Smoking cessation post-discharge following nicotine replacement therapy use during an inpatient admission

BACKGROUND

Cigarette smoking remains a health issue despite declining prevalence in Australia. The burden of tobacco-related morbidity affects hospitals, particularly those in lower socioeconomic areas where prevalence is highest.

AIM

We have shown that nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) use during hospitalization increases motivation to quit post-discharge. We postulated that subjects using the nicotine patch post-discharge, in comparison to the inhaler, would have higher rates of abstinence at 12 months after discharge. The aim was to compare the efficacy of the nicotine patch or inhaler formulation for cessation post-discharge, following use during admission.

METHODS

Post-discharge, subjects chose their preferred formulation (patch or inhaler) based on their experience with NRT during admission. Tailored, medium-intensity support was provided with subsidized NRT during outpatient visits. Subjects were followed for 12 months. Exhaled breath CO confirmed non-smoking.

RESULTS

Of 123 subjects enrolled, 37 elected to use the inhaler, 50 the patch and 36 no NRT. At 12 months continuous abstinence rates were 38%, 38% and 25% respectively.

DISCUSSION

This study built upon the 'teachable moment' provided by hospitalization and the inpatient use of NRT, encouraging cessation post-discharge. Both NRT formulations provided similar 12 month cessation rates, and were superior to those achieved by subjects electing not to use NRT. Although the patch was the most popular formulation, the inhaler provided an equally efficacious alternative which addressed other facets of cigarette addiction. Subjects electing not to use NRT were less successful. Continuous abstinence rates were equivalent to community-based studies using NRT. We recommend a similar programme to other hospitals.

Implementing a hospital-based smoking cessation programme: evidence for a learning effect

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed a newly set-up, hospital-based smoking cessation clinic with regard to continuous abstinence rates and the effectiveness of concomittant nicotine replacement therapy.

METHODS

Smoking status of 369 participants of this 8-week cognitive-behavioural smoking cessation group programme was obtained using exhaled carbon monoxide at the end of the course as well as self-report 6 months after the course. In addition to demographic data, FTND score, SDS score, and usage of nicotine replacement products were recorded.

RESULTS

Overall, 29.8% of all participants reported to have been continuously abstinent for 6 months after the course. Success rates increased significantly during the first year after initiation of the programme (from 15 to 35%, p<0.001), indicating a learning process of the staff running the course. Nicotine replacement therapy was used by 51.3% of participants, but 58% of these discontinued its use within 5 weeks. Nicotine substitution for more than 5 weeks was associated with a 50% success rate after 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate a learning effect of smoking cessation course staff and a possible minimum duration required for nicotine replacement to be effective.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

The observed learning effect in smoking cessation programmes should be considered when evaluating newly established interventions of this kind. Patients tend to stop nicotine replacement therapy too early, thereby decreasing their chances of middle-term abstinence.

Effectiveness of hospital-based smoking cessation

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Smoking cessation for current smokers is a health-care imperative. It is not clear which approaches to smoking cessation are the most effective in the hospital setting and which factors predict long-term abstinence. We hypothesized that a hospital-based smoking cessation program involving behavioral modification and support would provide an effective intervention for smoking cessation.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Smoking cessation clinics in a tertiary referral, cardiothoracic hospital.

PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred forty-three smokers and 187 never-smoker control subjects.

INTERVENTIONS

Smokers underwent specific sessions of individual counseling on behavioral modification, including written information, advice about quit aids, and support during the quit attempt. Abstinence was confirmed by exhaled carbon monoxide measurements.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Compared to never-smoker control subjects, smokers were more likely to have grown up with a smoking father or siblings, and to currently live or socialize with other smokers. Two hundred sixteen smokers attended at least two sessions of the smoking cessation program. Of these, 25% were unavailable for follow-up at 12 months and were assumed to be smoking. The point prevalence abstinence rate at 12 months was 32%. Independent factors associated with abstinence at 12 months were self-belief in quitting ability, having a heart condition, growing up without siblings who smoked, and increasing number of pack-years.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective study has demonstrated that this hospital-based smoking cessation program was as effective as programs in other settings. Social and psychological factors were associated with a greater chance of abstinence.

[Veracity of smokers' reports of abstinence at smoking cessation clinics]

OBJECTIVE

To assess the reliability of smokers' response as criteria for measuring abstinence and the necessity or not of confirming abstinence with carbon monoxide (CO) measurement.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A multicenter, prospective, longitudinal study was carried out on patients over 18 years of age from 5 smoking cessation clinics who underwent treatment with nicotine or bupropion. When the patient attended the clinic at 15, 30, 60, 90, and 180 days, abstinence was checked by self-reporting and expired-air CO levels. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive, negative, and overall predictive value of patient reporting, measured CO levels, and the 2 procedures in combination were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 904 smokers (476 men and 428 women) with a mean (SD) age of 42.51 (10.09) years were enrolled in the study. Of the 904 patients that made up the study population, 820, 776, 687, 719, and 679, respectively, attended the scheduled visits to check abstinence. Self-reported point-prevalence abstinence at 15 days was 74.5% and at 180 days was 57.6% while abstinence determined by expired-air CO was 75.7% and 59.4% respectively. Results according to self-reporting, CO measurement, and the 2 methods in combination were not significantly different (P<.05) at any of the points in time. Neither sensitivity nor specificity showed significant differences in relation to patient variables.

CONCLUSION

The reliability of self-reported abstinence from smoking is high. Measurement of CO is therefore not essential, although it could be advisable for motivating patients rather than as a way of confirming abstinence.

Inpatient smoking-cessation counseling and all-cause mortality among the elderly

BACKGROUND

Although smoking cessation is essential to the management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), prevalence and benefits of smoking-cessation counseling in the inpatient setting are not well described among older adults. The objective of this study was to evaluate associations between inpatient smoking-cessation counseling and 5-year all-cause mortality among older adults hospitalized with AMI.

METHODS

The Cooperative Cardiovascular Project (January 1994-July 1995) included 788 Medicare beneficiaries aged >/=65 years who were current smokers, admitted to acute care facilities in North Carolina with confirmed AMI, and discharged alive. Information on smoking-cessation advice or counseling prior to discharge was abstracted from medical records. Associations of counseling with 5-year risk of death were assessed with multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

Smoking-cessation counseling was provided to 40% of AMI patients before discharge. Women (p =0.06) and blacks (p =0.02) were less likely to receive counseling. Counseling was associated with a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p =0.01). Increasing age, discharge to a skilled nursing facility, and histories of hypertension, heart failure, or stroke were associated with no counseling (p <0.05, all cause). Age-adjusted mortality rates (per 1000 enrollees) at 5 years were 488.3 for patients who were given counseling compared to 579.3 for patients without counseling. After adjustment for age, race, gender, prior histories of hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Killip class III or IV, and discharge to a skilled nursing facility; inpatient counseling remained associated with improved survival (relative hazard, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

Inpatient counseling on smoking cessation is suboptimal among older smokers hospitalized with AMI. Even without confirmation of actual cessation, these data suggest that provision of smoking-cessation advice or counseling has a major impact on survival of older adults.

Short-term pre-operative smoking cessation intervention does not affect postoperative complications in colorectal surgery: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Smokers have a higher risk of complicated tissue and wound healing after surgery than nonsmokers. We tested the hypothesis that short-term pre-operative cessation of smoking in colorectal surgery decreases the incidence of postoperative tissue and wound complications.

METHODS

From February 1998 to March 2001, 60 patients, who smoked daily, undergoing colorectal resection were randomly assigned 2-3 weeks before scheduled surgery to either abstinence from smoking, counselling and nicotine replacement therapy or maintenance of daily smoking habits. Postoperative tissue and wound complications necessitating surgical or medical treatment were evaluated at discharge and 30 days after surgery by blinded outcome assessment.

RESULTS

In the pre-operative period of 15 days (8-24) (median, interquartile range (IQR)), 89% of the patients in the intervention group vs. 13% in the control group abstained from smoking or reduced by more than half (P < 0.05). In the postoperative period of 11 days (10-13), the corresponding figures were 92% and 50%, respectively (P < 0.05). Postoperative tissue and wound complications occurred in 33% (9 of 27) of the patients in the intervention group compared to 27% (8 of 30) in the control group (NS). Likewise, no difference in overall postoperative complication rate was found between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Short-term cessation of smoking does not reduce the risk of complicated tissue and wound healing or other complications in colorectal surgery.