High proficiency in detecting the six major hepatitis C virus genotypes of laboratories involved in testing plasma by nucleic acid amplification technology

Standardization of NAT for Blood-Borne Pathogens

Assays based on nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT) are increasingly used for screening of blood and for diagnosis or monitoring of patients. Both regulatory requirements for blood screening and international recommendations for the treatment of patients are based on common reference materials available globally for the standardization of NAT assays. World Health Organization International Standards (WHO ISs) and International Reference Panels (WHO IRPs) are primary reference materials. The characterization and manufacture of WHO reference materials as well as their evaluation is performed on behalf of the WHO by collaborating centers; their establishment is decided upon by the WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization (ECBS). The potency of the first WHO IS is defined by the 'international unit' (IU) which should be maintained upon replacement of the IS. The IU, unlike copy number or genome equivalent, is defined by the IS with a physical existence, is available worldwide, and allows traceability and comparability of results. The anticipated use of WHO ISs is the calibration of secondary standards or the validation of essential assay features, e.g. limit of detection.

External quality assessment programmes for detection of HCV RNA, HIV RNA and HBV DNA in plasma: improved proficiency of the participants observed over a 2-year period

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Two External Quality Assessment Programmes (EQAPs) were run in 2008 and 2009 to evaluate the proficiency of blood centres in detecting, by nucleic acid amplification techniques (NAT), the possible contamination of plasma with hepatitis C virus (HCV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the EQAP-2008, three customized panels were designed; each containing positive samples with a viral nominal concentration for the three viruses of about three times the 95% DL of the respective commercial NAT assay. In the EQAP-2009, the proficiency of the participants was evaluated with a single panel, independently on the NAT method used.

RESULTS

While 84% (102/122) of the participants in the EQAP-2008 correctly identified the positive and negative samples of the panels, in the EQAP-2009 the percentage of proficient laboratories increased to 97% (118/122). Most importantly, in this 2-year experience, we observed a decrease in the number of pre-/postanalytical errors, from 14 in 2008 to two in 2009.

CONCLUSIONS

The design of these two EQAPs allowed participants to assess the performance of the NAT methods applied in their routine screening of blood donations, not only with respect to analytical errors but also to human errors that, despite the high level of automation reached by NAT methods, can still occur.

HCV genetic variability: from quasispecies evolution to genotype classification

HCV is a ssRNA virus belonging to the Flaviviruses and is found worldwide worldwide in humans. Following primary infection, persistent infection develops in more than 85% of cases, which in up to 30% of cases, may progress to liver disease, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The virus presents a high degree of genetic variability owing to the combination of a lack of proofreading by the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase and a high level of viral replication. This genetic variability allows the classification of genotypes, subtypes, isolates and quasispecies to which epidemiological and pathogenetic significance may be associated. The features and biological implications of HCV variability and of quasispecies dynamics in infection transmission, mechanisms of chronicity and resistance to antiviral therapy are discussed.

External quality assessment for the molecular detection of Hepatitis C virus

BACKGROUND, OBJECTIVES AND STUDY DESIGN: External quality assessment (EQA) panels were distributed internationally by UK NEQAS for Microbiology to 159 participants for the detection, quantification and genotyping of Hepatitis C virus (HCV) in freeze-dried plasma from 2000 to 2004. The results were analysed to determine the level of standardisation of qualitative detection, quantitative detection and genotyping.

RESULTS

The accurate detection of HCV in the panels varied from 86.9% to 100%. Four genotypes were distributed with the panels and there was no significant difference in the detection of different genotypes of HCV by participants. Further analysis indicated most variation occurred in quantification of HCV at lower concentrations and from 0% to 14.8% reported quantitative values outside 0.5 log(10) of the median value. In addition, three negative specimens were distributed and false positives were found to be rare (0.9-2.2%) with all methods included in the study.

CONCLUSION

The laboratory detection of HCV in plasma EQA specimens was varied, with decreasing parity of quantification at lower concentrations of HCV. False positives and negatives were rare, irrespective of the genotype under test.

External quality assessment for the detection of blood-borne viruses in plasma by nucleic acid amplification technology: the first human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis B virus studies (HIV EQA/1 and HBV EQA/1) and the fifth hepatitis C virus study (HCV EQA/5)

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

This External Quality Assessment (EQA) study was aimed at assessing the proficiency of blood centres and blood product manufacturers in detecting, by nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT), the possible contamination of plasma with hepatitis C virus (HCV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three independent panels, one for each virus, were prepared at the Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS) by diluting the respective reference preparations. NAT methods used by the EQA participants included polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays by Roche, transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) assays by Chiron and in-house PCR assays.

RESULTS

Forty-three of the 45 participants (95.6%) in the HCV EQA/5 who used a validated method were consistently able to detect a nominal concentration of 100 IU/ml for all six major genotypes. In the case of the HIV EQA/1, all 35 participants detected the samples containing 1000 IU/ml HIV, while five (14.3%) did not identify the samples containing 100 IU/ml HIV. With respect to the HBV EQA/1, all 16 participants correctly identified the positive samples containing either 1000 IU/ml or 100 IU/ml HBV. No false-positive results were observed with any of the three panels.

CONCLUSIONS

The HCV EQA/5 showed an improved proficiency of laboratories as compared with the HCV EQA/4. In fact, HCV genotypes 1, 2, 3 and 5 were correctly identified in 100% of the assays and genotypes 4 and 6 in 97.8% of the assays. While most of the participants in the HIV EQA/1 showed a good level of proficiency, an excellent performance was shown by all participants in the HBV EQA/1.