1365-3148.2003.00436.x]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
The development of monoclonal immunoglobulin G (IgG) anti-D for prophylaxis necessitates estimation of their potency in terms of their red cell-binding ability, but it is unclear which quantification methodology is most suitable for this. The aim of this study was to assess 50 monoclonal anti-D from the 4th International Workshop for quantitative and qualitative binding to red cells in a competitive enzyme-linked immunoassay (EIA) in which varying amounts of monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) and a constant amount of biotinylated monoclonal anti-D (BRAD-5) compete for red cell binding. The potencies of the MoAb were estimated against the International Reference Preparation (IRP) for anti-D Ig. Two MoAbs as supplied were insufficiently inhibitory of biotinylated BRAD-5 binding to be quantified; the potencies of the remainder ranged from 4 to 343 IU mL-1 and included 11 MoAbs showing dose-responses that were nonparallel to those of other MoAb and the IRP. Estimation of the concentration of antibody in the supernatants by radial immunodiffusion ranged from 0.5 to 61 micro g mL-1, giving specific activities of <1-24 IU micro g-1. The results show that competitive EIA is suitable for quantitating most monoclonal anti-D for development and quality control purposes, regardless of their D epitope reactivity.
Collapse