Direct glutamate-mediated presynaptic inhibition of sensory afferents by the postsynaptic motor neurons

Cholinergic Modulation of Locomotor Circuits in Vertebrates

Locomotion is a basic motor act essential for survival. Amongst other things, it allows animals to move in their environment to seek food, escape predators, or seek mates for reproduction. The neural mechanisms involved in the control of locomotion have been examined in many vertebrate species and a clearer picture is progressively emerging. The basic muscle synergies responsible for propulsion are generated by neural networks located in the spinal cord. In turn, descending supraspinal inputs are responsible for starting, maintaining, and stopping locomotion as well as for steering and controlling speed. Several neurotransmitter systems play a crucial role in modulating the neural activity during locomotion. For instance, cholinergic inputs act both at the spinal and supraspinal levels and the underlying mechanisms are the focus of the present review. Much information gained on supraspinal cholinergic modulation of locomotion was obtained from the lamprey model. Nicotinic cholinergic inputs increase the level of excitation of brainstem descending command neurons, the reticulospinal neurons (RSNs), whereas muscarinic inputs activate a select group of hindbrain neurons that project to the RSNs to boost their level of excitation. Muscarinic inputs also reduce the transmission of sensory inputs in the brainstem, a phenomenon that could help in sustaining goal directed locomotion. In the spinal cord, intrinsic cholinergic inputs strongly modulate the activity of interneurons and motoneurons to control the locomotor output. Altogether, the present review underlines the importance of the cholinergic inputs in the modulation of locomotor activity in vertebrates.

Profiling neurotransmitters in a crustacean neural circuit for locomotion

Locomotor systems are widely used to study rhythmically active neural networks. These networks have to be coordinated in order to produce meaningful behavior. The crayfish swimmeret system is well suited to investigate such coordination of distributed neural oscillators because the neurons and their connectivity for generating and especially for coordinating the motor output are identified. The system maintains a fixed phase lag between the segmental oscillators, independent of cycle period. To further the understanding of the system’s plasticity for keeping the phase lag fixed, we profiled the neurotransmitters used by the Coordinating Neurons, which are necessary and sufficient for coordination of the segmental oscillators. We used a combination of electrophysiological, immunohistochemical, and mass spectrometric methods. This arrangement of methods ensured that we could screen for several specific neurotransmitters, since a single method is often not suitable for all neurotransmitters of interest. In a first step, to preselect neurotransmitter candidates, we investigated the effect of substances known to be present in some swimmeret system neurons on the motor output and coordination. Subsequently, we demonstrated electrophysiologically that the identified synapse between the Coordinating Neurons and their target is mainly chemical, but neither glutamate antagonist nor γ-aminobutyric acid antagonist application affected this synapse. With immunohistochemical experiments, we provide strong evidence that the Coordinating Neurons are not serotonergic. Single-cell MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry with subsequent principal component analysis identified acetylcholine as the putative neurotransmitter for both types of Coordinating Neurons.

Pigment Translocation in Caridean Shrimp Chromatophores: Receptor Type, Signal Transduction, Second Messengers, and Cross Talk Among Multiple Signaling Cascades

Pigment aggregation in shrimp chromatophores is triggered by red pigment concentrating hormone (RPCH), a neurosecretory peptide whose plasma membrane receptor may be a G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR). While RPCH binding activates the Ca²⁺ /cGMP signaling cascades, a role for cyclic AMP (cAMP) in pigment aggregation is obscure, as are the steps governing Ca²⁺ release from the smooth endoplasmic reticulum (SER). A role for the antagonistic neuropeptide, pigment dispersing homone (α-PDH) is also unclear. In red, ovarian chromatophores from the freshwater shrimp Macrobrachium olfersi, we show that a G-protein antagonist (AntPG) strongly inhibits RPCH-triggered pigment aggregation, suggesting that RPCH binds to a GPCR, activating an inhibitory G-protein. Decreasing cAMP levels may cue pigment aggregation, since cytosolic cAMP titers, when augmented by cholera toxin, forskolin or vinpocentine, completely or partially impair pigment aggregation. Triggering opposing Ca²⁺ /cGMP and cAMP cascades by simultaneous perfusion with lipid-soluble cyclic nucleotide analogs induces a "tug-of-war" response, pigments aggregating in some chromatosomes with unpredictable, oscillatory movements in others. Inhibition of cAMP-dependent protein kinase accelerates aggregation and reduces dispersion velocities, suggesting a role in phosphorylation events, possibly regulating SER Ca²⁺ release and pigment aggregation. The second messengers IP₃ and cADPR do not stimulate SER Ca²⁺ release. α-PDH does not sustain pigment dispersion, suggesting that pigment translocation in caridean chromatophores may be regulated solely by RPCH, since PDH is not required. We propose a working hypothesis to further unravel key steps in the mechanisms of pigment translocation within crustacean chromatophores that have remained obscure for nearly a century.

The effect of sensory feedback on crayfish posture and locomotion: II. Neuromechanical simulation of closing the loop

Neuromechanical simulation was used to determine whether proposed thoracic circuit mechanisms for the control of leg elevation and depression in crayfish could account for the responses of an experimental hybrid neuromechanical preparation when the proprioceptive feedback loop was open and closed. The hybrid neuromechanical preparation consisted of a computational model of the fifth crayfish leg driven in real time by the experimentally recorded activity of the levator and depressor (Lev/Dep) nerves of an in vitro preparation of the crayfish thoracic nerve cord. Up and down movements of the model leg evoked by motor nerve activity released and stretched the model coxobasal chordotonal organ (CBCO); variations in the CBCO length were used to drive identical variations in the length of the live CBCO in the in vitro preparation. CBCO afferent responses provided proprioceptive feedback to affect the thoracic motor output. Experiments performed with this hybrid neuromechanical preparation were simulated with a neuromechanical model in which a computational circuit model represented the relevant thoracic circuitry. Model simulations were able to reproduce the hybrid neuromechanical experimental results to show that proposed circuit mechanisms with sensory feedback could account for resistance reflexes displayed in the quiescent state and for reflex reversal and spontaneous Lev/Dep bursting seen in the active state.

Inhibitory glutamate receptors in spider peripheral mechanosensory neurons

Most mechanosensory neurons are inhibited by GABAergic efferent neurons. This inhibition is often presynaptic and mediated by ionotropic GABA receptors at the axon terminals. GABA receptor activation opens Cl- channels, leading to membrane depolarization and an increase in membrane conductance. In many invertebrate preparations, efferent neurons that innervate mechanosensory afferents contain glutamate in addition to GABA, suggesting that the sensory neurons are also modulated by glutamate. However, the effects of glutamate on these neurons are not well understood. Peripheral parts of the spider (Cupiennius salei) mechanosensory neurons are surrounded by efferent fibers immunoreactive to antibodies against GABA and glutamate. GABA and its analogue muscimol were shown to effectively inhibit spider mechanosensory neurons innervating lyriform slit sensilla VS-3 that detects cuticular strains in the leg. Here, we show that glutamate also inhibits the VS-3 neurons, but its effects are different from those of GABA or muscimol, suggesting that it acts on a different group of receptors. GABA and muscimol always depolarized these neurons and the inhibitory effect was strongly correlated with the amount of depolarization. In contrast, glutamate inhibited the VS-3 neurons even when it did not depolarize them. In addition, while glutamate inhibited both the axonal action potentials elicited with electrical stimulation and dendritic action potentials produced by mechanical stimulation, muscimol only inhibited the axonal action potentials. Therefore, the inhibitory glutamate receptors in the VS-3 neurons are distinct from and differently distributed than the GABA receptors, providing a subtle control of the neurons' sensitivity in varying behavioural situations.

In Vivo Analysis of Proprioceptive Coding and Its Antidromic Modulation in the Freely Behaving Crayfish

Although sensory nerves in vitro are known to convey both orthodromic (sensory) and antidromic (putatively modulating) action potentials, in most cases very little is known about their bidirectional characteristics in intact animals. Here, we have investigated both the sensory coding properties and antidromic discharges that occur during real walking in the freely behaving crayfish. The activity of the sensory nerve innervating the proprioceptor CBCO, a chordotonal organ that monitors both angular movement and position of the coxo-basipodite (CB) joint, which is implicated in vertical leg movements, was recorded chronically along with the electromyographic activity of the muscles that control CB joint movements. Two wire electrodes placed on the sensory nerve were used to discriminate orthodromic from antidromic action potentials and thus allowed for analysis of both sensory coding and antidromic discharges. A distinction is proposed between 3 main classes of sensory neuron, according to their firing in relation to levator muscle activity during free walking. In parallel, we describe 2 types of antidromic activity: one produced exclusively during motor activity and a second produced both during and in the absence of motor activity. A negative correlation was found between the activity of sensory neurons in each of the 3 classes and identified antidromic discharges during walking. Finally, a state-dependent plasticity of CBCO nerve activity has been found by which the distribution of sensory orthodromic and antidromic activity changes with the physiological state of the biomechanical apparatus.

Central inhibitory microcircuits controlling spike propagation into sensory terminals

The phenomenon of afferent presynaptic inhibition has been intensively studied in the sensory neurons of the chordotonal organ from the coxobasal joint (CBCO) of the crayfish leg. This has revealed that it has a number of discrete roles in these afferents, mediated by distinct populations of interneurons. Here we examine further the effect of presynaptic inhibition on action potentials in the CBCO afferents and investigate the nature of the synapses that mediate it. In the presence of picrotoxin, the action potential amplitude is increased and its half-width decreased, and a late depolarizing potential following the spike is increased in amplitude. Ultrastructural examination of the afferent terminals reveals that synaptic contacts on terminal branches are particularly abundant in the neuropil close to the main axon. Many of the presynaptic terminals contain small agranular vesicles, are of large diameter, and are immunoreactive for gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). These terminals are sometimes seen to make reciprocal connections with the afferents. Synaptic contacts from processes immunoreactive for glutamate are found on small-diameter afferent terminals. A few of the presynaptic processes contain numerous large granular vesicles and are immunoreactive for neither GABA nor glutamate. The effect that the observed reciprocal synapses might have was investigated by using a multicompartmental model of the afferent terminal.

GABAergic and glutamatergic inhibition of nonspiking local interneurons in the terminal abdominal ganglion of the crayfish

Nonspiking local interneurons in the terminal abdominal ganglion of the crayfish Procambarus clarkii receive inhibitory inputs from mainly glutamatergic spiking local interneurons and GABAergic nonspiking interneurons. In this study, the inhibitory responses of nonspiking interneurons to local application of glutamate and GABA into the neuropil were compared. Glutamate and GABA injection mediated the hyperpolarization of the nonspiking interneurons with an increase in membrane conductance. The glutamate-mediated membrane hyperpolarization was reversed by injection of 1 or 2 nA hyperpolarizing current. By contrast, more than 3 nA hyperpolarizing current was frequently necessary to reverse the GABA-mediated hyperpolarization. Bath application of a chloride channel blocker, 50 microM picrotoxin (PTX), reduced the glutamate-mediated hyperpolarization, but had no effect on the GABA-mediated hyperpolarization. The GABA-mediated hyperpolarization was not consistently affected by bath application of low chloride solution. These results suggest that the glutamate-mediated inhibition was related to the gating of a Cl(-) conductance, while the GABA-mediated inhibition was not. Electrical stimulation of sensory afferents innervating the exopodite elicited ipsps in uropod opener motor neurons. These sensory-evoked ipsps were also PTX-insensitive, suggesting GABAergic nonspiking interneurons could be the predominant premotor elements in organizing the uropod motor control system.

Nitric oxide modulates presynaptic afferent depolarization of mechanosensory neurons

In crayfish, movement of the tailfan causes stimulation of exteroceptive sensory hairs located on its surface. Movement is monitored by a proprioceptor, the protopodite-endopodite chordotonal organ within the tailfan. Proprioceptive afferents provide indirect presynaptic inhibitory inputs to sensory hair afferents in the form of primary afferent depolarizations (PADs). Bath application of nitric oxide (NO) substrates, donors and scavengers, and nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitors had no effect on the responses of proprioceptive afferents during imposed movements of the chordotonal organ. In contrast, the amplitude of PADs in exteroceptive hair afferents was dependent on NO levels. NO levels were altered by bath-application of the NO-precursor L-arginine, the NO donor SNAP, the NOS-inhibitor L-NAME, and the NO scavenger PTIO, while changes in PAD amplitude were measured. Application of L-arginine or SNAP resulted in consistent decreases in PAD amplitude, whereas L-NAME and PTIO induced increases in PAD amplitude. These results suggest that endogenous NO decreases inhibitory inputs to exteroceptive neurons, thus enhancing transmitter release at their output synapses.

Presynaptic modulation of sensory neurons in the segmental ganglia of arthropods

The afferent terminals of arthropod sensory neurones receive abundant input synapses, usually closely intermingled with the sites of synaptic output. The majority of the input synapses use the neurotransmitter GABA, but in some afferents there is a significant glutamatergic or histaminergic component. GABA and histamine shunt afferent action potentials by increasing chloride conductance. Though glutamate can also have this effect in the arthropod central nervous system, its action on afferent terminals appears to be mediated by increases in potassium conductance or by the action of metabotropic receptors. The action of the presynaptic synapses on the afferents are many and varied. Even on the same afferent, they may have several distinct roles that can involve both tonic and phasic patterns of primary afferent depolarisation. Despite the ubiquity and importance of their effects however, the populations of neurones from which the presynaptic synapses are made, remain largely unidentified.

Neuromodulation of arthropod mechanosensory neurons

Arthropod mechanosensory afferents have long been known to receive efferent synaptic connections onto their centrally located axon terminals. These connections cause presynaptic inhibition by attenuating the action potentials arriving at the axon terminals, thus reducing the synaptic potentials in the postsynaptic neurons. This type of inhibition can specifically reduce the excitation of selected postsynaptic neurons while leaving others unaffected. However, recent research has demonstrated that sensory signals detected by arthropod mechanosensory neurons can also be synaptically modulated before they ever arrive at the axon terminals. In arachnids and crustaceans, wide and complex networks of synapses on all parts of the afferent neurons, including the somata and dendrites, provide mechanisms to inhibit or enhance the responses to mechanical stimuli as they are being detected. This modulation will affect the signal transmission to all axonal branches and postsynaptic cells of the affected receptor neuron. In addition to the increased complexity of mechanosensory information transmission produced by these synapses, a variety of circulating neuroactive substances also modulate these neurons by acting on their postsynaptic receptors.

Efferent controls in crustacean mechanoreceptors

Since the 1960s it has been known that central neural networks can elaborate motor patterns in the absence of any sensory feedback. However, sensory and neuromodulatory inputs allow the animal to adapt the motor command to the actual mechanical configuration or changing needs. Many studies in invertebrates, particularly in crustacea, have described several mechanisms of sensory-motor integration and have shown that part of this integration was supported by the efferent control of the mechanosensory neurons themselves. In this article, we review the findings that support such an efferent control of mechanosensory neurons in crustacea. Various types of crustacean proprioceptors feeding information about joint movements and strains to central neural networks are considered, together with evidence of efferent controls exerted on their sensory neurons. These efferent controls comprise (1) the neurohormonal modulation of the coding properties of sensory neurons by bioamines and peptides; (2) the presynaptic inhibition of sensory neurons by GABA, glutamate and histamine; and (3) the long-term potentiation of sensory-motor synapses by glutamate. Several of these mechanisms can coexist on the same sensory neuron, and the functional significance of such multiple modulations is discussed.

Adaptive motor control in crayfish

This article reviews the principles that rule the organization of motor commands that have been described over the past five decades in crayfish. The adaptation of motor behaviors requires the integration of sensory cues into the motor command. The respective roles of central neural networks and sensory feedback are presented in the order of increasing complexity. The simplest circuits described are those involved in the control of a single joint during posture (negative feedback-resistance reflex) and movement (modulation of sensory feedback and reversal of the reflex into an assistance reflex). More complex integration is required to solve problems of coordination of joint movements in a pluri-segmental appendage, and coordination of different limbs and different motor systems. In addition, beyond the question of mechanical fitting, the motor command must be appropriate to the behavioral context. Therefore, sensory information is used also to select adequate motor programs. A last aspect of adaptability concerns the possibility of neural networks to change their properties either temporarily (such on-line modulation exerted, for example, by presynaptic mechanisms) or more permanently (such as plastic changes that modify the synaptic efficacy). Finally, the question of how "automatic" local component networks are controlled by descending pathways, in order to achieve behaviors, is discussed.

Central control components of a 'simple' stretch reflex

The monosynaptic stretch reflex is a fundamental feature of sensory-motor organization in most animal groups. In isolation, it serves largely as a negative feedback devoted to postural controls; however, when it is involved in diverse movements, it can be modified by central command circuits. In order to understand the implications of such modifications, a model system has been chosen that has been studied at many different levels: the crayfish walking system. Recent studies have revealed several levels of control and modulation (for example, at the levels of the sensory afferent and the output synapse from the sensory afferent, and via changes in the membrane properties of the postsynaptic neuron) that operate complex and highly adaptive sensory-motor processing. During a given motor task, such mechanisms reshape the sensory message completely, such that the stretch reflex becomes a part of the central motor command.

Active motor neurons potentiate their own sensory inputs via glutamate-induced long-term potentiation

Adaptive motor control is based mainly on the processing and integration of proprioceptive feedback information. In crayfish walking leg, many of these operations are performed directly by the motor neurons (MNs), which are connected monosynaptically by sensory afferents (CBTs) originating from a chordotonal organ that encodes vertical limb movements. An in vitro preparation of the crayfish CNS was used to investigate a new control mechanism exerted directly by motor neurons on the sensory inputs themselves. Paired intracellular recordings demonstrated that, in the absence of any presynaptic sensory firing, the spiking activity of a leg MN is able long-lastingly to enhance the efficacy of the CBT-MN synapses. Moreover, this effect is specific to the activated MN because no changes were induced at the afferent synapses of a neighboring silent MN. We report evidence that long-term potentiation (LTP) of the monosynaptic EPSP involves a retrograde system of glutamate transmission from the postsynaptic MN, which induces the activation of a metabotropic glutamate receptor located presynaptically on the CBTs. We demonstrate that LTP at crayfish sensory-motor synapses results exclusively from the long-lasting enhancement of release of acetylcholine from presynaptic sensory afferent terminals, without inducing any modifications in postsynaptic MN properties. Our data indicate that this positive feedback control represents a functional mechanism that may play a key role in the auto-organization of sensory-motor networks.