The role of pentoxifylline in the treatment of erectile dysfunction due to borderline arterial insufficiency

Novel portable apparatus for outpatient high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy in penile cancer

BACKGROUND

Penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSC) is traditionally treated with surgical resection with significant morbidity. Penile sparing approaches, such as brachytherapy, require expertise, prolonged inpatient stays, poor patient convenience, and heterogenous plans with variable long-term toxicity. In this study, we describe the protocol for novel portable apparatus created for PSC, allowing outpatient hybrid interstitial/surface brachytherapy, improving homogeneity and patient convenience.

METHODS

A portable brachytherapy apparatus was developed utilizing a foley catheter, prostate template, 6F interstitial catheters, 5 mm bolus, and a jock strap. The apparatus allowed for internal and external catheter placement housed in a jock strap to allow mobility and defecation without affecting the implant. High-dose-rate brachytherapy was performed as an outpatient.

RESULTS

The apparatus was then used on a 62-year-old male with cT2pN0M0 (stage IIA) PSC with bilateral glans and urethral meatus involvement, who elected for definitive brachytherapy (4000cGy in 10 fractions over 5-days). Given external dwell positions, heterogeneity correction of the template was calculated (AAPM TG186) with <2% variation. Patient had minimal impact on his active lifestyle during treatment and had complete clinical response at 3-months. Grade 2 skin desquamation resolved at 2-months, with no necrosis. At 6-months, he was able to resume sexual intercourse, and at 12-months, he remained disease-free with sexual and urinary function intact.

CONCLUSIONS

Novel portable implant allows for improved patient convenience, reduced inpatient stay, capable of optimizing dosimetry with hybrid brachytherapy. This outpatient treatment allows the opportunity to increase fractionation, offering high local-control and lower toxicity. Future studies utilizing this apparatus for more fractionated regimens with further lower dose-per-fraction (∼3 Gy/fraction) is recommended.

Treatment of Poor Sperm Quality and Erectile Dysfunction With Oral Pentoxifylline: A Systematic Review

Background: Pentoxifylline (PTX) is a member of methylxanthine chemicals and a type of non-selective phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, which has been used in male infertility treatment to improve sperm quality and erectile dysfunction (ED) treatment. Mutually tight associations existed between ED and male infertility. Using PTX might kill two birds with one stone by improving sperm quality and erectile function in infertile men with ED. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched by October 2021. Based on available evidence from observational studies and randomized-controlled trials (RCTs), we conducted a systematic review to summarize the efficacy and safety of PTX in treating ED and male infertility. The protocol of the article was registered and updated in PROSPERO (CRD42021291396). Results: From 202 records, eight studies (7 RCTs) evaluating the role of PTX in ED and three studies (2 RCTs) assessing the efficacy of PTX in male infertility were included in the systematic review. Three studies (100.00%) and two studies (100.00%) reported the beneficial role of PTX in improving sperm progressive motility and normal sperm morphology rate, respectively. In contrast, only one study (33.33%) indicated the favorable role of PTX in enhancing sperm concentration. As for ED, three (60.00%) studies supported the treatment role of PTX alone in ED, and two studies (66.67%) favored the combination use of PTX and selective PDE5Is compared with selective PDE5Is alone. Safety analysis showed that PTX was a well-tolerated drug in ED and male infertility treatment. Conclusion: Given the association between ED and male infertility and satisfying findings from available evidence, PTX administration for the simultaneous treatment of poor sperm quality and mild ED in infertile men will highly enhance the treatment compliance. However, the finding should be treated carefully until validated by further studies.

A Small Group Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Daily Pentoxifylline in the Management of Patients With Erectile Dysfunction with Suboptimal Treatment Response to Sildenafil

Introduction

Several studies have reaffirmed the use of regular pentoxifylline therapy in increasing the penile brachial pressure index in men affected by erectile dysfunction when compared to placebo.

Aim

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of pentoxifylline as an adjunctive treatment for patients with erectile dysfunction.

Methods

This study was a single center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Subjects were recruited between April 2014 and November 2016 from the National University Hospital, Singapore. The combination therapy group was given pentoxifylline 400 mg thrice daily orally and the monotherapy group was given placebo capsules thrice daily orally. Both groups continued their on-demand 100 mg sildenafil. The treatment duration was 8 weeks. Efficacy was measured via the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) questionnaire at the eighth week. Differences in mean IIEF-5 score and the domains of the IIEF at 8 weeks between the 2 treatment groups were compared using independent sample t-test.

Main Outcome Measure

Baseline IIEF-5 and the IIEF-15 score vs post-therapy IIEF-5 and the IIEF-15 score.

Results

50 patients were randomized into 2 groups. Patients in the 2 groups were comparable in terms of the demographic and clinical characteristics, comorbidities, and baseline IIEF-5 scores. The mean IIEF-5 score post-therapy of the combination therapy group vs the monotherapy group was 14.11 and 14.87, respectively. There was no significant difference between the outcomes of these 2 groups (unadjusted mean difference -0.76; 95% CI -4.01 to 2.49; P = .641) and the outcomes are the same even after adjusting for baseline IIEF-5 scores. There was a significant improvement in the “overall satisfaction” portion of the IIEF score for the combination therapy group as compared to the monotherapy group (unadjusted mean difference 0.12; 95% CI -1.49 to 1.25) and even after adjustment for baseline scores (adjusted mean difference 1.11; 95% CI 0.10 to 2.12; P = .032) the improvement is significant.

Conclusion

Our trial suggests that the use of combination therapy does not improve the management of patients compared to monotherapy.

Law YXT, Tai BC, Tan YQ et al. A Small Group Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Daily Pentoxifylline in the Management of Patients With Erectile Dysfunction with Suboptimal Treatment Response to Sildenafil. Sex Med 2019;8:14–20.

The effect of sildenafil citrate and pentoxifylline combined treatment in the management of erectile dysfunction

INTRODUCTION

In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy of sildenafil and pentoxifylline combined therapy in the treatment of vasculogenic erectile dysfunction.

METHODS

Sixty-eight patients with various degrees and types of vasculogenic erectile dysfunction were included in the study. The patients were recommended to take oral sildenafil (minimum two 50-mg tablets/week) 1 h prior to sexual intercourse for 4 weeks. After 4 weeks of washout period, patients were recommended to take combined therapy (minimum two 50-mg tablets/week sildenafil 1 h prior to sexual intercourse and 1.2 g of pentoxifylline/day divided into three doses) for an additional 4-week period. Both treatment regimes were evaluated with the international index of erectile function (IIEF).

RESULTS

Mean IIEF score was higher after sildenafil treatment when compared to pre-treatment score (14.2+/-4.3 and 8.6+/-4.2, respectively, P<0.05). Likewise after the combination treatment, mean IIEF score was higher when compared to pre-treatment score (18.1+/-5.2 and 8.6+/-3.8, respectively, P<0.05). The increase in the IIEF score was 5.62+/-2.08 in the sildenafil only group whereas increase in the IIEF score was 9.51+/-3.77 in the combination therapy group. There was a statistically significant increase in the combination group when compared to the sildenafil only group (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that use of sildenafil citrate and pentoxifylline combined therapy could be effective in the management of patients with vasculogenic erectile dysfunction.

[Erectile dysfunction]

In Spain, based on the IIEF, 19% of males between 25 and 70 years old present some degree of erectile dysfunction (ED). Therefore, around 2,000,000 Spanish men present this condition and could require medical attention for it. Here, we present an up-date of the most important aspects of erectile dysfunction (pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment). We review, in detail, the oral treatments and future drugs that are presently in the premarketing experimental phase. Diagnostic and therapeutic management of the patient with erectile dysfunction should be individualized, taking into account the goals of each patient. It is highly recommendable to carry out a basic assessment (comprehensive clinical history, physical examination, recommended lab testing). If previously undiagnosed diseases are discovered (diabetes, arteriosclerosis, etc.) these should be treated and modifiable risk factors should be corrected. There are numerous therapeutic options for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Replacement therapy with testosterone should only be used in males with ED and low levels of this hormone, under medical supervision. At present, first line treatment consists of the administration of oral drugs (sildenafil, apomorphine). There are two new PDE 5 inhibitors (tadalafil and vardenafil) that will be released on the market 2003, which will provide better selectivity. Moreover, several drugs for oral administration are in the initial phases of research that will facilitate erection via a direct penile action. When oral drugs are contraindicated, are not effective or when they are unpopular with the patient, the second line of treatment is intracavernous injection. Prostaglandin E1 is the initial drug of choice in patients using intracavernous autoinjection for the first time and has a high efficacy. Implantation of a penis prosthesis and penile revascularisation are appropriate for highly selected patients. Psychotherapy can be an option for men with ED of psychogenic origin, either as a monotherapy or combined with sildenafil or apomorphine.

Subjective visual halos after sildenafil (Viagra) administration: Electroretinographic evaluation

PURPOSE

The ophthalmologic and electroretinographic (ERG) findings in one subject with subjective visual disturbances after sildenafil administration are described.

DESIGN

Interventional case report.

METHODS

A complete ophthalmologic examination was performed, including best-corrected visual acuity and ERG, repeated 1 and 2 hours after administration of 100 mg of sildenafil.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Rod responses were obtained over a range of retinal illuminances from those producing a minimum detectable response to those producing rod saturation. Intensity amplitude function was determined.

RESULTS

At 2 hours after 100 mg of oral sildenafil, we observed significant variations from baseline in parameters of best-fit Naka-Rushton function; V(max) was notably higher, and K was 0.14 log units lower than baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Sildenafil administration resulted in a higher rod response to light stimuli and in a higher rod sensitivity. These findings are consistent with the weak PDE-6 inhibition induced by sildenafil.