Secondary oesophageal peristalsis in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Relevance of ineffective esophageal motility to secondary peristalsis in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The study aimed to investigate the hypothesis whether the presence of Ineffective esophageal motility would affect physiological characteristics of secondary peristalsis.

METHODS

Secondary peristalsis was performed with slow and rapid air injections into mid-esophagus of 18 ineffective esophageal motility patients and 15 age-matched controls. Severity of ineffective esophageal motility was defined by the application of combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry.

RESULTS

Ineffective esophageal motility patients included 11 patients without impedance abnormality and seven patients with impedance abnormality during liquid and/or viscous swallowing. The prevalence of failed secondary peristaltic response during slow air injection was significantly greater in ineffective esophageal motility patients without impedance abnormality (3/11 [27%], P < 0.001) and with impedance abnormality (4/7 [57%], P = 0.04) than healthy subjects. The threshold volume for inducing secondary peristalsis during rapid air injection was significantly greater in ineffective esophageal motility patients with impedance abnormality (6.1 ± 0.3 mL) than healthy subjects (4.6 ± 0.3 mL, P < 0.05) and ineffective esophageal motility patients without impedance abnormality (4.1 ± 0.4 mL, P < 0.05). The frequency of peristaltic response during rapid air injection was significantly lower in ineffective esophageal motility patients with impedance abnormality (40% [20-50%] than healthy subjects (90% [90-100%], P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Defective activation of secondary peristalsis is present in ineffective esophageal motility patients with impedance abnormality. Our study indicates that increased ineffective esophageal motility severity associated with defective triggering of secondary peristalsis may contribute to impaired esophageal clearance in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

The role of delayed gastric emptying and impaired oesophageal body motility

Delayed gastric emptying in a variable proportion of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease has been observed in most series, however a relationship between delayed gastric emptying and increased gastro-oesophageal reflux has not been convincingly demonstrated. Enhanced postprandial accommodation and delayed emptying of the proximal stomach have been described, but some controversy exists. Impaired primary peristalsis is often present especially in patients with oesophagitis and its prevalence increases with increasing severity of inflammatory mucosal lesions. Patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease often have defective triggering of secondary peristalsis independently of presence of oesophagitis. It is presently unclear if impaired oesophageal motility is a primary defect or an irreversible consequence of inflammation. Attempts at pharmacological improvement of impaired oesophageal motility have been so far disappointing. Patients with partially preserved neuromuscular structures need to be identified in order to select them for new prokinetic therapy.

Dysphagia after antireflux surgery

BACKGROUND

Dysphagia is experienced by many patients after antireflux surgery. This literature review examines factors associated with the development, prediction and management of postoperative dysphagia.

METHODS

Published studies examining issues related to dysphagia, gastro-oesophageal reflux and fundoplication were reviewed.

RESULTS

Postoperative dysphagia is usually temporary but proves troublesome for 5--10 per cent of patients. Technical modifications, such as a partial wrap, division of short gastric vessels and method of hiatal closure, have not conclusively reduced its incidence. There is no reliable preoperative test to predict dysphagia.

CONCLUSION

It is uncertain whether postoperative dysphagia arises from patient predilection or is largely a consequence of mechanical changes created by fundoplication. Anatomical errors account for a significant proportion of patients referred for correction of dysphagia but these are uncommon in large single-institution studies. Abnormal manometry cannot predict dysphagia and, on current evidence, 'tailoring' the operation does not prevent its occurrence.