Colonic J pouch reconstruction of the radiation-damaged neorectum

Radiation proctopathy in the treatment of prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To compile and review data on radiation proctopathy in the treatment of prostate cancer with respect to epidemiology, clinical manifestations, pathogenesis, risk factors, and treatment.

METHODS

Medical literature databases including PubMed and Medline were screened for pertinent reports, and critically analyzed for relevance in the scope of our purpose.

RESULTS

Rectal toxicity as a complication of radiotherapy has received attention over the past decade, especially with the advent of dose-escalation in prostate cancer treatment. A number of clinical criteria help to define acute and chronic radiation proctopathy, but lack of a unified grading scale makes comparing studies difficult. A variety of risk factors, related to either radiation delivery or patient, are the subject of intense study. Also, a variety of treatment options, including medical therapy, endoscopic treatments, and surgery have shown varied results, but a lack of large randomized trials evaluating their efficacy prevents forming concrete recommendations.

CONCLUSION

Radiation proctopathy should be an important consideration for the clinician in the treatment of prostate cancer especially with dose escalation. With further study of possible risk factors, the advent of a standardized grading scale, and more randomized trials to evaluate treatments, patients and physicians will be better armed to make appropriate management decisions.

Faecal incontinence: A late side-effect of pelvic radiotherapy

AIMS

Despite advances in pelvic radiotherapy, damage to normal tissue can lead to chronic gastrointestinal problems. The frequency with which this affects quality of life is controversial. Faecal incontinence is not widely perceived to be a major issue after pelvic radiotherapy. The aim of this paper is to review the frequency and mechanisms for the development of faecal incontinence after pelvic radiotherapy, and to review treatment options for faecally incontinent patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search of original literature was carried out using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from 1966 to 2005.

RESULTS

The reliability of the published data is poor because patients frequently fail to admit to faecal incontinence, and because prospective studies are lacking that assess faecal incontinence as a specific end point using adequate, validated and reproducible methodology. The published rates of late new-onset faecal incontinence after pelvic radiation are between 3% and 53%. Patients treated for prostate rather than gynaecological, bladder, rectal or anal cancer may have a lower rate. Only 8-56% of affected patients state that faecal incontinence reduces their quality of life. Studies examining the physiological changes occurring after radiotherapy are generally not adequately controlled or powered, assessment of ano-rectal function is rarely comprehensive and loss of patients to follow-up frequently makes it difficult to extrapolate results to a wider population. Where there is agreement over the physiological changes that occur after radiotherapy, it is not clear at what threshold these changes cause symptoms. No prospective studies of any non-surgical treatment for faecal incontinence after radiotherapy have been published. Surgery other than colostomy probably carries a high risk of complications in this group of patients, but few data have been published.

CONCLUSIONS

Now that improvements in outcome from combination treatments, including radiotherapy for pelvic cancer, are being achieved, it is time that serious attention is paid to determining how frequently significant gastrointestinal toxicity arises, and how best to optimise the quality of life of long-term survivors.

Review article: current therapeutic options for radiation proctopathy

Radiation proctopathy is a common unfortunate complication following radiation therapy of pelvic malignancies. Symptoms of chronic radiation proctopathy include haematochezia, urgency, constipation, tenesmus, diarrhoea and rectal pain. Currently, a wide variety of pharmacological options, endoscopic cautery techniques and surgical procedures have been proposed for the treatment of chronic radiation proctopathy. Although these have been proposed primarily as treatment for rectal bleeding, the control of other symptoms has been noted with some of these agents. Pharmacological options include 5-aminosalicylic acid preparations, coticosteroid enemas, sucralfate (oral, enemas), formalin, short chain fatty acid enemas, oestrogen/progesterone, hyperbaric oxygen, antioxidants, sodium pentosan polysulphate and misoprostol rectal suppositories. Of these, sucralfate and formalin therapy appear to be effective for bleeding control. Misoprostol rectal suppositories and oral sucralfate may be useful in the prevention of acute and chronic symptoms of radiation proctopathy. Endoscopic cautery techniques have included the use of Nd:YAG laser and argon laser for coagulation of bleeding neovascular telangiectasias. Argon plasma coagulation offers a safe non-contact method of delivering haemostasis which has proven to be particularly useful in targeting difficult to reach lesions tangentially. Surgery is generally reserved for severe refractory cases involving ongoing haemorrhage, obstruction, stricture formation, fistulas and perforation. Given that formal randomized placebo-controlled studies are lacking for most treatments, the management of these patients is often challenging and unclear. Hence, there is a need for more research and education on radiation proctopathy.

Anorectal injury following pelvic radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Current knowledge of the effects of radiation on the anorectum is based on a limited number of studies. Variability in delivery techniques, both currently and historically, combined with a paucity of prospective and randomized studies makes interpretation of the literature difficult. This review presents the existing evidence and identifies areas that require further work.

METHODS

This review is based on a literature search (Medline and PubMed) and manual cross-referencing.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

More than three-quarters of patients receiving pelvic radiotherapy experience acute anorectal symptoms and up to one-fifth suffer from late-phase radiation proctitis. About 5 per cent develop other chronic complications, such as fistula, stricture and disabling faecal incontinence. The risk of rectal cancer may be increased. Conservative treatment options are of limited value. Surgery may be considered if symptoms are severe, provided sphincter function is adequate and recurrent disease is excluded. Large prospective studies with accurate dosimetric data and long-term follow-up are needed to provide meaningful information on which to base new strategies to minimize the side-effects from radiotherapy.